IronMountainIssues.org

  Home Page Public Forum  

March 2008 Postings

 


3-31-2008-03

I was reading through this month's postings and saw the one about Ken Tousignant still being used to represent the City as Mayor on the streaming video tour. I then went to a web search. I was surprised to find a link to the Dickinson Area Partnership that took me to a page that still listed the past council members and Ken Tousignant as mayor. And there are numerous links to be found that take you directly to the video of Ken Tousignant claiming to be the mayor of Iron Mountain.
 
 
I must agree with the person who previously posted. Shouldn't a 'progressive city' start by being current with their website updates? Shouldn't they inform and insist that the local Chamber of Commerce also update their municipalities information?  You won't draw people in with outdated information.  It looks like you aren't concerned with being current.

3-31-2008-02

I’d like to comment on comments I’ve been hearing lately. Some people are concerned that this website is an embarrassment to the City. That people from out of town would not come here, or laugh at Iron Mountain because of this website.
 
I think Iron Mountain has a lot to be embarrassed about. But, the tactic being used now is to blame the messenger - this website. This website should go away because it’s embarrassing. It’s impeding progress. Please. If our city manager lies about issues, that’s an embarrassment. If the manager violates the charter or breaks other laws, that’s an embarrassment. If certain council members gave him a bonus for his questionable performance while ignoring public outcry, that’s an embarrassment. If the City spent 200 grand on a reassessment and ended up with nothing to show for it, then won’t explain it, that’s an embarrassment. If they spent 700 grand on engineering in less than two years, that’s an embarrassment. If a council member thinks there’s nothing wrong with violating the charter - recommending her mother for employment - that’s an embarrassment. If a council member presses charges on a constituent because they have a difference of opinion, that’s an embarrassment. If council members have the attitude that we only have public comment at open meetings because we have to, that’s an embarrassment. If a council member has to make false statements to defend himself against a recall, that’s an embarrassment. If we have to discuss our concerns of questionable activities on this website because the council ignores us and the documented facts, that’s an embarrassment.
 
IT’S NOT THIS WEBSITE THAT IS EMBARRASSING THE CITY. WE, THE PEOPLE, ARE THE CITY, NOT THE COUNCIL. JOHN MARQUART AND HIS FOUR LAPDOGS ARE THE EMBARRASSMENT. Got it? I thought we stopped shooting the messenger of bad news back in the days of Caesar.  Again, stop blaming the messenger and start looking at the facts.  We don't have to put up with the treatment we are getting from our city government.  It's too damn bad if they are embarrassed that people would publicly stand up for themselves.  You gave us no real alternative, puppets.  You reap what you sow.

3-31-2008-01

Response to 3-30-2--8-03:
 
The sad reality is that both the Fake Ad and the anonymous Speak Out articles most likely hit the targets of intimidation.
 
When petitioners were recently pounding the pavement, many responses they were getting were, " I don't want to put my name to anything."
This is actually a pretty normal reaction to the intense threat that the Ad and letters meant to inflict.  It would be just as intimidating to thrust upon voters that they must sign, or they are cowards.  Either line of thought is just not fair to the weary voters who have had to deal with this entire situation for way too long.
 
I believe that what would be the best, most appropriate and fair way to reach out to the average voter is to make available the facts.  Facts with the documentation to back up every situation.  I happen to know that the facts and documentation exist, but getting these out to all households is not an easy task.
 
I suggest that there be neighborhood meetings set up for each Ward, where interested citizens can come together and view the documents.  If they choose to sign, or even circulate petitions themselves, wonderful.  I suggest that someone can be there to answer their questions and concerns.
 
The bullying will never stop from the "other side."  It is at every level conceivable.  The last thing a resident of this City needs is to feel that if they don't sign, they are somehow a coward.  Every individual has the right to digest information and make their own educated choice.  All I am saying is that the information get to the individual, so they have the facts upon which to make that informed decision.
 
You probably know who I am...

3-30-2008-03

In both the fake-a-loo ad of March 25 and again in the Speak Up column (both anonymous, of course) there is the threat of intimidation  in that if you sign the recall petition the people being recalled have the right to see those petitions and can see who signed them.
 
Question:  Are Iron Mountain voters living in the "LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE" and are they counting themselves among the BRAVE?  I suppose there will be some so timid, cowardly and meek that the slightest intimidation would keep them from signing, but they should be few in number.
 
Remember the adage - A coward dies a thousand death, a brave man dies but once.
 
I seriously doubt there are that many cowards in Iron Mountain.


3-30-2008-02

To poster 03-29-2008--03
 
Excellent post  Please bring this to the daily news for Saturday or the voice of the people.
 
The public needs to know the real facts and this will help
 
Thanks

3-30-2008-01

To: 3-29-2008-05
 
Interesting that someone else thinks that. As soon as I read the article, I looked at my husband and said: "I wonder if they did an actual interview with Robin, or printed something that was submitted? This doesn't sound like Tchokreff. Look up any council comments from him and they aren't that eloquent."
 
I re-read the article this morning and saw this one line that I had overlooked on Saturday:
'On Friday, he issued his response.'
 
Oh, he ISSUED his response. I thought Linda Lobeck actually interviewed him. The quotation marks make it appear as though Linda Lobeck is quoting what she is hearing him say. It's sad that we can not trust to just take what our local newspaper prints at face value.
 
I'd like to see Eden Caudell & Robin Tchokreff respond on TV6, like Dan Burke did. At least we knew his ridiculous statements came from his own mouth. I doubt Tchokreff could even memorize the article well enough to repeat the comments we read.  A council person should always be honest; so I would hope he wouldn't submit someone else's words as his own.
 
Sorry if that sounds like a low-blow; but I've come to despise these people who refuse to listen to me and my neighbors. They act like they own this city and are doing us a favor by ignoring us and continuing to do as they please. I also want Mr. Marquart gone. I've never had to deal with such a rude city official in all of my life.

3-29-2008-05

Did anyone read Marquart's column in the Daily News on Saturday?  You didn't see it?  It was masked as an answer to the recall petition by Robin Tchokreff, SILLY
 
Does anyone in all of Iron Mountain think it was written by Robin himself - I DON'T THINK SO, AT LEAST NOT ANYONE WHO KNOWS HIM.


3-29-2008-04

Yes, I noticed the similarity to the writing style of the truth (hate) site and the infamous ad of March 25.
 
Hmmm.  It wouldn't be someone who came in last in both the primary and general election would it?
 
I should perish the thought.  Somehow, I can't.


3-29-2008-03

Robin Tchokreff’s article in Saturday’s paper cannot stand unanswered. I’m tired of seeing these idiots give John Marquart credit for things that he did not do and neglect to give the proper credit to those who actually did accomplish something for this city.
 
This is not going to be done in any specific order, but I’m going to throw a few things out here.
 
First of all, he states that “After Jim Urbany retired, every city manager hired could only put a band-aid on the old budget, The ‘Outspoken Minority’ managed to fire every city manager after Jim Urbany….”
 
What “every”? There was only one city manager after Jim Urbany and before John Marquart. That was Perry Franzoi, and he was NOT fired, he resigned! Robin ought to know that, since he was a council member at the time, and the resignation was UNANIMOUSLY accepted… or was that just another meeting that you were absent from?
 
And the year and a half that he speaks of as being left without management, I’d like to remind him that Joe Rogina not only held down that position, while being assessor at the same time; but it was Rogina who got the State to reinstate that portion of the U.S. 2 project after Michigan had cancelled so many projects. Yet, this crew gives Marquart credit for the project, simply because it was completed after he was hired. It’s the same with the water project. That had been in the works since Jim Urbany was manager. The only thing Marquart really did with that was add millions of dollars extra to the project and increase water fees far beyond what past management had deemed necessary. How often did past management go over budget on any project….? Check past records. Now check Marquart’s!
 
What has he really done on his own? He’s given credit for businesses that would have located regardless of who was manager. Businesses don’t suddenly look at a town and say… “Oh there’s progress there now, let’s go.” Many business study an area for years before ever making a decision. And, please. Let’s not forget the number of businesses that have left the city since Marquart’s arrival. I’m sure I can find where that list is posted, and add even more to it.
 
Past management did plenty for downtown. Did they let downtown die after the devastating fire in 1981? That entire block was rebuilt. A new business replaced the old Kresge building, and even the Moose Jackson building came in during past management. What new construction has come to downtown since Marquart? Oh, let’s even add the very City Hall he sits in. That too was done by Jim Urbany and Ted Corumbos.
 
If Marquart (and this council) want credit for a couple of motels, then lets give past management credit for everything from the Holiday Kitchen and Econo foods through to the new hospital, the K-Mart Mall, and Wal-Mart. There’s a lot of jobs created. On the other end…. It wasn’t Marquart who established the industrial park; nor did he bring in Boss Snowplow. And a good deal was in the works to keep them here without costing the taxpayers over a million dollars for a parking lot or lost tax revenue.
 
Tourism. What has Marquart done? Past management is responsible for the grant for the boat Launch at Lake Antoine. Past management already had plans and a fund started for the pavilion project at City Park. Even the bicycle path was nearing completion until John Marquart came and threw a monkey-wrench in that.
 
Past management always made sure our parks and cemetery were well groomed. I’ve visited neighborhood parks recently when the grass nearly reached the seats of the swings; and the cemetery was unsightly.
 
I could continue; but I think I’ve made my point. These council people really ought to do a little research and think things through before they speak out publicly (to people who actually care enough about their city to remember; or, at least investigate the facts).
 
Yes Robin, it is mainly about getting rid of John Marquart. He’s a charter-breaking, budget-busting bully. This city is no closer to financially stability, and it’s citizens are not better off than with past management. We want progress to come through a manager that will follow the rules and listen to the people. Since the three of you continue to turn a blind-eye to his antics and rubber-stamp his unscrupulous deeds, then we must get you out first. That’s been YOUR choice!

3-29-2008-02

Oh, Mr. Sgrecci, it was so nice to read your post on ironmountainissues. The first thing I noticed,  it actually was on this fine web-site. No editing or removal because it doesn't meet someones point of view. It wasn't removed because you are just some special interest group. It was here because your point of view actually means something to some people. You have a right to be heard just like every citizen in this City.
 Having said this, you are obviously blinded by the smoke and mirrors of the formal council and Mr. Marquart. The issues on this post have first and foremost been substantiated by documented facts, not just some fruitful idea! Let's take the issue that appears to be near and dear to your heart: the Champion building downtown.
  Why was the City going to buy this building? How was the City going to pay for this building? How many jobs will this create, and is the risk of spending tax dollars worth the final benefit? Well as a "lay" citizen of this City, I'll give you my view.
  The Citizens of this City were never offered the opportunity for their input. The City was going to use DDA funds. Oh really, I thought the DDA only received around 36 thousand a year (the salary of the DDA Coordinator is more than that)! Oh yes wait, they are going to transfer funds from TIFA to the DDA to pay for the building. Well if the TIFA Act (450 of 1980) and the DDA Act (197 of 1975) clearly delineate that funds from one fund can not be used to fund other authorities projects, I would think this violates a LAW. In fact when I went to the State web-site and found the Attorney General had already ruled on this manner, I felt quite confident that what the council and Mr. Marquart were about to do was illegal. And actually, If the DDA was established pre- Headlee, funds from the DDA can only be used for "operations" use only. The DDA can't purchase property. And if the DDA was established post- Headlee, the registered voters within the DDA District must be offered the ability to vote on how the DDA funds are spent.  NOW I'm only a "lay" citizen so I'm sure I must be all wrong about these facts! And actually, I mean factually, the City has transferred funds from TIFA to the DDA to pay bills. So as a  tax paying citizen that only owns a home in Iron Mountain, I shouldn't care how DDA and TIFA funds are spent according to you.
  Well wait! If my taxes are raised to pay for services offered in this City (including Mr. Marquarts' salary) due to captured taxes in the DDA and TIFA Districts being used only for projects within those districts, shouldn't I have some concern? I guess I should just "fold my tent",  move on, and let Mr. Marquart spend DDA and TIFA funds however he likes. I'm well aware that this is not "free money", as those of your likes seem to think. Why didn't the Senior citizens of this city, the Library, Health Department and in fact the County show more interest in the revenue they were losing to these Authorities? They did! They just got the "finger" from the past council and this City Manager. I have much respect for the new members of the current council for seeing that the County taxes were finally going where they are intended. As far as creating jobs, how many minimum wage, part time jobs with no benefits were you going to create? This City needs to create REAL jobs (like they had with Khourys prior to the previous council and Mr. Marquart). You use Wal-Mart as your example. I did not pay to build Wal-Mart, nor do I pay to advertise and make updates and changes. The responsibility of someone to venture into business is just that, Their responsibility! Some of the downtown businesses feel it is the responsibility of others to provide tax money for their success. I love going downtown and spending money for things I feel I'm getting my monies worth. A six dollar lunch downtown is as good (if not better) than a six dollar lunch elsewhere. What I can't see doing is spending several hundred dollars for a couch that I can't sit on versus spending a couple hundred for one which I can. The need for some of the businesses downtown are just not for the majority of us, plain and simple! Tourists are not buying these items and taking them home, the local merchants are. In order to survive, the downtown area needs to provide year-round items for the majority of local merchants. This is basic economics. You are not paying my home mortgage, why should I pay your business mortgage? Are you more important than me? In fact, is your downtown business more important than all the businesses outside of the downtown district? The City of Iron Mountain starts and ends at the North, South, East and West boundaries, not Kent St. to D St.and Iron Mountain St. to Carpenter Ave. 
  In closing, I would just like to express my belief that if things are done correctly, and by the laws, charter etc.. that govern this City it will take time to fix the wrong doings of the past council. We are not like Kingsford because maybe Kingsfords' council is doing things legally and by the book. Your alley, sidewalks and curbs will be fixed when the council drops the "pipe dreams" spending. TIFA captures over two MILLION dollars a year in taxes. This is money that must be returned to the general fund in order to start taking care of just those issues (though hypocritical) that you raise yourself. Have a nice day Sir! The future is Bright! As a famous philosopher once said ; "can't we all just get along"?
 
                             Another Voice heard from

3-29-2008-01

Has anyone else noticed that the infamous "ad" of March 25th has many of the same characteristics as the content of Ironmountaintruth.com?  
All capital letters, misplaced apostrophes, run-on sentences.........same writer?


3-28-2008-03

Re: the 3-28-08-01 post:  I too was intrigued by the neighborhood watch program that Mr. Burke said he had pro-actively begun.  Wanting to know what such a program is, what the organization and set-up of such a program entailed, what the responsibilities might be of those involved, how the program actually operates, and what beneficial results have occurred since its inception in Ward 3, I also have asked well over a dozen people from various areas of that ward about this program and had the same response from everyone as the previous poster had.  No one had heard of nor had any idea what the neighborhood watch is about in Iron Mountain.  I think the program might be a good idea, but please don't take credit for what doesn't presently exist. 

3-28-2008-02

To Anthony Sgrecci:
Thank you for a very well written and informative letter. I, for one, am sorry that you got some bad "press" on this website. I think what happened in your case was that no one knew what was going on with the Champion building, and no one from city hall was talking. It was being kept like some big, dirty secret. Openness from city hall, like so many people write in about, would have made that and many other issues non-issues. If people care and are interested in what is going on in our city, but have no real information to go on, that is the fault of city hall. That is where the frustration has come from. And the speculation. And the venom. City hall could have completely diffused this website long ago just by being open and honest about what they were doing with our tax money. They vehemently and repeatedly chose not to.
 
There is this to think about, too. In your case, city hall dealt with you in a respectable and reasonable manner. That is only because what you wanted to do fit in with their narrow-minded vision for the city. They do not do that with everyone.  In fact, how they dealt with you is more the exception than the rule. I am one of the people that has been dealt with in a very arrogant, disrespectful, and uncaring way. I have had city hall lie about issues that affected me personally, even with documented facts supporting my side of things. I am not the only one this has happened to. Did you know that the manager is still trying to keep information close, even from the new council members? What else can we do if we care about our city? I am not a machine or a politician. I have feelings, and I get worked up when city hall lies and covers things up. They use that to their advantage by pointing at the reactions as venom, hate, and scare tactics, and try to discredit you based on that. Yes, using people’s own natural, emotional reactions as a weapon against them. I firmly believe that this is intentional. That creates even more emotion when people realize what they are doing, and snowballs into what this website is now.
 
I wish that you could see this other side of city hall first hand, how ugly they can really be behind closed doors when you don’t fit in with their "vision". Intentionally working people up so they can blow off the ranting and raving that is a result. But, I repeat that I am sorry you were personally caught up in anything negative. Blame city hall for that. Remember, a political science major engineered what is happening right now.

3-28-2008-01

Dan Burke claims he has established a neighborhood watch.  Strange.  I live in the third ward and I have talked to over 50 people in the last week and NOT ONE OF THEM has any idea what this is all about.
 
Want to explain the apparently non-existent neighborhood watch that you claim to have
started, Burke?
 
I guess anyone who would  parade his young 10 or so year old son to the podium of a city council meeting to defend his father is not above creating some fiction about a neighborhood watch.


3-27-2008-04

Call me old-fashioned; but I just don't get the 'familiarity' that I'm seeing when Ms. Caudell speaks of the City Manager. Never have I seen a council-person speak in a public setting by addressing a city manager by their first name. You aren't supposed to be speaking as this man's friend in these situations.

Could you imagine this in any other governmental setting? Would a member of Congress, when speaking publicly about the President, refer to him as George? Would anyone at the State level refer to our Governor, in a public setting, as Jennifer.

Ms. Caudell should be referring to our Manager as Mr. Marquart, not John. If she is his friend, that needs to be completely separate from her role as a council-person. It has no place in the Council-Manager setting.


3-27-2008-03

 
I would love to remark on the posts on this website (Ironmountainissues.org).  I am really shocked to see what a nightmare and mess our town has become and the way in which it's citizens are acting.  I was born and grew up here, on the Northside of Iron Mountain.  I know current council members, past council members, and my family is good friends with one of the newest council members.  I personally chose to move back to Iron Mountain because of the "progressive council."  Now I am not so sure.  Kingsford doesn't seem to be like this....
 
Now the rest of the website is devoted to nothing but negative things, or things that can be spun that way.  All of the cool cities links, water links, City Manager links, on and on....All negative.  If you search the web for Iron Mountain and get this site, there is no way you want to visit and certainly no way you would ever consider living here.
 
As far as the recall goes, I think it is a little over the top.  The pure venom of it all...  No one has indicated how a recall would actually work.  Is another election on tap if  it actually recalls the council?  How much is all of this going to cost IM's taxpayers?
 
The post numbered 3-26-2008-03...  Give me a break.  I am not even in the political game here in town, yet I was thoroughly trashed by this website.  Complete inaccuracies about a proposed plan for the downtown Champion Building.....I should sue this website.  As a result of the attack that was directed towards our former Mayor Ken Tousignant about his "gay restaurant," a good business deal for me and a great opportunity for the City of Iron Mountain is now gone.  These remarks listed my name and were completely false, all the way down to badmouthing Bill Verrette from Champion, and so much as making the whole thing look underhanded.  It was not.  Now it will generate no jobs and never be.  I might sue.....
 
I have a great idea.  Why don't all the people that read this website and post complete false statements here get together, and really start with the Mariucci and Varda group.  Maybe then they will NEVER invest serious money into this town, and NEVER create a fantastic employer by opening a convention center, etc...Maybe the posts on this website can alienate everything and everyone that could possibly EVER advance the economics of our town, but in the process make sure that everything in the very limited campaign platform of our newly elected council members happens, under the direction of another former mayor or other special interest groups...I knew your son, former mayor, I always thought he was a nice guy.....we graduated together.  Tell him how this site has bashed me.....
 
Now, if you are still reading this, I really do think that our local government should be held responsible for all of their actions, but a little less in a witch hunt fashion.  I think also our newly elected council members should watch their backs, as a watchdog group will probably soon have something to say about them, if they do something. 4-3  4-3...we can't get it done....sure you can't....Do it.
 
Now, who will be the one to fix the curbs on my block?  Who will fix my alley?  I pay my taxes, on time and without complaint.  Who will actually get something done?  I think you should keep the downtown alive.  Ever see a really nice tourist town (with lots of tourists' money) without a downtown?  NO ?  That's because they don't exist.  I am doing my part.  I fed over 1000 people at Italian Fest.  Downtown.  It was fun.  When my parents were my age, downtown was the place to go and the merchants were thriving.  Now it's a WalMart lifestyle in IM.
 
Anyway, I thank you for the time you spent reading. I think we should sign our names, since all it will take is one clever person to look in the archives....
 
The visitor count is still just visits, not unique visitors, right?  I would love to know who is really saying all of the comments on this site.  One person, several people, or the community.  I don't think it is the last one.  I will send this to the Truth site also, and hopefully into the Saturday Daily News.
 
Oh I forgot...The daily news did not run a "deceptive ad"...it was very obvious what it was, and I found it a little funny and sad at once.  Obviously it was just like the campaign tactics of the last election, from BOTH sides.  Lighten up....
 
Everything is like a "REIGN OF DOOM" and very dramatic when the new council and Ted Corombos, etc. refer to it....I just don't understand that....Do we think giving it such flair will incite the voters of Iron Mountain?  Ease up on the drama.
 
And maybe, just maybe, someone can say something nice for once.  Happy Spring. Fix my alley.  Make downtown nice....Can't we all just get along.....?????
Anthony Sgrecci

3-27-2008-02


3-27-2008-01

The thing that I do not understand of Mrs. Caudell, Mr. Tchokreff, and Mr. Burke is how can you be shocked at what is happening.  You three were elected to represent the people of Iron Mountain, not represent your own agenda.  This is the basic fact of why this is happening.  You did not listen to the people you represent.  Not at one council meeting did you ever listen to a citizen on his or her concern.  You heard them but you did not listen.  There is a big difference and I thought you might have learned that that from last November's election, but you did not.  That is why I will sign the petition for the recall.  This is why we the citizens of Iron Mountain need a change.


3-26-2008-11

To:  Eden Caudell, Robin Tchokreff and Dan Burke
 
When you make a Faustian deal with the devil, there is a price to pay.  You are the process of paying the price.
 
You have been conned and used mercilessly by John Marquart.  These con jobs have been brought to your attention repeatedly.  You ignored the warnings.  You thought you were not vulnerable.
 
At the Court House hearing today, you lost by a unanimous vote. Embarassing, yes, but that is nothing compared to what a well informed electorate will do to your respective egos on August 5, 2008. 
 
August 5, 2008 will be FREEDOM DAY for the good, honest residents of Iron Mountain.


3-26-2008-10

I have to agree with post 3-26-2008-07 about the hypocrisy of the city over the rental ordinance. I remember when Mayor Tousignant was talking about how much they want to protect the tenants with the ordinance. What a crock! Shutting off water to a woman with two children sure is nice, isn’t it?
 
Actually, I scoffed at that double-talk long before now. They were using that rental ordinance line about tenant safety when they seriously downgraded our fire protection and lied about it. Please, don’t give me any grief for bringing that up again. It still bothers me greatly that the City lied about that one for so long and so blatantly, all the while leaving it unfixed and unsafe.  And to give Marquart a bonus after it was finally shoved down his throat as the lie that it was, not to mention the fines and other lies.  I’d sign a recall petition just for that serious gaff alone. Hmmm, I actually covered four or five serious gaffs while trying to bring up just the one. Oops.
 
PS - I saw the TV 6 News tonight about the recall language approval. Do the circulators have a plan, or a place a person can go to sign? I don’t want to wait until there’s a knock on my door. What if I’m not home?

3-26-2008-09

Anybody else just love the shot of Robin Tchokreff on tonight's News Extra? It's such a Classic! And yet so typical of him.  This is a shot of him in Council Chambers looking about as interested as he usually does.  Anybody else ever notice that he often unseals his packet of information just before the meetings begin?  How can he make knowledgeable decisions when he's reading the information for the first time just as the meeting is about to start?  Members receive these packets several days before the meetings so that they can review the info.  Yet, Robin has been seen unsealing his packet in the Council room on meeting night.  Also: How many meetings has he been absent from, especially if there's a hot topic on the table?
Let's get someone in that seat that at least gives a damn!


3-26-2008-08

Re: the "political" ad in Tuesday's edition of The Daily News.  I guess the old adage is true......."give them enough rope and they will hang themselves".


3-26-2008-07

The city of Iron Mountain keeps insisting that we need a rental ordinance to protect tenants from living in unfit housing.  I am a landlord and it recently came to my attention that a tenant of mine, a single mother with two children and a very limited income, fell behind on her water bills. Consequently her water was shut off.  This same city that says we should protect our tenants, shuts their water off and creates unfit living conditions with no water for toilet and showers.  After several days with no water, the tenant was able to get help from a church to pay the outstanding water bill, but was still charged the $50.00 reconnect fee, which was paid by a charitable organization.  I guess it’s all about the money in the city of Iron Mountain.  In a case like this the reconnect fee should have been waived.  Come on, city of Iron Mountain, have a little HEART!

On rental properties, shouldn’t the owner of the property be notified before water is shut off??


3-26-2008-06

I cancelled my subscription to the Daily News after the cheap shot editorial the day before the election this past November. Remember that? Just this week, I’ve been contacted several times in an effort to get me to come back as a customer. I’m glad I held off.
 
Last night’s newspaper (3-25-08) had a political ad that deliberately sought to make people think it was from someone other than whoever paid for the ad. I thought this kind of ad had to have a "paid-for-by-so and so" disclosure at the bottom of it. I guess that depends on which side you're on. In my opinion, the Daily News has allowed an anonymous entity to deliberately mislead the public on a political campaign issue. Aside from the fact that the person who paid for the ad shows a complete disregard for ethics, the newspaper has the power to allow or deny ads like this. They chose to let it run, showing their own disregard for ethics.
 
To the Daily News: No, I won’t be subscribing to your propaganda rag again for quite awhile. What were you thinking?
 
To the entity that placed the ad anonymously: Do you think the people of this city are stupid enough to fall for this stunt? You seek support by insulting our intelligence?  You use deliberate misdirection to accuse someone else of mistruths?  That's rich.

3-26-2008-05

The recall language went through.
 
The Daily News has some 'splainin to do...

3-26-2008-04

Good news for the voters of Iron Mountain.  The language of all three recall petitions has been approved by the Dickinson County Elections Board, made up of Probate Judge Thomas Slagle, County Treasurer Margie Tarsi and County Clerk Dolly Cook.
 
That means that when sufficient signatures are obtained, Eden Caudell, Robin Tchokreff and Dan Burke will all have to face a recall election in August.
 
There is hope yet for Iron Mountain to be run by the book and by the law by honest council members. 
 
Sincere congratulations to Barb Toedter, Carol Schneider and Ted Corombos for their superb efforts in getting the petition language approved.


3-26-2008-03

I couldn't believe the political ad in the Daily News last night.  It tried to look like it was written by Ted Corombos, which is preposterous on the face of it. Mr. Corombos has proven many times over to be an excellent public servant, his reputation is impeccable, his honesty unquestioned.
 
Why the Daily News would even consider accepting such an ad is beyond me.
 
If I were Mr. Corombos, I would seriously consider legal action.  The ad was clearly aimed at defaming him.  I would also subpoena the newspaper to disclose who paid for the ad, and then sue that person as well.


3-26-2008-02

Regarding the attempt to recall three of Iron Mountain’s city-council members:

 

I don’t understand the violent knee-jerk reaction and self-righteous indignation some people have to a recall per se, and their not knowing when asked, not seeking for themselves, overlooking, and/or ignoring entirely the issues and reasons for a recall.  Do these people think that others pursue a recall just to tick them off?  You’d think that if a recall’s the right thing to do, you do it.  If it’s the wrong thing to do, you don’t do it.  But they’re simply against a recall.  Period.  What’s that all about?

 

I question the rationality of it and a person’s sense of priorities.

 

Recall is one of American democracy’s ways to correct mistakes.  Why would a person unthinkingly and intensely dislike the recall process and choose to foully and unChristianly disparage and demonize people who are trying to exercise a time-honored democratic and legal procedure to deal with other people who repeatedly abuse their power and who publicly, visibly, provably, and by their own admission behave ineptly, immorally, illegally, and irresponsibly in public office, but pooh-pooh their behavior with an “aw, shucks” and a wink, and feel they should be excused out of sheer expedience and convenience -- despite the harm and the deterioration they have caused and continue to present to the community?

 

Seems to me that, by every standard we claim to believe in, the people of this town should be violently upset if we do not have a recall!  We can’t financially and spiritually afford, nor can we continue to allow, inattentive and irresponsible council members to rubber stamp incompetent, ill advised, expensive, and illegal management behavior.  We have a responsibility too!  Let's at least meet our responsibility and attempt to make our officials accountable.  If recall is an effective way of doing this, so be it.

 

Pass it on.

3-26-2008-01

Anyone who has known Ted for any length of time knows that he would never stoop to such an evil level as the ad in the paper last night.  He has way too much character, honor, and integrity to fall to the level of the opposition, who were the writers of said ad.  Unfortunately, the writers of the ad didn't have the decency or the guts to say who paid for the ad.  Ted has devoted 30 years to the betterment of his hometown and has sought with great wisdom and backbone to do what's right and to serve all the citizens of Iron Mountain to the very best of his ability during that time.  We should be very thankful to Ted for all his dedication that we often have taken for granted.  There is hardly a need to seek out more ideas of where the past City Council and City Manager have failed to obey state laws and the City Charter and where they as public servants (they seem to forget that's their role) have failed to consider the well being of the citizens for whom they worked.  Thus they violated their oaths to uphold the laws and Constitution.  The opposition would have you feel intimidated to sign any petition.  It's time to stand up, let your voice be heard, and get honest government back for our city.  If Kwami gets tossed out in lower Michigan, his lies and shifty financial tactics would blend nicely with those of our City Manager and the four incumbents.


3-25-2008-03

The March 25 advertisement on page 3 of The Daily News is:
 
(a) clearly libelous
(b) too thinly veiled to hide the four people who are attacked therein
(c) obviously a political ad that did not designate who paid for it, in violation of election laws
 
Culpable parties:

1. The Daily News for accepting the ad, which they were under no legal obligation to accept.

2. The party or parties who paid for the ad.
 
I have both agreed and disagreed with The Daily News over the years, but I have never seen that newspaper sink so low for an ad. They must be desperate for money at any cost to their reputation.
 
The parties who wrote and paid for the ad are equally desperate and extremely fearful of a successful recall. That ad, if nothing else, can be put to great use by the recalling committees.  If anyone ever had any doubt that a successful recall is needed, that ad should put such a doubt to rest.
 
Sent to webmaster March 25, 2008 @ 8:41 PM
 
cc:  Robert Johnson, Publisher, The Daily News
       Blaine Hyska, Editor, The Daily News


3-25-2008-02

It bothers me that Mr. Burke brought his family to a council meeting, using them as pawns in his political game.  It is to bad that a recall was even started, but it is time for him and the others to wake up and pull their heads out of the sand.  The fall vote was a clear message from the public to make some changes and he chose not to.  Having your children speak on your behalf at a meeting when the last thing that you taught them was it is ok to be dishonest is sickening.  Not only is that ok, but you will be rewarded financially.  Doesn't he realize the message he is sending to his own children????  What was brought out at council meetings concerning the manager was not fiction or stories concocted to discredit the man.  They are facts that have been shown to be true.  Performing your duties in a upright and honest manner has nothing to do with progress!!!!  Perhaps you are one of those who placed the ad in Tuesdays paper.  I am sure Iron Mountain will continue to have progress without the need to sweep the dirt under the carpet. Mr. Burke, you should be ashamed to have used your wife and children in such a way. Look at the facts and stop being an ostrich.  Admit some errors were made and try to rectify them.  Perhaps at that point the citizens may show you some respect, if it's not to late!!

3-25-2008-01

Regarding the "political ad" in the Daily News on March 25:

li·bel
a: a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression b (1): a statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt (2): defamation of a person by written or representational means (3): the publication of blasphemous, treasonable, seditious, or obscene writings or pictures (4): the act, tort, or crime of publishing such a libel


3-24-2008-01

In his response to the recall language, Dan Burke stated that he had initiated a “neighborhood watch” program.  I live on the same block as Mr. Burke and have never seen, heard, or been contacted in any way (phone, email, letter, personally) about a neighborhood watch program.  Perhaps Mr. Burke is out “watching the neighborhood” all by himself.  It would be nice to see a response to this, but that is probably too much to expect.


3-23-2008-02

The Widen the Investigation post (3-21-2008-01) is an excellent idea.  It should be brought up at the very next city council meeting.
 
Watch the squirming and wiggling of the gang of four as they desperately try to squelch it.  If they vote 4-3 against widening it, it would by just one more powerful piece of evidence to bring to the Attorney-General's office.


3-23-2008-01

Famous non-quotes from the Marquart book of management & leadership:
 
"To function efficiently, any group of people or employees must have faith in their leader." - Capt. William Bligh (ret.)
 
"Numerical superiority is of no consequence. In battle, victory will go to the best tactician" - General G.A. Custer
 
"They never let you live it down. One little mistake!" - Nero

3-22-2008-03

THANK YOU MZ PETERSON

3-22-2008-02

Well said Tina, I thought you did a fantastic job downstate. Thank you for taking time out of your life to represent us, it is very much appreciated by many.
Keep up the great work!

3-22-2008-01

Town Hall Meeting Update:
 
The opportunity to be involved in the Town Hall meeting was there for anyone:  it was on the TV6 website on Friday asking any UP resident if they wanted to participate.  When the station called me back on Monday, I was excited and thrilled to hear that I would be able to go.
Major problem?  How in the world do you find out the biggest Economic concerns of the entire UP in a day and a half?  All I could do was get on the computer and try to do more research on the Strategic Plan of our State, and see where we can fit into that plan.  I wanted to lobby for what we have to offer, and for the UP to not be forgotten as this all moves forward.  I also asked everyone I could of their thoughts, including those I ran into on the trip down.  By the way; of course the trip was as a citizen, and paid for as a citizen:  in no way was it connected to Iron Mountain City Council or paid for by any City taxpayer.
 
It was an incredible experience to get to speak with residents from across the State, and hear of their unique problems and ideas for solutions.  The Governor spent time before the program speaking with all of us individually, and was truly gracious.
 
You can imagine that when you know you are on camera, maybe you don't spit your words out perfectly...or you realize afterwards that you didn't mention key elements.  I wanted to stress that the research, development, and manufacturing of all Alt. Energy systems or products would have a perfect home in the UP.  I didn't want the rest of the State to think us incapable of the high tech aspects, or to see us only as the "wilderness" part of the State.
 
I was able to convey those thoughts to the Governor after the program; I guess you could call it lobbying for our fair share of the future and direction that the State is heading into.  As only one person, I couldn't possible speak for everyone in the UP, and get it right, across the board.  The Governor recognizes that many residents of the UP wouldn't want to lose what we do have in natural beauty and our way of life, but I hope that she realizes we need jobs.  Period.
 
In a National map breaking down growth rates, approximately 85% of the UP shows a loss of up to 10%. Some UP areas show more than a 10% loss. We have to push for turning this around.  My personal opinion is that it won't be flowerpots, blight enforcement, or pavillions that will bring us jobs...it will be lobbying to the powers that be about our capabilities combined with the affordability of living in our area.  It will be about tax incentives and geographic location.  I believe that Companies look at the dollar as a bottom line of if they will locate to your area; along with your school and health care system, police and fire protection, and infrastructure.  I also believe that we have to be loud enough to be heard all the way downstate; to be that wheel demanding to be oiled.  Our local taxpayers need to be able to put food on the table, heat their homes, and be afforded the health and safety rights they have been paying for. Our local basic needs have to be met before spending precious tax dollars on what turns out to be ill-planned notions, without public input, of some extremely vague idea of a "vision." 
 
Wanting clean drinking water, honest government, and undivided attention towards seeking quality, family-sustaining jobs in your City in no way means that you are "against progress" or "going backwards."  It's just common sense. 
 
Sincerely,
Tina Peterson

3-21-2008-01

WIDEN THE INVESTIGATION

The recommendation offered by Council Member Dave Farragh to open an investigation of the reassessment issue, and approved by the city council, is a good start.  I have confidence that many glaring inconsistencies that have been reported on this site and elsewhere will come out. But it's only a start.
 
Based on the findings of post 3-19-2008-03, a part-time cop gobbling up 55 to 70 hour work weeks
is open to serious questioning and legal concerns.
 
How about STS Consultants outrageous fees. And the many city charter and state law violations and the subsequent fines (MIOSHA).
 
I think the investigation should widen into the long list of substantiated violations this council and city manager have thrust upon us at great cost. SUBPOENA EVERYBODY, INCLUDING COUNCIL MEMBERS, THE CITY MANAGER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT HEADS, RICH BROOK, DAVID LEGGE, STS CONSULTANT OFFICIALS, THE CITY ATTORNEY (who is often left out of the loop), AND ALL THREE DEFEATED INCUMBENTS, and get them UNDER OATH
 
It may involve hiring an outside attorney, not because I think the current city attorney is culpable, but rather to avoid any conflict-of-interest problems that may arise.
 
If the city council, by a 4-3 vote, in any way seeks to restrict such an overall and thorough investigation, I suggest going directly into PLAN 2.  The three new members should immediately petition the OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.  I am confident that with the cooperation and help of our state representative and state senator, they would gain access to and have the ear of the attorneys at the A-G's office.
 
The massive amount of documentation the three new council members have accumulated would get the attention of the Attorney-General's office in a hurry.  That will have not just the three council members under recall shaking, but a much wider net of culprits. 
 
GO FOR IT, new members.  You have made a very impressive start.  The community will be forever thankful that they elected you. Honest, open and legal government will return to Iron Mountain under your guidance and diligence.

3-20-2008-08

3-20-2008-05

Let me make a premise or two here.  Divisiveness for the next two years is essentially guaranteed without a successful recall.  a continuation of 4-3 votes on major issues is inevitable.

Should've listened to Oskar.

If you had done so the 4-3 votes would have been in the reformer's favor.  But it's too late.  If you had listened to Oskar the City Council would have been in the hands of the reformers, but now there's Gridlock.  Gridlock is not necessarily a bad thing, because it guarantees that nothing will get done, and the government that is able to do nothing is unable to harm anything.  Which is not a bad thing.  Unless there are things which need desperate fixing.

There are things in Iron Mountain which need to be fixed, but the fact that four councilmen are blocking the fixings is not  a bad thing, just a future thing.  I would urge the new members to bide their time.  As the saying goes, Rome wasn't built in a week.

Do your homework is my last word here, and you would be wise to pay heed.

Oskar


3-20-2008-07

Isn’t it about time the four more experienced council members are permitted to move forward with important city business? It’s March already, and they have not yet appointed a political kommissar, for heaven’s sake.  I mean, really, why not make Dr. Fileppa's position official?  She's done a good job, hasn't she? Not only that, but I haven’t heard a serious discussion on flower pots for months. All this talk of corruption is gauche. It’s not vibrant. Not visionary. Passe. Unfashionable.
 
You new council members will never fit in if you keep mucking things up with silly facts and such.  Blase, you know. You are part of the elite crowd now. Come on. Let your hair down. Dance a little. Don’t you want to fit in? Hob knob with the real players? You can do it. Just look the other way. Every time. That’s all you have to do. Is that so hard?

3-20-2008-06

Post 3-19-2008-03 ( a long one) struck some chords with me. The part about our tap water brought back some memories of better days and better water. As little as four years ago, I bragged about our city water to people from out of town. How good it was, you know? Out-of-town visitors used to tell me we could bottle our water straight from the tap and sell it.  It didn't kill my houseplants and tropical fish, either.
 
Then, along comes Marquart, telling us how bad our water system is, and that we have to spend 4 million dollars to make it better. Then, after sinking all that money into the water system, he told us how much better it was. What a joke on us, hey? I can’t even drink straight tap water from Iron Mountain anymore. My family would get unexplained stomach problems from time to time. Sure enough, a week or two after that happened, I'd get a notice in the mail that our water had to be treated again. If it ain’t bacteria it’s the chemicals making the water horrendous.  I changed the water in my fish tank and eleven out of twelve fish that I had for years went belly up.  That's a fact.  I have to let water for houseplants sit for a day so the chemicals won't kill the plants. 
 
I don’t brag about our water now. In fact, the quality of our "improved" water is now a running joke.
 
Thanks for the memories, #3-19-2008-03.

3-20-2008-05

I read a number of well thought out and well written posts earlier today - Thursday, 3-20-2008. 
 
Let me make a premise or two here.  Divisiveness for the next two years is essentially guaranteed without a successful recall.  a continuation of 4-3 votes on major issues is inevitable.
 
Now, if a successful recall takes place, the recently elected council members and the newly appointed ones will have a majority. Then, WE CAN JUDGE THEM ON THEIR OVERALL PERFORMANCE.
 
What we do know is that Caudell, Tchokreff and Burke have consistently voted on and approved the  same bad decisions that resulted in three incumbents getting voted out this past November.
 
We also know that the financial condition of the city has deteriorated dramatically the past few years.  We know that they share full responsibility for this sad state of affairs.  We know they rely on the city manager and have been rubber-stamps for him during their time of service. We know they, and the city manager, have been party to many violations of the city charter and of state law.
 
It seems to me there is no downside risk in eliminating them.  We would eliminate the guaranteed divisiveness for the next two years.  We would then be able to judge the performance of resulting city council rationally based on their ability to make good decisions. 
 
It is difficult to envision a poorer environment than we've had for four years and one which is continuing to this day with the 4-3 majority the newly elected members find themselves facing every meeting.


3-20-2008-04

THANK YOU TINA FOR BEING THERE TO REPRESENT ARE CITY AND THE UP AT THE STATE TOWN HALL MEETING IN LOWER MICHIGAN.        
 
ALSO I KNOW THAT TINA DID THIS ON HER OWN WITH NO CHARGE TO THE CITY TAX PAYERS.
 
AGAIN THANK YOU.

3-20-2008-03

I for one am proud that Tina will be representing us at the meeting in Grand Rapids.  Her proven ability to be curious and ask questions to understand both sides of a question, to dig up the facts in seeking the truth, to challenge in a gentle but firm manner, to show courtesy and concern to the citizens,  to respond to the citizens (that's a refreshing change from the previous four years of being ignored), along with many more traits the three new council members share are lessons the old guard could learn and apply.  Tina is going to this meeting  to try to benefit our city--and not at city expense--in contrast to the trip the mayor and city manager are taking next week to Lansing.  Yes, Mr. Marquart, as you said, those people down there do know who you are, but their opinion, as reported to us by lawyers in that area, is not how you see yourselves.  They view you as a laughing stock.

3-20-2008-02

Does this have a familiar ring to it?

Homer Simpson: "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true."


3-20-2008-01

Dan Burke accuses people of grandstanding at the podium, then he parades his family at the council podium in a pathetic, cheap, political grandstanding stunt. Coaching the poor, nervous kid on what to say while standing there was hard to watch. Way to go, Dan.
 
If he is willing to subject his own child to that kind of unwarranted mental stress, it makes me wonder about the other coaching he is always bragging about.

3-19-2008-11

I’m just a little curious, based on the council of recent past…. Since Tina Peterson went downstate to represent us (and the whole U.P.), did she get to hire a private jet? Did she get to take other supporters and a local media person? Is she staying at a high-end hotel and eating at top-ranked restaurants? How much has her trip cost the tax-payers, compared to extravagant trips made by “representatives” of our city in recent years?

3-19-2008-10

To 3-19-2008-02, the writer who is embarrassed to be represented by Tina Peterson at the state wide town hall meeting. Relax. I watched the meeting tonight, and Tina represented us with intelligence and professionalism. Besides, it could have been worse. It could have been ex-mayor Tousignant, Marquart, Caudell, or - can you even imagine - Burke or Tchokreff, representing us down there. Now that would have been embarrassing.

3-19-2008-09

I think it speaks volumes that council member Tchokreff chose not to respond to the recall claims against him. He is the most seasoned politician of the bunch. He knows what has gone on over the last four years. He was a council member before the so-called fab-four took office four years ago, and he has something to compare the last four years to. Unlike the naive Ms Caudell and the uninitiated Dan Burke, he is savvy enough to know there is a lot of indefensible truth in the recall claims. Truth that cannot be honestly debated against. I hope he is not arrogant enough to think he can coast through under the radar while Caudell & Burke trade barbs with the public over the next three months. It worked for Vanlaanen, but I really don’t think it will work again. Maybe he’ll be smart enough to resign before the heat gets turned way up.

3-19-2008-08

To 3-18-2008-03:

Yes, I agree completely, there's a lot of self-righteous baloney and personal backstabbing on this site, some deliberate, some inadvertent through misinformation.  We should all reexamine our motives.

I couldn't agree more that we should be pursuing issues rather than going after people -- unless they're people who are preventing us from pursuing issues.

I disagree that facts mean nothing.  Facts, not cherry-picked or distorted or misrepresented, but in full context and in full perspective, mean a lot.  They're very important.  They're the stuff of vision.  They're the stuff of truth.  And without truth, which the city management and council of the last fours years has worked inordinately hard to avoid, for whatever reasons, you'll accomplish nothing beneficial for the city.

I also agree with you that we need people with vision.  Just not the people we had governing us from 2004-2007.  And not the holdovers among them now.  You have the right idea, pal.  You're just backing the wrong horses.  They have no vision, only an idea that they read in a textbook somewhere that something called vision would be grand and desirable.  They also have had no ability or capacity to bring to life and achieve any visions.  In fact, their so-called visions have been extremely self-serving, empty of value, and counterproductive for the city as a whole, which has seen its morale, treasury, and physical structure deteriorate horribly under them.  You know as well as I do that this city is worse off today in every measurable way than it was four years ago.  Talk about change!

You're absolutely correct -- we need improvement, we need change.  Which means not change for change's sake.  And not to serve the interest of a few individuals and parties around Iron Mountain.  We need beneficial change from which the entire city profits. 

Look at -- drive on! -- Main Street between US 2 and North Kimberly, and F Street, particularly between Carpenter and Kimberly, and Chapin.  The actual streets -- the pavement!  They're like the friggin' Baja.  Street after street, alley after alley, sidewalk after sidewalk.  A person can get lost in some of those cracks and potholes.  They're not safe.  And what they're doing to our vehicles is not cheap to repair and maintain.

Have a glass of tap water.  Without holding your nose.  Or thinking of the more than $4 million you paid for water improvement and how much you're now paying monthly for ... this stuff?  So sulphurous and clorinated, it tastes scooped directly from a warm, open, and busy swimming pool?  Bleh. 

Check the number and amount of fees and taxes you're paying in exchange for the actual civic services you are and are not getting. 

Look at the city budget and try to discover what black hole millions of dollars have vanished into.  Like the aborted assessment last year and the gone-forever $200,000 it gulped to no avail.  Or the tens of thousands in MIOSHA fines due to the incompetence and negligence of our city management.  Look at the expense accounts and excuses of your city management and councilpersons over the past four years.  These people get to travel like royalty?  On our dime?

Examine the frivolous and unnecessary lawsuits in which the city is expensively involved defending itself for prideful, indefensible behavior.  And examine the pending investigations, including one by the state of a serious pollution violation.

Try to find an increase, or an effort to increase, jobs from which someone can actually support a family. 

See how rudely and condescendingly ordinary citizens are treated on the phone and in person and at meetings by city officials, elected and hired. 

Try to get a straight and true answer from a city official.  Try to get a response at all!

Watch the city manager grab his jacket and flee City Hall out one door as he watches people he's scheduled to meet enter through another door.

Witness the loss of respect, affability, goodwill, and cooperation from among our neighboring municipalities.  From among our elected and appointed state officials.  From among our elected congressional officials.  Witness the growing resentment and bitterness from among them. 

Try to understand why city assessments are raising the value of our homes and properties to increase our city taxes, while home and property values everywhere throughout the United States are actually going down significantly -- are actually crashing through the floor, in fact.

Try to find a reasoned and direct economic development plan around which the city can stabilize, prosper, and grow.  Every week it's a whimsical new fairy tale from City Hall.

Examine the absurd and unwarranted dissension and conflicts between and among (and notice the inherent public dangers from) City Hall, the fire department, the police department, TIFA, the department of public works ...

Etc. etc. etc.

We need change all right.  Buster, you couldn't more correct.

But not the kind of change of the last four years.  Not destructive and harmful change.  Not Bush/Cheney-like change.  Arhgh!  That's a path we have to get off of and I mean fast. 

Be more discriminating, pal, and less political.  We need positive, progressive, and profitable change.  Beneficial change.  Improvement.  And not just the word improvement as you throw it out there like an empty old beer can, but the actual achievement of improvement.  We need fruitful results.  Movement toward a higher standard of living and a better quality of life.  Maybe this summer we can continue the change and improvement we started last November by recalling the three dead-end status-quo incumbents, and then finally ridding ourselves of our harmful and expensive no-change, no-improvement, ethically challenged, "aren't I terrific" city manager.  Then, based on the actual facts of life rather than someone's noisy and unrealistic and egotistical delusions of grandeur, perhaps we can genuinely progress and change.  Maybe then we can finally get down to business in this town and improve.


3-19-2008-07

Post 3-18-2008-03 says "There's no vision, just a goal to see that nothing changes."  Well, in six meetings of the current council, with three new members, quite a bit has happened.
 
1. The $1,200,000 "A" Street project has been reduced to around $36,000 with DPW  personnel taking care of a two-block sewer project this summer.  That was the only part of the whole project that had any urgency at all.  Savings: About $1,150,000
 
2.  TIFA squashed a $750,000 project that will be done for around $150,000 to $200,000 tops.
Savings:  $550,000 minimum.
 
3.  A push is in place to correct the problems at water reservoir located at Park Avenue between A & B Streets. This may help with getting rid of chlorination.
 
4.  At the last meeting, the council voted to investigate the reassessment fiasco where the city has spent well over $200,000 with no idea what we have to show for it.  This should be a very elightening investigation.
 
5.  The previous four years has absolutely nothing tangible to show for their "vision"  Study after study, STS designs, Cool Citiies, Main Street, Signature program, bandhshell proposal and cutting 37 parking slots --- this is vision?  Chalk it up to unrealistic pipe dreams.
 
6.  Progress is being made with the prospect of some paid volunteer firemen, four years after a stalled program by the previous administration that resulted in $23,000 in MIOSHA fines.  Is this the kind of vision we should be looking for? 
 
The Tousignant-Marquart era  was all talk and no results, except a lot of money spent with very little to show for it.  The public wasn't fooled.  They voted three of a possible four out of office.  You'd think the remaining three would get the message instead of giving the city manager a bonus.


3-19-2008-06

Jeez, I'm gonna get long-winded; I can feel it.  Eden Caudell has a statement in the newspaper today. I love when she talks about how the new council members came up with a new way to evaluate the city manager. You know, by actually evaluating his performance on 17 glaring discrepancies? No, that’s just a hate campaign, according to Eden. It’s not "moving forward." How dare you call looking at facts "hate," Ms Caudell?
 
And, somehow, I can’t quite make the stretch to call certain things extenuating circumstances. Since when does lying fall under that title? How about breaking the law? How about violating the city charter? Nope. Too much of a stretch for me. Things were beyond the control of the manager, so it’s not his fault? Well, then, whose fault is it that things got so out of control? Isn’t it a council member’s JOB to prevent that from happening? I guess that makes it her fault, hence, the recall against her. Again, how dare you trivialize real issues like this, Ms Caudell?
 
One of those items was the reassessment fiasco. Ms Caudell had two full years on the council to express concern over that, and she did NOT. Thanks to Dave Farragh for calling for an investigation. Why didn’t YOU do that a year ago, Eden? There are other very important issues that she ignored in her two years, too.
 
I will sign the recall petition against Ms Caudell, supposedly my ward council member. She never questioned a single thing the manager did, no matter how many people were bringing it to her attention. The least she could have done was to listen to the people who had the nerve to attend council meetings and express their concerns. Many times, people’s concerns were backed up with documentation. Instead, she just blew them off. Again, HOW DARE YOU IGNORE DOCUMENTED FACTS?
 
You have NOT done a good job of representing me, Ms Caudell. You have not provided the oversight that is necessary. You have cost me a great deal of money as a taxpayer; money that could have been spent on useful things instead of paying for John Marquart’s numerous and serious mistakes. And, you actually gave him a bonus after viewing his actual performance for his evaluation? That one takes the cake.  In short, you are no Ted Corombos, who DID represent me fairly for many years.  How dare you attack someone like him?
 
In closing, why didn't I just bring my concerns to Eden, personally?  Quite simply, I don't trust her to represent my concerns fairly to the rest of the council.  She ignores facts; why not ignore me or misrepresent me?  After what Dan Burke did to one of his constituents, I have even more reason to feel leery about direct contact with a council member in the old guard clique.

3-19-2008-05

I must register my disagreement with the writer of post # 3-18-2998-03. This person says, "there’s no vision for improvement, just a goal of making sure nothing changes."
 
This person could not be more wrong. The new council members are trying to make a HUGE change from what the previous council did. They are trying to be open and honest. That is a huge change. They are trying to undo significant damage caused by the "vision" spoken about. Another huge change - to actually address and attempt to fix huge mistakes made by the previous council.
 
Whoever you are, you have to accept the fact that your idea of a "vision" is not the only one out there. You also have to accept that your idea of "vision" took a severe beating in the last election. Change for the sake of change seems to be your vision, and it’s not only foolish to have that mind set, it’s also been PROVEN WITH FACTS to be both costly and dangerous. You are transparent, irrelevant and hypocritical. Hypocritical because it is obvious that you are the one who cannot accept anything that is a change from your warped vision, even as you ignore real facts and accuse others of not wanting change. Get over yourself.

3-19-2008-04

In checking on the City's web-page, I see that Ken Tousignant's written 'Welcome' has been removed; but he's still in the Video Tour Book (under Welcome) as the Mayor of Iron Mountain. Shouldn't our "progressive city" keep their web site current? He should no longer be represented as the mayor in these videos.


3-19-2008-03

To any Iron Mountain City Council members viewing this post:
 
I was able to view the February vendor and payroll reports today. I believe another official investigation is warranted. There is a "part-time" police officer working in our police department. Part time because the civil service hiring requirements have not yet been followed, and the listed rate of pay is well below what our full-time officers are earning. In the February payroll report, it shows the rate of pay plus the monthly pay based on that. If you take the monthly pay, divide it by the five pay periods in February, then divide that by the listed hourly rate, this "part-time" employee averaged - AVERAGED - 70 hours per week for the month of February. Who approved this?
 
I then looked back at the November, December, and January payroll reports. Surprise. This "part-time" employee averaged 55 hours per week for that three-month period, based on the listed rate of pay and the amount earned per month.
 
What amount of hours per week makes a person part-time? I believe civil service has been violated by having this person work full-time hours without being hired through the civil service process. Please look into this. It is a direct violation of the City Charter, if you can do simple math based on the information given in the payroll report. If this employees rate of pay is more than what is listed, thus dropping the average number of hours, doesn’t that mean that the payroll report is falsified? There are three people with higher scores on the police civil service list that have not been hired while this employee has been putting in full-time hours. They have grounds for costly lawsuits against the city if this is what is going on. The "part-time" employee also has grounds to sue the city under the Fair Labor Standards Act if this is the case.  I don't understand how the payroll and vendor reports could have been approved with this happening. Again, to any council members seeing this, please investigate. Thank you.

3-19-2008-02

Tina Peterson is representing the UP at the Governor's Town Hall meeting?
 
I'm embarrassed!  I don't want here representing my neighborhood let alone the City of Iron Mountain OR the UP.
 
Is she bringing here Fire Department acquaintance with her?


3-19-2008-01

After reading news stories about the most recent council meeting, I have a few observations. First, There is going to be an investigation into the reassessment fiasco. That’s great. Why was this not ever suggested by any of the three members facing a recall? Don’t they ever look at anything on their own? If they don’t do their own homework, they should be recalled. Why did this simmer untouched until three new council members were elected?  The old guard just wants to forget the past and move forward.  Forgive and forget.  I say, bulls**t!  Don't you dare forgive and forget what happened to our tax money in that reassessment black hole!
 
Second, the ISO is going to let Iron Mountain keep a class 4 rating if they make a whole list of improvements. What? Why do we have to make improvements to the fire department to keep the rating? Marquart, Tousignant, Rigoni, VanLaanen, Tchokreff, and the rest of them repeatedly told us that our fire protection was better - and cheaper - with what we have right now. They all lied, even though plenty of information was available to all of them to show they were wrong. Caudell, Burke, and Tchokreff all could have questioned this, but they did not. It took getting three new members elected to even have serious questions asked about it. Caudell, Burke, and Tchokreff should all be recalled just for letting this dangerous situation go on as long as it has. I won’t get into the MIOSHA fines other than to say they are further proof that the council continuously and blatantly misled the public.  Should I forgive and forget if my property insurance goes up?  I don't think so.
 
Then, I saw that Mr. Burke’s wife spoke in his defense at the meeting. To her, I say, you have my sympathy. This is not about what he has done. It is about what he has not done. He has not independently researched a whole lot of important issues. He has made his decisions based on what he is told by the city manager, a proven liar. He has voted to keep the manager even after it was shown that the manager - by his actions - is causing a huge level of mistrust - among other equally bad things - in the city government. He even voted to give the manager a bonus after this was shown in black and white at the same meeting. He filed a criminal complaint against a citizen. I saw a copy of that complaint, Ma’am. It says that the citizen threatened to recall Mr. Burke. That is outrageous, not to mention a fairly obvious stab at intimidating the citizen. I think our police have better things to do than chase after foolish crap like that.
 
There are so many more big issues that have not been handled properly by council.  I won't get into them right now.  I think the three members facing recall should save the city a lot more strife and money. They should all resign. It’s better than continuing to serve in disgrace.

3-18-2008-04

Funny how quietly the fact that the ISO rating will be remaining at 4 passed by on this site.......figures. Congratulations to those that worked to keep it there...including the fire trained police officers, firefighters, fire chief and police chief. Seems that the ISO threat was  really not a threat at all.


3-18-2008-03

A misspelled name on another website that posts untrue statements. That would be the proverbial pot calling the kettle black. I've read completely fabricated statements on this website and I know they are made up because they were about me. Tiny people with tiny outlooks and tiny thoughts to go with it, lots of name calling, plenty of accusations and so little meaningful discourse. These long rambling letters with "facts" galore - none of it means anything. You will never get anything accomplished because you spend all your time going after going after people. There's no vision for improvement - just a goal of making sure nothing changes.


3-18-2008-02

I will be attending the State-wide Town Hall meeting on Wednesday in Grand Rapids.  The subject matter is Michigan's Economy.
There may only be two people representing the entire UP, so I am trying to solicit as many opinions and concerns as possible from fellow residents.
 
Please email me with items and issues that affect you the most in regard to the direction of Michigan's Economic growth/decline.
 
Also, please email me with your ideas for what could bring about or enhance Economic Development in the UP...this is a chance, although a small one, to bring some voices from the UP straight to the Governor.
 
I will be checking my email right up until about 4:00 pm Wednesday.
 
 
Sincerely,
Tina Peterson
City Council

3-18-2008-01

It just occurred to me that if the City has spent $700,000 on engineering services from STS over a 2-year period.......$350,000 per year........why wouldn't the city spend that money on an in-house engineer instead? You could get 4 full-time engineers working on nothing other than Iron Mountain projects for that money.  Something doesn't smell right about this.  Whose idea was it to make STS the engineer of record for the City anyway?


3-17-2008-02

Like my friend who's writing to you about Bruce Rosen and his blamelessness regarding the lost wireless and tech opportunity of a couple years ago, I'm writing about something on the Iron Mountain Hate site.  Bill Toedter's name is spelled "Toedter," not "Toeder."  Also, his daughter filed a recall petition, not his wife.  Why do I mention these items?  No, I'm not a fussbudget.  I mention them because I think they're examples of the common fuzzy thought, inept communicative skills, and disrespect for accuracy and the truth common throughout that Web site and throughout its owner's outlook on politics and life.  If we're to debate issues, can't we do better than this?


3-17-2008-01

As a long-time local businessman who has been involved peripherally with this issue as early as 2003, I would like to respond to the contemptible narcissist and horrible writer who continues to publish the Iron Mountain hate Web site and who asked, "Where is Bruce Rosen's buddy who promised to invest millions in the city and create a city wide wireless network?"

First, I wouldn't rain on Bruce Rosen if I were you.  If you're referring to the Hostway/IMEplace/SiteMail package-project proposal with Nortel and its municipal wireless associates, that "buddy" was actually a consortium of nearly two dozen technological and financial companies, of which Bruce Rosen first met the one local lead person 18 months AFTER the consortium had retracted its approach to Iron Mountain and promptly moved on to its next alternative, and 18 months AFTER your doppelganger Mayor Ken Tousignant, City Manager John Marquart, and Council members Doug Rigoni, Sally Jacobs, Bill Calcari, Bob Jayne, Robin Tchokreff, Jeff VanLaanen, and eventually Eden Caudell and Dan Burke negligently and irresponsibly ignored and failed to respond in any manner over more than 3 months to the consortium's approach in 2005 and 2006.  During which Mr. Marquart, thoroughly overwhelmed and confronted by something he felt he couldn't manipulate and control, characteristically spoke simultaneously from both sides of his mouth, telling Council members, other city employees, and the public that on one hand the approach never occurred and on the other hand it was a scam -- despite documentary evidence to the contrary directed to him and the other city officials.

Second: you ask, "where is that 'buddy' now?"  
http://www.muniwireless.com/   The general consortium, with a couple of parties changed here and there, is right under your nose all over the country among hundreds of municipal wireless projects.  All you have to do, like you should have then, is look, is do your homework completely.  Not blindly trust some well dressed mustachioed smoothie of a city manager who doesn't know what the heck he is talking about.  Although I would be much happier being subcontracted to do greater work in our own local area, I (and a couple other locals) have been happy to be hired to do smaller jobs for them in nearby states.  Also, the lead family of companies temporarily expanded their space in Chicago and are cooperating with a smart, forward-looking, and welcoming community in Wisconsin to build their new headquarters, proposed as a very real possibility to the deaf ears of Iron Mountain's entirely unresponsive city government 2 and a half years ago.  Now you know.  But you knew anyhow, didn't you?  Or could have simply contacted the "buddy," the consortium, couldn't you have?

Third, that business group never promised to invest a dime in Iron Mountain, not to Bruce Rosen, not to anyone.  These were businesses -- they proposed, they didn't promise.  Had the city responded to the group, met with it, and worked cooperatively with it, millions of dollars of investment would have been a natural economic result.  Besides, how naive are you, you pathetic little bug?  Do you believe that any successful business would invest, much less promise, so much as a nickel in a community whose government will not even communicate with it?

People of and sympathetic to the city government of of 2004-2007 should back off Bruce Rosen if they don't want to look additionally idiotic.  With their dumb decisions and foolish behavior, it is those very people, his opponents, who put Bruce Rosen and his two new Council colleagues in office.  And this lost tech/wireless opportunity is a good example, and merely one, of the previous (and much of the current) government's stupidity, lack of vision and foresight, incompetence, and irresponsibility -- even in their own self-interest.  Because don't you think that if the government of late 2005 and early 2006 had acknowledged the approach of and responded to the tech consortium, and as a result every single household, business, church, school, government, and other institution in Iron Mountain was saving a minimum of $10 to $60 per month because it had a free municipal wireless connection to the Internet, don't you think on just that one item of legitimate accomplishment alone that Mr. Tousignant, Ms. Jacobs, Mr. VanLaanen, and Mr. Rigoni's odds of convincingly winning last August's primary and November's general election would have increased significantly?

You and yours just kept and keep shooting yourselves in the foot over and over and over.  No matter how much highfalutin, self-important vision you huffily claim to have.  So don't you dare go blaming Bruce Rosen for your foibles and failings and injuries to this town.  You and yours with your twisted ravings and inept behavior put Bruce Rosen and his two colleagues in office, and will send like-minded others there in upcoming elections in an effort to clean up your mess and reverse the course of arrested progress, aborted benefit, and accelerating decline you have set us on.


3-15-2008-02

I just finished reading the Speak Up articles in the paper.  This business of "let's forget the past and move forward" is getting weary.  So is the accusation that it's the same few people doing the criticizing all the time.
 
As I recall, the voters kicked out three incumbents a few months ago in an election, and it was not just a few people who voted.  None of the three who may be subject to recall were up for re-election, so they got a free pass.  If their terms would have been up, it's likely all three of them would have been history, too.  These three, Tchokreff, Burke and Caudell, are desperately trying to save Marquart his job.  If there was ever a losing cause, it's trying to defend Marquart's performance.
 
They would also be in the position of desperately defending their own votes, like the glossing over a large number of huge and unauthorized bills and the many violations of the city charter they have been part to.
 
If I were in their shoes, I guess I wouldn't want all this coming out loud and clear in a recall election, either.


3-15-2008-01

Looks to me like the the button panic is being pushed by the three ward council members who are up for a hearing on recall language.  They are even trying, based on the "Speak Up" articles in The Daily News, to influence the three Dickinson County officials who determine whether the language of the recall is proper.  They aren't even challenging the language so much as they are saying "please don't allow a recall" because we don't want to face one.
 
Running a little scared, maybe?


3-14-2008-01

You want to know what’s going on in Iron Mountain? In the linked video, substitute Don Rumsfeld with John Marquart & the Gang of Four, and you have it in a nutshell.
 
 
Seriously, think of how many times the tactics in the link have been used, and are still being used.  It explains why they hate open dialogue AND this website.  It also explains the purpose of the "truth" website, doesn't it?  I'll bet it will be applied to how they defend themselves against the looming recall.  How else can you defend against documented facts?

3-12-2008-02

I have never met Chuck Wiethoff, but I intend to.  His letter in The Daily News hit a lot of nails right on the head.  In case you missed it, here it is.
 
EDITOR: Hello, Iron Mountain. Well, here we go again, accusations flying and still more political turmoil.

Didn’t we fix everything the last election? Evidently not. The deal is that the “Upstarts” (new council members) are still sounding the alarm, won’t they ever get over themselves?

And the “Incumbents” steadfastly think that the “Upstarts” issues are much ado about nothing. After all everybody makes mistakes. So let’s forgive and forget and move on already. In fact, let’s give our city manager a bonus just so his feelings won’t be hurt too much by those “Upstarts,” who have brought up those unfortunate mistakes.

What I have heard at council meetings is the “Upstarts” repeatedly bring up their issues supported by their research and the facts they have found. And the “Incumbents” trying to minimize the “Upstarts” concerns and move onto more important matters like bike paths, soccer fields, and the like.

Am I being unfair? As an example that the “Incumbents” are serious people, I bring up the open dialog with citizens at council meetings issue. Issue?

What issue? You know as well as I do we can’t trust our citizens, what if they ask something embarrassing, worse yet what if they have something intelligent to say.

I know because of Michigan law we have to let them say something at the podium, that’s bad enough, but what if we had to actually talk to them.

The “Incumbents” feel that council meetings are for serious city business, period. Seriously.

So I ask myself if the “Incumbents” are serious people why won’t they confront the “Upstarts” head on? Oh, I know they do on a personal level, but I mean about the issues that the “Upstarts” are raising? Like lawsuits that cost the city money, like fines that cost the city money, like cable charges that cost me money and like a lowered fire insurance rating that will cost us money?

Then I tell myself, do not be so quick to judge, after all there has been progress made. The two lawsuits against the city went away. We are closer to an agreement so our fire insurance won’t go up. Millie Hill subdivision is going forward. The landlords are closer to an agreement with the city. Hmmm. Let’s see “Upstarts” take office in January, progress being made, I wonder if there is a connection.

Could it be that the “Upstarts” actually know how to get things done and want to help take the city in a direction that can actually achieve those lofty goals, like bike paths? Could it also be that the progress that has been made, has been made in spite of the “Incumbents?”

You know if I was to seriously consider this I’d probably give myself a serious headache. Oh well, you know I think I’m just confusing myself with the facts. The “Incumbents” are probably right, it’s much ado about nothing. I’m going back to my Lazy-boy for a snooze.

Chuck Wiethoff

Iron Mountain


3-12-2008-01

Hi, my name is Rose Brady and I am a landlord.  Now I always may not agree with what goes on in the council, but these people were elected by the people they represent.  I also have no problem with the Rental Ordinance.  My apartments are up to date and code.  I know that there are places out there that are not.  Yes, these should be delt with.  I believe that people should have a safe place to live and it should be up to standards.  Also, I have had to take renters to court and have had my place trashed, but that is part of renting and then you go through the court system.  People must realize that there are good and bad renters out there.  Just as there are good and bad landlords.

3-11-2008-03

I try to stay informed on city government issues. I like to know what’s going on. I have attended many council meetings over the last several years. I greatly appreciate that the recordings of the meetings are now available on the city website, so I don’t have to miss the meeting if I’m not there in person. It’s just not the same to read the watered down minutes. You miss the passion, earnestness, frustrations, and other emotions both good and bad when reading the minutes.
 
One thing I’ve noticed is that no matter what the issue is, no matter how controversial, no matter how blatantly wrong something can be, no matter how much something is documented as wrongdoing, Eden Caudell has the same response to everything. It’s great that we are communicating and we should all move forward. That’s it. The same every time. No meat. No potatoes. No substance. Just empty rhetoric. And it usually takes a lot of pointless rambling and meaningless blabbering just to get that much out.
 
I hope she realizes that filing a recall is solid, substantial communication, and that it’s a huge step in moving forward. Not empty rhetoric, but decisive action.  It's too bad she doesn't yet realize that having three new council members elected that don't agree with her was another substantial communication from the public she is supposed to represent.  And a decisive example of how the public wants to move forward.

3-11-2008-02

After the election of the new council members I spoke with Dan Burke.  I spoke with him about the people of Iron Mountain wanting a change.  He told me everything will stay the same 4 to 3, 4 to 3.  The voting will alway