IronMountainIssues.org

  Home Page Public Forum  

April 2008 Postings


4-30-2008-05

Enough of this Sol Blu nonsense.  Who gives a damn about Sol Blu, anyway.  We're not here to analyze local bars.  We're trying to figure out the millions that Marquart and Van Laanen and the three go-alongs have squandered and further millions they're planning on blowing given half a chance.
 
Let's continue to build the air-tight case against them, which was moving along nicely on this site, until the Sol Blu distraction.


4-30-2008-03

Nice try, #4-30-2008-02. Yes, Dale tells us how things should be run. The funny thing is, I agree with Dale. When he calls John Marquart a liar, I agree with him that the city manager should not lie. When he says the city council broke laws and that they should operate within the law, I agree with him.  When he says the manager should be fired for cause, I agree with him. Why? Because Dale backs up what he says with documentation. So, if you don’t agree with Dale, are you saying you condone all the misinformation and illegal crap this council has pulled in the last four years? Why don’t you put your money where your mouth is? Sue Dale over his comments. He’d kick your sorry a** in court if you did. Groundless character assassination doesn’t hold much water when it’s up against documentation.
 
Speaking of documentation,you probably didn’t hear about the latest thing Marquart pulled that directly affected Dale in a negative way. Dale, if you read this, PLEASE don’t let the scheming snake off the hook on this one. It was blatant abuse of power and retaliation and Marquart should be sued over it. If you don’t, he’ll just find a way to twist it around to make you look bad, and some morons will believe him.
 
And, keep pluggin’ away at the meetings, Dale. There are more people that agree with you than ones who don’t. For the record, Dale beat Ken Tousignant, Doug Rigoni, and Sally Jacobs in the last election. I wonder why you are not telling Dougie and Kenny to sit down and shut up?

4-30-2008-02

Just a small note to previous writers - I think the last place finisher in quite a few contests was actually the ever-amazing Dale Alessandrini. In fact, I think he was only on the city council as an appointed member. Never won an election - never finished his jobs. So why don't you write about how awful he is for showing up at every council meeting and boring the world with his lengthy, shaky presentations of how he thinks things should run - or how someone tells him what to think. The voters have spoken - over and over - Daley should sit down and shut up until he can win over the will of the electorate. Please, Daley, take this advice and give everyone a break.


4-30-2008-01

To Therese Bujold of Sol Blu
 
Every business develops a personality or a culture, some quickly, others gradually.  This applies to giant corporations as well as small businesses.  It can evolve and change over time for various reasons.
 
If you make a long list of businesses you know, you will see it very clearly.  Businesses get an overall reputation.  Sometimes, under new management, a business will rise to greater heights or fail.  In almost all cases, management should get the credit for success and the blame for failure.  In some situations, a business can be a big hit in one city and fail in another, depending on the complexities of the local culture.
 
One business we are all familiar with, the government of the City of Iron Mountain, has been in great turmoil for the past four years. The turmoil could continue for some time into the future.  The city is a business that cannot shut down, unlike every private business.  It must continue, and it will.  If the situation cannot be resolved by the voters or the city council, the State of Michigan would eventually intervene.  The turmoil is directly the result of management..
 
Let's move on to your business.  You are the management.  You make decisions for everything from the decor, what you serve, the prices you charge, the overall ambience and the kind of clientele you choose to cater to - upscale, down scale or any scale.  How the clientele interact with each other will eventually determine the success or failure of your business.  But you need enough clientele to make a decent return for your time and investment.  If enough people like the place and return on a relatively steady basis, you will succeed.
 
You business has been linked to City of Iron Mountain management because enough of them stop in with some regularity.  Has this helped or hurt your business?  Only you can decide.  You say you have no problem with diversity.  Fine.  Has this helped or hurt your business?  Has it attracted a clientele that others do not wish to associate with or are uncomfortable with?  These are the factors that are unspoken in most cases.  People voted with their feet and their wallet.  They can walk into any of the many bars and lounges available in the area, or none of them.
 
You make economic decisions every day, both in your business and non-business spending.  You have made the decision to list your business for sale.  That's your right and your choice.  I hope you find a willing buyer on the right terms.  If I were looking to buy a business such as yours (I'm not) I could not place any value on your present clientele because I don't know how many would stay under my management.  I would depend on building a clientele from scratch, just as you did when you opened the doors.  
 
I don't know you, but I have known many business people - the very successful, moderately successful and also-rans.  In the local bar scene, many bars have changed hands for any number of reasons over the years.  Some have had very good runs for years.  In all cases, it was because enough people liked the owner and enjoyed the kind of place he/she ran and the kind of clientele that were catered to. These are the issues you or a future owner will face day to day.  Do not blame anyone for the success or failure of your business.  It all depends on the decisions you have made and will continue to make as long as you own your business. Good luck to you now and in the future.


4-29-2008-04

To 4-29-2008-02
 
Wow.  Saying "your buddy Ken" is your own conjured idea.   Is he an obsession for you?  I just looked at how long my letter was, around twenty "unsmall" paragraphs about different subjects and you are focusing on him and one single paragraph way down the line in the letter, right off the bat.  I didn't even mention his name?!  What does that have to do with this/me?   Here we go with associating phobias for a need for some sort of control over them perhaps?
 
I've laughed many times about it with friends including Cind that "Ken doesn't like me," generally tongue in cheek as it isn't something he or I would likely lose sleep over.  They'll tell you it's been a running joke.  I'd list their names, but then they'll be involved without a choice, by association once again.  His sister is a friend, his mom Maddy is always been sweet to me and is kindhearted.  He and I have never had any sort of real rapport.  Some people "click," some don't.  For he and I It's basically,  'hi, how ya doing? Good, you?"  He gave me a great compliment when Sol Blu first opened about how well it turned out, and I appreciated that as I could tell when he looked me in the eye that he meant it. 
 
Re: "he has been vindictive and intolerant of anyone who does not embrace homosexuality."  an "He spreads lies that you are hate-filled, if you weren't marching in the streets and wearing T-shirts proclaiming gay rights." Are you sure you aren't exaggerating?   Firstly, this is heresay  (once again)  because you are posting anonymously.  Who are you, by the way?  He isn't on the council, isn't the mayor.  Why you still follow him and mention him by name leads me to thinking you must think he's a pretty powerful, influential guy. 
 
My only advice to you, is "until you've walked in the shoes."
 
Re: "If you think that your business is any more important or special than any other in town, then you are an ego-maniac. " Do you own your own business or work for one?  Isn't that what it's is all about?  That you truley believe you have a better product/can do better for a customer than others?  I don't know too many business people who walk around telling others why the competetion is better and they should spend their money elsewhere.  Think about what you just said, and reflect on whether that was an intelligent thing to say.  I read it twice before I could believe I was really reading what it said.  Wow, there would be no such thing as advertising if what you say is true.  Advertising?  How ego-maniacal?!?  No advertising leads to no newsprint, internet news, t.v. news.  I could carry on with each step that leads to but.....
 
Where the money goes is my job as owner-manager, so your largest paragraph, mostly in bold type also is not relavant to ask of me.  Please ask someone who delegates decisions of where to spend their money to others and they might answer your question from experience. Probably someone with something larger scale. Who would let anyone other than themselves decide where money goes in their small business?  I don't think that would be the smartest way to go.   
 
Maybe I don't have a business mind?  I reacted to a slanderous statement of giving drinks free to John Marquart at Sol Blu, of all things.  Those statements and false association online lead to misconceptions about people and businesses.  It happens everywhere, not just here.  Self defense to online slander can't be all bad.
 
Did not flourish?  I think you are making assumptions. .You do not know what I consider acceptable return on an investment after three years new.  Why am I defending myself to an anonymous.  hmmm   Maybe this is a hobby for you,  wanting to entice people in to bicker with by provocation.
 
 
Therese Bujold

4-29-2008-03

I really doubt that anyone cares if the Manager goes out for dinner with whoever, but not on City business unless approved by the Council.  Lets remember all the current problems can be traced back to meetings and decisions made without Council approval. 
 
I also have a problem with the Mayor attending.  Our City is not a Strong Mayor Council.  He was not voted into that position by the voters.  His duties are to run meetings, set up committees etc.  His power as a council member is no different than the rest. If he is allowed to make decisions for all members we are right back where we started prior to the election.  It was very obvious, even to those who refuse to admit it, the residents of Iron Mountain wanted to see some change. When it comes to issues that effect the City, meetings should be held in appropriate places where all can attend including the public.  If there is nothing to hide this shouldn't be a problem!!

4-29-2008-02

To Therese, owner of Sol Blu:
 
You sure can get your shots in, under the pretense of trying to be friendly or informative.  You could say you have a talent for it, as I have experienced in prior emails from you during the election.
 
If you want to attack and label a whole City, because a few may not have the same beliefs about sexuality...well, that just doesn't seem right.
 
There is a different kind of intolerance, Therese, that you have forgotten to mention, that has come from your buddy Ken and quite a few others.  He has been vindictive and intolerant of anyone who does not embrace homosexuality.  If a person is neutral, that's not good enough for Ken.  He spreads lies that you are hate-filled, if you weren't marching in the streets and wearing T-shirts proclaiming gay rights.  Is that fair? 
I've never said a derogatory word about him being gay in my life, have actually stood up for it, and it has come back to me over and over that he claims I have cut him down for it. He just flat out lies, to get people to feel sympathy and do what he wants.
 
You want to talk about slander, Therese?  Go to the "Truth" website, which has been run by Ken and Scotty, and you will find hundreds of examples of the most yellow-bellied slander possible.
 
If you think controversy is what is hurting your business or any other business, then you don't truly have a business mind.  The "controversy" is the truthful situations that are trying to be squashed by Marquart, Ken, and others.  They are the ones that started calling it "controversy" for political reasons, in defense, because they did not have any answers for their illegal moves.  But I can see that it would be very convenient for you to blame the so-called controversy, instead of the fact that your business just did not flourish as you would have liked.
Example:  Would you let your Bar Manager spend $200,000 on a product that didn't even exist?  Would you fire your bar manager if they did that?  If you just said, "Aw, shucks", would that make you a good business woman?
If a State licensing bureau tried to come in for over a year to inspect, and your Bar Manager wouldn't let them in; would you just pat your manager on the back and give them a bonus?
Tell the truth, Therese.
 
If you think that your business is any more important or special than any other in town, then you are an ego-maniac.
 
To 4-28-2008-04:  You know darn well that it was not just a dinner and the other council members had no idea...well, not the three new ones, anyway.  Can anyone say "425, $300,000 buy-in" instead of paying the water and sewer rates?  That's a quick way to raise revenue.  And a quick way to lose future revenue, for a quick fix that the past council created the need for.
 
Get a grip on reality, for a change.

4-29-2008-01

To 4-28-04 - Are you missing the point or just ignoring it? The point of the post involving Breitung Township is that, unlike Iron Mountain, Breitung consistently chooses to be open and honest about things. I find that to be a very valid point. On the other hand, I agree with you that Ms Bujold wrote a very nice post. It’s too bad that such a nice and unique place got a bad rap just because of the clientele.

4-28-2008-04

Nice letter Therese, I agree. What is wrong with you people writeing to this site ? The city manager and the Mayor  are going to have dinner with a couple of reps from Breitinug !! So what? , They have to tell the whole city via the media or at a council meeting that there having a dinner together? It happens all the time, Tell me what is legally, ethically or morally wrong with that?


4-28-2008-03

You know, as an isolated incident, the situation brought forth in post 4-28-2008-02 isn’t so bad. But, criminy, can’t they ever do ANYTHING openly and honestly? If it involves Marquart, past experience says you can bet it’s not come innocent little dinner date. I am so tired of having to watch every single thing the manager does.   Even harder when he's (and Vanlaanen) not telling anyone what he's doing on our behalf.  It shouldn’t have to be that way.

4-28-2008-02

It seems that the Breitung Township Board was approached by Perry Franzoi with a request that Perry Franzoi and Denny Olson meet with Marquart and Vanlaanen for dinner. This was to have, in effect, secret discussions that affect both government entities. A motion was made at the March 10, 2008 meeting, but died for lack of support. Another motion was then made at the same meeting which drove the point home. See the Superintendent’s report section of the minutes.
 
Then, at the March 24, 2008 Breitung board meeting, the subject came up again! Again, see the Superintendent’s report.
 
I must give Mr. Franzoi great credit for bringing this up at a public meeting, as it should be. But, why bring it up at two consecutive meetings when it was so thoroughly shot down the first time? And, I have to ask, why was this never brought up at an Iron Mountain Council meeting? Were Marquart and Vanlaanen just going to attend these "dinners" without telling anyone? What gives them the right to discuss (decide?) public affairs at a private dinner setting like that? Do the other Iron Mountain Council members know about this? Remember when one of them tried to chastise Tina Peterson for "speaking for the council?" What utter hypocrisy.  
 
THANK YOU, BREITUNG TOWNSHIP.   Your great integrity in this matter shows the complete lack of it from Marquart and his puppets that we are all so fed up with.

4-28-2008-01

Hello,
 
My name is Therese (Swenski) Bujold, and I Own City Hall.  Well, at least what was City Hall for many years until I believe 1994 when the new location became where it is today.  As a bar owner, Sol Blu Lounge, located in the old City Hall,  that gives me a "joke" pass for the first sentence, correct?  This website is so heavy it needs a little lightening.  
 
What has motivated me to speak here is the anonymous, off the cuff remark by someone implying that John Marquart drinks for free at Sol Blu. Surely you are kidding.  First of all, it is illegal in this State to give drinks for free,  - check the tough laws of MI - and secondly, I only wish it was affordable for me to pay for people's drinks. (laugh)  That will become apparent below.
 
It has been nearly 5 years since my idea of building a "really nice bar" in the area as an entreprenural endeavor came to me.  This month is Sol Blu's Three Year Anniversary.  Time flies and it has surpassed the time of upstart business failing.  Bar business are even a higher percentage of failure in the 2 years than the statistics for other types of new business.  Like so many people who pondered "being their own boss" but not being able to figure out just what to take on,  I thought to myself, "what does this area need, what would succeed due to the business' uniqueness to the area, and very importantly, with a general population large enough to support it?"  Then time to mull over where to put it.  The first idea was to purchase the now non-existant bar in Spread Eagle  that had so many names over the years. Alot of you remember it as the Mark IV, then Pugzy's.  Make it geared to the Menominee River residential community that has grown so fast was the idea for the niche there. Have a bar AND restaurant for a boating destination.  After looking at it twice, doing my homework with the WI DNR and finding out the included 59' of river frontage only will allow one dock in Wisconsin (commercial or residential) that was scrapped. That along with the state of the structure itself made it obvious that wouldn't do.
 
Next building up was that was the O'Callahan/Payant's house, now Leeds Real Estate.  That house has a great storied history and certainly was likely several more than only those two families homes.  Moving here with my family in 1973 was the Payant era.  What Linda Plumley has done there is magnificent.  For a bar, it would not have been feasable. Unique? Yes!  But there also the parking issues.
 
There were no allegiances to where my business would be located.  Wisconsin was first!?   Where it is now was the 3rd place looked at, and when I looked at it it made perfect sense.   The City Council members and City Manager with were tickled that I chose Downtown Iron Mountain, and they have been great supporters ever since. 
 
Several individuals allowed me to see that one can build and start a community enhancing business from a 100% gutted location state.  Mary Ninomiya (Bakery Shoppe & high school friend) inspired me by doing it. My sister Camille Butsic (Vintage Sundries) inspired me.  It's been a great chapter in my life to have taken an idea and brought it where it is today. No regrets whatsoever.
 
Now, I have listed Sol Blu for sale; signed the paperwork last week for a year listing.  It is a profitable business, but in my eyes, as the general manager  who works behind the scenes, literally putting my life's equity into it is not providing enough return, to my surprise.  Truley, in my eyes, this business was a no brainer, a sudden "build it and they will come" type of epiphany.  Worked with people I grew up with and were raised here in architecture, and legal counsel;  living in Minneapolis and Lansing respectively.  Both are highly successful in their fields in "big ponds" -Tom Betti and Steve Dulan, high school friends.  Good Gawd we actually all three went to Amidon grade school when I think about it so I've known them since 2nd grade.  They left the area for college and never returned.  Of course that is an entirely different but relevant fact in itself.
 
In a town, a county divided I have found  it keeps otherwise sensible people needing to label or categorize a bar by heresay, then latch on to it.  1)"The Martini Bar."  Yes, we have a martini menu and I've advertised that, but Fontana's, our neighbor, had a martini menu on each table years before I put a martini menu on our tables. Yikes, Sol Blu's cost 50 cents more, despite the reputation of "being way to expensive to go there."  Slightly more overhead being a Commercial Condominium,  individually owned Suite type of building where annual association fees exist.  Then again, employee indoor parking is a great plus in our climate.  "Sol Blu is expensive."  I did not know $3.00 for a standard domestic beer was expensive?  When I opened it was 25 cents more than the only other area popular area bar I took the time to check with, with very little effort put in to make it a bar that had anything different or better quality that every other cookie cutter tavern in the area and northern Wi.   House wine is a better quality wine (but priced the same ) than what all the area bars and restaraunts serve as house wine.  Variety of good 'ol Beer is far more than local taverns and as much, usually much more liquor selection than any bar or country club in the area that I am aware of.  But the "1)" name somehow sticks.
 
Another label  (that I am aware is not to be discussed or THE WORD used on this site)  is one that I have personally heard many times from complete strangers when they learn that I am the owner of Sol Blu in conversataion.  "That's what I've heard" is always the quote.  Always heresay.  I've also found that as individuals, people speaking "have no problem" with diversity.   But 2 or more people, you get the hyuk-hyuk jokes and the Pack Mentality that changes from what they may say straight to myself or others as an individual opinion.   Sol Blu and it's employees are mature and kind enough to accept diversity, which I guess much be unique to a small town mentality if the "unspoken" label flys around.  That is quite sad, in my opinion, you shouldn't even have to think about it as BEING an issue in 2008.   I have another sister, whom I love dearly who could not feel comfortable living here and being accepted for who she is. She loves visiting her family here at least once a year, sometimes twice. Flagstaff, AZ has been her home for 17 years.  Left for college, never returned.  God Bless those who don't hate.  So many of those people faithfully attend Church on Sunday thinking that they are nullifying what they know to be true about their inner feelings of "diversity" or their own wrongdoings.  Don't they call that hypocracy?
 
In my eyes, my business would be an entertainment type of casual place like The Hard Rock Cafe, or The House of Blues.  100% unique with 21 somethings to "old" somethings,  :)  all appreciating the place.   T-shirts and jeans, fine!   Dress up or come after a formal event, no one should care!  Nothing being an issue in whether you are comfortable there or not.  It is not a formal atmosphere in the traditional sense!   It is modern decor,  with historic brick walls, gritty original iron vault, heavy iron chairs and table legs custom welded locally.  Hardly the Grand Hotel.  Again, a Label of 'no sweatshirts or hats are welcome' was started by someone (competition perhaps?) and people latch onto it. 
 
It doesn't look like I'll be franchising, ala House of Blues or Hard Rock Cafe,  :-) but I've heard from more than one in and out of towner that I should consider it.  Many out of towners visiting realatives or here on business are agog  that such a place exists here.  "Wow, this reminds of this place in New Orleans I go to,"   "This reminds me of a place I went to in England."  But our town is a Town Divided and many times wrought with controversy (previous to the current city council and manager, actually)   that hinders any sort of new economic growth, support from the community  whether Downtown, Southside, Northside, wherever.  Just two weeks ago a small restaurant owner from Escanaba was astounded-- there's nothing like Sol Blu in Esky there and he couldn't believe the place wasn't wall to wall.  I wish I could airlift my business.
 
Look at Bay West College.  People fought it tooth and nail and I smile everytime I ride by that full parking lot.
 
After a year's listing, If I do not find an acceptable offer, I am seriously will think of changing the entire interior style, business name, everything.  Something that suits the masses.  Of course I won't reveal that, as someone might beat me to it. ;-)
 
Back to another issue in addressing this site.  I grew up and went to high school with Cindy Tousignant also. She's a great freind; a great person.  After college she moved to Portland, OR, then Austin,TX and landed "back home" because she loves her waterfront living.  It's where her ancestors literally walked and that means alot to her.  I've listed my business with Maddy  (Cindy's leaving for greener more peaceful locales soon.)  I sincerely hope that small town "since childhood"  freindship, association, doesn't raise absurd specualation, such as I've read here about others.  Growing up in a small town, you can't NOT have associations with each other.  We are individuals and should act and be treated as such.
 
Never would I toot my own horn about the warmth of Sol Blu  (which exists in large part simply due to the building/space itself)  but now when selling, why not voice an Iron Mountain Downtown Business Owner's opinions at a site in response to a slanderous statement made by someone who's angry and may want to drag anyone such as myself into the fray.
 
My bar and the rest of the space westward in the building is all vacant. Good 'ol Gleason's that everyone loved and shakes their head as to wonder why it sits empty.  What a shame it has not been sold and reopened.  An empty gutted Suite the same size as Sol Blu sits between.  It all can be interconnected easily.  I'd be open to a joint venture type facility that would preserve the town's history should I not sell for my price after the year listing.  Wedding receptions, banquets ect., ala the now lost Premeire Center.   Iron Mountain is one Venue down now for these occasions.  Lost revenue, lost tax base.  Maybe I'll call another old classmate and 8th grade boyfreind  :-)  with connections, Bobby Mariucci.  Steve's been in recently.  What the heck.  Revive the best darn building in town!
 
Hopefully this will be my only posting as I gets long winded. Surely I'll think of something I forgot to mention after sending.  You don't want someone here who writes and thinks consecutively without alot of prescreening  before sending.  I think that's called a straight shooter?  Also I don't activate spel-czech. 
 
Thanks for listening!  :-)
 
Therese

4-27-2008-01

To 4-24-2008-02, 4-23-2008-02 and others:

No luck.  Sorry.  Too long.  Not the first time length has prevented the publication of my submissions to The Daily News.  We'll have to find other ways of broadening the distribution of 4|18's reflections.  Thanks for the suggestion, encouragement, and support, however.

Author, 4-18-2008-04


4-26-2008-01

When is lying O.K.?  (see post 4-18-2008-4) was a great one.  There is no justification for the long list of lies.  None.  It happens when you have a man in charge who is a compulsive liar, dedicated to deception at every turn, and who is mentally ill.  It happened in job after job he has held for over thirty years.  
 
This man has moved laterally with the cooperation of the International City Manager Association (ICMA) and in the last move, the cooperation of the Michigan Municipal League (MML) which failed to dig deep enough into his past and  listed him among the candidates for City of Iron Mountain to consider.  The city paid good money for what it thought was a good screening service.  It got John Marquart.
 
Lying happens when you get a mayor with a narrow, maniacal obsession with with a vital   downtown focus and a "to hell with the residents mindset.  He is a spoiled child who has accomplished nothing in his 40 some years of living. 
 
Lying happens when you get a council member in the contracting business with no scruples about self-dealing, and uses character assassination of opponents as his prime campaign tool. He too is a spoiled  middle-age brat with the benefit of inheritance. 
 
Lying happens when you get a council member who has grandiose ideas totally detached from reality.  His few job forays in the computer field got him fired repeatedly. He finally gave up and lets his wife support him.
 
Lying happens when a nobody gets elected basically unopposed who has moved from job to menial job for decades and starts frivolous lawsuits to the point the prosecuting attorney has to read him the riot act. He has never been in any position to make serious financial business decision, so he has no choice but to be a lap dog for others. 
 
Lying happens when a pot smoking, porno selling council member who has not had a single good idea in ten years in office, and has never run with opposition, and claims experience in office as his main reason for sitting there.
 
Lying happens when a council member gets her mother a job and then claims it was all innocent.  She spouts out bland generalities ad nauseum, but is incapable of answering a specific question
with facts or the simplest logic.
 
Lying happens when wealthy people team up with a compulsive liar to rob the city treasury of millions of dollars.
 
The voters booted out three of them in November, but those remaining four did not learn anything from those results.  Lying, combined with documentable outright malfeasance in office, in some cases possibly criminal, will leave them hanging in the wind when the recall election is held and when various investigations move forward.
 
Only with the firing of John Marquart can the healing process start.  Then he should be sued personally for the many hundred of thousands of dollars he has spent beyond his authority and for the gross negligence he has shown repeatedly in carrying out his managerial responsibilities.


4-25-2008-01

You get some really good stuff on this site sometimes.  That picture at 4-19-2008-05?  Who's the genius that put that together?  Very effective.  And I ain't talking about the tech artwork.  The content.  It speaks volumes.  It's much more than a quick, cheap laugh.  What's really scary is how naturally Marquart fits in there among the others.  Very matter-of-factly.  Yikes!  It's just plain spooky.  And it's got nothing to do with the mustache or how he looks.  We forget that most evil isn't loud and spectacular and sensational.  Evil is really mundane.  It's always there, part of the routine, boringly chipping away.  It simply insinuates itself into our lives.  It just plods along, jading and lulling us, everywhere, right under our noses, day in and day out.  Having its way with us while we stare past it, unseeing and unwitting, which of course it counts on.  Boy, that really is frightening.  Nice pic, pal.  Marquart is indeed all those other guys writ small town off the beaten path.  I'm not a morose person but your photo collection sure spoke to me.  Got me shivering and the little hairs are still standing up.  Right on.  The devil, however you define him, does work through human beings, and they show up everywhere, even in the remote small towns of America.


4-24-2008-02

Could the Author of 4-18-2008-04 please consider submitting that to the Daily News?  If not, would he/she at least consider giving permission to someone else to submit it for the Speak Out?
That post puts things in perspective, takes us back to the "real world".....while some City officials/management would have us believe that doing what is right, fiscal responsibility, morals, ethics, open government, common sense, and caring for ALL of the residents of this City is somehow old fashioned and passe`.
 
If this was in the Daily News, it would reach a larger audience and remind people of what this is really all about.  I, for one, am getting darn tired of being accused by Eden, Dan, Robyn, Jeff, and Marquart that we all "just can't accept change", we all are "looking in a rear-view mirror", we all are "against progress", and that we "get upset if we don't get things our way."
 
I have yet to hear them actually address the issues.  I have yet to hear them come up with solutions.
 
To other Cities, "normal" is being responsible and legally pursuing their goals.  To other Cities, "normal" is distributing decision-making among elected officials and not having one solitary man be in complete power.  A former council person from Dormont said that is one of the reasons Marquart was fired, besides the underhandedness; he was constantly trying to rule over them.  Remember Sally Jacobs saying it was nice to work for John Marquart when they voted him his previous bonus?
 
How did this all happen, and when will this bizarre, abnormal world in Iron Mountain finally stop?

4-24-2008-01

Let's cooperate.  Let's cooperate. Let's cooperate.  How many times have we heard that tired notion.
 
Cooperate to do what?  If the three new people cooperated with the four who have been there, and with Marquart, we'd be back where we were before the election. 
 
If the voter wanted that, they wouldn't have stomped Tousignant, Rigoni and Jacobs into ex-member oblivion.
 
You remaining four, especially the three who are up for recall, are just too dumb to realize that if you have any chance of avoiding a recall, it would be to cooperate with the new members who have brought forth all new ideas that have come up in the last four months. 
 
Remember this, the only reason three of you are there is because you weren't up for re-election, not because of your performance.  Keep listening to Last Place Kenny and Marquart.  That will only move your chances of being recalled from 90% to 100%.


4-23-2008-02

Read 4-18-2008-04.  That article is the best ever submitted to this site.  No doubt the longest also.  But it's great.  Truly great.  Gets to the heart of things and expresses what so many of us have felt and couldn't find the words for.  Hits the nail right on the head.  All the more so when you go visit all the physical proof and witnesses and victims that support all of the items.  Wrongdoing.  Its volume, its constancy in Iron Mountain.  That the mess afflicting us is not political disagreement.  It's outright immorality among our city's leaders -- and we're complacently, apathetically, expediently letting them get away with it.  Ouch.  Wanna be a good person, good Christian (or Jew or Muslim or Buddhist etc.), a good citizen, a good example to your kids?  Take the time to go read that article.  Startles you, wakes you up, makes you take a hard look.  It looks long but it's quick, riveting, well-written, and worthwhile.  Take the time.  To its writer: thank you.


4-23-2008-01

Dear 4-22-2008-01:

Let me elaborate a little.  Overall I'm inclined to agree with you.  That's the anger, bitterness, and righteousness in me talking.  But I'm convinced that there are some good-intentioned players who still don't realize that they've been duped and are being used.  Hence, the "Heads up!" and opportunity to get on the right side of all this in the immediate future, before it's too late.  Besides, Marquart and the others have already claimed far too many victims with their escapades the last four years.  I see no reason for them to claim more through simple association and our impatience.  Because they don't do it doesn't mean that we shouldn't still discriminate keenly among the players and continue to take the high road.

Like you, I believe they should throw the book at Marquart and at his closest collaborators and active offenders such as a couple of particularly egregious recent council members, some current ones whose behavior and stubbornness increasingly implicate them, associated and involved city officials hired by Marquart, and supportive and involved business interests for whom and with whom Marquart and his political cronies are directly if often covertly working.

Others, however, both in and out of the city machinery, are players who I believe Marquart and his most closely involved associates duped, conned, and scammed, seizing upon prospective legitimate projects and enterprises and shrewdly but darkly manipulating them to their advantage, so that these politicians and local business magnates might personally and professionally gain.  Please: just follow the money.  Every single time.  And no matter how circuitous they make it.  In the end, who profits?

One example of a well-intentioned player and a project being perverted for others' gain may be Steve Mariucci and what has become of his originally proposed convention center since the city became involved.  The way that's been handled outside procedure, against laws, and with money already changing hands, a great deal of it from the city's treasury and into private coffers.  It's nearly impossible for me to believe Mariucci is crooked.  For one thing, it's against his nature.  For another, he doesn't have to be.  But Steve and this project are perfect marks for Marquart, real estate interests, contracting interests, and other entrenched business interests in Iron Mountain.  He may be like I and others were last fall.  And as we remain today.  It's very difficult to believe, and even harder to swallow, even as we see, hear, touch, taste, and smell the evidence, that lifelong friends and other acquaintances in this town, whom we always trusted, looked us in the eye and lied to us with the sincerity and earnestness of a parent or a parish priest, convincing us to put ourselves in Marquart and the council's hands, doing so for their gain, and doing so without the least concern over the risk at which they were putting us, our families, our reputations, and our livelihoods.

They should've known better than to screw their friends.  Did they think this wouldn't come around?  Did they think they were invulnerable; that no one else had money, connections, and influence; that the world and its workings were no larger than Iron Mountain, Michigan?

Granted, I think Marquart and his tight little political and business coterie should burn in Hell for this, but, again, the innocent, the well-intentioned, the marginal, and the genuinely duped should not be damned merely by association, but given a warning and subsequent opportunity to get on the right side of these issues before the hammer falls.  Of course, if they choose not to ... Well, amen to that, too.  At least they had a shot.  Let's face it: some people are too blind to see the writing on the wall or too stupid to understand it.  And others, in the end, would simply rather be wrong their way than right somebody else's way.  O.K.  So be it and let the hammer fall.


4-22-2008-02

Reference Post 4-21-2008-02

It all starts with you!


4-22-2008-01

Three recent posts have started a wave of public rage like seen nothing for years around here.  I've never seen people so outraged - and it hasn't made The Daily News yet. They don't have a full time investigative reporter. They'll need one soon enough.  Refer to:
 
Post 4-17-2008-02 - BREAKING NEWS

Post 4-18-2008-04 - When did lying become OK

Post 4-20-2008-01 - THE GRAND SCHEME FALLING APART.
 
The best part is that all of this is documented on paper or stated by John Mar quart in public at official meetings.  There are plenty of witnesses.
 
I liked a very recent post 4-28-2008-01 telling people to distance themselves from Marquart, but I hope they don't.  When the paddy wagon rounds them up, let the prosecutors and judges decide who is culpable. I can count at least ten, maybe fifteen, who could come down under the hammer.
 
Former council members, some current council members, the culprits in the caper to literally steal TIFA money, other behind the scene players, and, of course, the center of the tornado, the mustached one, are in for more than a slap on the wrist.  Some council members may claim stupidity, (which would be true) but that defense has never gone over too well.
 
By the way, when is the investigation the council voted on a few meetings ago going to start.  The one on the $200,000 reassessment rip off.  Hopefully, former assessor Rich Brook will find himself deeply embroiled in that one.
 
The Daily News, Frog Country, Channel 6 and other media should be prepared to reserve plenty of space and/or time.  When the warrants, subpoenas and depositions start flying, they'll need it.
 
Marquart got fired in two of his last three jobs and moved on.  This time, he may find himself in somewhat more cramped quarters when he leaves Iron Mountain, and the pay will be a lot less as well. 
 
Let's see how much his rich buddies will put up for his defense.
 
To the Dickinson County Board of Commissioners:  START PAYING ATTENTION. You've got a lot riding on this, too.  Remember what Marquart tried to pull off on you on the TIFA capture issue recently. This one involves a lot more money than that one.


4-21-2008-02

With all of the bickering and words exchanges on all of the "TOPICS" of the day everyone appears to have the attitude that the city or any city owes them more than they actually do and that they themselves are not responsible for anything or any work. This quote, albeit altered for the circumstances, is the most important thing we can say "Ask not what your city can do for you, ask what YOU can do for your city" Put down your poison words and roll up your sleeves and actually do something to help your city, your neighbors and yourselves. This site and its opposing one do nothing to actually help, just complaining about things is not really action. Recalls, poison letters are really not action, cleaning a sidewalk...for your neighbor, raking a yard for the elderly person down the street, helping a neighbor paint their house because they can't afford to hire someone, hauling someones rubbish who doesnt have a vehicle, raking a baseball field THESE are actions that actually make the city a better place to live. Lets all start making the city better by changing what each of us does, not trying to change others.


4-21-2008-01

Distance yourselves from John Marquart and his closest cronies and working associates, inside City Hall and out.  Time is short.  Do it now.  This includes you, pardon me, the gullible and duped city officials, elected and unelected, past and present, and other unwitting supporters and collaborators who Mr. Marquart has been cultivating, using, and leading on for years, and to whom he has been less than forthright -- yes, even to you -- about what is actually going on and the gamut of investigations he and his closest handful of local associates are facing.  Perhaps even not all of those associates are fully aware of the city manager's web of complexities, intrigues, and divisive small alliances to which he can resort even among and against his cronies -- individually, Mr. Marquart plays it close to the vest with everyone.  For years and to this day, he attempts to set up everything he does to deflect blame from himself in the end and onto you should his house of cards collapse.

You do not want to be around when the federal prosecutor, on behalf of the Justice Department and a collection of other federal departments and agencies, and in conjunction with similar departments and agencies of other states and municipalities, drops the hammer on this man and his small Iron Mountain bunch at the heart of the city's finance and control.  Simply, it has always been a matter of following the money and watching the city government leverage its treasury to create windfall profits and other expensive benefits for select private businesses and individuals.   Everything else has been ego, pride, and camouflage.  Mr. Marquart, apparently, was not the person to put in charge of such an operation if success was its goal.  His reach has always exceeded his grasp.  Which we will all soon learn in great detail.  And which reflects on the person(s) who chose him and on whom the hammer will also drop soundly and justly.  The charges will be much more serious than you can imagine and have been led to believe, and, slow-moving as the law can be, its representatives are so close that you can smell the ink on their warrants and the detergent in their orange prison jumpsuits.  Jump ship A.S.A.P.  Distance yourselves now.  And persuade your pals in a similar position to do likewise.  Delay and -- bang! -- you're in front of an unhappy and unforgiving judge and jury before you know what hit you.  Therefore, pooh-pooh and dismiss this warning at your own peril.


4-20-2008-02

All the stuff that is happening in this city I am surprised the state has gotten wind of it and start its own investigation. Sounds like misappropriation of funds among some of the city officials.


4-20-2008-01

THE GRAND SCHEME FALLING APART

 
The Grand Scheme is finally unraveling.  The multi-million dollar heist of the City of Iron Mountain is falling apart right before the eyes of the perpetrators. 
 
A lengthening list of scheming participants is falling into place.  So big was the scheme that it could have sent the City of Iron Mountain into bankruptcy.
 
In on  this attempted theft are many so-called prominent and some not so prominent  local people.  Millions of taxpayer dollars were riding on the outcome. 
 
What started out as a highly-touted Convention Center with a large attached motel, a restaurant, a mini-mall, possible condominium housing and more has turned into a scheme to steal millions of dollars from TIFA and the taxpayers of Iron Mountain. 
 
A 1,200 capacity Convention Center was never a viable business model.  It could never be a profitable business.  Steve Mariucci and Bruce Varda should have figured this out very early in their analysis.  The market is not there no matter how large a circle you draw from Iron Mountain, 100 miles or 1000 miles.  Sure, you will get some groups.  Some may quite large.
There are 365 days in every year.  Even a dozen or more large conventions a year could never make the operation profitable.
 
Then the scheming starts.  What if they can buy the land at far less than anybody else.  How is this possible.  Enter JOHN  MARQUART.  He will convince the TIFA Board to sell the Khoury property to them for $300,000 less than they paid for it.  He will also convince TIFA to buy the railroad property for $800,000 and sell it to them for $200,000.  TIFA takes $900,000 LOSS.
 
It gets worse.  TIFA will be talked into building a $2,000,000 road with water and sewer lines through the property.  The land for the road will be generously donated for this purpose.
 
At this point, TIFA would have  invested $2,900,000 minus the $780,00 they received for the sale of the land, or a net investment of $2, 120,000 and own NOTHING.  Marquart then budgets another $800,000 of TIFA money for a free parking lot for the Convention Center.
 
Now, TIFA has $2,980,000 invested and owns NOTHING. At this point, TIFA is broke.
 
The investment group including Mariucci, Varda and others would have close to 30 acres of land  with valuable water and sewer installed road frontage and a free parking lot that would be owned by the city, all for an investment of $782,000.  At this point, they would announce that the projected Convention Center is not viable and put up a smaller version at a far smaller investment.
 
The big money would be made in selling the large tract of land.  Who would they hire as the exclusive real estate agency?   Hmmm!!!  Who handed in the lawsuit filed to throw out the recall language?  It's a known fact it was Ken Tousignant.
 
Didn't Steve Mariucci call two local residents involved in the recall and implore them to stop the recall?  Did Marquart convince him the TIFA Board was a slam dunk and he has, at least for now, a 4-3- guaranteed votes on the city council.
 
Why have their been evening meetings after business hours at Moose-Jackson, operated by council member Eden Caudell with Ken Tousignant, Jeff Van Laanen, and, yes, former council member Doug Rigoni and John Fortier, principals at Bacco Construction.
 
Who is really paying for the high-powered Detroit law firm at hundred of dollars per hour to stop the recall of Robin Tchokreff, Dan Burke and Eden Caudell.  It certainly isn't the three being recalled. 
 
What is the real motive in preventing or stalling a recall?  Marquart has proposed $400,000 in the TIFA budget for water and sewer lines along the proposed Hydraulic Falls Road to the railroad tracks.  Then the sewer line is stubbed off and not used.  Shortly beyond the railroad lines in a large chunk of property owned by Bacco, most of it in Breitung Township.
 
Add that $400,000 to the $2,980,000 for the Mariucci-Varda project and you have $3,380,000 of TIFA money disappearing for TWO parties and nothing for anything else. And TIFA is then broke.
 
Yes, there is a HUGE incentive to stop the recall and spend $10,000 or $50,000 if needed.
It's penuts compared to the rewards for the TWO parties, and possible real estate commissions for a third party.
 
Let's hope the public outrage snuffs these schemes quickly.  Who knows exactly what incentive Marquart has in all this, but based on his past record, it is more than a free drink at Sol Blue.

4-19-2008-05

Here's a subtle dig.  Do any of the local political sites take editorial photos?  A la cartoons?  Dry, deadpan humor?  For the forums or elsewhere.  Seems I saw some last fall before the election.  I'll attach and embed the file to make sure a copy arrives.  Everything is part of the one photo, text and pix.



4-19-2008-04

To the three council members facing a recall:
 
Your defense strategy seems to be nothing but getting the citizens to believe this is only about bickering with the new council members. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Tchokreff, Burke, and Caudell, you have let the city manager spend money wildly and irresponsibly, and with no oversight for the two and a half years you have been in office. Many City funds are alarmingly depleted because of your complete lack of oversight. One has only to look at the new proposed budget to see how badly our City has been victimized in the last four years. The City is close to financial ruin due to the past four years of mismanagement.
 
The disturbing things is, there were more than enough reasons for a recall before the new budget proposal exposed just how badly you three have mis-managed our tax dollars. This is not about bickering. This is about saving our City from ruin. You three were confronted with loads of documentation exposing how badly our City has been run into the ground by city manager John Marquart. Instead of firing him, you voted to give him a bonus. Why?
 
Why have you aligned yourselves with Ken Tousignant, who was voted out by an embarrassing margin?  Everyone knows he dropped off your appeals at the court
house. Why, too, are you not defending yourselves against the recall charges? Why are you trying so hardly to make this into nothing more than a case of infighting on the council? Are things so blatant that you cannot even defend yourselves? Thankfully, it’s not working as well as you had hoped. Nearly eight hundred citizens have signed on to the recall petitions at this writing.
 
We have had enough. To Tchokreff, Burke, and Caudell, I say stop wasting even more tax dollars in your fight against the will of the people. Drop this ridiculous appeal and let the people decide. We don’t believe that driving the City into receivership it what is best for us, and that is where you are taking us.

4-19-2008-03

The question of what happened in or around the 1950's to the condition of Crystal Lake raised in the April 17th Daily News article will likely be explained in the Sundberg, Carlson & Associate study referenced in the previous post. The condition of the Lake would have been impacted by the construction of the Iron Mountain-Kingsford sewage treatment facility in the early 1950's and the construction of a storm water separation project in the late 1950's which discharged to Crystal Lake. The construction of the sewage treatment facility resulted in termination of the surface outflow from the Lake known as "Sewer Creek". Leading up to these events, the termination of pumping ground water from the Chapin Mine would have been a significant event related to water quality.

4-19-2008-02

After reading the April 17, 2008 article in the Daily News I was wondering if the extensive hydrogeological study conducted by Sundberg, Carlson & Associates in the early 1990's was utilized in conducting the current evaluation. The earlier study was done in conjunction with the MDEQ permitting process in advance of the storm water separation project constructed in 1995 and included aerial photos and mapping of Crystal Lake which illustrated the evolution of the Lake over time. Soil boring data and water quality analysis were also included. The parameters involved in this type of study are similar and it would be interesting to compare the results of the current and prior study in determining changes in the Lake, if any, which may have occurred since the early 1990's. If the earlier study has not been incorporated and there is an interest in reviewing the data, STS Consultants which acquired Sundberg, Carlson & Associates may be a useful resource. If the earlier study has been incorporated, a comparative analysis would be helpful in understanding the evolution of Crystal Lake.

4-19-2008-01

Just a note about all the trails that we are hearing about being proposed for various parts of the Iron Mountain area: I say if you are seriously going through with them, then hurry! We’re going to need some good trails to walk on. Before long the roads and alleys will be impossible to drive on!

4-18-2008-05

Is there no limit to the scheming John Marquart will go to in lining his friend's pockets - and his own. 
 
Why else would he give away three million of taxpayers money.  There cannot be any other reason except stupidity and he is not stupid.  Just evil and conniving.


4-18-2008-04

When did lying become O.K.?

Not fibbing.  Not hedging.  Outright, pathological lying.  When did that become O.K.?

When did cheating and routine lawbreaking become O.K?

When did ignorance of and within your job become O.K.?

When did unauthorized spending of city funds become O.K.?

When did the whimsical personal manipulation of state grants, to the point of lawbreaking and/or having them rescinded by the state, become O.K.?

When did unauthorized city hiring, contracting, and other behavior become O.K.?

When did unauthorized pollution and threats to public safety become O.K.?

When did coverups become O.K.?

When did openly and gratuitously provocative behavior that invites undesirable, expensive, and likely unwinnable lawsuits become O.K.?

When did the city's unauthorized, unlawful, manipulative, and publicly undisclosed purchase of poisoned private land at great expense to the taxpayers and for the financial benefit of only private parties become O.K.?

When did bad advice, spun from whole cloth and completely unfounded, become O.K.?

When did the whimsical sacking of TIFA become O.K.?

When did ignoring citizens' serious emergency problems caused by the city become O.K.?

When did bullying, abuse, and intimidation by city officials of employees, peers, and the people those city officials represent and work for become O.K.?

When did ignoring, absolutely and without exception, approaches by current and prospective businesses of all sizes and types become O.K.?

When did the arrogance toward and the inability and unpleasantness of working effectively with neighboring municipalities and greater jurisdictions become O.K.?

When did government by manipulation of the media's local message become O.K.?

When did it become O.K. to replace information with propaganda, civic accomplishment with mere words?  The voters replaced the former mayor and some Council members recently in large part for those reasons.  Why is it O.K. for the remaining veteran Council members and the city management to still behave in this manner?

When did absolute unresponsiveness to the people you work with, represent, and work for become O.K.?

When did management's insubordination towards selected Council members become O.K.?

When did spitefulness and revenge become O.K. against a citizen or city official because that person opposed a city-management official or publicly, incontrovertibly illustrated that that city-management official was incorrect, inept, dishonest, or behaving illegally, immorally, or injuriously?  When did such juvenile spitefulness as turning off a family's water in midwinter become O.K.?  What kind of man does that?

When did openly and knowingly breaking city and state law, regularly, become O.K.?

When did it become O.K. to ignore months of governmental and corporate notice after notice and then, after it's too late, procrastinate for months while train horns horribly disturbed the peace for nearly half the city's resident and business population including businesses, private residences, hotels, and hospitals at the most unhealthy and inopportune times of day and night?

When did it become O.K. to disassemble a city, almost literally take it apart, progressively running it into the ground by routine incompetence and consistent wrongdoing?

When did it become O.K. to choose bureacracy, red tape, and obfuscation over transparency, common sense, and effectiveness?

Comic as it may be, when did it become O.K. to literally run out one door of City Hall and jump in your car and drive away when you saw an individual or a party you didn't want to meet or deal with, even on legitimate city business, coming in another door?  Sort of raises yet more questions about mental health, doesn't it?

When did examples of gauche, distasteful, adult public behavior at public civic events become O.K.?

When did taking advantage of, exploiting, victimizing, and generally working the system for one's own benefit become O.K.?  For example, like spending more than three or four times what was reasonable or necessary on travel expenses.  And always finding an excuse to travel, despite a trip's usual fruitlessness.  When did that become O.K.?

When did all of these types of behavior, of which Iron Mountain's city manager John Marquart is publicly guilty, become O.K.?

When did it become O.K. to ignore the public record, to overlook proof, to overlook material, legal documentation?

When did it become O.K. to offer (and to accept) gossip and spin and cherry-picked facts over the factuality, truth, completeness, and provability of the entire story?

When did openly raping and pillaging a city and then daring the population to do something about it become O.K.?

When did it become O.K. to take loud public credit for another person's years of hard work, efforts, and public achievement?

When did it become O.K. to blame one or more persons for mistakes you made, provably, and don't want to be held responsible for?

When did it become O.K. to choose complacency, apathy, expedience, and convenience over doing what's right and following the law?

When did it become O.K. to use public office for private interests?

When did it become O.K. to put financial concerns ahead of human safety?

When did it become O.K. to promise the voters the moon until after you got the voting results you wanted, then fail to effect what you promised to the tune of currently jeopardizing the city's insurance rates and safety standards, the citizens' property insurance, losing an expensive lawsuit, paying $23,000 in state fines, and facing another $200,000 in state fines in the immediate future for still failing to effect the law that you promised and must, by state law, enforce?

When did it become O.K. to reward a city-management employee financially, and generously, for doing his job poorly and often not at all?

When did it become O.K. to look the other way or bury one's head in the sand to avoid the discomfort of choosing to behave properly, to behave responsibly?

When did it become O.K. not to hold wrongdoers responsible?

When did it become O.K. not to hold wrongdoers accountable?

When did it become O.K. to pay $200,000 for a city-wide assessment that, in effect, has never happened?

Where's that $200,000?

When did it become O.K. for a Council member not to exercise one's responsibility of oversight and not to supervise city-management employees, but instead to trust them absolutely on blind faith, with great laziness and without a shred of evidence?  How is the Council member governing when behaving that way?  How is he or she being accountable and holding up his or her end of the Council's covenant with the voting public?  How and when did that Council member's negligence become O.K.?

When did it become O.K. to wink, nod, say "Aw, shucks," turn into a bleeding heart and let wrongdoers go unpunished, let wrongdoers continue to do wrong?

When did it become O.K. not to recognize but even to accept and praise incompetence at every turn?  When on Earth did that become O.K.?

When did it become O.K. to arrange that the city and most of its ordinary working stiffs pick up the tab for the city's major businesses and their projects?

When did it become O.K. to hire and support a city manager that primarily spends his days striving to support the city's rich at the expense of the city's other 99%?

When did corporate welfare become O.K. in Iron Mountain?

When did it become O.K. for Council  members Daniel Burke, Eden Caudell, Robin Tchokreff, and Jeffrey VanLaanen to subscribe to all this behavior and to support and encourage it from John Marquart?

How is it O.K. that the former mayor, Kenneth Tousignant, is soundly defeated twice in recent months, the ninth of nine candidates each time, that sympathizers and allies of his are also defeated, yet those Council members who were not up for re-election today parrot Mr. Tousignant's political verbiage exactly, and that for all intents and purposes they are Mr. Tousignant politically, still running the Council and the city as their small private club and personal treasury, despite the voting public's obvious and overwhelmingly contrary sentiment?  How is that O.K.?

In other words, regarding all these items, when did wrongdoing become O.K.?

It's become a habit.  We regularly accept and exercise wrongdoing now as casually and matter-of-factly as breathing, eating, speaking.  When did this become O.K.?

When questioned about all this wrongdoing, John Marquart and Jeff VanLaanen and Robin Tchokreff and Eden Caudell and Dan Burke don't deny it.  How can they?  The preponderance of proof, of documentary evidence, is overwhelming.  Instead, they rationalize it.  They excuse it.  They arrogantly and derisively scoff at any opposition.  They tell all comers, on the record, that the wrongdoing is necessary, that it's naive not to exercise this wrongdoing in order to govern the city.

Naive?  Fine.  John, Jeff, Robin, Eden, Dan -- does this make you feel savvy?  Un-naive?  Like big shots?  Like real movers and shakers?  Politicians extraordinare?

Look.  We know better.  From Washington to Lansing to Iron Mountain.  Within any government.  Wrongdoing is not a useful tool.  It is not the right hand of God.  We know whose right hand it is.  And we know the ultimate effects of wrongdoing.  There's nothing good in those consequences when they finally arrive.

Naive?  Who is naive?  Any persons who believe that wrongdoing is effective and proper behavior for government, politics, and anything else are the ones who are naive.

I challenge any moral, intelligent, and right-thinking person to argue against that statement and expect to win.  And as evidence we need look no further than the current condition of Iron Mountain and its precipitous deterioration to this point over the past four years.  This city is worsening daily by every measure, by every standard.  Its standard of living is sinking, its quality of life is dropping.  John Marquart, Jeff VanLaanen, Robin Tchokreff, Eden Caudell, and Dan Burke celebrate it.  Yes, they do everything they can to direct your attention from this deterioration, and they and their supporters exploit it and celebrate it.  When did that become O.K.?

When did we all become so disconnected and gullible that when these people, without a shred of evidence, and with reams of evidence against them, say that their words are absolutely true, we believe them?  And, for goodness' sake, when the heck did that become O.K.?  No wonder concerned citizens are pursuing a recall.

When did all this wrongdoing become O.K.?

It didn't.

And I'd venture to say that it's time, right this moment, for the citizens of Iron Mountain to stiffen their resolve and do something about it.  Right this moment.  Because what's going on is definitely not O.K.


4-18-2008-03

The Americans with Disabilities Act requires a clear, unobstructed path at least three feet wide. That's the minimum. I've read ordinances in some cities that require much more. In downtown Iron Mountain, there are several businesses which place portable signs at their convenience. Perhaps they ought to get out there with a measuring device and check to see if they are allowing the required 36 inches for people with disabilities to pass.

A wheelchair requires a minimum of three feet in width to pass by. I cannot even imagine a blind person trying to motivate those sidewalks with a cane. Iron Mountain's Café ordinance requires the three feet accessibility clearance; so why aren't these other businesses required to comply. It seems these signs are placed without regard for pedestrians. Some days they might meet the requirement; while other days, I doubt it.  If I were to be walking arm-in-arm with a blind friend, there are places where I'm afraid that I would have to release her arm, or step into the street to get around a sign in the middle of a sidewalk.
 
No, I haven't gotten out and measured for myself. As a somewhat disabled person myself, with several friends who are profoundly disabled, I just avoid downtown. I have little doubt that many travelers will do the same as they see the growing number of obstacles along our downtown. Because we don't have street parking, visitors are already aware that they will likely have to find a parking spot and walk from store to store. Let's not make that look like a further hindrance. Is this how downtown businesses want travelers on the highway to view them? Is this how they show concern for people with disabilities? Don't forget that we have the only Veterans Hospital in the Upper Peninsula. Many of those veterans are disabled. Is this how we want to show them, and their families, that we appreciate their service… by making our city inaccessible?
 
I implore every business person, whether you have a sign out or not, to work at making Iron Mountain a welcoming city to EVERYONE. And, to every council person, whether old or new to the council, get out there and make sure our city is in compliance with The Americans with Disabilities Act. And while you're at it… check the measurements on either side of those stone planters that the City placed on the sidewalks of "A" Street, near City Hall.

4-18-2008-02

The $3,000,000 of TIFA money that the City Manager proposed spending for the benefit of a couple of privileged people should be published as widely as possible, including The Daily News and all radio stations.

Enough of this crap.  No money for necessities, but handouts for parking lots and kickbacks for property totaling $900,000 is not just outrageous, it is very possibly criminal. 
 
The Dickinson County Board should be keeping a sharp eye on all this because they are losing around $400,000 a year to TIFA captures.


4-18-2008-01

After reading the Chief Financial Officer's letter and the  very informative post called BREAKING NEWS, I have no doubt that the lawsuit being filed by the three council members being recalled is being financed by those who have their hands deep in the city pockets.
 
That's a pretty short list.  These so-called prominent people who have plenty of money are part of the sleaze and greed that's permeating our society. They don't give a damn about the citizens of Iron Mountain, and neither does their henchman, Marquart. 
 
I hope the TIFA board slams down the whole scam that Marquart and his rich buddies are trying to
ram through.  The city doesn't have money for fuel and repair costs in the DPW but Marquart proposes blowing $3,000,000 of TIFA money.  This guy is either insane or on the take.  Either way, he has to go - right now.


4-17-2008-04

Here is the letter Carol Bartolameolli included in the proposed budget warning the council of the true condition of the city.  Note the highlighted words in the next to the last sentence.

2008-2009 Budget Letter


4-17-2008-03

   I personally don't feel the location is the best place for a convention center, but I did some checking around the state with various clubs and found the Am Legion, VFW, AmVets, Elks, the DAV would love to have a state convention up here, i.e., the crime rate is lower, the price of meals would be lower and the cost of a room would be one third or less. The crime situation at places like Milwaukee, Detroit, Flint, even Racine WI is bad. We might have some problems here but don't under estimate a state convention of a lot of different organizations would surely make it worth while.


4-17-2008-02

BREAKING NEWS

 

Be thankful that the TIFA Board has a lot common sense.  Below is the budget the City Manager presented to the TIFA Board at the meeting of April 15, 2008.  No commentary or further explanation was furnished.

 

Many questions followed.  What is the $400,000 for the Hydraulic Falls Road all about? TIFA thought there was a grant for it.  Marquart explained it was for water and sewer lines from the highway to the railroad tracks.  The sewer would be stubbed off at the tracks.  He did not explain the need for a water line.  The stubbed line would be very close to acreage owned by Bacco, but almost all of it is in Breitung Township and is not part of any annexed 425 district.  Bacco would be getting $400,000 of improvements very near their property that would be of no economic value to the City of Iron Mountain but would be of substantial economic value to Bacco if they got it and saved $400,000.  What city manager would make such a suggestion and spend $400,000 of taxpayers’ money when the economic benefit is zero?  Good question for John Marquart.

 

 
 

 

 

 

6/1/2008

 

6/1/2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

to

 

to

 

 

 

 

 

 

6/1/2009

 

6/1/2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hydraulic Falls Rd.

 

    400,000.00

 

 

 

 

 

Bellagamba Rd. Extension

      25,000.00

 

 

 

 

 

System Control

 

    250,000.00

 

 

 

 

   (1)

Land Acquisition/Public Improv.

 1,620,000.00