IronMountainIssues.org

  Home Page Public Forum  

August 2008 Postings


8-29-2008-02

Hey 8-27-2008-02
 
That's the thing I don't like about these forums--we loose the human element to discussions and its easy to not really read the intention of the poster correctly.  I'll gladly answer all of your questions and firmly stand by all of my decisions, but would rather do it face to face.  I bet we'll agree on some things, and will disagree on others--but either way the conversation will be fun as long as we both approach it with an open mind.  We won't accomplish anything going back and forth on this site--but I think face to face we can.  You can get a hold of me at nalwine@norwaymi.com
 
Thanks
Nate

8-29-2008-01

RE: Bike paths
 
As far as I can discern, every street in Iron Mountain is a bike path, and has been for as long as anyone can remember.  I have not found a single sign anywhere in town that says "No bikes allowed on this street".
 
What purpose would a designated bike path serve?  Are we going to ban bikes on any streets that are not designated bike paths?  Try enforcing that one. 
 
If people want to build bike paths all over the county where none exist now and volunteer their labor, let them. Iron Mountain, Kingsford and Norway can be declared open to bikes (they already are anyway).
 
What purpose is served by inconveniencing dozens and dozens of homes with a no parking ban in front of their homes where none existed?
 
As for safety, there are, fortunately, very few accidents with bikes, and the proposed designated bike paths would not alleviate this problem one bit.


8-27-2008-02

Mr. Alwine, I'm the writer of the post that you feel was insulting you. First, I am not against a bike path, but I am against putting a bike path in a city street. Second, I want you to know that it was not my intention to insult you. In fact, it was a feeling that you were insulting me that generated my response to you.
 
I had to wait awhile before responding to you again, because I was at first speechless at your indignation. I was then taken aback that you actually agreed there are problems that need to be fixed, and then named several of them. Why was I shocked? Because you proudly displayed a vote no sign during the recall campaign, DEFENDING the people who caused all the problems you now admit are real! Then, you go to a council meeting and write on websites about a bike path like nothing is wrong. What gives? Why did it take someone "insulting" you to come out with your own admission of these city problems?
 
Further, I live in Iron Mountain; you do not. Why are you even involved with a bike path in a residential area of Iron Mountain when you do not even live here, I had to wonder? I felt not only insulted, but patronized as well. Not just because of the path itself, mind you, but coupled with what you didn't say about what is wrong here and how you recently supported the cause of the problems. I felt you were being disingenuous. You probably had no intentions of insulting or patronizing anyone. I'll give you that. Then again, neither did I.
 
It's too bad this all happened; you are probably a pretty decent person that I would like to meet and get to know. That will take a little time.. This city has a lot of healing to do. I am dreading the upcoming election already, with the ousted side already not telling us about the deep connections their new candidates have to the old, rightly-ousted regime. I think it's outrageous that they are trying to paint the new candidates as "starting fresh" with new people. What a joke. What utter hogwash.
 
If you have not already, please contact the people who ran the recall and ask to see the proof of the serious claims they made. If you do that with an open mind, I think you will be ashamed that you supported the anti-recall campaign, and maybe begin to understand the deep frustration that triggered my original response to you, as well as the depth of hard feelings felt by the many other citizens who did check the facts before they chose "sides".  I just wish you knew how frustrating it has been to hear people praising Marquart, when all along so many of us know what a liar, lawbreaker, and bully he really was.  He'll probably be back here to answer for it, someday.

8-27-2008-01

To 8-25-2008-01
 
 
First, if you're going to insult me, or accuse me of things such as redirection at least have the decency to use your name--or tell me face to face. 
 
Second--The bike path is a group of volunteers independent of the City Government.  We are not misdirecting or distracting the city from the issues it faces.  The city should be able to work on the infrastructure issues and still be able to listen other ideas--especially when they are volunteer based, with volunteers willing to do the leg work--after all in this case we were just looking for input from the council on permission to proceed and how they felt best to proceed.  Don't twist this to try and say I'm putting my head in the sand trying to ignore or distract from the issues because I'm not.  This is something unrelated to those issues and it should stay that way.  I want the city to fix the water system, police and fire issues, determine a resolution to the assessor issue that is satisfactory and I want them to do it as soon as possible.  Asking about the possibility of striping a line for bikes is not part of some grand deceitful scheme, just an idea we think would be good for those neighborhoods.   If you want to discuss this further contact me at nalwine@norwaymi.com       
 
This isn't meant as a negative comment, but I won't respond to any reply that is unsigned.  I think this site would be better suited if everyone signed their names because i think it would force all of us to act more civil towards each other.
 
Thanks
Nate Alwine

8-26-2008-07

To 8-25-2008-02

I speak as just an average-Joe, living in this community.  Yes…I still live here, so I think I can speak for what this site has done for me.  If it weren’t for this site, I would not have known the facts of what has been going on in this community.  Prior to finding this site, I had to depend on the Daily News.  They do NOT cover stories the way they should, in my opinion.  In daily life, I just knew during the Rigoni/Jacobs, etc. reign, that my money was being grabbed more and more by this city with nothing to show for it.  Water bills are through the roof; taxes are astronomical; additional fees on my cable bill, etc.  Yet, what I see is that every other house in this town is up for sale.  The streets and alleys are falling apart and there are no jobs to be had.  There was a new “inspector” to go around and fine people for chipped paint on their homes.  In my mind, decisions were being made that benefitted only a small percentage of the population and not benefitting the greater population.  I don’t mind paying my fair share of taxes and fees if I felt that it was bringing our city somewhere.  I won’t even begin to speak my mind about event center and land deals!

This website was one of several tools I used to make an informed decision when I voted.  Pick through and you can find the facts.  I will continue to read here and check the facts myself, as I hope everyone does.  This website is just one of many informational tools.  I don’t see it as anything else.  I don’t see it as something to either unite or divide.  It’s INFORMATION.  And for that, I am grateful. 

I am very anxious to hear the new candidates inform us of their vision for this city.   As much as I like Jim Benbow as a person, at face value I would worry about him because of his close relationship to Rigoni.  Therefore, I will withhold judgment until we hear from HIM the ideas that he has to better this community.  I want to know where the candidates stand on the Mariucci thing.  I hope ALL of the candidates speak their mind and let us decide based on their ideas and vision.


8-26-2008-06

To 8-26-2008-04
After reading your post, the post that you slammed, and then the post that they slammed, I gotta ask: Why are you defending someone who thinks the only thing we can do about the dirt and crap in this world is to bend over and accept it?

8-26-2008-05

To poster 8-26-2008-04, from 8-26-2008-02: You may find this hard to believe, but I, too, have been the victim of baseless allegations on this very website. I've even been the victim of outright lies. These baseless claims and lies always came from the small faction posting here in favor of Tousignant, Rigoni, Caudell, Tchokreff, Burke, and Vanlaanen. Any factual stuff I've seen here - the kind with documentation - always seems to come from the "other side". I try to refer to factual statements, not opinions, when making my admittedly heavy-handed judgments. Why do you insist on ignoring those facts when you pass your own judgments? They aren't going away just because you try to cloud the issue into one of simply a difference of opinion.  I find your statements outrageous, because your tactic is obvious:  convince those who don't know the facts that this is all just a difference of opinion.  As a previous post said - if you have to do that to win, you should not win.
 
"Local reign of deceit" does sound quite dramatic, I must admit. Too bad it's true, isn't it? You know as well as I do that there are many documented instances of deceit - among other sins - from our council over the past four years, and you know by now that I can back that statement up with documentation. It was shameful and embarrassing to have that going on so blatantly in our government, and I'm glad the people, including me, stood up and challenged it. What continues to be shameful and embarrassing for Iron Mountain is the group of people who still won't admit the depth and gravity of the deception and everything else, even with documented proof shoved in their faces. You won't even admit that it was bad at all! How sad.
 
Yeah, calling someone a loser wasn't very nice, even if true. Sorry about that.
 
And yeah, I agree about the tax lookup thing. I didn't get the point of that post anyway.

8-26-2008-04

To the poster of message 8-26-2008-02  you are wrong, and shame on you.  Allegations (made on this truthful, fact checked website)  in some case are very damaging without proof.  Plenty exist here on this website, and I have even been victim of them, though I am simply a voter and business person looking to better my life and community.
 
Drama, drama, drama,...."local reign of deceit"....give me a break with the drama.  You shouldn't call anyone a loser.  You will not allow an opinion, such as you say should be allowed. 
 
To the poster of message 8-25-2008-02, thank  you.
 
Clean up the attitudes, stop the damage, let a little of the petty stuff go......
 
Stay off the tax look up.  Too easy to be hateful and nasty in the computer age.  Not like going to the courthouse to actually get something, just point, click, and start spreading the hate.......

8-26-2008-03

As I was perusing the City of Iron Mountain's website I came across the tax lookup feature...interesting reading, especially if you type in the council members. Try it and you be the judge on who you should listen to when it comes to money/budget management.


8-26-2008-02

I just finished reading post #8-25-2008-02. It was long, and it was angry. The angry part confuses me.
 
It seems to me that the entire point of the post can be summed up by saying that the whole world is dirty, so, stop complaining about it, stop trying to change even your local dirt because you can't, and just accept it..
 
So, writer, why are you angry at those of us who have not yet sunk to that shameful level of indifference to wrongdoing? Why are you APPALLED that people give a damn? Why are you against spreading information to people that is kept out of the media? If the whole world is so dirty, why are you picking on this little website and its contributors for voicing their opinions and providing documented facts? Why does it bother you that some people seek factual information rather than gossip?
 
I got news for you, buddy. We do give a damn about wrongdoing. We will keep trying to change it in our neck of the woods. And, we will continue to inform the people of facts on issues, even if the local media will not. You are quite the spinmeister, pal. Don't pretend to be disgusted by this website, when, really, you are concerned because the LOCAL reign of deceit is seriously challenged by it.  Glad to hear you moved away, loser.

8-26-2008-01

Come on.  Give these candidates a chance.  How well do you know these individuals.  I myself don't know them very well but certainly am going to introduce myself and talk to them about the needs of the city.  Just because Mr. Benbow is friends with John Fortier and Doug Rigoni doesn't make him a bad candidate.  Personally, I have heard very good things about Mr. Benbow as an individual and find that he is a doer and helps in many ways in the community.  Mr. Walters is a life long resident of this area and I believe he wants what's best for the city.   I heard him speak at a council meeting during public comment and he was passionate about doing what is right for Iron Mountain.  These are law abiding, tax paying citizens of this community and they deserve a chance just like anyone else.  You said that Mr. Walters has some land he wants to sell.  Well he has wanted to sell it for some time but it hasn't sold so he has held on to it, paid taxes on it and when the time comes I hope he is able to sell it to whomever.  Are you saying that anyone who has land to sell will be running for council to insure the sale of their property?  No, it's not worth that much trouble.


8-25-2008-03

I don’t know Harlan Walter so I won’t comment on him, but come on when will people bashing stop.  

To degrade someone for running for office because he is a bank officer which John Fortier is a board member of doesn’t make sense.  I know Jim and he is a guy that will run to better the community in which he works and lives in.  To say “Very seldom do bank officials show interest in city politics directly.”  Just doesn’t make sense to me.  Why wouldn’t bank officials want to see a community thrive and grow?  Tell me why would any bank official want to work or live in a community that is going to just get by and not going anywhere and not get new jobs and opportunities? 

What makes the other candidates so good?  I am sure if you look hard enough you can find something wrong with every candidate that would run, but seriously stop wasting your time.  

To answer your other comments, Does Jim Golf?  Answer Yes.  Does Jim hunt?  Maybe, but you would have to ask him.  How about you ask Jim where he lives because the answer would be the same, he lives in Iron Mountain, same city as John too.  Some conspiracy.  Being an active part of this community through various community service organizations, involved with the partnership and other board seats and committees, and another Bank officer, I believe that everything aside about Mr. Benbow except for Golfing, Hunting, and god forbid working for a living, for a bank, he is a honest hard working guy that wants to do right by the community.

 Just live with it, some people do not want Ted C running the city the way it used to be where nothing happened.  It is a new economy, a global economy, the old way of doing things do not work.


8-25-2008-02

Hi -

I was just made aware of your wonderful forum, a community building website, on my recent visit back to Iron Mountain.   I must say, this is a GREAT way, (...as if verbal gossip wasn't enough) to tear your small community TOTALLY APART!   I'm APPALLED that anyone with a conscience OR half a brain would think that this would be ANY GOOD at ALL for your community!?!   ...Unless eMail, IMing or verbally communicating your opinion just wasn't enough to fill your need to publicly hurt or degrade yourself, or someone else!   If putting someone down, or better yet, kicking them when their down makes YOU feel like you're better person...  well, at least YOU believe that!

People who "thrive" on this type of depravity need HELP - NOT a site like this to feed their sickness!   If stating your opinion, prying your nose into peoples private business, or posting fallacies PUBLICLY makes you feel like your helping to resolve the cause - well, guess what Genius?  You're NOT!!!

You are simply supplying AND stacking the bricks higher - to detach and segregate your small community from each other MORE.

I thought it was just wonderful that the community could come together for the benefit of the families who lost their children at the railroad bridge - my heart overflowed with PRIDE knowing I had the privilege of growing up in that community...  then I come across this website...  makes me utterly sick to my stomach!!!

I grew up with Iron Mountain for over 40 years, and even though the Italian Heritage is slowly fading, the sickening gossip, unfortunately, is not!  You wonder WHY people move out of your community and never ever look back... you wonder WHY people are willing to take their own lives or others, or WHY people sustain a life of substance abuse or mental illness...

You are feeding the monster You are CHOOSING to create!
   ...All the back-stabbing. gossip, complaining, assuming, accusing is NOT going to help a single thing at all - ever!!!  

Let me get you "in" on a little secret - the WHOLE WORLD is corrupt!!!- Politicians, Religions, Business... even the OLYMPICS!!! (((GaSp!)))  So, to think you are doing everyone else a "favor" by PUBLICLY accusing people or businesses of unethical practices - well guess what - you're NoT!!!   If we all were made aware of all the fallacies, lies, corruptions, pay-offs, etc. of our past... we'd be SICK to death!!!   It's very unfortunate, but that's just the way it is - and will always be, sadly...


 
"It's a dog-eat-dog world - and I'm wearing MilkBone boxers!?!"
                                       
                                            - Anonymous
 

Do you hear what I'm saying - the world isn't going to change because of all the the back-stabbing, complaining, or accusing you do...   Life sucks - period!  We all have to deal with our own personal "pooper-scooper" - it's unavoidable!   You DO NOT have a choice!   But, what you DO have a choice about is how YOU CHOOSE to deal or react to it.   If you choose to let it get to you, you loose sleep, or get stressed out - that's YOUR choice - NOT mine!   Don't let YOUR bad decision influence MY well-being, please!   That's all I ask - Thank YoU!!!

I choose to try to be able to live WITH my fellow man - "as is" - to accept the things I cannot change or unable to understand.  People are people - and even though I know I cannot change them, I therefore choose to accept them for who they are, and respect that they are not perfect or do not hold the same values or opinions as I do... and that's OK!  If we all were the same, I don't think I would need to take the time to write all of this.

To say, "I'm not friends with Mr. X because they did this..." - well guess what - you're NOT a friend!!!   Nobody cares to hear about your inability to comprehend what a true friendship means...  If you were TRULY a friend, you would understand that WITH your friendship and a little effort, some change or acceptance may be possible.   To say, "Act local, buy local" - whatever - do you THINK other people of your community WANT to volunteer to be humiliated and hung on the cross by your sickness???   Do you think they want to waste their time having to justify their actions to YoU?!?  To sit here and tally what XYZ spent (past tense) to do on this job, or whatever campaign is just stupid, very PETTY and a waste of time - it's DONE and OVER with - move on!!!   Get a life!!!

My GoD! 
How much of this do you deem acceptable or even simply necessary???

If you choose to think all is fair in the world, please deposit another $20 into my PayPal account - cause it isn't!  It never will be.   If you enjoy the thought of becoming like Niagara, and having all your businesses moved away, or bought out, high unemployment, or closed - be my guest!   If you think your local businesses in your area CHOOSE to have to deal with other global markets they way they must - you simply have NO idea!   I'm sure the choices they make are NOT as easy to deem as acceptable - but unless you can all imagine your community life without Champion or Bacco, you must understand, accept and most importantly, support them for things they sustain for your community.

It's easy to accuse, or to assume - but it's NOT easy to simply TRY to understand!   ...And until we all do, I think for the well-being of the community, that some things are better left unsaid.   I'm not going to be the one who will call the kettle black (like others), but I am unsure if a forum website like this will go any GOOD for the community?!?
 
If the point of your "forum" is to inform and educate people on the community's issues - that's what the local newspapers and meetings are for.   If the point of your "forum" is to post local happenings, that's what CityofIronMountain.com is for...   If the point of this "forum" site is to PUBLICLY humiliate and ridicule your fellow community members - you are doing a wonderful job - keep up the good work!!!  

So please tell me, what is the point of IronMountainIssues.org ?

Thank you for your time and consideration of my opinion.  I will pray for you Iron Mountain - God Bless and MOST importantly...
Peace!!! Capeesh?!?   ...and PLEASE remember:

 
"Opinions are like ***holes!?!   Everyone has one, and they ALL stink!"
                                                                                              - Anonymous
 

(((p.s. Sorry!  I understand about the profanity of your posts - so if you can, please edit as needed to deem post-worthy - thanks!)))

8-25-2008-01

With all due respect to Mr. Alwine, please, sir, either get your head out of the clouds or stop yanking my chain with redirection away from important issues. We have a lot more substantive issues facing this city than a bike path, for heaven's sake. That path is nothing but a distraction right now. There are a lot of things that are seriously broken and need to be fixed. I am appalled that Mayor Vanlaanen would even talk about a bike path after the negligent and irresponsible way he has helped run this city into the ground, both financially and service-wise.. Not to mention the damage that has been done in regard to our credibility and integrity to the surrounding communities and the state. Not to mention the never-before-seen level of division among our own residents - those who see what was happening, and those who deliberately seek to suppress knowledge of it.
 
Why did we spend/waste $800,000.00 in a year and a half on engineering costs? We could have had full-time engineers on the city payroll working exclusively on city issues for a lot less than that! How is this horrendous waste of tax money going to be addressed so that something this irresponsible never happens again? We still have two irresponsible members on the council that approved all of that without ever questioning it.
 
Why are we spending TIFA money to fund a private enterprise? Why are we spending it on a project that is not in the TIFA plan? Why are people so bent on throwing our tax money at a local celebrity, for no other reason than that he is a local celebrity? How is the city as a whole going to benefit from giving a private businessman millions of dollars to fund his private business?
 
Why did the lame duck city council tie the hands of the current council by approving a five year contract with the police after they lost the election in 2007? Why did they not address the health insurance problems in that contract? They were the ones always spouting doom and gloom about healthcare costs, so how can that be explained? Was it spite? God knows, it was definitely an irresponsible and hypocritical decision with our tax money. How can that be fixed? Will the police officers "step up to the plate", as Marquart used to say, and do something reasonable and fiscally responsible about their pie-in-the-sky contract?
 
Why did that same lame duck council approve an early retirement in the police department that cost the city $87,000.00, and cost the pension program even more? These were the same people who, again, preached doom and gloom about the pensions and healthcare costs, so why did they make problems worse by this action? Spite? Returning a favor? There was no benefit at all to the city in doing this.
 
Why was Marquart not called on the carpet for losing the Centers for Regional Excellence grant? We had that grant, and he single-handedly managed to lose it for the entire area.
 
Why did they approve hiring employees in a way that was in violation of the City Charter? Are we going to abide by the Charter from now on? If so, how do you address the illegally hired individuals? It wasnʼt their fault; they didnʼt do anything wrong. So, how do we make it right? I suggest pressing personal charges of City Charter violations against the individual council members who did this and other violations. No one else should have to suffer for their misdeeds.  They should be held accountable so this never happens again.
 
Why did they approve spending tax money to send an illegally hired employee to police school?
 
Why did they lock us into that contract with the police with no language to address the huge gap in our fire protection that they caused? Why did that contract not address the safety problems that have cost us $23,000.00 so far? That contract was approved only a couple of months after we got hit with the $20,000.00 fines. So why was that problem not addressed? Again, we still have two members of the council, Vanlaanen and Burke, that approved all of this without ever questioning of attempting to fix anything.. This problem still exists.
 
Why did city tax money pay for a new water line across private property, the Champion property?
 
How are we going to address the reassessment fiasco? Was there criminal activity? How do we address the lost $200,000.00 caused by this irresponsible, incompetent action? Can we get some of that money back? Can we press criminal charges?
 
Do we want to go back to lawsuit after lawsuit against the City because of the way they ran things?
 
Are our outrageous water and sewer rates within the legal parameters of the Bolt decision?  The city attorney says yes, but I've heard other attorneys say not even close.
 
Through everything that was going on, many city residents addressed the council with their concerns about the above problems and many others as they were happening. There was no chance for "plausible deniability". Why were these concerns shoved aside? Why was city manager Marquart given bonuses while this was occurring? Why was he not fired? Why has he not been charged with malfeasance? From 2004 to 2008, we had the single most incompetent and irresponsible and negligent city council in the history of Iron Mountain. And some of you out there are trying to say it's nothing but bickering. Wow.
 
Why did Burke Vanlaanen, Caudell, and Tchokreff approve the new budget, when a smart fourth grader could have seen it was not viable? How can we fix such incompetence? We, the people, have been trying . . . man, have we been trying. One decisive election, and one decisive recall later, we are now faced with more of the same from new candidates for office. And more of the same misdirection, misinformation, and personal attacks against those who saw through the bull of the last four years. Some of you are seeking to bring us right back into what we just got rid of. Benbow as a candidate, with his obvious connections? Walters as a candidate, with his obvious self interest in that Mariucci project debacle? How do you people sleep at night?
 
But, I digress.  Back to that all important bike path.  Wow!  Ooh!  Aah!  Joy!  Rapture!  Put some sparkles on it, and I just might be blinded to that other stuff I was talking about.

8-24-2008-01

It sure looks like "Follow the money" is still a very valid consideration when considering a couple of the candidates who have entered the Iron Mountain City Council races in Wards 1 and 2.
 
Harlan Walters had almost never appeared at a city council meeting until very recently.  He was approached a while back about some empty lots he owns bordering the Lehman Road at Milwaukee Avenue by city officials.  The price offered was apparently enough to suddenly peak his interest in city affairs. To protect his chances of selling them, he joined the "No recall" group and had NO signs on the property.
 
Jim Benbow is closely aligned with the Bacco interests.  He is in a golfing foursome with Doug Rigoni and John Fortier.  He hunts with them and may have an interest in a hunting lodge with them at Sundog Lake. Benbow is an officer at the First National Bank of Iron Mountain.  John Fortier sits on the board of that bank. Is this enough to suspect that Benbow was encouraged to run so that Bacco interests  would continue to be well served since Doug Rigoni is no longer sitting on the city council?
Jim Benbow has never attended a city council meeting.  He served very briefly on the Planning Board.
 
Very seldom do bank officials show interest in city politics directly.  For someone to pop up with the obvious connections Jim Benbow has with Bacco interests should raise all kinds of red flags.


8-23-2008-05

To Post 8-23-2008-03

"City Right of Ways" are alleys and areas of property that telephone poles run through.  The tax was implemented by the FCC to help in the cost of maintaining those "right of ways".  Trimming tree branches and ensuring that access is maintained for maintenance.  Most new housing areas have underground utilities.


8-23-2008-04

Steve was at a high school football event in Marquette after the June Ryan show was recorded and stated unequivocally that he has moved back to California for good.  The poster below is correct; Steve's wife is from Cal and that is home.  He also stated that he has not ruled out another head coaching job somewhere, but if he takes one it will be a commute; he will not move his family to wherever the job may be.
And for those who may have missed it, Steve was also at the center of the Favre controversy.  Favre wanted Ted Thompson to interview Steve for the head coach's position in GB after Mike Sherman was fired, and Thompson declined.  This season should be interesting; who was wiser, the GM or the QB?
My money is on Favre.


8-20-2008-03
The Ryan Report segment you saw was a repeat.  It was recorded in June and aired in early July.  I saw it in July.  I don't think anyone said that Steve was moving back to Iron Mountain.  His wife is home and that is where she wants to stay.


8-23-2008-03

To: 8-22-2008-04   Re: cable T.V. fees and liaison officer. Please explain what "city rights of way" are. Thank you

8-23-2008-02

Response to 8-21-2008-01 - I read those blogs you say you didn't read. That person referred to was lying, not voicing an opinion. If you posted here to defend them, and are feebly trying to call it an opinion, I do not believe you are "concerned for the well-being of our city and its citizens." Nice, though juvenile, try at spinning the issue, though.
Are you actually going to stick to your argument that the First Amendment guarantees the right to lie? Please.

8-23-2008-01

To 8-21-2008-01
If you don't read those blogs, then you don't know what I'm talking about. Not everything is a matter of opinion. There is still such a thing as facts. When I say someone is a liar, I am not attacking their opinion, I am pointing out that they misrepresented facts. There is a huge difference. I can also point to specific lies this person told, if you want to spilt hairs. Example: Nonamiss stated as fact that the city assessor was NEVER an employee of the city. That's not an abstract opinion, friend. It's a lie. Furthermore, I can show you documented evidence of his other lies.  I am offended that someone would misrepresent city affairs in a public forum like that, and I have just as much right to respond to it as they had to utter such misinformation.
 
And I repeat: The First Amendment DOES NOT guarantee the right to tell public lies about public affairs. To believe otherwise would mean there is no such thing as slander and libel. Get your facts straight before you try to lecture me again. Yes, it is VERY hard for me to live in a world with people who believe there is no such thing as facts anymore.

8-22-2008-04

Regarding the cable TV fee:  In one of the early meetings in January, maybe the first one, the three new council members tried to eliminate the TV fee completely.  It was voted down 4-3 (of course) with Caudell, Tchikreff, Burke and VanLaanen voting to keep it in.  Peterson, Farragh and Rosen voted to eliminate it altogether.
 
At the last meeting, Burke suggested lowering it to 3% from the 5% maximum because it was bringing in too much money for the police liaison officer.  The trouble with that suggestion is the law specifically says any TV Cable fees have to be used for city rights-of-way ONLY, and cannot be used for a liaison officer in the first place. 
 
Tieing it in to the police liaison officer in the first place was a political ploy that was illegal to begin with, but the gang of four at the time did it anyway.
 
A budget hearing is set for this coming Monday, August 25, at 6:00 PM.  At that time, the TV Cable fee will be discussed again, and I'm sure the three who voted to eliminate the first time will do so again.  However, the city attorney has ruled that 4 votes are needed to pass almost anything, so a 3-2 vote to eliminate it would not be enough.  We'll see how all this plays out shortly.


8-22-2008-03

To 08-20-2008-05:
 
Dan Burke, according to past meeting minutes, first proposed using the cable franchise fee to fund the liaison officer.  The city attorney voiced that it wasn't the correct use of the fees, but was not listened to and it was passed.
 
In January, before the budget process and before it became known how bad off the City was financially, the three new council members put a motion forward to eliminate the cable franchise fee.  Four council members, including Dan Burke, voted no; citing the Fee-funded liaison officer as a convenient reason...they had financially tied the officer to the fee.
 
In April when the three new council members received their financial information to start the budget workshops, the City was reported by the Manager to be $176,000 in the red.  The only income that the manager and 4 old council members added to the budget to balance it included numbers that could not be counted on.  For example:  Numbers that had to be yet negotiated, tower fees that had to be renegotiated (and still are not), and rental ordinance fees that had yet to be negotiated.  There is a current shortfall in all of these numbers.
 
The "trimming" that the Manager and 4 council members put forward was in two categories only, and included opening contracts.  Also, a number that could not be considered solid.  The other trimming included needed equipment by City Departments.  Consistent overtime costs due to a Police and Fire protection plan that has not been working financially, or with personnel, was not budgeted for.  Hence, yet another shortfall. 
 
At last Monday's council meeting:  Dan Burke, after voting for the cable franchise fee twice, put forward the discussion to reduce it.  He said that some cities had theirs at  2%.... Back when the old council first voted the Fee in, residents pleaded with them that very fact, but were ignored and it was voted at 5%.  Dan Burke stated at last Monday's meeting that somehow the City has pulled in twice as much money for the liaison officer than what they needed.  Good mathematics by the old council would have prevented that, and the fee should either not have happened in the first place or should not have been 5%.
 
It is a political move only for Mr. Burke to put forth reducing that fee at this time.  It is plain and clear it was intended to put the three new council members in a seemingly impossible situation.
 
A budget that was nearly destroyed by others over the past few years, inherited by new members, that already requires amendments due to shortfalls.  A budget that was recognized by the three new council members to be faulty and they voted accordingly...this budget cannot at this time, without cuts, simply reduce the fee.  Other income would have to take the place of the fee, which will be discussed along with the other missing income that did not materialize.
 
The three new council members acted responsibly, and will continue to do so.

8-22-2008-02

All comments regarding the bike path here are some replies to questions/concerns
 
Specifically I would like talking with the author of 8-20-2008 02 and 8-19-2008 01.  Please feel free to email me at nalwine@norwaymi.com  perhaps we can exchange phone numbers and have a good dialog on this.  I'm not looking for an argument at all--but a friendly discussion because this proposal is not bad like it appears you think it is.  I believe a face to face dialog will be a very positive thing.
 
Anyone interested in more information can also feel free to contact me, I can give you information on when the meetings are and where and the overall goals as a whole.
 
Thanks!
Nate Alwine
 
 
1) The Lake Antoine Bike Path was worked/is being worked on by a group separate from the group proposing the bike lanes on the west side.  There have been many challenges in establishing this path, but currently the Path/Route is slated to be constructed this fall. 
 
2) As for the routes on the west side, we discussed several options.  (I am on the routes and planning committee for this path--and have been at each of the meetings except one).  One route was along Hughitt.  We explored that option because it was the widest street.  However the other option which was presented at the City Council Meeting was to utilize A and B Streets, placing bike lanes on one side of the street and having bikes flow with the traffic, with parking remaining on the other side of the street.  We presented both options to the council, and our goal in presenting these options was to start the dialog that needed to be started.  This will allow us to see if the residents of this area would even be open to this idea, or have inputs on how to make this work in a way acceptable to them.  Jeff volunteers with the same committee I do, and since this is a volunteer based group we needed to present our idea to the council and let them decide the best way to get a dialog with the residents.  Tourism is not the goal with this section of the path--we really want to provide a safe route to the school, downtown, and city park for residents.  We also want to link the larger path which will extend throughout Dickinson County when completed.  I am more than happy to discuss the details of that path with anyone who wants to contact me at my info I leave below.  Now as far as permanent, we have many ideas for how this would be implemented on the west side.  One was that we have a bike lane from late April-early November.  And then parking returns as normal.  Our goal is nothing more than to want to add something to make this place a little better.
 
I do have some interesting statistics on tourism and bicycling.  As the overall path/and spur trails will not only serve the residents, but also spur tourism as well.  I'll throw out a summary here:
 
When it comes to tourism the fastest growing sector in the country is the Adventure Destination Tourism.  If we drive deeper into this we see that the top 3 sub categories of Adventure Destination Tourism are #1) Whitewater Rafting   #2) Rock Climbing  #3) Bicycling (mountain/road)     
 
Next look at the local Adventure Destination Resorts.  Between Memorial Day and the end of fall colors they bring up to 500 people to this area each weekend for rock climbing and whitewater rafting at Piers Gorge.  These people are usually very impressed by how beautiful this area is and one of the most common question I face after guiding rafting trips is if there are any biking/hiking routes/trails  they can explore.  They want to explore this area after seeing it from the vantage point of the Menominee River, or via cliffs north of the city.  This non-motorized route will empower them to do that. 
 
Last weekend I worked the Tour de Dickinson and we had over 320 people sign up to ride in the tour from all over the mid-west.  The checkpoint I worked had 62 people stop in for refreshments.  It was a great mix of local residents and individuals from out of state.  While volunteering at Italian Fest later that day I saw many of the riders that went through my checkpoint buying food and drinks from local vendors.  That definitely shows interest in this area with biking. 
 
Beyond the tourism this provides a great alternate resource for transportation and is great for us.  I save 1.5 gallons of gas or close to $6/day when I ride my bike from Norway to work in Iron Mountain.  In doing so I get a great opportunity to experience our communities from a different perspective.  This summer I'd see kids playing baseball in Quinnesec, say hi to different neighbors, and get my legs in good shape.  The tough economy has caused many to start riding their bikes, and as bike traffic increases in town car and bicycle conflicts will increase, so it makes sense to have this dialog and search for the right routes for bikes.
 
Thanks again
Nate Alwine

8-22-2008-01

To 8-20-2008-05, As I understand from asking about this, new members did want to abolish the fee as soon as they took office.  As I recall it was voted down 4-3. Then the new budget was set with this money added in and now it will just take some time to figure out how to fund the liaison officer when the fee is removed. It appears from the last meeting that there are some serious issues with the budget that need to be fixed.  Looks like we need to give them some time to work this all out.

8-21-2008-02

Hughitt Street (wide!) and the ever awaited Lake Antoine bike path should not be mutually exclusive. Both would be ideal.
 
A community has to be modern day friendly to attract new residents and businesses. 
 
Modern day communities do not gear toward sedentary lifestyle.  They gear for safe ways for non motorized communting.
 
Going back to the 70's and 80's ways of thinking will ruin Iron Mountain.  All U.P./Wisconsin communities have potholes to deal with.  I should not be one or the other (fix potholes/have safe bike paths.)

8-21-2008-01

In response to the below blog:   I don't read the blogs just the newspaper articles.  The first amendment DOES guarantee the right to free speech.  Just as is expressed on this site.  People have opinions that differ but that doesn't make them lies.  I don't even know what you mean by nonamiss.  And  what do you mean by "you people are so shallow"?  You don't even know the "you people".  And lets stop talking about this side and that side.  We are all concerned for the well-being of our city and its citizens.  I know that I am, aren't you?  Why is it that anyone who doesn't share your opinion is a liar?  It must be hard for such a perfect person such as yourself to live in this imperfect world. 


8-20-2008-02
 
Dear 8-15-2008-01, the First Amendment does not guarantee the right to tell public lies about public affairs.. To suggest some of these people (by some people I specifically include Nonamiss as a blatant liar) are middle of the road is outrageous. If they go as far as to lie to make their point, it's fairly obvious what side of the road they are on.  Don't read them, you suggest? Why not? So no one responds to them with the hard facts on the issues they are lying about? Would that make it easier for the "other side" to try to get back in power in November?   If you can only win a majority through blatant lying, you should not be winning.  Your way is NOT the American way.  For you to quote the 1st Amendment in this context is to defile it. You people are so shallow and transparent it sickens me. 
 
Oh, and to everyone on Hughitt Street, won't it be nice for you if the mayor's plan comes to fruition? You will never again be able to have guests come to your homes and park in the street. Great idea, eh?

8-20-2008-05

Is just me or didn't the campaign and recall literature speak about abolishing the cable fee?  It doesn't seem like anyone supported the idea of reducing it. 
 
I cannot find any of the campaign material or recall literature.  Could someone please post this information please so I can read it?


8-20-2008-04

Regarding the proposed bike path it would make much more sense to use both A and B streets. With the traffic moving in only one direction, it leaves room for a wider bike lane and street parking on one side of the street. I also would like to know what ever did happen to the Lake Antoine bike path?


8-20-2008-03

The Ryan Report segment you saw was a repeat.  It was recorded in June and aired in early July.  I saw it in July.  I don't think anyone said that Steve was moving back to Iron Mountain.  His wife is home and that is where she wants to stay.


8-20-2008-02

Dear 8-15-2008-01, the First Amendment does not guarantee the right to tell public lies about public affairs.. To suggest some of these people (by some people I specifically include Nonamiss as a blatant liar) are middle of the road is outrageous. If they go as far as to lie to make their point, it's fairly obvious what side of the road they are on.  Don't read them, you suggest? Why not? So no one responds to them with the hard facts on the issues they are lying about? Would that make it easier for the "other side" to try to get back in power in November?   If you can only win a majority through blatant lying, you should not be winning.  Your way is NOT the American way.  For you to quote the 1st Amendment in this context is to defile it. You people are so shallow and transparent it sickens me. 
 
Oh, and to everyone on Hughitt Street, won't it be nice for you if the mayor's plan comes to fruition? You will never again be able to have guests come to your homes and park in the street. Great idea, eh?

8-20-2008-01

I saw Steve Mariucci  this weekend on TV6 Ryan Report. He was very adamant about California being his "home". For those of you that think Steve is coming back to Iron Mountain to save the world, keep dreaming. Of course he had to discuss the "events center" and how a few people are holding up the plans. Thank God for a few honest people!
  Speaking of plans, can someone tell me the status of the strip-mall that was to be built next to the police station? Did the city ever sign over the city property, or was this just another "cart before the horse" deal?  The way Marquart and his gang of seven spoke a year ago, you would have thought the cars should be lined-up to the city limits waiting to get into all the fabulous stores by now.
  A bike path to city park? What ever happened to the bike trail around the lake?
WOW !!!

8-19-2008-04

As a non resident of Hughitt St. I think the no parking/bike path is a very smart idea.  There are also many, many grade school and high school boys who bike and walk to get to the football stadium and City Park for football practice and games.  This would provide added safety.  You really don't generally see a lot of cars parked on Hughitt west of Central School anyway.  Our town needs to be much more bike/rollerblade friendly to keep up with other progressive towns of Michigan, including the U.P.

8-19-2008-03

Dear 8-14-2008-03:
 
Nope.
 
Dear S.L.:
 
Thanks for bringing the question to my attention.
 
Jim Hogan

8-19-2008-02

Gee, things sure are quiet around this website lately.  I can almost hear the crickets.  I hope that means a lot of people have found a lot less to be concerned about, city-wise.  I would like to see some more of this year's vendor reports posted if someone has them.  Thanks


8-19-2008-01

Can you believe it?  Of all the problems Iron Mountain faces, Jeff Van Laanen seems most concerned about establishing a bike path from downtown to the city park.  Is a bike path from downtown to the city park the highest priority item he could think of?
 
Now get this - he suggested  abolishing all parking on Hughitt Street, striping a yellow line about three feet from the curb on both sides of Hughitt street and restricting it for bikes only.
 
Fortunately, more sensible minds prevailed when it was suggested by Bruce Rosen that all residents who live on Hughitt Street be surveyed to see what they thought of the idea.  Can you imagine a single resident from Carpenter Avenue to the golf course entrance agreeing to a permanent no parking in front of their home.  Goes to show you the mindless management skills of our mayor.
 
Never mind the miles of roads that need work, never mind getting to the bottom of the bacteria in the water, never mind the millions of dollars of unfunded liabilities - let's get a bike path from downtown to the city park.  
                                                                                                                                         Apparently  thousands of tourists would suddenly appear, with bike racks on their cars so they would have the uplifting experience-of-a-lifetime by biking from downtown Iron Mountain to the City Park.


8-15-2008-01

Apparently the individuals that are blogging on the newspapers website are just exercising their "First Amendment" right.  And as to what "SIDE" they take, maybe they are middle of the road.  If you are bothered by those comments, don't read them.  No one knows who is writing them so don't throw stones into the dark. 


8-14-2008-08

I checked out that link in post 8-14-2008-02. I want to know why the Daily News is allowing someone to post outright lies on their website? I though they made people prove whatever they wanted to say. Or, was that just the a rule for the side that was exposing everything? The other side can say whatever they want, with no proof, even outright lies?


8-14-2008-07

See what I mean?

8-14-2008-06

A unique Characteristic of the TRUTH

Unlike everything else in human relations, the TRUTH has one very unique characteristic - it cannot be KILLED.

The truth can be hidden, sometimes briefly, sometimes for centuries, but it is never dead.

The truth can be burned, stabbed, stomped on, riddled with bullets, blasted with artillery and even nuked.  Yet, like a phoenix rising from the ashes, it will arise again and again and again.

Sometimes nations, civilizations and empires will fall because the truth was hidden.  Human history is replete with examples where the truth was hidden and millions died, but the truth didn't die. 

Those who choose to squash the truth, twist the truth, avoid the truth or bury the truth will eventually pay a price.  Sometimes the price is life itself.  Other times, it is merely the embarrassment of losing an election in a small town as the populace sees through the shroud and sees the truth - which once again, did not die.

A life filled with attempts at deception must be a very shallow life indeed.  Some have paid the price of their deceptions.  Hopefully, they have learned a lesson. Deception, however, is also addictive.  Often it cannot be seen by its practitioners for what it is - the path to a hollow, meaningless life.


8-14-2008-05

The one other thing that made news all over the country was the "Pen throwing charge".  It was so laughable that it made news all over!  You can still look it up online to see how many places included it in their news.  Everyone saw it as a joke!


8-14-2008-04

To, 8-13-2008-03

Puh-leaze! You were in lower MI and people were asking about that nonsense in Iron Mountain? I can see them asking about the shooting, as that was national news that weekend, but to imply that they were asking about our local politics is absurd. No one in lower MI, without ties to the local area or in Lansing politics, is going to care a lick about our local politics.


8-14-2008-03

To: 8/13/08-02

Is that you, Jim Hogan?


8-14-2008-02

People who are interested in the goings on of our city government should go to this link:
 
 
You may have to cut and paste it in your address bar. This is a recent Daily News story and the comment blog. It's almost unbelievable what someone from the "other side" is stooping to to make their false points.  IT has been reduced to outright lying.  See for yourself.

8-14-2008-01

Since when is fighting for and voting for the truth a shame!!!

8-13-2008-03

I guess we've done it now.  No takers on the open city council seats.  Maybe appointments will be made to fill those seats until elections are held in 2009.  I have a funny feeling that our city is going to be dormant for sometime now.  Makes you wonder if the Iron Mountain Event Center will come to fruition or if ANY business will take the chance on coming to a community that doesn't have a viable government.  I know that many throughout the state are questioning the stability of Iron Mountain.  I was in Ludington and Saginaw the first week end in August and when they asked where I was from or saw my driver's license I was asked, "just what is all this nonsense that is going on in Iron Mountain.  I guess we are famous for something. What a shame.


8-13-2008-02

Re: 8-11-08-02
What do you consider a "safe site?"  One that never calls into question the actions of elected and/or appointed public officials?  One that only presents one side of an issue (i.e. the oxymoronically name "truth" site?).  In the months that this site has been on-line it is clear that the webmaster has printed in the public forum both sides of the issues facing Iron Mountain - simply acting as a conduit for thoughts from both sides of the issues. That those who represent the recent administration (Marquart, Tousignant, Rigoni, Jacobs, Caudell, Tehokreff and Burke) are in the minority on the postings is not the fault of the webmaster - and by the standards of the last two elections not the majority view of the citizenry of Iron Mountain either.

As to the threat of a lawsuit over "slanderous" remarks it is clear that you do not understand that legal meaning of that word. This is an eerily similar misunderstanding of the law to the council member who filed a criminal complaint against a constituent because the citizen "threatened" to recall or filed a criminal complaint for assault against another council member for "throwing a pencil" at him!

The best defense against the charge of slander is truth - if the statements made are truthful (i.e.: the council/city manager wasted over $200,000 on an incomplete reappraisal, or one of the council members voted to pay a relative in violation of the city charter, etc.), there is no slander, because those statements are true.  Additionally in the case of public figures (the city manager and the council members certainly fall into this category), the burden of proof falls on the
public official to be able to demonstrate that the statement must was published knowing it to be false or with reckless disregard to its truth.  Further  stating one's own opinion cannot be slanderous simply because opinions by their very nature are true - the opinion may be wrong, but it is still the writer's opinion. 

The founding fathers of our nation recognized the importance of the free interchange of ideas when they wrote, "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."  Threats of slander and lawsuits over the freedom of speech as people "peaceably assemble" (via the internet) and "petition the government for a redress of grievances" (through postings on the public forum) certainly fly in the face of the First Amendment.


8-13-2008-01

Dear poster #8-12-2008-02,
 
Thank you for patronizing me. Maybe you shouldn't ask such obviously leading questions. You are not as clever as you think with your "innocent" sounding questions, or your change in tactics. You should know the true answers by now. You should also realize who slandered who, if at all. Please spare me any more moral lectures. The ground is pretty solid where I'm standing.

8-12-2008-03

Re: 8-11-08-02  Shame on you.  No matter what side you were on, your attitude is extremely rude, negative and not at all helpful as we move forward to heal and restore this city.


8-12-2008-02

This is not the safe site that 8-11-08-01 referred to.  I have been on this site with questions or comments and have been rudely criticized.  I also found that in the not so distance past that individuals have been slanderous towards other individuals and therefore, by printing those remarks, the webmaster has put himself/herself in a place where they could be held liable.  This is a  "public forum" and this could be grounds for a suit.  There are a few people who write for this site that look at the world with "green eyes" instead of accepting there lives the way they are or working to make them better.  It is easier to criticize other then to look within ourselves and identify the problem for what it is.

8-12-2008-01

As far as I can see, the only person constantly harping is some wingnut with the handle of nonamiss making comments on the Daily News website on stories and letters to the editor.  Se continua a sparare cazzate lo ignorero. Other than that, a few anonymous speakout letters to the paper is all I've seen or heard. 
 
So, does anyone know who is going to run for the two empty seats?

8-11-2008-03

Who's harping?


8-11-2008-02

Fruitcakes.  You figure it out.


8-11-2008-01

While there is an Election coming, and the outcome will still yet determine exactly who will be representing the residents towards what they want for their City; 
 
Somewhere, somehow, there has to be a start to the healing of the hard lines that have been drawn.  If not, then the person and people who have drawn them (even though absent) will still be doing their damage.
 
We know we are better off without secrecy and corrupt thinking, but to get out of the tangled mess that was left behind it's going to take a Hell of a lot more than bickering and wound-licking.  Some like to come on this site and inflict even more wounds.  They then call this site "hateful", even though they themselves were guilty of that very word.  That won't change.  It won't because people like that refuse to change.
 
What can change is others coming to this site with their ideas of what they want for their City.  So, let this be the place to share those ideas.  Let this site be where it is always safe to not only be a watchdog and find information, but also where it is absolutely safe to express what you see for the future of Iron Mountain.  That is what everyone fought for, took the hits for:  That Freedom.
 
It is time now.  Let's get this show on the road.

8-10-2008-02

The proud & positive gang continues to harp about lies and distortions WITHOUT ONCE listing any of them.  If there are so many, they should have no trouble listing them.  The three being recalled never once addressed the charges in the recall language because it was all true and documented and recorded with their votes while sitting on the city council. 
 
They are playing the same worn out game of accuse, accuse, accuse - but never spelling out the accusations. 
 
We'll see open dialogue between council members for the first time in four and a half years, I am sure.  The veils of secrecy that abounded will be gone. 
 
The drastic steps taken by Bacco and Champion interests (unsuccessfully, but at a cost of over $7,000 to them) to prevent the recall from even going to the voters is what will not be forgotten. 
 
Before the council meets for the first time with two seats empty, Bacco, Champion and their groupies are already anxious to throw mud.  They will eat their words in due time when the investigations bring out the level of violations that have taken place in Iron Mountain, and I'm not talking just about the reassessment, but much, much more.


8-10-2008-01

About 8-8-2008-02
I'll take what we have now ANY DAY over the deceitful, incompetent, greedy, self-serving, snobbish, egotistical, ignorant, bullying reign we had before. If the new people are deceptive, I will be the first to call them on it. If YOU have proof that the new members are being deceptive, prove it with documented facts. If you have nothing, your word means nothing. You are just a troublemaker. It was reams of proof that did in the old members, not just some blowhard like you making unsubstantiated accusations. Thank God we still have enough people left in this city that look at the facts and weigh them when they vote.
 
Further, even if the former council members were the most honest and open people in the city, their ideas to "move the city forward" were not popular enough to win a majority of the vote after the people saw what the "vision" really was. That goose is cooked, too. The people decided. Get over it. There is more than one way to move forward. I hope - no, I believe - this new path is less crooked than the last one.

8-9-2008-01

I'd like to add to what 8-8-08-1 said.  The "proud and positive" group will take issue with your "return to normal", claiming problems that needed fixing when Marquart and the Fab Four came in.  Problems or not, they were the wrong people for the job, they did not have a viable plan, and they did not go about their business the right way (read:  above-board, legal, and ethical).

So the p&p crowd can say all they want about problems created by previous councils and managers.  I won't argue, not because they're right, but because it's not the issue.  Marquart was incompetent, and was supported by a mix of the ignorant, the confused, and the crooked.

Now that the deadlock vote is gone from the council, problems can be identified and addressed, and - *gasp* - the public doesn't have to be kept in the dark or misled.


8-8-2008-02

To 8-8-2001-01,
Yeah right. If you think what we have now or will have is normal you are mistaken, If you think that we, even now with whats left, have HONEST council people you are mistaken...Lies for political purposes and gain continue. True, their is honesty among some of them (but others...they know that I speak of their lies. Their distortions that they have given to the press, to the public...They know who they are)...Honest is far from what we have. What we have is different from before, yet still the same....trully sad.

8-8-2008-01

I wanted Vanlaanen, Tousignant, Rigoni, and Jacobs gone in the last election as much as anyone, and it happened, less Vanlaanen. I wanted Tchokreff, Burke, and Caudell recalled as much as anyone out there, and that, too has happened, less Burke. I wanted to see Marquart removed as much as anyone. He's gone, but of his own choice. All this, yet, victory feels hollow to me.
 
It's not hollow because Vanlaanen and Burke survived. It's hollow because it was such a hard fought battle, but the prize was never anything more than vigilance, fairness, openness, honesty, and integrity in our city government. It's hollow because I only strove for what we should have been able to have all along. The prize was nothing but a return to normal.  And many on both sides paid dearly.
 
So, let's not squander this "hollow" prize. We now should realize how precious it is. Let's not get complacent. Remember what was defeated, so we can recognize it coming the next time and maybe avoid it. Right the wrongs that were caused, and demand atonement if it is warranted, but mend the hard feelings. End the brother against brother, neighbor against neighbor bitterness. The cause of it all has been defeated. Let's truly move forward, but never forget what is behind us.  Just a thought.
 
PS  Rats!  There is another election in three months.  I'll not kid myself into thinking that things won't get ugly all over again.  But I can hope, I guess

8-7-2008-08

To post 8-7-2008-05:

I think your prescription of Prozac has run out.  You need to wake up and face reality about wasting other people's money.

We need a Tea Party!


8-7-2008-07

Game, Fellippa, Kramer
 
Build a bridge and get across it.
 
A new day has dawned in this city.
 
The community of Iron Mountain and it's citizens know who you are and what you supported and they just told you by vote to get a life and reflect on your part in dividing this city!
 
It is a great day again for this city and you were not a part of the solution but were a part of the problem!
 
Are all of the citizens wrong and you three were right???????

8-7-2008-06

In French:  C'est la vie.


8-7-2008-05

Politics is a dirty game.  Taking the high road in this arena is difficult but doing the right thing never comes easy.  Anger and negativity only hurt those who harbor these feelings.  To be guided by anger to the point of loving the feeling is a definite road to disaster.  It may take time but it will take its toll. 
Have you noticed that politics is taking on the face of bullying?  That is the way of the weak and the insecure.  I ramble.  Having so much to say and not knowing how to say it without being a bully is leaving me with nothing more to say.  Se la vie.


8-7-2008-04

He won by nearly 16% (over 100 votes).  A retally would be a statistical waste of time and taxpayer money.  I can't imagine any City Clerk authorizing this nonsense.

Oskar


8-7-2008-03

Oh joy. Another City election is just around the corner. Has anyone heard who may be running for wards one and two?  Whoever you are, are you nuts? :) 
 
Does this mean we get to have a new mayor chosen by the new council, too? Will Burke and Vanlaanen finally get the message? I guess an argument can be made that wart [sic] three WANTS Dan Burke to press on, regardless, and, gulp, he should vote as a representative of his ward. I will not hold against him what his majority think they want.  I may think they are a bunch of uninformed idiots, but, that has no bearing here. 
 
Vanlaanen, not so with you. Everyone knows what the voting majority in wards one and two want, and it ain't what you been slingin'.

8-7-2008-02

Even as he leaves the sinking ship, Marquart's supporters continue to stoop to ridiculous lows:  see that huge ad in today's paper? Look closely at the signatures.  They duplicated many of them, apparently to be able to fill the page and make it look like he had more supporters.


8-7-2008-01

Isn't anyone else embarrassed that Ken Tousignant is still on our City website, stating that he is the Mayor of Iron Mountain? How "progressive" do we look to those who see that, when he hasn't been our mayor in how long now? It's been said before and I'll say it now….. It's time to get him off of that Welcome video and show people that we are a city that stays current.


8-6-2008-11

I, too, expect HONEST and OPEN answers from the three newer members but also from the two incumbents who remain on city council.  However, I think think that's what the new members have been doing all along, so I'm quite optimistic about it. I have no problem holding them to honesty and openness at all times.
 
Dan Burke has stated that he will now be a watchdog.  After sitting on the council almost three years, all I can say, it's about time.  You and every other council member are supposed to be a watchdog from the instant you take the oath of office at the very first meeting.  In other words, Dan Burke is admitting he is over three and a half years late in fulfilling his role as a watchdog.  
 
If he had truly been a watchdog from the beginning, he would have spoken up and stymied the many schemes and machinations that Marquart, Tousignant and Rigoni dreamt up and are coming home to roost now.


8-6-2008-10

Danny boy, when you were elected 3 years ago it was to be a watch dog for the city, not a lap dog.

8-6-2008-09

I was thinking about the recall and the people who are working on each side. It reminded me of the American Revolution. On one side was an empire with vast wealth with a huge army and navy. The American side had a rag tag army, no navy and very little money, but they had the determination to stand by their convictions.   
 
Today in Iron Mountain we have a small army working on the recall. These people have given their time and money to help all of the people in this town. I give all of them a pat on the back for what they are doing.  Thank God we have people who care and are willing to try to right the wrongs that have been done.

Thanks


8-6-2008-08

Well,
The people have spoken as it should have been, the council members recalled have failed their citizens in some way but to the current council members its time you practice what you preach, OPEN and more importantly HONEST (or truthful, not distorted for political purposes) let the people see what things really are...not what sells your point best. Whether it be bills, or costs or projected costs or reasons, do not provide the public with "worst case" numbers and state them as fact, do not believe "facts" that support your cause just because they support your cause and then, when opposing ideas are given you act surprised that the facts are "inflated". Please, please actually be open and HONEST...you know who you are.

8-6-2008-07

A silly and uninformed post, 8-5-2008-07, makes no sense at all.  First of all, the writer misspelled Mr. Corombos name.  Then there is the assertion about the landlord and his so-called girl friend.  Those two people are simply friends who live a block and a half from each other.  They are not a couple, and never have been, as each of them will tell you.  The landlord has three or four units in a large converted home, and he lives in one of the units himself. This is the extend of his rental units.
 
I checked with Mr. Corombos, and as I suspected, he was never against any 425 agreements.  He pointed out that there was some language he wasn't crazy about, but that's about it.
 
I couldn't reach Mr.Gene Carollo, but show me where he took any position on 425 agreements.
 
Is it wrong for people who support a cause to openly and willingly put their money where there mouth is, and neither fear nor care that it is public knowledge?
 
Further, I think that writer missed the not-so-subtle humor about "hidden agendas" and "conspiracy" that Mr. Corombos threw in his post.  Looks to me like the writer was a butter knife in a drawer full of much sharper knives.  Oh, well, the election settled the issue anyway.


8-6-2008-06

re: a retally for Dan Burke:
Why would there be a retally for only one ward?  Is something amiss?

8-6-2008-05

There is a retally going on for Dan Burke.


8-6-2008-04

To the writer of 8-5-2008-07, I trust we now know the size and importance of the movement you mentioned. 
 
I sincerely hope that remaining and future council members can work together to repair the divide that has happened to our City because of the last four years of mismanagement.  Six out of the eight people responsible for that are now history.  Let us move forward with an open and honest government.  Who knows, with the clouds now removed, we may even achieve vibrance for real.

8-6-2008-03

This website established a new record for daily visitors -  It passed 1000 hits in a single day for the first time ever by recording 1011 hits in a 24 hour period - between 11:00 PM Monday and 11:00 PM Tuesday.
 
The recall election was the primary reason, and the hit count will certainly drop back in a few days, yet it has served the informational needs of the voters by allowing diverse opinions on major issues affecting the City of Iron Mountain.
 
Thank you, Webmaster, for the time you have volunteered the past few years.  I hope intelligent dialogue on issues continues.  Let's all try to discuss ideas and keep it lively without slamming people you disagree with.  Slam their ideas all you want.  Dissect them if need be, improve on them if they have merit.
 
Iron Mountain citizens have endured a lot.  Let's hope a period of calm follows and that good and knowledgeable candidates step forward to occupy the two empty seats that will be filled in the November election.


8-6-2008-02

Iron Mountain City Council Recall
Should Daniel Burke be recalled from the Iron Mountain City Council?
Yes 280
No 382

Iron Mountain City Council Recall
Should Robin Tehokreff be recalled from the Iron Mountain City Council?
Yes 348
No 262

Iron Mountain City Council Recall
Should Eden Caudell be recalled from the Iron Mountain City Council?
Yes 419
No 331


8-6-2008-01

This information has not been confirmed yet but the preliminary results are as follows:

Caudell has been recalled.

Burke was not recalled

Tchokreff was recalled


8-5-2008-07

Mr. Corombus,
What I find interesting is the 4 people that put in to this supposedly huge movement, a landlord, his girlfriend, Gene Carollo and, I believe, a relative of the fire chief(and his brother). If this is such a huge and important movement, why on earth are there only four people contributing??? Maybe its not as big as you may care to say on this site...Nothing like the old school IE: yourself and Gen Carollo included who saw it ever so fit NOT to annex (junction to junction thus avoiding any need for a 425 agreement which you now oppose) prior to last year and the one and only land owner that held up the original bike path. Progress I tell you, progress. Vote NO or return to yesteryear when all the "RIGHT" decisions had been made!

8-5-2008-06

Barbara;
 
In your recent post, you stated, "I emphatically state that I have never and I mean never had a personal conversation with Ms. Caudell or am I interested in doing so."
 
My honest question is this, why wouldn't you speak to Ms. Caudell?  Don't you think that would have been the correct first step?  Why did this escalate into a recall situation immediately?  Why the venom?
 
Just a thought.
 
Please all of you.  Give thought before you vote.


8-5-2008-05

To all those "vote no" people with signs on the highway:

"Signs must be more than 30 feet from the edge of the roadway (white line) for highways that do not have curbs. For highways with curbs, the signs must be more than three feet from the back of the curb."

There's no curb out there in Breitung Township on the highway.  You are in violation of Michigan law.

But, nothing new there.

Nice touch with the balloons, Eden.  I was going to vote "yes" based on the issues, but now I'm distracted by the colorful balloons.


8-5-2008-04

8/5/08

Setting The Record Straight

I am writing to set the record straight. At last night's city council meeting, Ms. Caudell made the statement that she had talked to the person who was attempting to recall her and encouraged the person to talk to John to try to resolve the concerns. She also made the statement that the recall members had stated that they would not stop until John was gone. I want it on record that this is a total fabrication of facts. As I am the person who initiated the recall process for Ward 1, I would certainly be aware of a personal conversation with Ms. Caudell. I emphatically state that I have never and I mean never had a personal conversation with Ms. Caudell or am I interested in doing so. I also have never made the statement that I would not stop until Mr. Marquart was gone. Why would I make a statement such as this, when I believe the council is ultimately responsible for whatever happens. Mr. Marquart is only part of the problem. It is up to council members to monitor the city manager, make sure he is completing his job duties correctly, and to reign him in when he is spending extravagantly, not completing assigned job duties, not following the charter or established responsibilities, etc. Plain and simple, the council members did not do the job they were voted in to do.

The only contact I have had with Ms. Caudell is through observing her performance or lack of at city council meetings and during the court hearing regarding the recall language. At the hearing, Ms. Caudell had the opportunity to provide her views on the recall and recall language. At one point, in the conversation, she turned around to me and proceeded to try to tell me what I was thinking and feeling. She made the statement that I was not really upset with her or her performance, as a council member, but was mad at John (referring to Mr. Marquart). When I had the opportunity for rebuttal, I make it plain in no uncertain terms that it was her I was upset with. I stressed that it was her job to reign in Mr. Marquart, as she is one of his supervisors and she did not do her job. I further discussed the extravagant spending for travel on his part, the problems within the fire department and MIOSHA fines, the tax assessment debacle, etc. Lastly, I stated, to her, that it was the last straw when she voted to give Mr. Marquart a bonus after all the mistakes he had made. Mistakes, I may add which resulted in significant costs to the taxpayers (i.e. extravagant travel expenses, tax reassessment debacle, MIOSHA fines, STS Consultants engineering plans which he obtained without obtaining council approval first, were very costly, and many of which never ended up being utilized, etc. )

During her rebuttal time, Ms. Caudell stated that she realized that John had made mistakes, but the good he had done far outweighed any mistakes made by him. She reported to taking all of this into consideration and that is why she voted to give him to give him a 4% bonus instead of the amount allowed.

While I am setting the record straight, I want it understood that no one, not Mr. Corumbus, my father, or any other person made me initiate this recall. I have become a very strong and assertive person, and anyone who is close to me knows that I cannot be made to do anything I do not believe in. I made the decision to initiate the recall petition for Ward 1, after researching all the facts, looking at many documents (travel expenditures, every copy of the rental ordinance which was put out, budgets, reports from MIOSHA, vendor reports, lack of any pertinent information being available to support the tax assessment when asked to provide it by the city, ISO correspondence, some TIFA information, and a variety of other documents), attending and observing the performance of the council members, and unresponsiveness to taxpayer's concerns.

Last evening, during public comments, a constituent basically said that there was a group of small minded individuals behind the recall effort. To me, a small minded person is a one who points fingers without researching the facts. It is a person who believes what they are told, by others, such as the previous tax assessor, current city manager, city council members, etc. and do not research the facts themselves, individuals who want to shove an ordinance down someone's throat without really listening to the facts or trying to be fair, or individuals who approve the vendors reports without looking, in detail, at whose names were on the report being submitted for payment and amounts being billed.

Thanks for listening,

Barbara Toedter


8-5-2008-03

Re: 8-5-2008-01  Re:  Comments about the Honest and Open Government Committee
 
Michigan campaign finance laws required us to close the books on July 20, 2008 and file the report by July 25, 2008.  As of the closing of the books on July 20, we had $1,600 in income and no expenses. 
 
On Monday, July 21, we incurred our first expense when we paid the U. S. Post Office $428.12 for our mailing of 1,981 letters to voters who had voted in the last General Election.  That was our first expense, but fell one day after the closing of the books.
 
We had not been invoiced for the envelopes or the printing costs associated with that mailing.  The same for some signs.  We will pay all bills as invoices are received.  Our two identical ads in The Daily News cost us a total of $492.  Again, after the closing of the books deadline.  We have received additional contributions after the closing of the books and they will be reported in the final filing which is due September 4 along with all expenses.  Am I correct in assuming you found no great hidden agenda or conspiracy when you saw the list of contributors?
  . 
Please feel free to get a copy of our September 4 filing and you will find a final itemization. 
 
Ted Corombos
Record keeper
Honest and Open Government Committee

8-5-2008-02

To 8-5-2008-01

I would think that at this stage the important part would be the income.  The expenditures would be listed after the 5th of August.


8-5-2008-01

Honest and Open Government.  PLEASE.  How about start with HONEST?  
You filed your contributions and expenditures as of July 20th.  
Contributors:  Carol Schneider $250, Bob Moraska $250, Eugene Carollo $500, and Ronald Johnson $100.  Another $500 for a total of $1600.  
Now here's the HARD TO BELIEVE part . . . $0.00 in expenditures.  
Really now?  How do you mail out 5000 letters and put out a number of signs for $0.00?  Looks to me like someone should investigate campaign finance FRAUD.  Ted Corombus is the record keeper.  Interesting.


8-4-2008-14

Re: 8-4-2008-10  Your post is completely inaccurate from beginning to end.  I talked to the person who distributed the brochure to Mr. Burke's home.  The brochure was put in the door and not given to a child, nor was a child talked to.  The report of his behavior at the court house came directly from court house personnel.  Who do you think I'm going to believe?

8-4-2008-13

Tomorrow is an important day in Iron Mountain's future as well as it's citizens.  By now you should have spent some time really
finding out what has happened to our City and your tax dollars.  Only time will tell where we will be heading from here.  With that in mind, I found a little more information to put in your memory banks for a later date.  I questioned some city policies and found the following is in the City Policies Manual.  This concerns new developments for road paving.  It is item 2 in the manual and reads:
The developer will prepare and provide the following:
1. Bring street up to grade.
2. Furnish water and sewer lines at developers expense.
3. City will then place this street on the blacktop program and blacktop when funds become available. 
4. City may require laterals on all lots of entire street prior to paving.
 

Notice it does not say the city will pick up all expenses!!!

 
Since some of you keep trying to make an issue of the events center when the recall was never about that to start with, I thought you should read this section. No. 65. adopted by the Council on 7-2-01, read as follows:
 

Requests to purchase City owned property shall adhere to the following procedures as established by the City Council.

1. Individuals, partnerships, corporation and other entities who wish to purchase City owned property shall submit a written request to purchase property of the City Council.
A. The request will contain the legal description of the the property.
B. A preliminary site map identifying the location of the property.
 
2. The proposed purchaser of the property shall identify, in the  request to purchase, the intended use of the property at the conclusion of the transaction.
A. The use shall be identified specifically.
B. The purchaser shall also state if zoning variances will be required to establish the proposed use of the property.
 
3.  The proposed purchaser will provide a time frame for the development of the property.
A. Development of the property shall include clearing, filling, leveling and other earth work necessary to the development of the property.
B. All buildings proposed for the property shall be identified along with the anticipated start date of construction and completion.
 
As virtually very little, or  any of the above has been completed, let's keep our focus on what this recall is really about.  It's about the fact your tax dollars were wasted on many projects that still are not completed and those who refuse to take responsibility for
their actions.

 

VOTE YES TO STOP WASTEFUL SPENDING.  
VOTE YES, TUESDAY AUGUST 5TH.

8-4-2008-12

After reading the Daily News this evening, again you see that Caudell, Burke and Tchokreff refuse to respond to the big issues that are brought to light.  All address some small issues while refusing to take any responsibility for the reassessment debacle.  No body is perfect, so why is it that none of the three can apologize to the public for their gross negligence???  It is much easier to forgive someone who admits their mistakes and tries to rectify any future errors in judgment.  If you can't see the mistakes of the past why should the citizens of Iron Mountain believe they won't happen again?  It seems the Zebra really can't change its stripes.  
 
All of the voters, who last November felt so strongly that changes were needed, must come out tomorrow and stand up for what they believe.  Without your help nothing will change and they will only continue to serve special interests until the bank is completely empty.  I hope you will VOTE YES TO BRING BACK OPEN AND HONEST GOVERNMENT  TO IRON MOUNTAIN.

8-4-2008-11

To 8-2-2008-01
I would like to rebut the points made in your post.
 
1. Would you like to enter into a friendly wager that there IS factual and supporting documentation on the anti-recall contributions? I strongly advise you not to bet against that.
 
2. How many times must it be said - get your information for yourself, just once!
 
3. Blacklist away, my friend. You may as well, because, right or wrong, I will no longer be patronizing any businesses sporting No signs in their windows. There is too much evidence out there that tells me they are supporting something that has no place in our government. They MUST know what they are backing by now. If they feel that way, I don't want to do business with them. It would be a favor to ME if they returned the favor, just in case I missed a few.
 
4. Are you still hung up because everyone IGNORED the gay stuff? That it really wasn't important enough for anyone to latch onto, except you? I think we may have to come up with a new term to describe this attitude; I suggest heterophobic.
 
5. I agree with you that the term elite has to go. You are right. There are no elite.
 
6. Sorry. Your opinion is irrelevant. The people already adopted a City Charter that states the makeup of our city government.
 
7. So. Someone says they are sorry and offers their sympathy . . . and your response is that this person does not speak for you? Hmm.

8-4-2008-10

Your query about Dan Burke's adventure at the county clerk's office was NOT as you heard.  I accompanied him there and no such incident happened.  FYI:  The brochure delivered to Dan Burke's home was not given to him but to his ten year old daughter who was told that this is information that her father can choke on.  Of all the despicable behavior by so called adults.  This sounds like something a kindergarten age child would do.  No, I take that back, they are far more compassionate then that.


8-4-2008-09

This site can only condemn Bacco and Champion for what they have done or what they have failed to do.  When mines closed did they high-tail it out of here and leave our community in worse shape than it was turning out to be?  No, they stayed and grew and contributed to the city's economy.  No one is in business to lose money so keep that in mind IF we should get companies paying TOP wages ($14.00 an hour and benefits) when they start turning a profit and do things that don't follow you prescription.  (Tina, $14.00 an hour won't look so good when the employees have to pay a substantial portion of their health benefits  and retirement.  The days of your employer taking care of you are gone.  It is time for us all to realize that the only one that will take care of us is US.  I am not the imbecile your thought your were talking to on the this site.  I have done my homework and know more than what you shared.)

I have read here that we live in a free country and can say and do what we want, but REMEMBER, that goes for everyone.  We are all entitled to our opinions and whether you like them or not we are STILL ENTITLED.  Iron Mountain was going nowhere for years and it will continue to go nowhere with the poor me attitudes expressed on this site.


8-4-2008-08

Why did the three being recalled respond only in part to the charges leveled in the recall petition the last day prior to the recall election? The answer is really quite simple, they don't have any defense and did not want to provide additional time to be torn apart.
 
Burke maintained that the police officer's early retirement is done all the time and it will be paid for over his retirement. The truth is the pension board motioned to have an attorney render a legal opinion prior to allowing the early retirement. This was not done.
The pension board was required to run both a short term and long term actuarial analysis prior to allowing this early retirement. This was not done. Burke also said this will save the city money. This will cost our city $87,000 in the short term and no one knows how expensive this will be, as the long term actuarial study was not done. Come on Burke, weren't you there when this was discussed. We could do better with anyone as a 3rd ward councilman.
 
Oh Caudell, what were you thinking when you responded. Distorting the reassessment. I don't think so. How could you not ask one question when Mr. Swartout sent you a letter outlining the problems, just months after the reassessment began. When you didn't respond to his letter, he took the time to attend a council meeting to tell all of you in person that this reassessment was a joke. Still not ONE question from you or any other council person. Regarding your mother, shouldn't you read a document prior to voting to approve it? You had two months in a row to catch this. How about reading the City Charter when you're elected, I'm just guessing here, but that might have helped on other issues as well.  We could do better with anyone as a 1st ward council person.
 
Now comes our resident brain trust, Tchokreff. Everything written above applies to his attempt at rationalizing the reassessment. He also blatantly states in his article that the State of Michigan requires a periodic reassessment - this is a lie. There is NO reassessment underway now, where did he pull that from? Tchokreff has spent 10 years on the council and has wasted his time and our money. We could do better with anyone as a 2nd ward councilman.

8-4-2008-07

I may have misspoken and want to make the correction. Mr. Tchokreff may not have been on the council when Mr. Kramer was on the payroll. That does not, however, make Robin any less responsible for knowing that the tax rolls were indeed being updated throughout the years. Instead he took Marquart and/or Rich Brook's word when they claimed it had not been updated in 30 years.


8-4-2008-06

These three up for recall don’t need anyone to make them look bad….. They do that themselves. Here are just two examples:
 
In Monday’s article Mr. Tchokreff Says: “After our former assessor retired, a level 3 assessor was hired, and he determined that we were in dire need of updating our tax rolls. The state actually requires a reassessment at regular intervals. Since we hadn't been doing this on a regular basis, we knew the update was going to be costly…”
 
Well Robin, if we hadn’t been updating our tax rolls, why did you repeatedly approve monthly payments to Ralph Kramer as Joe Rogina’s assistant in gathering info for updating the tax rolls?
 
And Ms. Caudell said, in reference to approving to pay her mother: “My error, not crime, was not realizing that she was on the vendor report when it came before the council for approval. Instead of abstaining, which I certainly would have done had I noticed her name, I voted to accept the report,"
 
Tell us, Eden, why didn’t you notice her name?  You should not be approving a report that you have not carefully gone over line-by-line.
 
We need people who carefully tend to the business at hand. They need to know what they are agreeing to and why. These three have not shown that diligence.

8-4-2008-05

In response to  8-2-2008-01.

The post who responded to you was right on point. Why don’t you put just a little research into your own question of whether posting a public document is legal? It is available to anyone from the county clerk. You must be a council member up for recall as you too wait for someone to provide information – why don’t you ask your leader – Marquart. Oh I know, you can’t rely on his information. Ref. MIOSHA fines LOL, reassessment LOL, STS unapproved spending LOL, etc. etc.

“Government by the people for the people.” You stated this suggesting recalling all. We haven’t had a city government for the people for over four years, thanks to blind followers like you. What does it take for you people to understand that the facts speak the truth, not the b.s. move forward and forget the past statements. Will they EVER take responsibility for all the huge mistakes they have made?

Thanks to our exiting city manager and council of the past, it will take years for our city to recover from the WORST COUNCIL we have ever had. Your blind following is to blame as well. Our only chance is if the recall is successful.

VOTE YES!!!!


8-4-2008-04

When Dan Burke received the brochure by the YES committee, he stormed into the County Clerk's office ranting and raving that disclosing the contributor information was illegal.  In fact, as we all know, it is public information. From all indications, he was loud and intimidating (again).
 
He then demanded and got a copy of the YES filing, which, as has been mentioned on this site, was a grand total of $1,600.00, compared to $10,160 or so for his side.
 
The no group has had this information in their possession for a number of days now.  Why don't they post it on this site?  Because there is no chance that $1,600 can by any stretch be interpreted as a grand scheme or a secret agenda, that's why.
 
They can put the names of all the contributors on-line, right here, if they wanted to, but that would just prove they are blowing smoke with their allegations.  So anyone who is all that curious about who contributed this $1600.00 can call Burke and find out.
 
Do you think Rigoni, Fortier and Verrette don't have this information?  Why don't they post it?
 
Anyone complaining on this website can go to the court house and get it and post it if they weren't so lazy.


8-4-2008-03

To 8-2-2008-01
Of course it's legal to post information that is required to be subject to public disclosure! Is that all you got?
 
If you are so concerned about public disclosure on the Yes side, do the homework and legwork yourself, just like the Yes people had to do. What's the matter? You can't get the info yourself unless it's spoon-fed to you? That's been the problem with your side since 2004.

8-4-2008-02

Does anyone have solid information on Dan Burke and his adventures at the County Clerk's office? I heard he blew up had to be escorted from the building by armed deputies. If this is true, why is it not in the news?  I don't care if this doesn't make it online until Wednesday after the election.  As citizens, we deserve to know what kind of people we have running our city.


8-4-2008-01

In reference to 8-2-2008-01:

Yes it is legal.  The information is on file at the Dickinson County Court House and is open to the public.

If you want to see the other sides financial report I suggest you go down to the court house and read the report yourself.  Its public information.


8-3-2008-03

Terrific job on the brochure by the recall folks.  Well laid out, exceptionally well written and very interesting.  That had to take a lot of time - and I'm sure quite a lot participation from various people.
 
Distributing it door to door must be quite a job, too.
 
As pointed out in the brochure, the no group has yet to rebut a single charge as presented in the recall language.  All they can do is slap a bunch of signs around town practically ordering you to vote their way with no reason why.
 
In case any readers didn't get one, you can read it on the
www.ironmounainrecall.com website.


8-3-2008-02

August 5th is fast approaching and I imagine many citizens are still undecided how to vote on the up coming recall.  As for myself, I have continued to look into information that exists so that I may
make an informed decision.  What I choose to do that day will be something I may have to live with for several years.  With that said, I continue to look at information that is available with a little research and I hope all will do the same.
 
I first had to first ask myself can I trust the three that are up for recall?  When the information came out last Monday on the reassessment I began to wonder.  I looked back at the City minutes of March 19th 2007, Mr. Swartout had attended that meeting.  His comments to the council in a nut shell was, there were to many discrepancies for any of the reassessments to be put on the 2007 tax rolls.  This certainly should have been a red flag and followed up on.  After his testimony last Monday it is obvious the ball was dropped big time.  I can't afford more taxes to pay for another assessment!!!   If we vote someone to the council, shouldn't they be aware of what is going on???
I have found to many issues to bring up in one email, but below have added some issues that are a concern to me.  As careless spending seems to have put our City budget in a world of hurt.
 
STS Consultants were paid in the neighborhood of 700,000+ in a year and half. Not many projects were ever completed for that large dollar amount.  I look at my street and other streets in town wondering what could have been repaired with that money.
 
Back on the January 16th, 2006 minutes is when the rental ordinance was voted on and approved.  Why did it take until July 21, 2008 to finally settle this ordinance. I believe if not for the new council members this would still be up in the air.
 
I no longer feel the trust needed to support those up for recall.
There seems to be many areas that still need investigation so
on Tuesday, I am going to VOTE YES FOR HONEST AND
OPEN GOVERNMENT.

8-3-2008-02

Our hearts were deeply saddened by the tragic loss of the three young people Thursday afternoon.  To those families,  may we express to you our sincere and deepest sympathy for your loss.
The days ahead will be difficult but we will continue to keep you in our thoughts and prayers.
Sincerely,
David and Donna Farragh

8-2-2008-01

In response to the link on the home page:
 
 
Is that legal to post on this website?  It is a list with no supporting documentation or factual evidence, yet it basically lists and condemns very well respected members of this community.  Be careful.
 
Where is the list for the Yes movement?  I see it is conspicuously missing.  I would like to see who is supporting that financially.  I think we deserve to see it immediately, not later as some have suggested.  Who is pulling the strings for the Yes movement.  I think we might know.
 
Besides, if you all on the Yes team want to put this list of people on some sort of blacklist, others may want to put the Yes campaign contributors on their own blacklist.
 
This website has always been biased and unclear.  The condemning of the gay mayor, the cool cities links with their anti gay message, downtown elite bashing (what elite?)....
 
I really think the whole damn council should be replaced, by a lottery pick of registered voters, with a short term.  Also, they should be unpaid volunteers, and there should be more like 12 of them, jury style.  Government by the people for the people.
 
Shame on anyone trying to get a leg up with messages to the affected families in the recent unspeakable tragedies in our small town.  It wont make us like you more, and don't speak for me, I have done so myself already. I think we need a total shutdown of everything and some quiet time to mourn.  May God help us all.

8-1-2008-07

I  wish to express my deepest sympathy to the families and friends of the victims of yesterday's shooting.
I am so sorry for your losses and hope that you will find strength from your loved ones.  Please know that your community has you continuously in their prayers.
 
Respectfully,
Tina Peterson

8-1-2008-06

Response to 7-31-2008-02's questions and comments:
 
You said:  "Feedstock used for cellulosic ethanol will raise food prices.  Isn't it better to use natural, renewable resources, such as those chosen for the proposed plant in Sault Ste. Marie?"
When I use the word "feedstock", it is the term meaning the renewable components used by the facility to create the final product in the cellulosic ethanol plant I described.  Renewafuel's feedstock, in KI Sawyer, will be switchgrass and woody fiber.  Mascoma, in the Eastern UP, will be using only woody fiber.  Some operations use a combination of switchgrass, lawn clippings, woody fiber, food waste products...even animal waste products.
 
"Feedstock" does not mean Feed or Food, it means the fiberous products the company uses in their production....the "waste" products and renewable products they will break down to a cellular level. 
 
For Cellulosic Ethanol, there are several patented processes out there to extract the sugars from the plant fiber.  Coskata is using a microbacterial process, Range Fuels calls theirs the K2, and some others use dilute acid hydrolysis.  There is a race to build the first commercial size Ethanol plant in the US, but pilot plants and smaller scale projects have been up and running for quite some time.  These do not use corn, are not corn ethanol plants, and therefore they do not compete with the food market.
 
You asked: What level of pay do you deem necessary to be paid in a family sustaining job?"
I believe that wages above $14.00 an hour, plus benefits, are what is needed to cover a family's cost of child care and the continually rising costs of heat, food, and utilities.  Also, every product that households need to purchase in this country has been affected by fuel prices, due to the transportation it takes to get it to the final marketplace it sells from...simply, everything we need has risen sharply in price. 
Every family's needs are different, but at least one job in the household must be able to cover the basic necessities, and a minimum wage job just cannot.  A family will end up, for survival's sake, applying for subsidizing resources to be able to get through.
 
You said: "With all the new technology needed in manufacturing, more than a high school education is required.  What is the education level of the population of Dickinson County?  What percentage of the people living here have an education beyond high school?  Do we have the eligible work force"
The MEDC has Grants to train employees for Alternative Energy and other types of job training.  The Centers for Excellence program is being started by the State of Michigan (not to be confused with the CRE).  The State is increasing funding to community colleges.  Also, please note the quote in my post on the "Green Jobs Initiative", with the DLEG.
I don't know the average education level of Dickinson county, but I know how bright, talented, hard-working, and resourceful our County population is.  I know we have a dedicated and eligible work force, an amazing local farming industry, and people who need to be able to support themselves and/or their families.
 
You asked: "Do you consider M.J. Electric, Grede Foundries, Champion-Gundlach, and Bacco Construction as steady and high growth industries?"
I consider these Businesses very important to our area, and made it clear in my post that all businesses are important. 
 
You asked: "I thought that NewPage was shutting down or are you referring to the Escanaba facility?" 
Escanaba, for the fact that they are partnering with ChemRec in the Alternative Energy direction with Black Liquor production...which will be turning waste products into energy.
 
I hope I have answered your questions.  I encourage you to "google" Cellulosic Ethanol and also Companies such as Mascoma, Range Fuels, Coskata, and Renewafuel.  Renewafuel is not a Cellulosic Ethanol company, but is producing an alternative to coal with their bricks.  A website called Earth2Tech is very interesting, as well as numerous sites with new info on Ethanol blends and fuel efficiency factors.
 
The predicted cost of a gallon of Ethanol from Cellulosic ethanol production is about $1.00 - $2.00, (compared to approx. $3.30 for current E85, and $3.89 for regular unleaded.)  The amount of energy this product creates compared to the amount of energy it takes to produce it is a ratio of 15/1.  That is incredible. 
The more alternative resources there are for fuel, the lower the prices will become on oil.  Ultimately, it is just good stewardship to start "recycling" energy.  It also happens to create jobs.
 
Sincerely
Tina Peterson
Iron Mountain City Council

8-1-2008-05

Rigoni and Fortier were willing to put up over $6 grand to keep three stumps in office.  I shudder to think what they got away with in phony add on-charges during the last four years on the many jobs Bacco did for the city under the intentionally unwatchful eye of of their cohort Marquart.
 
Another investigation in order, along with the one on reassessment.


8-1-2008-04

What an eye opening brochure the Honest and Open Government committee put out.  I try to keep up as best I can on city affairs and attend quite a few council meetings, but there were many well documented facts I didn't know.  If anyone was confused by the debate going on in Iron Mountain, they now have way more than enough reasons to vote YES.
 
The old adage about the "Best politicians money can buy" came to mind when I saw how much of the $10,162.66 the vote no committee took in was from Bacco and Champion interests.  People in those two companies alone kicked in $8313.66 or 82% of the total.
 
A second thought then came to mind.  If you're going to buy politicians, can't you buy better merchandise than Eden Caudell, Dan Burke and Robin Tchokreff?  If you are backing them, you must know them, and you could not in any sense consider them mentally over-endowed.. 
 
Oh, on third thought, you're not buying their brains, you're buying their votes.  Now I get it.
I must be a little slow myself.  Care to sponsor me if I decide to run for city council Mr. Fortier, Mr. Verrette and Mr. Rigoni.  I'll spend dozens of hours a week on city business on your behalf.
 
It only pays $500 a year though, so how about putting me on your payroll as a no-show employee?  $20,000 a year from each of you sounds like a good start - and maybe a percent of the profits from all jobs or deals I manage to get for you. It's an offer you can't refuse, unless you're getting Burke, Tchokreff and Caudell to vote your way at a much cheaper rate.  I'm sure you are, so I guess I'll have to withdraw my offer.


8-1-2008-03

The "Yes" committee at the July 25 filing showed $1,600 of income and no expenses as of that date.
 
They have obviously incurred expenses since then.  The final filing deadline is Sept 4 for both sides, and at that time we'll all get the final figures.
 
It sure is a lot less income that the "no" committee had taken in.  But then the "yes" group didn't get $8,312.66 from Bacco and Champion, Inc. people, either. 
 
It doesn't look like the "yes" group has any special interest group pouring money into their coffers. I take this as a very good sign and just one more reason I am voting to recall my council member.


8-1-2008-02

Can you imagine BACCO and CHAMPION, INC. people trying to justify spending over $8,000 to stop a recall and deprive the voters of Iron Mountain a chance to decide for themselves?
 
The sleaze that has been going on at City Hall has been proved beyond a shadow of a doubt.
 
Personally, I think they even got blindsided by their great ally John Marquart. When they filed their lawsuit, they almost certainly had no knowledge that Marquart was planning to skip town at the first opportunity and leave them hanging. 
 
Marquart was in BACCO's hip-pocket and BACCO had a $400,000 free water and sewer project riding on the proposed Hydraulic Road change that would run very near their acreage in Breitung township.  This would have made the property value jump astronomically.  The $6,000 spent on attorney was a pittance compared to getting a $400,000 freebee.
 
CHAMPION, INC. got a freebee water line through their property from their new office building to their property on the highway.  That needs to be looked into to see who approved it and when. BACCO installed and got paid for that water line.
 
Is it any wonder why Teresa Fortier is working so hard for the "no" side? Is it any wonder why John Fortier, the president of BACCO has been attending city council meetings so regularly lately, where had never attended any in the past? Is it any wonder Gary Benjamin, Chief Operating Officer of Champion attended a city council meeting, probably for the first time in his life, to push for his definition of "progress?"
 
Remember the hefty sums Doug Rigoni SPENT on ads in The Daily News on his failed re-election campaign?  Any two ads cost more than the $500 a year a council member makes.
 
FOLLOW THE MONEY - FOLLOW THE MONEY - FOLLOW THE MONEY - FOLLOW THE MONEY
 
You may get sick to your stomach as the dots connect, but its worth it to get to the truth.


8-1-2008-01

If you support the anti recall committee you support out of town businesses.  Following is a "small list" of expenditures to business out of Iron Mountain:
 
$6668.06    Detroit, Michigan law firm
$1065.32    Yard signs paid to Cross & Oberlie of Neenah, WI
$ 404.92      Letters, window signs paid to CJ Graphics of Kingsford, MI
$8138.30    Total spent outside of Iron Mountain
 
They DO NOT support local business, so why should you support THEM???
 
The last I looked there are numerous Iron Mountain attorneys that could have handled the issue.
Also, we have Standard Printing in Iron Mountain and Jon's Signs who would have gladly done your campaign signs.