|
IronMountainIssues.org |
||||
|
||||
|
September 2007 Postings 9-30-2007-04 Dear Readers: Entirely aside from and unrelated to the ongoing political campaigning in Iron Mountain and elsewhere, our group is a corporate practice that represents many gay individuals and organizations and monitors gay/anti-gay media activity. We have an exhaustive index and are aware, or thought we were, of every Web site in and around Iron Mountain, Michigan. In a post dated 9-28-2007-05 at www.ironmountainissues.org, the writer stated, "The challengers are being described as anti gay, because the website they are associated with is anti gay." All of the sites of which we are aware are either neutral concerning homosexuality or are pro-gay/pro-lesbian to one extent or another. Will you kindly post the Web site to which you are referring and direct us to the evidence that defines the site itself as anti-gay so that we might add it to our watchdog list and notify other watchdog companies and organizations? We appreciate your cooperation. Thank you. Responsible Media Representation (RMR) 9-30-2007-03 Like a business? Doesn't a business exist to profit? How has Iron Mountain even remotely done the municipal equivalent of profiting under the current administration? Aren't a business's shareholders supposed to benefit? How have this city's shareholders, its owners, its citizens, benefited? When has their stock value risen? What dividends have they received? Like a business? What an unfortunate simile. What an inaccurate comparison. If you want a metaphor, try "bleeding to death." And the current management and council have only widened the wound and not done one single effective thing to stanch the flow. There's not a single shred of empirical evidence to prove otherwise, and puddles of blood in every corner of the city indicate an imminent death unless something effective is done. Pardon me for protesting, but the current Board of Directors and CEO have not done a good job, are not doing a good job. In fact, they are doing a terrible job while publicly trying to put a good face on it and withhold from the shareholders the truth of the matter. Like a business indeed. 9-30-2007-02
After reading post 9-28-2007-05, I
have an observation of my own to make. While it is true that
Truth and Issues both have opinion areas, the fact is that
Issues also has loads of documentation accessible at the click
of a button. I think that informed opinions based on actual
documentation is not even comparable to what the Truth site is
putting out. The
"I-believe-the-incumbents-because-they-said-this-or-that" method
of "documentation" is incredible. What scares me is that so
many people are willing to believe what they are saying, even
when there is REAL DOCUMENTATION readily available to counter
some of the ridiculous claims they are making.
People who form their opinion
without weighing the facts are very dangerous, and foolish,
too. That is the glaring difference between Issues and Truth.
There is nothing BUT uninformed opinion on the Truth site.
What's more, I felt I was being prodded to avoid even
seeking the real truth about City issues after reading
that site. I hope the people of this City are smarter than the
incumbents give them credit for.
9-30-2007-01
What this election seems to be about
is the landlords being to cheap to have the properties inspected
for the safety of the tenants. Most if not all cities in the US
have had rental ordinances for years. The IM property owners
will lose out in the coming election if they choose to elect the
new challengers who are only serving their own agenda and a
return to the good ol boys network. We need to continue the
progress or revert back to hooterville. We will get the
government we deserve in Iron Mountain this November. Remember
the old hospital site ? How long did that sit there looking like
a bombed out building? We had to suffer looking at that for
years because the owner wouldn't do any thing because it would
cost money.
9-29-2007-09 Reply to post 9-28-07-05 9-29-2007-08 JUST A INVITATION TO ALL 9-29-2007-07 Dear 9-28-2007-05, 9-29-2007-06
In
reference to 9-28-2007-5 in ironmountainissues web site.
To the person
who wrote the article in the above reference number and
said that I am biased and anti gay, is to distort everything I
said about the gay web site that appeared the day before the
primary and make it into another issue about this election.
I have
never been "anti gay" nor am I trying to influence anyone on how
to vote because of the web site's content.
Funny thing is, you accused all of the challengers of also being
anti-gay! Sounds to me like you have a serious identity problem!
I have several
friends who are gay and even a relative from England and
Appleton Wis and they are the best of human beings. I would help
them at a moments notice if they asked for help!
Being gay is
not a sin in and of itself, it does not make anyone a bad person
and it surely is not my right to make any judgment about another
person's sexual preference. (As the writer stated, "God will
make that judgment"
If I were
to use the same phrase as the person who said this,
"perhaps you had better worry about God's judgment for yourself,
as you distort my comments and viciously and personally
attack my spirituality and integrity in the church to further
your agenda!
I do have a
right however, as others have done, to condemn a web site that
promoted hatred, anti Christian values, slanderous remarks about
all candidates including the incumbents and challengers and
actually bordering on threats and innuendoes and thoughts
that would be enough to make any caring person angry and
concerned.
For the
record, here is a quote from my article written about
this "suddenly appearing web site" just before the
election!
“When I first
read the four hate articles on the above web site,
www.ironmountaingay.com),
I had mixed emotions. Was it someone who wrote the
articles to incite the citizens against the council incumbents,
but under the disguise of a supporter ------ was it a
mentally disturbed person (Dougie) who really believes and means
what he said or will people think it was a ploy by the
candidates who are running for office so they can discredit the
incumbents.”
Notice, ------
no blame was put on any incumbent, nor was it placed on the
challengers! It was non-accusatory to any individual, but was
condemning to it’s contents! To say that it was anti-gay is
ludicrous and vicious and serves no purpose but to try to
discredit any opponent apposed to your way of thinking!
The last
comment was as follows:
“It is time
to take back our city! This is no longer about politics, --- it
is our right and duty as a Christian to confront evil! We know
who the enemy is, ------- let us face him on Tuesday! These
words I just expressed are not about politics, or promoting a
certain candidate for election Tuesday, but they are words of
great concern and absolute truth!
Confronting
evil on Tuesday means the election will allow the voters to vote
for the candidate of your choice who you know condemns this type
of hate filled garbage and to stop this infiltration of lies,
deceit and attempts at division in this city and slanderous
remarks for personal agendas! The web site is a cesspool of
sewage!
To the person who wrote 09-28-2007 05 ---- I will not dignify any more of your lies and vicious remarks in future web site entries. If you don’t have enough guts to sign your name as I did, I will just consider the serious and personal problems you have and place you on ignore.
It is time for
challengers, incumbents and any interested citizens to stop this
viciousness and deal with the facts and what is best for this
city. Perhaps that would serve a better purpose!
The gay issue
is only here because some of you want it to be!
.
Don Christy9-29-2007-05 See 9-27-2007-05 Simply stated chlorine is a pesticide, as defined by the U.S. EPA, who’s sole purpose is to kill living organisms. When we consume water containing chlorine, it kills some part of us, destroying cells and tissue inside our body. Dr. Robert Carlson, a highly respected University of Minnesota researcher who’s work is sponsored by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, sums it up by claiming , “the chlorine problem is similar to that of air pollution”, and adds that “chlorine is the greatest crippler and killer of modern times!” http://www.ghchealth.com/chlorine-cancer-and-heart-disease.html The weight of the evidence suggests that chlorination by-products pose substantial cancer risks that should be reduced. MORE FACTS & SOURCES: DID YOU KNOW??? "Drinking tap water that is chlorinated is hazardous if not deadly to your health." HEALTHY WATER FOR LONGER LIFE - DR. MARTIN FOX "Known carcinogens are found in drinking water as a direct consequence of the practice of chlorination" MUNICIPAL ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH LAB - FRANCIS T. MAYO, DIRECTOR "Cancer risk among people drinking chlorinated water is 93% higher than among those whose water does not contain chlorine." US COUNCIL OF ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY "Chlorine is the greatest crippler and killer of modern times. While it prevented epidemics of one disease, it was creating another. Two decades ago, after the start of chlorinating our drinking water in 1904, the present epidemic of heart trouble, cancer and senility began." SAGINAW HOSPITAL - DR J.M. PRICE The National Academy of Sciences estimate that 200-1000 people die in the United States each year from cancers caused by ingesting the contaminants in water." SCIENCIES NEWS, VOLUME 130 - JANET RALOFF "The cause of atherosclerosis and resulting heart attacks and strokes is none other than the ubiquitous chlorine in our drinking water." CORONARIES/CHOLESTEROL/CHLORINE - DR. JM PRICE Chlorine gas was used despicably during WWI. When the war was over, the use of chlorine was diverted to poisoning the germs in our drinking water. All water supplies throughout the country were chlorinated. The combination of chlorine and animal fats results in atherosclerosis, heart attacks and death." WATER CAN UNDERMINE YOUR HEALTH - DR. N.W. WALKER, D.S. "48-49 states are failing to adequately enforce existing drinking water regulations." JAMES ELDER - U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY "Scientists discovered that chlorine reacted with organic material in water to produce hundreds of chemical by-products, several of which have proved in animal studies to be carcinogenic." U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT - JULY 29, 1991 "Drinking chlorinated water may as much as double the risk of bladder cancer." NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE - KENNETH CANTOR 9-29-2007-04 Regarding Item
9-28-2007-05 ... Addresses are online, the disservice of
lumping everyone together, and burying the gay issue 9-29-2007-03 I am a professional and
I have taken my profession very, very seriously for nearly 30 years.
I have served on state boards in my professional field. I know what
it is like get caught up in the ‘glory of power’ and to be in the
‘hot spot of criticism’. I have learned over the years that when I
have wronged someone it is best to own up to it and try to mend the
situation. We all make mistakes because we are human. It is nothing
to be ashamed of that we make mistakes but it is wrong to never
admit our faults. Each day I go home from my workplace and evaluate
my work and try to improve for the next day. 9-29-2007-02 In response to:
9-28-2007-05 9-29-2007-01 What is post #
9-28-2007-05 talking about when he/she refers to the webmaster
putting the Mayor's home address on this website? I can't find it
on this website. Not saying it isn't buried somewhere, but I can't
find it. 9-28-2007-06 There's no doubt in my
mind that Mike Carey (Carey Contracting, Inc.) got
involved with the upcoming election through friendship with one or
more of the candidates. He trusted what he heard, as we all tend to
do with many of our friends. 9-28-2007-05
A letter to
Ironmountainissues.org
Maybe someone can help me with these
things...
I am not sure where the information
comes from on some of the posts on this website, but it seems to
really be a completely biased effort to make the election go a
certain way.
It seems that the all of the posts
want to cut down our city council, and divide our city, and the
only way to make our city run better is to oust the current
council. Is that true?
Now that the G** (homo) concept is
banned, no one seems to care if it was ever there. That is
crazy. It was used for influence in the election process, and
is still part of the issues website. Don't try to disguise
hate. As far as what the churches say, Don Christy leads the
pack, as his pitchfork seems sharpest. God will judge him,
too. The challengers are being described as anti gay, because
the website they are associated with is anti gay.
I am sure that will be enough to get my letter rejected....
I am not sure, and would seriously
like to know, what is the change the Challengers would make...?
Is it really gong to work? How will you fund the School
Liaison, and how will you fix the roads and alleyways? Will the
downtown revival just die?
My , My, what a shame that would
be. I have seen a few really great pictures of downtown back in
the day, before I was born. I remember eating grilled cheese at
Kresge's and shopping at Ben Franklin.
Now there are once again places to
go downtown. It isn't perfect, and probably never will be, but
I like the hope that the current city council gives us all, or
at least those willing to hope and work with them....
I know Mike Carey, I think he's a
good guy. He certainly isn't as uninformed as the last poster
thinks...My opinion, just like his...
Now the
Ironmountaintruth.com
website is merely a source of information and opinion, just like
this issues site. It is operated in favor of the current city
council, because they are associated with it, just like the
challengers are associated with the
ironmountainissues.org
website.
It isn't anymore filled with lies
and slander than the other site is. They are equals in their
opinion broadcasting. That is all.
Iron Mountain's downtown did have
welcome troops signs, and that was a really cruddy low blow at
the downtown and it's merchants. Shame on you.
There is so much more, but that is
enough for now.. Wait, a little more...
I will ask the webmaster why he put
the Mayor's address on the site...that seems a little strange.
I know that people are listed in the phone book, but do all of
the challengers want their specific home address on a public
forum? I doubt it.
Progress is happening all around us,
whether we like it or not....
Let's try not to damage each other's
reputation to the point it literally affects our lives (and jobs
or future) in this town, and takes the food right out of our
mouths and away from our families.....Think about that.
9-28-2007-04 On Wednesday September 26, I attended Special Meeting of the TIFA Board and listened to Mr. Steve Mariucci as he made his presentation concerning the projects he is planning in Iron Mountain. I was very impressed. I can see a great deal of benefit to our community. The Premier Center, currently being torn down, and was the largest facility available for large groups in Iron Mountain, We will now have a convention center that will be able to hold more than twice as many people, twelve hundred, in fact, with kitchen facilities to match. If we can draw in some large conventions to the area, our other merchants will certainly benefit. An adjacent full service restaurant and a hotel are also planned. In addition, there are two more possible projects, a retail area and a senior citizens community. This is certainly what I would refer to as PROGRESS. In so many derogatory statements from the incumbents we are always accused of not being in favor of progress. That has never been true. Any city council would favor such a project. We want the benefits that are derived from such projects to be beneficial to the largest number of citizens possible, and this one certainly does that, Thank you, Mr. Mariucci, for supporting your home town in such a valuable way. Dave Farragh Candidate for City Council 9-28-2007-03
A Plea
I strongly encourage visitors to
this site to please do everything in their power to see that the
information on this site -- particularly the sound and
reasonable info that counters clearly and accurately others'
views -- reaches all of the voters in Iron Mountain and
especially all those who get the newspaper. The reach of this
site is not as great as that of the traditional types of media,
so believers of what shows up here must go the extra mile to get
the info out -- in an unobjectionable way -- that's very
important -- in an unobjectionable way -- to the city's broader
population, whether it be by flyers, word of mouth, emails,
whatever. Or just ask more people to visit this site and
patiently sift through what's here. You may even want to direct
them to particular postings. But get the word out. Please.
The web itself does not a campaign make -- it's the info on the
web that's important.
Thanks.
9-28-2007-02 Like a business? Wow. If there were qualities I always gave Mike Carey credit for, they were direct investigation, balanced judgment, and clear-eyed objectivity. He's always been a pretty pragmatic guy. You know -- let's do what works. Now I'm not so sure. Particularly in the light of so much evidence that contradicts exactly what he says. With all due respect, the last thing Iron Mountain is being run like is a successful business. My goodness! Simply compare and contrast it to a successful business! Mike! What's going on? Your business ranks among those that will most suffer and perhaps even perish if Iron Mountain continues to be run as it is. On the contrary, this city actually needs to be run like a business, professionally, not like a bunch of self-serving children huffing and puffing and playing at business, and it needs to attract and infuse private capital and those that provide it, not repel them, so that Carey Contracting and every other business already in this town can grow and prosper, not hunker in on itself, shrinking and depending on small jobs, fewer jobs, and/or dwindling government grants here and there. Indeed! This is precisely one of the major issues facing Iron Mountain and a principal point that the city-council challengers are trying to make. We're not professional and businesslike and we must make ourselves so. I respectfully request that you complete your homework regarding this, Mike. We must become professional and businesslike if we're to survive and thrive. Sorry, Mike. Normally I'm inclined to value your opinion and tilt toward your conclusion, but I couldn't disagree with you more on this issue. The evidence is public and available. Because you haven't seen or heard it on TV, radio, or in the paper yet doesn't mean that this city's current management and government hasn't been seriously inept, irresponsible, and troublingly unlawful and unethical, having gotten us all into serious and worsening trouble. Let's not pretend we're businesslike. Let's become businesslike. 9-28-2007-01 RESIDENTS
OF IRON MOUNTAIN - You are becoming a big nuisance. How many times
do you have to be told? YOUR CIVIC DUTY is to pay your taxes and
user fees and keep your mouth shut. 9-27-2007-10
My, my. What have we here? A
crusade? A clutch of revolting peasants? Um, I mean peasants who
are revolting? Hmm, still ambiguous. AH! The
"we’ve-had-it-up-to-here" type of revolting. Yes, that’s it.
Pitchforks and torches . . . tar and feathers . . . stocks and
pillories . . . 21st century style, of course. Not as
definitive as the good old days, but, there it is.
Aren’t you all the least bit
concerned for your necks if this little venture falls on its’
face? Have you all temporarily laid aside personal security in
favor of a shot at the common good? How very Ben Franklinesque. Noble
of you all to believe some sort of fairy tale outcome is
actually possible. Quaint. You even have me entertaining the
thought. Oh, heck, Down with the King!!
Percivale
9-27-2007-09 The political ad that
Mike Carey (from Carey Contracting ) states that this city is
finally being ran like a buisiness. 9-27-2007-08 I finally checked out
the Iron Mountain Truth site. My my. I was expecting something
much more, um, civilized, even a touch sophisticated -- or at
least affected and perhaps pseudo-sophisticated. It's very
disappointing. So unintelligent and gauche. I couldn't find a
single informed opinion or any reference to proof, substantiation,
or documentation of any claims made there. Some wit mentioned on
the Issues site recently that the word progress should check
in at the Caring House because of the abuse it's been taking.
Perhaps the word truth should join it. 9-27-2007-07 9-27-2007-06
Are You Proud Of
Yourselves
I came through Iron
Mountain Sunday when I met our troops coming home. I noticed
Iron Mountains "vibrant downtown" theme did not involve
signs welcoming our soldiers home. I guess they must have
thought it would make their stores look trashy.
Evidently none of their family
members put their lives on the line, so it did matter to them.
No money in their pockets.
I hope your PROUD of
yourselves.
I'll spend my money any
place but there.
Jim Ferris
9-27-2007-05 The cost of our new water system $5,000,000. The cost of safe drinking water $4.50 per case. The satisfaction of a new council priceless. "The cancer risk among people drinking chlorinated water is 93% higher than among those whose water does not contain chlorine".[1] From vendor reports Valley Chemical Inc - Chlorine June $605.39 July $543.89 August $808.58 3 Month total $ 1957.86 Used by Iron Mountain for: Contaminant Coliform Bacteria (an indicator organism for fecal coliform, streptococcal and other pathogenic bacteria.) Source sewage and animal wastes backflow or improper pipe connections in water systems improperly sealed or constructed wells Possible chronic health effects gastroenteritis, salmonella infection, dysentery, typhoid fever and cholera [1] US Council of Environmental Quality 9-27-2007-04 August 2007 Vendors Report is available: August 2007 Report Webmaster 9-27-2007-03
I am still waiting for Doug Rigoni
to actually prove that anything he has said in any of his
campaign ads is true. Innuendo doesn’t cut it with me. That
insinuation that landlords are responsible for fire deaths
rubbed me the wrong way. Why innuendo? Why not say something he
can actually back up with cold, hard, documented facts? Is that
all he has? Innuendo, but no substance to hang his hat on?
Didn’t he say in his garbage and
fire ad that we have better and cheaper fire protection? Can he
prove that with cold, hard, documented facts? What does the ISO
say about our fire protection? They are experts at determining
that. Why is the City not begging the ISO to come back and prove
their claims? What does MIOSHA say about our fire protection?
They, too, are experts on safety. Oh yeah, it’s none of MIOSHA’s
business, according to John Marquart. He said that three times
in one news article.
Why did the city give money to the
sewage back up victim if they were immune? What a foolish claim;
it only made him look irresponsible with our tax dollars.
Finally, why is he the only
incumbent who at least has the guts to campaign in public?
Even if he continues to shoot himself in the foot over and over,
at least he is not trying to sneak through the back door with an
obscure website obviously running on innuendo and outright
lies. He sure is spending a lot of money for a $500 a year
job. Why?
9-27-2007-02 I couldn't agree more
with 9-26-2007-03 and 9-25-2007-04. Finally, someone is hitting the
nail on the head with the broader, all-encompassing issue. Enough
of this high falutin' Mickey Mouse approach to government that's all
show, tail-covering, pettiness, expensive and unnecessary lawsuits,
perpetual ineptness, constant contradictions, open and shameless
law- and agreement-breaking in the face of documentation, disregard
for taxpayers footing extravagant expense accounts, undeserved
credit-taking, gratuitous finger-pointing, unresponsiveness,
engineered city council meetings, outright lying in the face of
evidence, and unrelenting self-advancement while Iron Mountain
deteriorates worse than ever around us. 9-27-2007-01 People are talking about two sewer back-ups that the city had to pay for. Can I make that three? Yes…it happened at my home and it, too, is on Fleshiem Street. I think the reason mine didn’t make any news was because A) I did all the clean-up myself and B) I didn’t claim EVERYTHING. I claimed what I felt was important. In comparison to the others, my claim was miniscule but nevertheless, it was a sickening mess and God forbid that it happens again. Because if it DOES happen again, I’m not going to be so polite and generous. This brings me to an important point. I’m paying up the nose for sewer & water and property taxes, yet there obviously is a problem with the sewer system if these backups aren’t isolated incidents. They should be making improvements to the existing systems to prevent this from happening instead of, say….improving Hydraulic Falls Road. I must say that what disappoints me most about the way this city is run is that the “average” citizen doesn’t benefit. I’m appalled at how high my taxes are, but my street is horrible. The sidewalks are impossible to walk on. There’s a For Sale sign on practically every block. There are no quality jobs that will keep our children in the area after college. Sure, anyone can get a minimum wage job with no benefits, but that won’t keep our kids here. I’d like to see a council that addresses the “Big Picture” or we may be putting up a For Sale sign as well. But sadly, there’s not much incentive for anyone to move here and this home will probably sit on the market for years the way the others are. 9-26-2007-08 Webmaster, I've been chuckling with a few callers and online visitors off and on all evening over your latest post, 9-26-2007-06. But we suspect your reasonably polite and tactful tongue-in-cheek sarcasm with the statistics went right over the I.M. Truth webby's head. Nice try though. I.M. Truth people, of course Issues isn't getting 14,000 unique hits or visits per week. Server requests are not the same as unique visits. The point is this: if you want your claims about how many hits or visits you're getting to have credence, you might want to use an independent and objective counter or meter that your Web host provides. Just telling people usually doesn't cut it, particularly on a site such as yours. And frankly 37,000 hits in your first week and a half, as you state, is misleading. For a site the size, age, and nature of yours, the numbers really strain one's ability to believe -- they're not credible, and therefore you're not helping your cause, boys and girls. That's what the Issues webmaster was getting at. You can't count all of your server requests as visits. Server requests include each photo and each little graphic, such as the 20 tiny arrows and Go Daddy material you have on each page. You can count only visits. Use a counter. It's more believable. And then only if you're not clicking the Refresh feature in your browser over and over continually to inflate the figure. You get a generally accurate reading usually only over time -- the more time, the more accurate, the more believable. Dig? I don't know if you were paying attention or not, but the Issues site didn't even put its counters onsite till after it had been online for a few months. With all due respect, come on. If you're gonna play this game, you don't have to be a pro, but at least be a player. Or at least make the effort to be. No one has any love and respect for a Grand Pretender or outright liar. An Uninvolved but Interested Geek Bystander 9-26-2007-07
"Yes, Virginia, there is an
Island of Sanity left in city
government".
Congratulations
to the TIFA Board!!
They flatly rejected the
unbelievably expensive proposal from Marquart, Tousignant
and company for the parking lot pavilion, paving a parking
lot that was not in such bad shape, and underground power
lines in a one block area behind city hall. They never did
receive a final price, but it had reached
$738,000 and counting.
In his spiel, Marquart didn't
bat an eyelash at recommending approval. Tousignant chimed
in with his old and tired "vibrant downtown" theme. All to
no avail.
Shrewdly, I thought, TIFA
Chairman Jim Brinker suggested a committee be formed from
members of the TIFA Board and City Council to review all
options and make recommendations next spring.
It passed unanimously. By then,
there may be a second Island of Sanity,
namely the city council.
Marquart and Tousignant
have certainly taken their lumps in recent months. Remember
the proposed bandshell and 37 disappearing parking spaces?
Gone. That's one. Remember the large,
ugly, pavilion and rest rooms in the Downtown Plaza parking
lot? Gone. That's two. Remember the STS
Consultants City Park plans that were never shown to the
public because they might be "too controversial"
with an election coming up? That's three.
Remember their "deer must go" proposal that they
conveniently blamed on the high school students studying
city government, when in fact Marquart had recommended it
far earlier in his 2006-07 Budget Proposal letter.
That's four. And the latest TIFA bulldozing
job makes the count FIVE.
Despite the best efforts of this
dismissive, arrogant and egomaniacal bunch, the
people have prevailed.
And they will
again in November as they did in August. Democracy lives in
Iron Mountain.
9-26-2007-06 I was just updating the forum and posting the note below when I decided to go to the truth.com website and see what was going on. I noticed this statement on the site: "The site had personally attacked the incumbents, their family and friends for four years. It has continuously spread misinformation and lies." Funny thing is this site is only 13 months old. We started it last August. I then went to our statistics area of this web site and noticed that in 13 months we have had 611,714 server requests. We are averaging about 14,000 a week. The hit counters that I have on the home page and forum page are not accurate to the number of visitors. Thanks for visiting. Webmaster of Iron Mountain Issues 9-26-2007-05 I really must remind everyone reading this website that just because something is written on here does not mean it was put on by a challenger or a supporter of the challengers. I am referring to 9-24-2007-7. I was at the 424 amendment meeting referred to, and immediately afterwards talked at length with Mr. Rigoni in the parking lot. We both saw Mr. Tousignant leave. He did not even come close to talking with Mr. Rigoni. I obviously can’t say what happened prior to the meeting I can say this conversation did not happen after the meeting.. Post 9-24-07-07 is showing on the Truth website, making it sound like challengers will do anything to win. If you are going to make a statement you want people to believe on this site, then I say sign your name so it can be verified. On the other hand, perhaps this is a supporter of the incumbents trying to cause trouble again. Always remember that anyone can post on this site unlike the truth.com site. Dave Farragh Candidate for City Council 9-26-2007-04
I attended the recent TIFA meeting
and Mr. Mariucci did a presentation on what plans he had for the
old Khoury property. I have been to many different presentations
before and this was one of the best. He presented a development
that the whole city can be proud of. He wants to start with a
convention center and a hotel connected to it. I hope
everything goes as planned for him. What I have seen, if
elected, I will support this project 100%. This project will
truly be a positive approach to economic development for our
city. Good luck to Mr. Mariucci
Sincerely,
Dale Alessandrini
See more on
www.ironmountaindemocracy.com
9-26-2007-03 Concerning Item 9-25-2007-04 Well said. And how! And about time. Thank you. Neither the people at city hall nor the regular writers to this site have a clue how many of us in town feel what this writer has expressed. I encourage every voter in Iron Mountain to read the "progress/pro-business" posting completely and carefully. And have everyone you know read it. It's Item 9-25-2007-04. It's mainstream stuff that affects everyone, and it cuts to the bone. I defy all readers to argue that those are not six paragraphs of solid truth, clear vision, and great advice. "Big Picture" is right, as the writer says. What he writes reflects on and influences every issue this city faces. It's time to grow up, broaden our vision to incorporate what's important and effective, then finally tackle Iron Mountain's issues with a realistic and universal businesslike professionalism instead of continuing year after year of bluff, half-measure, false bravado, and tawdry small-town politicking.
9-26-2007-02
The Iron Mountain Truth site is trying to say that landlords and challengers have tried intimidating tenants into voting for them. They state that “THE TRUTH has already collected three solid incidents of landlords and two of the challengers that approached then before the primary election and threatened a vote from them”
I really find it hard to believe
that these are credible. Who is dumb enough to think that would
work? If a landlord ever said I had to vote for him/her, I’d
know it was a joke and laugh with them. They’d have absolutely
NO way of knowing how a tenant votes. To even think of
threatening a vote would be absurd. I personally think that this
is just another desperate ploy by the incumbents to slander the
challengers.
I just laughed when I read what they
have on the assessor portion. We should believe that Rich
Brook was an excellent assessor when the equalization department
has proven otherwise? Do they think we forgot about the notices
from the County Equalization Department in 2006?
The more I hear and read from the incumbents, the more sure I become that I'll be looking to the challengers. And it didn't take any propaganda from the challengers to convince me. I'm just tired of all the double-talk from the incumbents. And if any of the incumbents that are on the ballot are in favor of the current mayor as a write-in, they automatically lose my support. The people have already spoken on that issue. He lost and needs to accept that fact! It's time you show us that WE, the voters, matter.... that our opinions and certainly our votes mean something. Support the mayor, you slap us in the face. By supporting the mayor, you are saying that we wasted all those tax dollars by even having a Primary election. 9-26-2007-01 It looks like the more
Doug Rigoni spends on re-election advertising, the
worse it gets for him. 9-25-2007-06 Tonight's Daily News,
Tuesday Sept. 25, has a very interesting letter to the editor. It
is titled, "What is wrong for the city." 9-25-2007-05
I just read the letter from Mr.
McRoberts in tonight’s Daily News. I found it very interesting
when he pointed out that the City demanded that the terms
of the settlement be kept confidential, and then Mr. Rigoni
broke that agreement in his campaign ad. In case you didn’t
see the letter, Mr. McRoberts is the attorney for the sewage
victim, so I think he knows what he’s talking about.
I wonder. Since the City broke the
agreement, could that also release Mr. Giguerre from the
agreement? And, free to pursue the full amount again? I
would love to see Mr. Rigoni have to eat his words. Yes, it’s
even worth the extra twenty thousand or so in tax dollars if it
turns out that Mr. Giguerre is legally entitled to it, after
all. Interesting. Keep shooting yourself in the foot, Doug.
Oh yeah, Ken Tousignant
appeared in the new continue progress ad tonight, too, as a
write-in.
Thanks for wasting our tax dollars on a primary that you won't
honor, Ken.
9-25-2007-04
When you say
progress, mean progress. When you say pro-business, mean
pro-business. 9-25-2007-03 LIES - INCOMPLETE INFO -
HALF TRUTHS - That's how this council operates!!!!! 1. Sewage backup two
times and claiming the city is held harmless due to State law.
Then why would the city settle for any amount of money with Giguere
when they didnt have to. Because they applied external pressure to
the lines which creates liability. Doing the right thing and
taking responsiblity just doesnt come into play with these idiots. 3. Fire the fire
fighters to save money. Now we pay the each policeman an extra
$4000.00 each per year and overtime for certification when
they still cant go into buildings as they lack qualifications. They
are late in going to a fire or don't show up at all. This saves us
money and affords better fire protection - NOT. 5. 425 agreement. Cant
we hear all the facts just once from the council. Will I.M. get any
tax revenue in 50 years with this 9-25-2007-02
If the city holds a public hearing,
and provides the wrong documentation for the public to review,
doesn’t that make their vote invalid? I’m talking about the
425 agreement hearing, where several people got their copy of
the agreement at the Iron Mountain meeting, and then took them
to the Breitung meeting, only to find out that they had been
given an obsolete copy of the document at Iron Mountain. The
outdated copy was missing some very pertinent information
that came out in the Breitung meeting. How can that be a valid
way of holding a public hearing?
9-25-2007-01
Mr. Rigoni's latest ad was in the
paper Monday night. This time, it was the landlords' turn to
take their lumps. One thing I found curious is that, in
his ad about the fire department he made no mention of
the four fire fatalities that happened since he helped create
our "cheaper, safer fire protection", but now is somehow blaming
the landlords for the deaths. What unmitigated gall.
I have to say it again. He had an
entire ad about fire and garbage, and never once mentioned the
four fire fatalities, but, he sees fit to blame that on
landlords? Outrageous. How dare you blame them for what could
just as likely have been the tragic results of your
mistakes, Mr. Rigoni? How do you sleep at night?
9-24-2007-08 To the I.M. Truth webperson ...
Sure. A challenger could have created or underwritten or supported
the dougie site. Would have had to have been the dumbest person
alive, but he or she could have done it. 9-24-2007-07 I was just outside City
hall after the 425 act meeting and over heard Mr. Rigoni and Ken
Tousnaut talking about the agreement and Mr. Rigoni said that he
was happy that no one brought up the water and sewer district that
9-24-2007-06 I hope all of you
out there realize the the
www.ironmountaintruth.com website is, in fact, the Ken
Tousignant website. 9-24-2007-05
To Mr. Lefebvre and the deer pen
Advocate:
The beauty of your dialogue is that
you are able to have this dialogue!
I believe that with new Council
members, issues such as this will receive public input, healthy
debate, and solutions that will satisfy both views. I predict
that things won't "go down" without the
public's knowledge, ending in irreversible outcomes.
Until then, however, try to hang in
there and have faith that all will be as it should be after
November. There are always solutions, always.
There will be a better
chance for creative solutions after November, when more
than 6 or 7 people are allowed to contribute ideas!
9-24-2007-04
Webmaster,
Please place the following statement
in the public forum.
Citizens of Iron Mountain and
Surrounding Communities,
Please see my campaign blog at
www.ironmountaindemocracy.com to read my views on issues, as
well as, my response to the allegations, about me, on the iron
mountain truth website.
Please feel free to email me, at
that website, with any questions or comments.
Thanks,
William Toedter,
Candidate for Iron Mountain City
Council
9-24-2007-03
I would urge all challengers to
ignore the
www.ironmountaintruth.com website completely. The site
claims it will send a questionnaire to all challengers and
incumbents. Look what their true motives are. Dale
Alessandrini issued a clear, concise statement there and was
immediately and viciously attacked, with many
mischaracterizations of his words.
Anyone can see the distortions
just by reading the replies to his statements.
Challengers, you have a clean
website at www.ironmountaindemocracy.com. Keep posting there.
9-24-2007-02 I was wandering through
the so-called truth site. I did not notice Ken
Tousignant's name in there anywhere. 9-24-2007-01 To 9-21-2007-05 about your maps: Sorry. Too cryptic for me. No matter how carefully I look. Besides, not only are the maps hard for me to read, but I'm one of the general public and not privy to the inside info, assumptions, and ongoing exchanges. (I have trouble understanding quite a few of the remarks that exist out of context on this site and ones like it -- you may be making a great point, but how would I know?) What's missing on the map? And what's significant about it missing? 9-23-2007-02
I request that someone who will
be attending the Public Hearings at Iron Mountain City
Council at 6:30 PM Monday, Sept 24 and/or at the
Breitung Township Hall at 7:00 PM,
post a report on this website on any interesting
discussions that transpired.
I am not against 484
annexations, but I won't be able to make either of those
meetings and just curious about the discussions.
9-23-2007-01
Dean Lefebvre
If you are not against another location then WHY don’t you give up on destroying the deer pen? Did you not see the results of the open house at City Park there was enough people saying the deer should stay to make the council listen, and that is a first! A plaque should be erected for that rare occasion when the voice of Iron Mountain was finally heard. The council insisted up until the open house that the few (75) at the meetings voicing their desire to keep the deer did not represent the way the citizens felt. So why should the many give up so much for the few? 9-22-2007-07 When I presented the plan to Parks & Recreation Committee about building a new field at City Park, I did not ask the City to pay for the project. There are several privately funded grants (a big one is with the NFL) that would help with the project. The big portion of the funding would come from our league and the kids that would use the field. I never asked the tax payers of Iron Mountain to fund this project. All I asked was for a piece of land. I have had several people talk to me about another location. I am not against another location, but I do like the City Park Area. This past Saturday we had hundreds of people at the upper Field. The teams from West Iron County brought picnic lunches and kinda tailgated down by the playground. I like the facilities located at the park. We already have restrooms, parking, and pavilion if we needed to have a large function and the big one is the play ground. 3 to 7 year old kids have no interest in watching a football game, so the parents send them to the playground. Thanks for listening. Dean Lefebvre 9-22-2007-06 It's been said before, and I'll say it again, now that the issue is hot again. How is it practical or cost-effective to turn the deer pen into any type of athletic field? The cost to fill in and level that area would be enormous when there are plenty of more level properties in the area to use. 9-22-2007-05
Several times over the past few weeks, I have
made it a point to drive through the Million dollar parking lot
that the City of Iron Mountain has provided to Boss Snowplow for
1 dollar per year. I drove through at several different times of
the day. To my surprise, the parking lot was never more than ¼
full. Then I started asking questions. Will the City provide
parking for other business and industries that request it? Come
on, have the doors been opened, or do only a select few like
Boss Snowplow and the Downtown Merchants get a free ride. We
have seen the cost of maintaining these lots downtown by the
amounts put forward by the City engineers to repair and repave
them. I wonder what is the costs to plow these lots in the
winter, and will the Boss lot be plowed by the City. It seems a
little strange, that if the City does in fact plow the lot, will
they do it with a Western Plow, a Blizzard Plow, or some other
manufacturer mounted on a City truck.
Also, with such an investment made in this
lot, you would think that the City would get a great return on
taxes as this industry expands. Wrong. As part of a sweet deal,
this City Council has exempted Systems Control/boss Snowplows
from paying all taxes on all new personal property. This is the
only exemption of its type ever granted by the City of Iron
Mountain and it was granted by the current City Council. The
first year tax savings to Systems/boss is in the neighborhood of
$490,000. This exemption was granted for 25 years. So the City
looses tax money, by building the parking lot for a million
dollars, loses by relocating streets and utilities to
accommodate Boss/Systems and loses by not recouping their
investment by exempting the facility from paying property taxes
through the year 2031. Does this sound like progress to you?
Especially when the City claims un-funded liabilities are
looming out there. Will these un-funded liabilities eventually
fall on the residents while business and industry are being
exempted from taxes.
The following is an article entitled “Tax
abatements under scrutiny” printed in the Lansing State Journal
of November 25, 1999. In it is the statement, “if it’s an
efficient company, it doesn’t need a subsidy, and if it’s
inefficient, why are we subsidizing it”, said Kenneth Thomas, a
political-science professor at the University of Missouri who
has studied tax-break policy in Michigan and nationwide. What it
winds up being is “you often have average people subsidizing the
rich folks” Thomas said. A tax break on an individual basis is
unfair because others do not benefit from it, in fact, it could
be an additional burden on those not receiving the subsidy,
while an across the board tax break benefits everybody on an
equal basis.
It's been done before and didn't work. In the
1980’s, the City got involved with granting tax breaks under the
Commercial Facilities Act. These breaks saw the businesses that
obtained relief flourish. To this day, they are still viable
properties in the community. This was at the expense of many
other businesses that could not compete economically with those
that obtained tax relief and thus went out of business. This
program created an unfair tax advantage to those who received
the tax cuts.
So City Council, by getting involved with
“Corporate Welfare” what a fine mess you are leaving for the
future of Iron Mountain. Is this your idea of ‘continued
progress‘?
9-22-2007-04 Response to 9-22-2007-02 The soccer league does not create teams that are aligned with their respective high schools. Lat year my son's team had kids form Kingsford and I believe Florence on it. If you look at their shirts they do not say Iron Mountain Soccer Team. It says SAY. The soccer league does a great serve to our community. The football league teams are youth versions of the high school football teams. If you attended any of the games at City Park this past Saturday you would have found youth Mountaineers, Bobcats, and Wykon players and fans cheering for their teams. We had a great Saturday at City Park. Over 500 people came to the field through the course of the day. That field was utilized to the fullest. Dean Lefebvre 9-22-2007-03 After reading information on the truth website, I find it necessary to respond. I would like to address issues that affect the upcoming election. If the incumbents feel it necessary to attack me personally, so be it. I know who I am and what I stand for.
I have never stated that the four fire fighters would be hired back. In fact, after reading a statement from Mr. Rigoni on ironmountaintruth.com, I placed a call to him. He responded that I had never made that statement to him. Why it is listed as such even though he admits it is not the truth is beyond me. Perhaps he does not care that they print lies using his name. My comment on this issue is that if we were removing these positions to save money, why then did the city turn around and hire a public works director, a code enforcement officer, a community economic and development planner and a main street coordinator? All of these positions are full time with benefits. So where is the savings to the city? You already had a competent individual running public works and other people available for code enforcement. I am not saying that other positions may never be needed, but the issue at the time was saving money for the city. As we have all stated, we need to study the situation to find any wasteful spending.
My next concern is the statement that I am not for the liaison officer. Who ever heard me say that? I have always favored that program, as I have grandchildren who attended school in Iron Mountain. The program gives you some peace of mind knowing that someone is watching out for our children. Again they put words in my mouth. What I stated is that the cable TV fee was not the way to pay for this service. I attended the meeting at which this decision was made. The city attorney commented that these funds should not be used for this purpose, but against legal advice they went ahead anyway. I think more research is needed to see if this is a legal use of this fee, even though our intent is to eliminate it. This should have been handled through a vote of the people. In my case my family would pay less in taxes than on my monthly cable statement at 5%--the point being it just was not handled correctly.
I will keep an eye on the truth website and respond as often as I can to keep you informed of my positions. If you want know how I feel on issues, please email me at ironmountaindemocracy.com with your question and name, and I will be glad to respond. You will never see any statements that I have made without my named signed to them. You will always know how I honestly feel about the issues.
David Farragh Candidate for City Council 9-22-2007-02 To Dean Lefebvre You are right I will not compromise and neither will most of the people in Iron Mountain when it comes to the deer pen at city park. We fought city hall for too long to give up now. There is enough room according to the city for twelve deer. There are 18 soccer fields in the area and one deer pen. Many of us remember not only a larger pen and herd but also buffalo. We already lost half the pen plus access, the road once went all the way around the pen. There is other vacant land suitable for sports. I also find it hard to believe that the kids whine as much as you about where they play. My niece and nephew just plain enjoy playing soccer I have never heard them whine about where. 9-22-2007-01 Dear Iron Mountain
Issues, 9-21-2007-06 Hey! Any one else run across this site yet? http://www.imeplace.org/phil_dougie_archive_item/ Interesting turn of events. That got me thinking, so I checked http://www.ironmountaingay.com/ to discover yet another turn of events. How long has that been there? Actually kind of an upbeat note on both counts, huh? No matter what side of the issues you're on. 9-21-2007-05
Look carefully at both maps at the
bottom of this notice of public hearing. What's missing from
the North US-2 map? I wonder if this is on purpose?
9-21-2007-04
Over the next few weeks I will be
posting my response to the allegations posted on the truth web
site. They will be posted on the ironmountaindemocracy.com site.
If you have any thoughts or
questions, please feel free to email me from my site.
Thanks for your support.
Bruce J. Rosen
Candidate for City Council
9-21-2007-03 How much has the city spent on the re-assessment of property? Click here: PDF Format Assessment MS Excel Format Assessment 9-21-2007-02 It is getting close to the November election, and I see by the lies on the Iron Mountain Truth website that the incumbents are starting to throw stones. I will not engage in any personal attacks, but I will talk about what is important. I will stick to the issues that we face as residents of Iron Mountain. I will answer any questions that the citizens ask, and I will be truthful and courteous to you. I invite any resident to e-mail me at www.ironmountaindemocracy.com with any questions, issues, or concerns that you may have. There are a few items that I feel need to be addressed right now. 1 – The school liaison officer is a very good program for our children. When I sat on the council six years ago, I voted to have it put on the ballot because I wanted that program to be safe for at least five years, and it was, I was a little worried that if it was funded though the general fund and a new council came in, they may not fund it. The incumbents want you to believe that just because I want to do away with the T.V. fee that I won’t fund that program. That is so far from the truth. We will still fund that program, but without levying a T.V. fee. 2 – I have stood up in many council meetings to address certain issues and have always had all the necessary documentation to support what I was saying, including tax reassessment issues, bidding processes, trips taken and money spent on these trips, and increased water bills to name a few. I have even told the city council that if they are interested in the information I have, I am willing to show all the data to them and to give me a call. Not one of them has ever bothered to call and get the facts that I had. 3-The Main Street Program is a wonderful program. It brings people downtown to enjoy our city. Britney, the Main Street coordinator, does a great job on the activities she brings in. I had a chance to help her for a little while at the Italian Fest and found that her heart is in the right place. Why would the truth website say that I want to fire her, especially to save $11,000.00? The I.M. Truth web site stated that I just told ”somebody” (no name given) that the $13,000.00 raised by the Italian Fest went into the general budget. That is not true. Before the Italian Fest even started, there were items on the Vendor’s Report that I questioned (wine glasses, wrist bands, etc.), so I called up City Hall. The report was explained to me that the money spent on these items was deducted from the DDA account. Besides that, I didn’t even know how much money they had raised. But congratulations to Britney and all who worked on the Italian Fest to raise that kind of money. 4 – On one of the so-called truths, they said that I sat on the council and almost lost North Star Industries. That is another accusation that is not true. North Star sent out a letter asking communities what they have to offer them to locate in their area because they wanted to expand. Yes, I was on the council at that time; but before we could negotiate with them, the new council came in, and I was no longer there. I sit on the Economic Development Alliance Board. Why would I not want development in Iron Mountain? Absolutely I am for development in Iron Mountain. The council needs to remember that if we are going to use city funds to supply water and sewer to develop property, we need to make sure that there is a contract with the developer to build on that site so the city can capture the taxes and, in turn, get our money back for the infrastructure costs. Come back for more insight on the issues that we face as taxpayers of Iron Mountain. I will be addressing the budget, tax reassessment, the bidding process, ISO rating, trips that this council and manager have taken, water and sewer rates, state and federal grants, and more . Thank You Dale Alessandrini 9-21-2007-01
Response to 9-20-2007-05:
I like the fact that your letter
tells a tale that possibly few residents are/were aware of.
What concerns me deeply, however, is
not only that Mr. Marquart hit on you (!) but also how you felt
villainized for trying to rectify a situation. That is
exactly what I am trying to convey about this
administration. That is exactly how it feels
to try and communicate with them, no matter how polite you are.
That is exactly how they portray you if you
have the audacity to actually speak up; as a
troublemaking militant.
Next part of the old and tired
pattern?: You have to fight tooth and nail in an exhaustive
battle of documents, contacting the proper sources, and
researching. Translation: You do their
job!
Final outcome?: Mr. John Marquart
and Co. take the credit for the positive outcome you worked your
butt off for....the outcome you grew 400 grey hairs for... the
one you put your heart and soul into...the one they publicly
slammed/slandered you for.
So I give you some major
belated credit for what you accomplished, along with
the many other citizens who worked so hard. The difference it
made in the quality of life was immeasurable and I'm glad you
came forward to set things straight here.
Instead of "Letters to the Editor"
like the one from Eden Caudell's Mom, I wish there were a few
from residents like you who had the real scoop
on experiences with this Council and Manager. I wish that
information was brought forward to the masses.
The experiences you endured; the
unjust situations, mistruths, and bullying...it's no gentler
from a campaign perspective. These guys are playing it pretty
dirty and it would be great to have a couple of letters in the
newspaper voicing support for us. For me personally, it would
be like having a very welcome "powerbar" against the drain of
their constant slander and incredulous statements.
Tongue in cheek: Hey, nothing wrong
with long letters or hormones: One might be needed to spell out
the facts, and the other often comes in handy to prompt you to
do it.
Sincerely,
Tina Peterson
9-20-2007-06 Response to 9-20-2007-04 From the tone of your post I would say that you are the one that wont compromise. I don't believe that our league is looking a $250,000 gift horse in the mouth. Again, it is a wonderful project that will help the youth soccer league. I was approached by the group involved in this project and asked if I wanted to help. See there is a grant for youth athletic fields. I could see raising around $200,000 for a field project. But I live in Iron Mountain and the facility should be within the city limits of Iron Mountain, supported by the residents of Iron Mountain, used for the youth of Iron Mountain. You want me to tell the kids from Iron Mountain that our new facility is out on Pine Mountain Road and is located in Breitung Township. The kids response will be "I don't play for Kingsford." Now let me tell the parents that we want you to live in Iron Mountain and pay taxes here but your tax dollar wont be spent on any facilities here. You have to go to Breitung Township for recreational facilities. Tell the Little League that all games will now be played in Norway at Marion Park. You do not know how important the spirit of our youth sports programs are. If there is no home town spirit the program will suffer a slow death. Look and Gwinn and tell me that there spirit is high. This school district can barely field teams this year. Iron Mountains are very strong. So if your asking me to base this communities future on deer or our youth, the deer can join the ones in my yard. But as I said in my post. A discussion among concerned citizens will bring about a common goal. I have been talking to other people and looking at other areas in the city. Anyway who am I but just 1 citizen in this town. Please don't be so threatened by my suggestions. Dean Lefebvre 9-20-2007-05
Do
those people really want to bring up the train horn
issue?
This is long, it's
not Tina Peterson, but I'm hormonal and have something to say.
I see
that unpleasant new hate site is stirring the recent train horn
issue so incumbent candidates can take credit for a problem that
happened on their watch to begin with. That's creative. But
ultimately self-defeating I'd guess. Nerve is one thing those
folks have. And it finally got me writing to this site.
Those people are
blowing smoke at you, Iron Mountain. They figure you won't
bother to check the facts or learn how they dropped the ball for
almost two and a half years. They figure they can lie, look
good, that you're too lazy to discover the truth, and as a
result they'll score some points and get a bunch of votes.
First, the State of
Michigan passed no law and had nothing to do with what
happened. It was a Federal/local issue from Day One. The state
figured in it only peripherally.
Also, no one I'm
aware of claimed that there was an agreement between the
railroads and the city for a quiet zone. Anyone who mentions an
agreement is being disingenuous. There was a definite public
knowledge, however, that the quiet zone that did exist in the
city was going to end on June 24, 2005, unless the city followed
the guidelines that the Feds had laid out to preserve the quiet
zone.
Following me so far?
The city --
meaning most of the council (because Marquart tells them only
what he chooses) and most citizens (because Marquart tells them
only what he chooses) -- may have been surprised, but
not everyone was, including John Marquart, the city manager.
Because of rail and business associations, a lot of citizens in
town were already aware in 2004 and not at all surprised about
the upcoming new Horn Rule that was to go into effect in June
2005.
Between Fall 2004
and Spring 2005, several residents contacted John Marquart via
telephone, mail, and email, providing him with the exact
information of what was to happen and when, and that the city
was responsible for grandfathering the Quiet Zone or otherwise
preserving it. If he was conscious -- and that really is a
consideration, sadly -- he was perfectly aware of what was going
on. He chose to ignore everyone for over nine months, with the
exception of one woman who finally snared him at City Hall just
before Christmas 2004. Me. He hit on me, saw that was a no-go,
then muttered that he would have to investigate. But he handled
these approaches in a very unbusinesslike and unprofessional
manner -- total unresponsiveness, and the ridicule and
villainization I personally overheard more than once in the
parking lot behind City Hall, Greenleaf's Bar, and Sol Blu
Lounge of those of us trying to communicate with him about this
issue for well over two years.
Don't believe
me. I insist that you not believe me. Don't believe anyone who
agrees with me. Go to
http://www.fra.dot.gov/ -- the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). More specifically, go
to http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1318
-- the Train
Horn Rule at that site. That's the information, with its
warnings, citizens in this town were giving to John Marquart
from Fall 2004 through June 24, 2006. Surprised as anyone, my
eye! He knew perfectly well what was to happen and did nothing
to prevent it. Even though that same material clearly states
that it was the municipality's responsibility to ensure or
create a Quiet Zone. He did nothing.
It took
another year and a half of his dancing and bluffing and
rationalizing ignorantly and incompetently -- but with the most
charming smile and convincing daily bluff -- to do what he must
to get the job done. Even though he had in his hands, and for
many months had had in his hands,
http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1318
-- the exact instructions of what he must do.
Everyone thinks it
was just a few unreasonable and militant individuals like Rev.
March, Trish Powell, Jim Hogan, and Carol Wicklund who were
pressing this issue, but countless residents and businesses were
on this issue, and instead of just fixing it, Marquart and his
defenders in town and on the Council were concerned only with
covering his tail -- like Bob Becotte at DPW trying to blur the
issue and scare folks off with threats of you will have to pay
MDOT $250,000 for new gates, lights, and bells at each crossing
(except that they weren't necessary; that was only one option
and dealt only with crossing protection, not horns). And
Marquart himself indignantly telling everyone he didn't botch
it, that he didn't know (despite all the info directed to him
for months), and that he couldn't do anything, it was Federal --
despite the Federal documentation in his hands telling him that
it was the local municipality's responsibility and here are the
steps you take to accomplish a Quiet Zone under the new Horn
Rule.
Either he's a moron
or he thinks the rest of us are. Or both.
You know, I don't
think so many of us would care so much about assigning the blame
to him if he hadn't made such an effort to make everyone else
look like hillbilly yooper asses and if he hadn't lied so
consistently, so pathologically, about not having any warning
prior to 6/24/05 and not having any responsibility for it
happening and no responsibility to then fix it -- despite the
Federal Railroad Administration, the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Bart Stupak's office, and Carl Levin's office
all looking into it and concluding irreducibly that it was Iron
Mountain's local government that was responsible for initiating
the process and carrying it out. And just so the railroads --
who were nothing but gracious and cooperative every step of the
way -- don't feel left out, let me include an email plenty of us
got once the horns started blowing regularly, once Marquart
denied responsibilty, and once we started inquiring of the rail
companies.
"The
City Manager of Iron Mountain failed to have the Whistle Ban
Grandfathered, and therefore we are required by Federal Law to
blow our whistles at the crossings.
"If you would like further information regarding this you may contact our office in Channing at (906) 542-3214. "Doug Salminen [elswells@up.net] Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad Company (ELS)" Canadian National (CN) ( contact@cn.ca), through a number of individuals, was more diplomatic and said that it had been, and remains, the responsibility of the municipality involved to take the necessary steps to preserve or re-create the Quiet Zone, and repeatedly directed us to the appropriate government officials other than Iron Mountain's, and reminded us that we should continue to direct our city officials to http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1318. And everyone -- rail companies, Federal politicians, Federal agencies -- repeatedly showed us and emphasized that after all was said and done, if Iron Mountain wanted to preserve a quiet zone before 6/24/05 or re-create one after, the buck stopped at Iron Mountain City Hall and absolutely no place else. Everything else was in place. The first and final buttons had to be pushed there. Except according to John Marquart, who stubbornly sat on his self-righteous can and let those horns blare for 19 months out of stupidity and incompetence or pridefulness and spite. Personally, I think it was only when the City Council became aware last Fall that a significant number of people were really ticked off, had had enough, saw that the solution's bottleneck had been and remained at City Hall, and were prepared to sue the city, that the City Council finally moved on this and had Marquart take care of it. So, you can believe that face-saving junk those weasels are trying to sell you at the new hate and spite site, or you can look at how things were, how they are, and how they operate through the official documentation, agencies, Congressman's and Senator's offices, and RR companies involved, then know what really happened. Iron Mountain Truth. Boy, the chutzpah of some people! And why is it important that I even bring up all this and refute the claim those weasals are making? After all, the horns have stopped. Yes, but it's important that we learn from that entire episode and others just like it over the past four years, so we can act accordingly and prevent them from happening again. 9-20-2007-04 Dean Lefebvre wrote Unfortunately it is located in Breitung Township and the church will have direct control over the fields. I say this because we have been turned away from using other privately owned fields in the area. The church did not say we could or could not use these fields. I am just planning on not utilizing these new fields for our youth football program. Did you inquire about it or are you just assuming. A lesson I learned early in life is don’t assume because you make an ass of u & me. Also wrote “I hope that as a community we can discuss the future of City Park and come to a common goal.” I thought they did. Leave deer pen where it is and let field where it is. The deer pen was shrunk once before for soccer, once is enough. Excuse me if I am wrong but you seem to be stuck on lets all compromise and do it my way. Stop looking a $250,000 gift horse in the mouth and ask if you can take it for a ride. 9-20-2007-03 This is in response to the 2 new soccer fields that the St. Mary’s Orthodox Church is building . This is a wonderful project. Unfortunately it is located in Breitung Township and the church will have direct control over the fields. I say this because we have been turned away from using other privately owned fields in the area. The church did not say we could or could not use these fields. I am just planning on not utilizing these new fields for our youth football program. The Central UP Youth Football League has 515 players from 8 areas playing this year. Of the 515, 110 are from Iron Mountain and about 106 are from Kingsford. All 110 kids from Iron Mountain use City Park, 4 to 5 days a week for practices and games. We are crowded. The location of City Park is great for the kids as most kids ride their bikes to practice or walk to the park after school. To these kids City Park is their home field. I invite all the citizens of Iron Mountain to visit the upper field this Saturday. We will be hosting 3 home games. I invite you to visit and see how nice it is to have this Iron Mountain sporting event held in Iron Mountain. I would still like to see another field in the City Park area. I also understand that the Deer are important too. This past summer, while I was watering the field, I took notice as to how many people visit the Deer. I was surprised by the number of cars that ride along the fence and the number of people that walked along the fence to see the Deer. I hope that as a community we can discuss the future of City Park and come to a common goal. Dean Lefebvre President, Central UP Youth Football League 9-20-2007-02 To Writer 9-19-2007-11: Follow up on IP Addresses Hey, I'm glad you pointed out all that stuff about many domain names and their sites residing at specific IP addresses on specific domain servers. Thanks. That stuff needed to be said. Typo though near the end of Point "2.)": should be oneclickidea.com (not oneclick.com; visitors will be checking the wrong site). I also found another domain name on that server at that IP address by doing entirely unrelated business. The domain name is one of many that belongs to the sizeable, private think tank and consultancy firm, Global Network Associates -- globalnetworkassociates.net. No site that I can find; they just own and store the name. Think they're out to oust the current Iron Mountain city council and eradicate homosexuality in the U.P. as your forum's conspiracy theorists suggest? LOL!!! Yeah, right. You think they even have the remotest idea that these other sites -- or Iron Mountain itself -- exist? Also, if I can add my two cents about the sites, servers, and IP addresses? Anyone can also go to a WHOIS feature like the one at http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/index.jsp and search an IP address itself. Just choose that option and then enter the IP address and search it. In this instance, you'll find that the address belongs to a domain server that belongs to Hostway, one of the largest and most popular web hosts in the world -- and a huge presence in this part of the country. Learn about how web hosts work -- and about how Hostway itself works, for that matter -- and you'll understand that this type of domain server hosts at least hundreds of Web sites, Internet packages, and domain names. You might also remember to tell your readers that this stuff changes constantly as hosts move domains to different servers and as clients change hosts -- that kind of stuff. A domain name's IP address and domain server can change overnight. BTW: I notice cityofironmountain.com and ironmountaintruth.com are registered at the same registrar: GoDaddy. By the conspiracy accusers' own logic (or semblance of it), does that mean that those controlling the City of Iron Mountain's site and those controlling Iron Mountain Truth's site are either the same person or different persons but in bed together, as they claim these other sites are? Ha! Too much! After all, what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Right? No? Ain't it? Come on, use your heads! That ethical/moral/civil etiquette stuff you (Writer 9-19-2007-11) mentioned too -- good stuff. Some really unscrupulous people out there, don't care what they say or who they attack as long as they think they're serving their purpose. You know that old saw about the neighborhood just not being the same since that shiftless riffraff moved in? Sadly, that's pretty much how it's become across the Internet. Selfish, meanspirited boneheads and flamers who bring their offline personalities onto the 'Net. No consideration for anyone else online with them. Bummer. Anonymity has some real value and good stuff to be said for it -- hotlines, voting, protection from real threats and danger -- but the flip side if it is really wild and ugly and potentially harmful. There are people who will use it, as they use everything else, irresponsibly. In other words, abuse it. Too bad because there's some great garbage on this site, including in this forum, if anyone bothers to sift and winnow through everything. It also shows the jerks and morons for what they are, even if they are nameless. Make time to read The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture by Andrew Keen. Great stuff. Although, given the way some of these people write -- those who most need to read a book like this! -- and, by not being able to articulate, show their inability to think clearly -- I worry that they may not be able to take it up a notch and read an entire book, in English, and understand it. But if you can't read, write, and think -- if you can't communicate but can only emote -- what the bloody deuces are you doing posting stuff on the Internet? Hey? (I bet most of you think that's a rhetorical question. It ain't. I'm asking.) 9-20-2007-01
Looks like those vile,
hateful Christians are at it again. Just kidding. I read in the
paper tonight that St. Mary’s Orthodox Church is building two
regulation size soccer fields on the Pine Mountain Road.
THANK YOU, St. MARY’S!! What a wonderful, caring gesture for our area.
I hope this mean the current city
council will cease their quest to get rid of our deer at City
Park. I also hope the new fields will be a large part of the
solution Mr. Lefebvre was looking for. Both were valid sides,
and now it looks like we can have both a beautiful, natural park
and soccer fields. Now I'll have to wait and see how
Iron Mountain
Truth (less) spins this. It was probably done for the
sole purpose of making the incumbents look bad, after all. It
seems like everything good around here gets that kind of slant
if they had no hand in it.
9-19-2007-12 Posted to ironmountaintruth.com and ironmountainissues,org This is a quote from your web site. "Keep in mind that two rental
properties have burned in the last two years costing four young
lives. Could we have avoided them if they had been inspected?" 9-19-2007-11 Basta!
Enough! Stop the harsh finger-pointing before your accusations harm
more innocent victims. 9-19-2007-10
Thank you for
posting my question regarding the police department. I sent the
same email to the "Truth" website and as of yet, it has not
posted. I feel I may not have provided adequate information to
receive an answer. The question was, why is the city still
filling daytime overtime shifts at the Police Department when,
for the last 2 years, there have been dispatchers working in the
office?
If I recall correctly, the
dispatchers were hired to enable the city to increase
patrols/police protection in the city as well as to
decrease overtime paid. During the day, when the
dispatchers were in the office, if a patrolman called in sick,
was in court, took a personal day, etc...the lieutenants could
be out of the office on patrol since the dispatcher could cover
the office, thus not requiring another patrolman to work
overtime for that shift. Sounds reasonable.
However, the hiring of the
dispatchers is the only part of the plan that has actually been
fulfilled. The only difference is now the work formerly done by
the lieutenants is now being done by dispatchers. On any given
weekday you will find the Chief of Police, the
Detective-Lieutenant, a Lieutenant, a typist, and a dispatcher
at the Police Department in addition to the two patrolmen and
school liaison officer on duty.
When an officer calls in sick or is
in court, the shift is offered to the patrolmen per contract
language. However, if all of the patrolmen refuse the shift,
one of the officers already on duty is forced to work the O/T
shift. This is regardless of the available staff in the police
department. Makes perfect sense for a midnight shift when the
office is empty. But a day shift when there are 5 or more
people at the Police Department?
A year ago I addressed this issue
with a council person. He was going to look into the situation
and whether he did or not, I don't know.
I can't help but ask, why have the
dispatchers? Why aren't the lieutenants on patrol EVERY day
now that the dispatchers are in the office? Also, why was staff
added to the Police Department but cut from the Fire
Department? Why, in an age of budget cuts, is the city adding
non-essential personnel to any Department? And of course, my
original question, WHY is the city still FORCING the patrolmen
to work overtime during the day?
I won't even address that a
dispatcher was sent to the Police Academy at the expense of the
city...that's one I'll never understand anyway.
Thanks for posting me...again,
anyone that finds answers to these questions will have my
vote--in fact, I'll campaign on your behalf!
9-19-2007-09 What a
pathetic, desperate, last ditch effort the misnamed
ironmountaintruth.com website is. 9-19-2007-08 In one of his articles,
John Marquart mentioned that the City of Iron Mountain now has
a world- class website. OK, it's a pretty good website, maybe not
world class, but good. 9-19-2007-07 Here is the Dougie web site material in PDF Format. 9-19-2007-06
Ann Henrickson is the mother
of Eden Caudell? Is this true? No way! No one would pull a
stunt that low and transparent, not even our incumbents, would
they? Her letter (in the paper Sept. 14) mentions more than
once that she is a "newcomer" to the area. Praises the council
over and over, yet does it in such a way as to leave you
thinking she doesn’t have ties to any of them. How could she?
She’s new to the area. She even directs you to the Iron Mountain
Lies (I simply cannot write Truth when referring to that
cesspool) website. She found out about
that awful quickly, like before it was even on the net if you
count the lead time for her letter.
I am really having a hard time
believing this one. If this is true, it needs to be published in
the same newspaper that printed her letter. Everyone in town
believes she is just some new resident with no ties to the area
because of her letter.
9-19-2007-05 Response to: 9-19-2007-04 Yes I do protect this web site: ironmountainissues.org Our Info: WhoisProtector Inc This company protects millions of web sites. Real coincidence. Dougie did get the idea from me. I told him to start his own web site. To bad it was yanked after only a day. The people of Iron Mountain needed to see that site to understand how this person wanted the future to look. Here is your info: ironmountaintruth.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
(480) 624-2599 Phone
(480) 624-2599 Fax
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
ironmountaintruth.com@domainsbyproxy.com
Do you have any new information on the site? The 14th of September seems to be a long time between posts. Especially if your getting over a thousand visitors a day. Webmaster Issues 9-19-2007-04
Webmaster of
issues.org:
You asked your readers to send you a
copy of what they sent to the truth website to the issues
website, so as to ensure they post it....why the double
standard, as you will not post from me.....As far as the website
hit counter goes, I think you are exaggerating, as I have been
watching it a bit....
As far as the connection to the
ironmountaingay.com...
All are registered to the same IP
address protection service in Canada. Did Dougie get that same
idea that you did? Big coincidence. Too big. Your gay website
was a fraud, cooked up by you.
9-19-2007-03
To keep the record straight
and connect the dots -
Ann Henrickson,
who wrote the Voice of the
People piece last weekend in the Daily News praising the
city is the mother of Council Member
Eden Caudell.
She made no mention of that fact
in her article.
9-19-2007-02 The Truth Web site has had 5,700 hundred hits in 4 days. Pretty good considering that the Issues web site has had 14,704 hits in the same time period and I think most visitors of this site are linking to the truth web site. I was questioned on why I put a link to the Truth Web site? Well, this site was created to get the all information out to the people of Iron Mountain. All information that I get I pass along. I have stopped posting certain subject material and have made it clear what those subjects are. I would like to clear up one thing. The Ironmountaingay web site was real, even though it only lasted a day. That site was created by someone who was writing to this site to get his message out. I refused to post his ideas and encouraged him to start his own site, which he did. The Truth web site says that I started that site to disrupt the preliminary election results. Very Un-True. I normally do not post items and only facilitate the open and free communications between citizens, but I am interested in how many of you have sent a note to the Truth Website and have not had it posted. If you do send a note to the Truth Web Site, please send this site a copy so I can post it on the forum. This will ensure that they are being truthful. In regards to Mr. Rigoni's sewage ad in the paper. Please visit this page Sewage Issues and read why the city paid those claims. It was not out of the kindness of their heart. They had to because they (city workers) caused the backup. Not a natural blockage. I would like to thank all those folks that have taken the time to research the material posted here. Keep up the good work and stay informed. The next 6 weeks are important to us all. Webmaster of the Issues Site 9-19-2007-01
Mr. Hogan,
I see you are upset about paying
Iron Mountain taxes for the School Liaison Officer and not
getting your monies worth because you are in an annexed area
which includes Breitung Schools. Well fine Sir, I'm sure you
will be happy to hear you also live in the TIFA district. NOW, I
don't know how old your house is. BUT, if it was built after
1985 All your taxes are going to Iron Mountains
TIFA ! If on the other hand Sir, your house was built prior to
1985, All the taxes generated from increases in
your homes SEV since 1985 are going to TIFA.
What does this mean for you? Not
only are you paying for services you don't benefit from, you are
also paying taxes for services you will never see. How
can this be? Well I'll tell you, fine Sir. One example is the
school debt tax for the new Breitung School you are paying. The
City of Iron Mountain TIFA has collected close to
three quarters of a Million dollars in this school tax
alone! So, rather than these taxes paying for
the new school, Breitung School District is about to pay for the
City of Iron Mountains six hundred thousand plus dollar parking
lots. Just think Sir, rather than the school getting the money,
they now have to adjust their budget to make-up for lost
revenue. This could have been a teaching position, a school
nurse, an administrator, a janitor, or a multitude of any other
things. But instead, the City of Iron Mountain is about to build
a parking lot with school money! This is just the beginning
Sir. I will be informing you of more in days to come! I can't
wait to see what the city does with township taxes after the 425
agreements go through.
I'll bet you didn't know that!
9-18-2007-11 I know this should be a dead issue but ironmountaintruth claims that the deer issue always has been a non issue. The high school story. There was never any real discussion about the issue. Now the real truth. Regular Meeting of the Common Council, City of Iron Mountain, County of Dickinson, Michigan held on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Room: Council Member Caudell said that more people are coming to her and looking for a greater use for City Park. She said the deer pen needs many improvements and the deer inside do not look like real deer and it seems inhumane to keep them there. An expansion of City Park is the feedback that she is receiving.
Council as a Whole Meeting of the Common Council, City of Iron Mountain, County of Dickinson, Michigan held on Monday, January 8, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Room: Council Member Tchokreff would like to get rid of the deer for financial and usage purposes. Council Member Caudell believes the Council would like to find if there is a greater use for the deer pen. Council Member Burke state that what alternative uses are purposed will determine if he is for or against the removal of the deer pen. Council Member VanLaanen liked the idea of a winter park on the west end as proposed by Mr. Nienstadt. Mayor Tousignant understands the nostalgic sentiment towards the deer pen but the City Council should create a master plan for City Park to see what is included and what is left out.
Council as a Whole Meeting of the Common Council, City of Iron Mountain, County of Dickinson, Michigan held on Monday, December 11, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Room: The Council briefly discussed the deer at City Park. Mayor Tousignant noted that the deer at City Park must be an issue of what is the best use of City Park for the greatest number of residents. They agreed that there needs to be a Public Hearing in the near future. When the current budget was presented, I recommended the elimination of the Deer Park at CityPark. I am not making that recommendation for the upcoming year. What I would propose, however, is to undertake an analysis asking the question: can that area be utilized in a better fashion to improve the Park? Can, for example, that area be converted into an out door amphitheater? Can that area be added to the ski trail or be developed into a hiking trail or into an interactive bio-ecology lab for use by students from the High School or Bay College? Or, in the final analysis, should it remain as is. Now is the time to pursue such an analysis in the event we wish to pursue grant funds from DNR for such purposes. Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007 Budget City of Iron Mountain City Manager Letter quote “When the current budget was presented, I recommended the elimination of the Deer Park at City Park. I am not making that recommendation for the upcoming year. What I would propose, however, is to undertake an analysis asking the question: can that area be utilized in a better fashion to improve the Park? Can, for example, that area be converted into an outdoor amphitheater? Can that area be added to the ski trail or be developed into a hiking trail or into a interactive bio-ecology lab for use by students from the High School or Bay College? Or, in the final analysis, should it remain as is. Now is the time to pursue such an analysis in the event we wish to pursue grant funds from DNR for such purposes.” You decide what to believe. The truth is out there. 9-18-2007-10 After living in this
city for four years; I look back at why I decided to move here from
a rural town 45 min south of here? I visited Iron Mountain many
times and always thought it was a neat place to live. But now I
look around the city and see nothing special anymore. The
sidewalks are a disaster on the east side of town. Businesses are
deteriorating, and some are moving out of the city and moving into
the neighboring committees. Instead of redoing parking lots spend
that 9-18-2007-09
I find it very interesting that
the so called "truth" web site is not only filled with lies,
but does not have a easy way to contact in order to
contradict their lies. Maybe running scared ??
9-18-2007-08
This is a quote from a Frog Country
news story about the 9-17-07 council meeting discussion on the
Signature grant application:
"He (Marquart) also noted the
renovation of the structure into a hotel and restaurant will
create jobs for local residents, of which at least fifty-one
percent (51%)of the jobs created will be for low and moderate
income residents."
Maybe I’m just a whiner. Maybe I am
full of negativity for no good reason. Maybe I’m just a bad
person. Maybe I’m actually evil because I am not under the spell
of JM & Co. Maybe there’s no hope for me. Maybe it means I'm
against progress if I disagree with the council for any little
reason. . . Forgive me for noticing, but, does that grant
application actually say that more than 50% of the jobs HAVE to
be low income? Do we lose the money if more than half the jobs
pay too well? That's progress? Are you kidding me? Correct me
if I’m wrong, but, aren’t most jobs taken by people looking for
work at the time, and, therefore, moderate to low income? What a
bunch of crap.
I’m not signing my name. Look what
happened to Mr. Hogan for having the courage to voice his
opinion on the cable fee. He has now been branded as part of the
"evil empire" of the challengers, and "fair game" for the likes
of Scot Nauertz to openly chastise. Simply because he signed
his name to a letter to the editor. This is the kind of regime
we are really dealing with, people.
Mr. Nauertz, I have never met you,
either. I don't know what you look like. I don't know what
drives you. What I do know is that, based on your record of
public comment, past and present, I don't like you. You seem to
have a very hostile attitude in general, which you display and
attack with indiscriminately. If you are the sort of person who
is "for continued progress", it's all the more reason for me to
vote for four challengers this year.
9-18-2007-07
To the Webmaster,
I want to submit the following entry
to the public forum. You can sign my name to the article.
Response to the
www.ironmountaintruth.com
I took time yesterday to look at the
ironmountaintruth website. After reading, it is my opinion that
it should be labeled
www.ironmountainlies.com.
I could not believe what they
accused my father, Bill Toedter of. It was slanderous. They
need to get their facts straight. My father does not drink,
gamble, had a bankruptcy, or ever not acknowledged his children
or grandchildren. Family is extremely important to him. He
started a family business and has two of his three children
involved. His grandchildren mean the world to him. Bill would
do anything for his family.
It was also noted, in the website,
that the challengers are against progress and that events such
as the Farmers Market, Italian Fest, etc. will be gone if the
challengers get in. That is absolutely incorrect. My dad is
very supportive of progress, but progress that benefits the
majority and not a select few. He is also supportive of such
things as the Farmer's Market, Out to Lunch, Hog Wild, Harvest
on Hughitt, etc. Many of these events were in place before the
current city council and should continue way into the future.
As far as the School Liaison
position, Dad is supportive of this position and the benefits of
it. He does not agree with the way the council decided to pay
for it. The cable franchise tax is not the way to do it. Take
it to the voters and let them decide how to fund it.
I read information, on the website,
regarding the rental ordinance. It is evident that they do not
have a handle on what the issues of the landlords are. I was at
a city council meeting in which Dad tried to talk to a council
member, after the meeting, regarding concerns with the
ordinance. The council member, basically, said the ordinance
stands and if you don't like it you will have to take us to
court. It is no wonder that people feel that they need to hire
an attorney when dealing with the city. In addition, I do not
know how they would be able to enforce the ordinance fairly and
equally. The city does not have a good handle on who the
landlords are. The list of landlords which was provided, to the
Landlord Association, by the city, is far from accurate.
Approximately 1/2 of the people listed are not landlords. Some
have a vacant lot of land, others that are listed reside in the
home themselves as a personal dwelling, some rental homes have
been sold and made personal dwelling, etc.
I have attended several
council meetings. It appeared to me that if you did not have
the same thinking, as the council, you were labeled as a
troublemaker. I have even heard comments on how rude the
citizens are to the council members. Let me tell you, I
observed rudeness on the part of the council members. During
public comments, on numerous occasions, I noted the city
manager, as well as, council members talking to each other while
citizens were voicing their comments. That, to me, is very
rude. You have to be respectful if you want to receive respect
back.
I was also in attendance at
the council meeting in which one of the members made the comment
about their only being a small group of persons (75 people) who
had concerns and that did not speak for the majority of people
in Iron Mountain. First of all, there were more than 75
citizens in attendance at that meeting. People were lined up in
the hallway to the glass doors at one point. Second, 75+
citizens seems to be a significant representative of people to
me and they should be genuinely listened to and their opinions,
at least, considered. Let me use an example, lets say you have
a child, in school, who was having a problem and you went to the
principal. I am sure that even though you are only one parent,
you would want you voice to be heard and your concerns
considered. You would not like to be told that you are only one
parent and do not represent the larger majority of parents.
Based on the results of the primary election, I would say that
there are more than 75 citizens which have concerns in the City
of Iron Mountain.
Thank you. I am appreciative of
having this outlet to set the record straight.
Barbara Toedter
9-18-2007-06 Oh! Scot! Ouch! Wow. Scot Nauertz should have done his homework. Hogan was exactly the wrong guy to pick on. Nauertz really botched it with his letter at the new ironmountaintruth.com site in the "Your Voice" section. Just off the top of my head and just locally I can think of three examples showing that Nauertz hasn't been paying attention and doesn't know what he's talking about. All three of these examples are/have been donated/underwritten without fanfare or remuneration by Hogan at his own expense as local public services. Nauertz impugned Hogan regarding Bay College, abuse, and drug use. Yet as early as March 2005 Hogan had put the following site online, a site which proves the exact opposite of what Nauertz suggests. http://www.imeplace.com/bay_west_campus_bay_de_noc_community_college/ Although Nauertz unconscionably suggests Hogan is not anti-abuse, Hogan has had the following site online for years, and with links to it all over the place. http://thecaringhouse.imeplace.com/ Nauertz also suggests Hogan is against anti-drug programs, but look at/click the banners on each page-top of the following public service site that Hogan provides. http://www.kingsfordmusic.org/ And I know I've seen other, similar local sites for other just causes and good organizations. And the local efforts pale beside much of what he quietly, charitably does nationally and internationally. Frankly, Scot, you really stuck your foot in it this time. Everything you claimed, suggested, or implied about this guy in that letter is flat-out wrong and immediately provable as such. And, actually, what he points out about the inequitable usage of the cable-TV fee makes sense too. His alternative example seems much more sensible, practical, and fair, and I'm surprised the city manager and council didn't see the arithmetic and ramifications of this issue months ago. Effective city government would have. 9-18-2007-05
I am bemused by Mr. Rigoni and his
apples to oranges comparison of a sewer backup in his home, and
a city crew, with a known problem in a sewer line, forcefully
blasting sewage until it had to take the path of least
resistance into Mr. Giguerre’s home. I was very sympathetic to
Mr. Giguerre’s problem, and I thought the City was obviously
liable. I still do. Mr. Rigoni’s explanation of the settlement
greatly disturbs me. If he truly believed that the City was not
liable for the damages, and thought that could be backed up in
court, why did he agree to give Mr. Giguerre our tax money at
all? If he truly believed that was the case, which he claims,
that settlement is a willful disregard for our interests as
taxpayers.
When he spoke of the "politically
smart" thing to do, I almost laughed. It was one way or another.
All or nothing. Right or wrong. What did the council do? They
rode the fence right down the middle, in the saddle of every
politician since the beginning of time. The place where all
politicians think is politically smart. How does that protect
the interests of all taxpayers, part of your job? If your were
right that the City was not liable, you robbed us all by
agreeing to that settlement, Mr. Rigoni. If you were wrong, Mr.
Giguerre should have got all that he asked for, as long as it
was a legitimate amount. You didn’t do anyone any favors with
that one. That move was nothing but politics.
9-18-2007-04
Did you see Doug Rigoni's
advertisement in the Daily News about the sewer incident
involving Me Giguerre. He claims the council was advised by
the City Attorney to remain silent because of impending
litigation.
He forgot to mention that for
months Mr. Giguerre was trying to work with the council and
the city manager and was getting the flip. Finally had to
get an attorney.
If the city has automatic
governmental immunity, as he claimed in his ad, why did they
settle at all. Why didn't they declare governmental
immunity and end it right there? Because the city does not
have unlimited immunity. If they did, why do they bother
with any insurance.
The incident with Mr. Giguerre
was caused directly and unquestionably by the city. No
different than if a city vehicle ran a stop light and killed
somebody. Would a governmental immunity plea work in that
case? I doubt it.
9-18-2007-03
Here's a question
for an incumbent or a challenger...
Why, with dispatchers working in the
Police Department for 2 years now, is our City Administration
still filling daytime overtime shifts at the Police Department?
I asked this of a councilperson over
a year ago...was going to be looked into...it's still going on.
Anyone who can answer this will get
my vote.
Thanks!
9-17-2007-02 From http://www.cityofironmountain.com property tax lookup search NAUERTZ Results below NAUERTZ SCOTT T & TOUSIGNANT K 414 W LUDINGTON ST IRON MOUNTAIN, MI 49801 The truth is out there. 9-17-2007-01 TO:
IronMountainTruth.com, IronMountainIssues.org, The Daily News 9-16-2007-08
This current Council wants to take credit for the
handful of new businesses that have come to Iron Mountain (as if
they personally had something to do with those). Perhaps we
should also attribute to them the list of businesses that have
ceased to exist in those same four years. In just a few minutes,
I came up with a list of more that 35. I’d be happy to post what
I have if anyone questions that number.
This council (along with Mr. Marquart) wants to
take credit for so many things that were in the works and/or in
the budget before they were seated. All major road projects were
already in the works. Even the City Park pavilion was in the
budget before Marquart ever came here. Bay College was also in
the works before Marquart. The Out-to-Lunch program is another
that was in existence prior to this bunch.
This council tries to make people think that
they, along with Marquart, have brought these things about; when
in reality they just got to see them through to their
completion. What have they done that was not already started by
those who preceded them? Not much… other than a few special
interest projects.
9-16-2007-07 I had to sit back and
laugh at all the things that is being said about the challengers. I
think that the web site should be shut down for all the slanderous
things that is on there. 9-16-2007-06 I tried to read the so called truth site. It brings to mind an old song by Tommy Roe DIZZY. Its just too much spin for this old man too handle. I read lie upon lie deer at City Park was never a serious issue, it was proposed by high school students while running a council meeting. Then why was money budgeted for their removal? Personal attacks Dale please sue the BAS****S. Is our tax money being used to fund this site? The cable franchise fee that the charter says can only be used for road funding will be reduced if too much money is collected. It is setup to collect more than twice the amount as needed, so cut it now if there is any truth to that lie. The real truth on that one is 5% BECAUSE WE CAN. The city was approached by the developer for the champion building. Then why did the city manager say the city had chosen a developer? 9-16-2007-05 An example of how the
incumbents spin, bend, or embellish the truth is shown on
ironmountaintruth.com, in this paragraph about fire protection: 9-16-2007-04
It's a Matter of
Principal
To the Incumbents and
creators of ironmountaintruth.com: I am taking this opportunity
to stand up for myself against what is written on your website.
For the life of me, I cannot
understand how your website or the incumbents keep saying that I
am against progress, children's safety, festivals, colleges, the
farmer's market, MISHDA, tenant's safety, etc. Where in the
world does that information come from? Have I uttered any of
those words to another human being? Muttered them in my sleep?
No, I have not.
I swear on my Grandmother's grave
that I am not a homophobe. You can ask anyone that knows me and
they will instantly tell you, especially my children who I have
raised to be tolerant of all races, religeons, sexual
preferences, and differences. My Aunt-by-marriage has been in a
stable, loving relationship with her female partner for over 20
years. When I have been to the Lautner Foundation meetings in
California, most of the Board members are World renowned, highly
respected Architects...and gay. Another Lautner Board member, a
dear friend, passed away this summer in Desert Hot Springs. His
name was Steve Lowe and he was an amazing, compassionate man.
He also happened to be gay.
Saying that our campaign was mean
and negative astonishes me. First, how much more negative can
you get than the public radio ads the
incumbents played, hour after hour, day after day. These ads
were slanderous. Legal action should have been taken. We stuck
to the issues and had the facts. They sent out flyers with
distorted numbers and claimed credit for programs that were here
long before they ever came on the scene. They even took credit
for projects that countless volunteers put their muscle and
sweat into. We would never, never do that.
They have covered up so many issues
in the last 6 months especially, that it's near impossible for
the public to keep track. The "Truth" has been buried by a
professional politician we call "manager" and it has blatantly
caught up to him. Even if there are council members who did not
instigate innapropriate happenings, they certainly should have
stepped up to the plate to correct them.
I am going to address as
many of the lies as possible from that website. I
cannot do it in one blog, as there are so many; so I will do
something every few days.
I am going to start with the Deer at
City Park...I can almost hear the collective groan out there,
but bear with me on this. It may not be this City's most dire
issue, but it is a perfect example of the residents not being
heard, treated shabbily, and it shows the intense, collective
stubborness of this council. A stubborness that refused to
open-mindedly entertain the thought that maybe, just maybe, they
were going against the majority of the public's wishes.
There are two different places on
that website that mention myself and the deer at City Park. One
claims that under the direction of someone else
and near tears, I addressed the council over
the matter. What?! (I am distressed to learn I have no mind of
my own..again...) I recall being very calm when
I addressed the council, every time. I don't recall feeling
calm after one of the meetings where Mrs. Jacobs and
Ms. Caudell had claimed the deer had mange and they didn't look
real. I know I wasn't calm when Ms. Caudell accused me
of not speaking well one-on-one and not being passionate enough
when I wasn't at a podium...while I was trying to tell
her the deer did not have mange.
It also claims that by addressing
the council, I have made it a "smear" campaign? Huh? This
website, under "parks and recreation" and under "gossip and
lies", claim that the only reason the subject ever came
up to get rid of the deer was because high school kids told them
to do it.
OK...
And they claim that this issue was
never seriously discussed by the council. Take
a look at council minutes and you will see otherwise. As far
back as 2005, it has been discussed by this council. December
11th, 2006 has some discussion, but it is not specific in the
minutes.
January 8th, 2007
Council Minutes: The opinions go something
like this, but I encourage you to please read the minutes for
yourselves:
Rigoni: Believes
the money spent to feed the deer (approximately $1600 per year,
I found out) would be better spent on Park improvements.
Jacobs: Feels the
deer pen could be recreational space or a bowl area for summer
concerts. Also claimed at two separate meetings that the deer
had mange, but that was not in the minutes.
Caudell: Feels the
deer pen would be better suited for additional recreational
space. Also stated that the deer don't look like real deer at
another meeting.
Tchokreff: Stated
he would like to get rid of the deer for financial and usage
purposes.
Tousignant: Stated
the City Council should create a Master Plan for City Park.
Which they went ahead and did. Which the public was supposed to
be able to see on July 29th according to their own article in
the Daily News. It was promised to be a time of Public
Input towards the Master Plan, but said Plan was not
available and one council member said it was too controversial
to unveil.
The Daily News article of
the January 8th Meeting adds a bit more to this:
VanLaanen: Renovations
at the park can only happen if the deer are not there.
(This is a pretty intense and misleading statement)
Rigoni: Discussion
of the deer removal had come before the council a couple of
years before. (Before the High School
students?)
Burke: Felt the
money used to keep the deer could be put back into the park.
Jacobs: There are
other ways to put the park to good use.
Caudell: Residents
see so many other deer outside the park and the City has to
shoot them...and then we have to pay to keep 10
penned up in the park? Most people I talked with are OK with us
taking the deer away from the park.
So, you see...no Serious
discussions have happened about the deer by the City Council.
How can they say that? Is being written out in a budget letter
and planned for not considered "serious?"
In the 2007-2008 Budget
Memorandum- page 5, written by John
Marquart, read and approved by the council, it speaks of the
removal of the deer pen as going ahead per
recommendation. It also promises public input
towards this...but then again it also stated that we were going
to see a 6.39% increase in City revenues from the reassessment.
What happened most recently was they
eventually realized that most residents were very
unhappy with a decision to remove the deer pen and they
back-pedaled after the Pavilion open house on July 29th. At a
following meeting, a day before the Primary, they
announced that it seemed as if people really wanted the deer and
the Mayor endorsed a "Friends of the Park" committee to help
fund things.
See, it only took months and months
of begging, groveling, letter writing, and their thoughts of
lost votes for them to place regard on the public's wishes.
While I am happily relieved that the deer will be able to stay,
I am dumbfounded at the effort it took to make this happen and
the personal price that had to be paid.
And somehow, they are twisting this
around and saying that I have used the deer as a "smear tactic"
when hords of residents have been speaking up about this issue
for over a year or longer...many, many months
before running for Council was ever a thought in my head.
Residents were writing "Letters to the Editor" and at the
January 8th meeting, 7 residents stood up to speak. Not
one suggested full removal of the deer pen, three
suggested partial removal for a Winter park concept, a wading
pool, and a field, and the rest asked that the deer be allowed
to stay. Mr. Dinnocenzo stated that as DWP Foreman he took care
of the deer, the cost was less than what the council stated, and
that not a day goes by without someone visiting and observing
the deer.
The Council had pushed that it was a
strictly a money issue at first, but when solutions were brought
before them to cut costs, it didn't matter.
When they said it was a space issue
and it was brought to their attention that the piece of land in
question was horrifically expensive and impractical to flatten
out, let alone the problems of the water hole, they still
refused to relent.
My point through all of
this: They did not listen to the residents
and still mislead on information. They had their own
plans in motion already, sets of drawings done, and only stopped
when it became an issue of possibly losing votes. They
pigeon-holed me on this issue, when I tried everything possible
to find solutions that compromised. I looked up Grants
available, including Federal, State, NWF, and Nature
Conservancy. I spoke with UP Whitetails and Western UP DNR
Wildlife who were both extremely kind and
helpful. I searched for possible locations of new Football and
Soccer fields, and somewhere along the line I wondered why I was
doing these things and the Council wasn't.
I wasn't out to get anyone, I just
felt very passionate as a resident about this
particular subject and gave it my all. The deer were not
political to me, they were simply creatures that meant something
to me. A child's ability to interact with them meant something
to me. The feedback that I saw from the paper, council meeting
articles, and people on the street was that the deer were
important to most of the residents. So, I was
silly (naive?) enough to try and make a difference before it was
too late, before they were gone forever. Is that really so
bad?
I didn't understand why it became an
issue of wanting a field or the deer. I
knew there could be both and so much more if the effort was
actually put into that direction. But VanLaanen told the public
that there could be no renovations if the deer remained, thereby
drawing a definable and harmful line through our city. And if
you wanted to have both? Were you against progress?
This will hopefully be the last I
will have to explain about the deer at City Park. Anything else
in the future that is mentioned about them, I hope will only be
progress about their habitat becoming improved. I will also
only be addressing the "truth" website on my blog at
www.ironmountaindemocracy.com from this point on.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Tina Peterson
9-16-2007-03
To the spin-master that said the
following:
"I am really having a hard time
believing that someone could write in to this site and try to
say with sincerity that having a full-time fire department is
somehow an insult to our healthcare workers in the two hospitals
located in Iron Mountain. That is spin at its’ extreme."
The insult lies in crediting the
fire department with the VA's success. The VA is an exceptional
facility with outstanding staff and services and thus has
remained opened in spite of budget cuts closing other
facilities.
If anyone honestly believes the
federal government, in assessing which facilities to close,
considered the VA in Iron Mountain and said, "Oh no, not that
one...they have a full-time fire department in Iron Mountain,
let's keep that one open." you really need to get real! Give
credit where credit is due on the VA...the VA administration &
staff.
Spin that.
9-16-2007-02
* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Thank you to
Doug Rigoni:
1. For keeping us well
occupied, arguing amongst ourselves about things like the fire
protection of other cities.
2. For making us realize
how easily we succumb to being baited.
3. For making us
temporarily forget about all of the other issues, just
long enough to feel even more torn apart as a City.
Thank you
to Ken Tousignant:
1. For ironmountaintruth.com and
the pure hatred it reeks of.
2. For claiming that this
website, ironmountainissues.org, is nothing but lies and
complaining.
3. For accusing nearly everyone in
town of being homophobic and full of hatred.
4. For being so vindictive at your
loss that you will stop at nothing to demoralize the
challengers; including trying to pull their credit reports,
lying pathologically about their words or stances on issues,
unthinkable accusations, and trying to dig up and publicly
display whatever personal "skeletons" you think are the most
crude and hurtful.
Thank you
to all of the incumbents:
1. For allowing all of this
to happen, standing silently behind it, and as usual not having
the moral courage to stand up and say, "this is just plain
wrong."
Thank you
to all involved, especially the City Manager, for allowing this
election to become more painful and sinister than any
Presidential or Congressional race...All in the name of 4 "at
large" City Council seats for Iron Mountain, Michigan.
9-16-2007-01 There is a new web site that someone has created to counter this web site. Please visit the new site. This site's content, other than the Forum, is only facts and links to factual information. The web site proclaims that the good people of Iron Mountain are in favor of the current city council and this new web site and only the bad people of Iron Mountain are in favor of this web site. You bad people that live in Iron Mountain better visit this new site and turn to the good side. From the voter turnout in August and the number of people that visit this site daily, there are a lot of you that need to be converted to the good side. Webmaster 9-15-2007-01
The City of Troy PUBLIC
SAFETY budget for 2006 was 28,700,000.00
(If anyone actually gives a crap,
cut & paste the above link in your address bar to verify the
28.7 million dollar figure.)
Enough with comparing apples to
oranges.
9-14-2007-02
To 9-13-2007-03:
9-13-03,
One more thing, Tomah, Wisconsin
population 8419, home of Tomah VA Medical Center boasts a
thirty(30) member VOLUNTEER fire dept. I am surprised the VA
Center there is still open( for those of you who don't see it,
thats sarcasm)
It has a 23
member police dept. (Iron Mtn has what 14)
and get this it has 2 full time EMS
operators (not fire personnel) with 8 volunteers
So you see who is the real
spinster...
Now the real issue is how to get an
open, caring, sharing two-way communication between the City
Council and the residents.
9-14-2007-01
9-13-03
Please don't "SPIN" my words...I did
not in anyway shape or form say that to have a full-time fire
dept. was an insult to VA workers. What I said was that to think
that the reason the facility is open is BECAUSE there is a full
time fire dept. here in Iron Mountain is an insult to the
hardworking caring people that work at the VA. I believe its
more to do with the quality staff here and not the fire dept.
that protects them that the facility remains open. Stop the
spin yourself!
9-13-2007-03
I am really having a hard time
believing that someone could write in to this site and try to
say with sincerity that having a full-time fire department is
somehow an insult to our healthcare workers in the two hospitals
located in Iron Mountain. That is spin at its’ extreme. I wonder
who the couple of friends are that you got your misinformation
from?
Everything that writer said is full
of misinformation, as far as I’m concerned. I’m glad someone did
more research on the city of Troy and posted it here. After
looking at that information, I did some research myself. When
Iron Mountain was staffed with 14 career firefighters in our
fire department, they achieved a class 4 rating. A quick call to
the fire department told me that a class 3 rating was missed by
only 3 points. This was done WITHOUT 180 volunteers and 6 fire
stations. What does that tell you about the capabilities of Troy
compared to Iron Mountain? It tells me we had an awesome fire
department if they could score that high in comparison to a
department with 194 people and 6 fire stations. We should be
begging the ISO to come back if our fire protection is better
now, instead of the delaying and stalling that is documented.
Have you ever called the fire department for information about
the fire department, or have you ever checked for documentation
supporting one side of an issue or another? Or, are you
spoon-fed information that you take at face value without ever
verifying it?
On the budget difference with
Kingsford, it definitely appears that Kingsford does not include
some items in their public safety budget that are included in
Iron Mountain’s, plus Iron Mountain has 26 people compared to 20
in Kingsford. Incidentally, don’t believe the numbers for the
"reduced" public safety costs you see on the line item for
public safety in the ten year budget history in the newest city
budget. More coming soon on that.
You will be shocked.
You also did not do your research
very well on the medical response issue. One, you overpriced the
fire truck by a 6-figure amount. Two, you said every ambulance
call, when the proposal was for life-threatening emergencies
only. Three, you claimed the fire truck would not get to a scene
faster than the ambulance, when in fact this was done on a trial
basis and the fire truck averaged a response of a couple of
minutes ahead of the ambulance. What is two minutes in a life or
death situation? Literally, life and death in some cases. Four,
you want real healthcare professionals responding, insinuating
you would not get that on a fire truck, when in fact your
full-time firefighters are all Michigan licensed healthcare
professionals. Five, you insinuate that only big cities have
fire-based EMS, when in fact over 90% of EMS in the entire
country is fire-based. Again, do some real research. I could
go on, but why bother?
I think someone is trying to turn
this city election into a one-issue thing. The first attempt at
that, the subject now banned on this site, didn’t work, so now
we have moved to the fire issue. It’s a big, serious issue, but
only one of many big, serious issues facing us as taxpayers.
Let’s not lose sight of that as the election approaches. It will
be hard for the challengers to address ALL of the large issues
facing us, because there are so many legitimate ones and so
little time, and sadly, so little interest in from people. I
hope the primary was a sign that I’m wrong about the people not
caring. I hope that people will make up their minds based on
what they can see in documentation rather than someone's
politically spun prose.
9-13-2007-02
Comparing the Troy, MI
Fire Dept with Iron Mountain is sheer nonsense. It serves
no purpose whatsoever. Some pertinent facts:
Troy MI has a population
of 80,500 (2000 census) or 10 times Iron Mountain.
Troy has 6 fire
stations. Iron Mountain has one.
Troy made 1225 runs in
the year 2005 - latest info on their website.
227 actual fires in 2005
or almost 5 per week
Troy has 9 Pumper/Ladder
trucks
3 Aerial Platforms
3 - 65 foot aerial
pumpers
Much other equipment
that I won't bother to list.
Their 180 volunteers are
each assigned to a particular fire station, so it's roughly
30 volunteers per station.
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING is
accomplished by making comparisons to TROY, so forget it.
9-13-2007-01 Lately I've been seeing an Iron mountain DPW pickup truck in Norway in the evenings and on weekends. Some times with a passenger and sometimes without. I was just curious as to why the taxpayers are providing transportation for this individual if he chooses to live out of Iron Mountain and does the insurance company cover passengers if they are not employees? 9-12-2007-06
Well, I did not mean to ruffle
feathers...
but since I am "spinning" check your
own spin...City of Troy, 80,000+ citizens, City of Iron Mountain
8500+. That works out to about 10 times as many citizens
as Iron Mountain!. Iron Mountain's fire budget is
approximately $1,000,000. So how is it that Troy, with a
population 10 times larger than us doesn't spend 10 time as much
on fire protection?
Based on your numbers there are 194
fire trained personnel in Troy with TEN times the population of
Iron Mountain. So that would equal about ohhhhh 19
fire trained personnel for Iron Mountain and would equal an ISO
3 rating..based on your own numbers it appears
the City's haphazard plan has provided us with equal fire
protection to the second highest SEV city in the state. Speaking
of spin, We would hardly need 180 volunteers here. So stop the
spin of your own! I am not sure if you are familiar with
volunteers but its not possible for everyone to respond at any
given time. At least with police they are awake, usually able to
get away from their job...and actually in the city not true with
many volunteers. And you call my info spin! I am sure however
that the multi-billion dollar corporations and retail
establishments in Troy are on their way out because of the fire
protection and skyrocketing insurance costs.
I was merely pointing out some
information I have found and the fact that our VA STAFF is the
reason its still open. Lost in the statement was the fact that
the city reacted in an unplanned, uncaring, cold ,poorly thought
out way.
But, based on the additional
information you provided me, I now believe the city has come out
smelling like a rose and come up with a plan that is viable and
equal to one of the most progressive cities in the state! Thanks
for showing me the light.
9-12-2007-05
On the City of Troy Fire Department:
14 career firefighters, yes, PLUS
180 volunteers - do you really think we could come up with
180 volunteers in Iron Mountain? Why didn’t you
mention this fact?
Troy Fire Dept. Budget -
$5,200,000.00 per year - is this sinking in?
Volunteer Firefighters in Troy
receive a pension from
the City - can you imagine 180 MORE people on the pension
system? Why didn't you mention this fact?
Oh yeah, It’s ISO class 3,
not 2, and it’s no doubt because of the 194 people on the
department, and the number of runs is about the same as Iron
Mountain. Iron Mountain is responding with 10 career
firefighters plus 9 minimally trained police officers, while
Troy is responding with 14 plus 180.
Way to spin it, baby.
http://www.troymi.gov/Fire/
- go to FAQ, frequently asked questions for your answers.
9-12-2007-04
If the fire protection is so
good now, as suggested by Doug Rigoni in his advertisement,
why did the City of Iron Mountain have to pay a $3000 ISO
fine.
You don't pay ISO fines if
everything is running as smoothly ask he claims. Care to
explain this to us - Mr. Rigoni or anyone who knows ISO
rules.
I am told even if policemen
respond to a fire, they are not yet certified to go into
basements or second floors. Does this mean we must all stay
on the first floor at all times if we expect to be rescued
in case of fire?
9-12-2007-03
What's the latest on the
assessment of the city? Haven't heard a word about since
Brook left.
We taxpayers have over
$300,000 stuck in this thing. Nothing to show for it yet -
and probably never will.
I've heard Brook has a
vital computer disc in his possession and so far hasn't
turned it over to the city.
Funny how we don't hear
the City Manager bragging about this caper that he and Brook
cooked up in the first place.
9-12-2007-02
I would like to see some
documentation on Mr. Rigoni’s claims that our fire protection is
expanded and is costing us less. I don’t believe that is
truthful at all. Something smells very fishy.
9-12-2007-01 Let Rigoni write his
ads. He just digs himself in deeper and deeper. 9-11-2007-02
In response to 9-11-01,
After reading this letter I did some
research and spoke to some friends, and used just plain common
sense.
Now I am not sure the main reason
the Iron Mountain VA remains open is because of the fire
department being full time. I would tend to believe that the
quality staffing, excellent services, efficiency and just plain
need probably has a greater role in keeping the facility open. I
would tend to believe that the vast federal Government and
Veterans Administration look more closely at these than a full
time fire department when they decide to keep a facility open.
The staff at The Iron Mountain VA should be insulted by
insinuating that the reason they are open is because there is a
full time fire department here.
While I know their hearts are in the
right place but as a citizen do I want my $500,000.00 fire truck
rolling on every ambulance call? Do I want what few firefighters
we have left tied up lifting someone off of their toilet? I am
sure the police cars can travel much quicker and perform the job
until the real medical professionals arrive. The ambulance crews
are prompt and by the time you load up a fire truck and get it
rolling the ambulance is going to be seconds away if not ALREADY
on scene. Sure in "other full-time departments" it occurs,
right, like L.A. where response is necessary because the
ambulance staff is probably strung out across a huge city and
back up fire coverage is already on duty. Thus, in this
community, it probably is not cost effective nor, in actuality
the safest option.
In the name of fire ratings and
insurance costs etc I did some research as well. We hear an
awful lot about insurance costs and fire dept staffing. What I
found was even more interesting. The City of Troy, downstate,
has the SECOND HIGHEST sev in the state, second only to Detroit.
It has a fire rating of 2. The only one higher is, again,
Detroit. The City of Troy employs only 14
full-time firefighters! The rest is augmented by volunteers or
paid-on-call. Now our city has approximately 8500 people and we
now have, what, 10 firefighters with 9 cross-trained police
officers. If fourteen is adequate for Troy, I am sure 19 trained
fire personnel is adequate for our fair city. We, as far as I
can tell, are the only city of its size to have a full-time fire
dept.
Now I went a little closer to home.
The City of Escanaba has a long standing public Safety Dept. and
I know a few people in Escanaba and they and most of their
residents feel perfectly safe with their police AND fire
protection.
Even closer of course is Kingsford,
ask any of the residents of Kingsford and I bet they will all be
satisfied with their level of protection. Now for something I
found shocking...On any given evening, late at night, the City
of Iron Mountain has 2 police officers on duty.
Combined with the 3 firefighters we now have on duty it makes
for a total of 5 fire personnel on duty
covering the city. In Kingsford, they too have five, sometimes
four, fire personnel on duty (overnite) the difference is in
Kingsford, ALL 5(sometimes 4)ON DUTY ARE POLICE
OFFICERS. Now Kingsford is half the size of Iron
Mountain and has over twice the police coverage at times. The
REAL kicker: Kingsford's public safety budget is approximately
$1,000,000.00 LESS than Iron Mountain's public
safety budgets (police and fire)! Same fire protection, more
police coverage for a million less? In these days of dwindling
revenue sharing from the state something had/has to be done
Its just a shame that the current
council and its sna..errr I mean:"slick" city manager
didn't present these issues in an open, caring, well thought out
way so that it might just be an option. Instead they alienated
everyone and missed the message.
God bless our firefighters and our
police officers for having the courage to not only put their
necks on the line for us but for the courage to deal with the
mindless way these changes were brought about. But to think
for one minute that the reason the VA remains open is because
there is a full-time fire department here is just plain silly.
9-11-2007-01
According to Doug Rigoni’s latest
article on Garbage Collection and Fire Fighting, he states that
the savings of 4 full time firemen was $185,000. This is a
savings of about $23.00 per year or less than $2.00 per month
per citizen of Iron Mountain. Past administrations of this City
saw to it that the citizens were protected. A full time
department is the best insurance policy that money can buy, and
you cannot buy this level of insurance for such a low cost
anywhere.
The City of Iron Mountain Fire
Department, prior to the arrival of Tousignant and the gang, was
on the verge of providing First response Medical Service to its
citizens. As a part of the full-time firefighters training, each
member was a qualified emergency medical technician. During
discussions on how to make more efficient use of personnel, the
Fire Department presented a plan to provide first responder
medical services to the citizens of Iron Mountain. This plan had
the backing of the medical staff of both Dickinson County
Hospital and the V.A. Hospital. It also had the backing of
Beacon Ambulance and the Emergency Services Director of
Dickinson County.
The plan would have been, that in
the event of a medical emergency, Iron Mountain firefighters
would be dispatched to the scene ahead of Beacon Ambulance. The
firefighters would stabilize and provide medical assistance and
Beacon would arrive and transport the victim. This would have
provided a very rapid response time within the City and given
the citizens the best possible fire department and medical
coverage possible. This is a life-saving procedure used by
full-time departments elsewhere.
Everything was in place to proceed,
the firemen had the necessary training, and the hospital and
Beacon Ambulance would be providing the necessary medical
equipment and supplies. Everything was ready to go, except one
last item. The City Council had to approve a $500 fee to license
the Department as a First Responder Service. It was rejected
without discussion. I believe, during the same meeting, further
on in the agenda was an item to spend approximately $13,000 to
color the concrete sidewalk across Chapin Pit. This item was
discussed and approved. And guess who did the work as an add-on
to their contract for the US-2 project? None other than Bacco
Construction. This medical service can no longer be accomplished
with the cuts that have been made in the Department. So, again
we have lost something that could have been a life-saving
benefit to our citizens.
Which would you rather have show up
at a fire. A full crew that can immediately enter a burning
building to save lives, or a partial crew that has to wait for
the trained police officers to arrive and get into their gear.
The police officers may be tied up with any number of things
such as a traffic accident or a crime scene. The firemen have
little choice but to wait.
Past administrations saw to it that
the citizens were protected by a full time department. We have
in this town, many older buildings, multiple story motels, and
two hospitals. Why do you suppose the VA Hospital is still in
Iron Mountain when other facilities have been closed down. I
don’t suppose that it was our level of fire protection that kept
them here, was it? So how much have we REALLY saved? Can we put
a cost figure on this Mr. Rigoni? Basic services to and
protection of our citizens cannot be just about dollar savings.
Especially not when this council has no problem spending far
greater amounts on frivolities.
9-9-2007-05 Does anybody know how the developer for the Champion Signature Building was chosen? Was this a fair and open process? Were proposals submitted and the best one chosen? Was this done openly and legally or was it done behind closed doors? Sounds like one sweetheart deal for the developer and I have to wonder if there was only one player in this game of stick it to the tax payer. 9-9-2007-04
So, we should keep Mr. Rigoni's
politics and Bacco separate, 'eh? That sounds like a reasonable
request, as long as that goes both ways. It's the appearance
that he is intertwining the two, or at least his other personal
business interests, that got people all riled up in the first
place.
I am glad someone pointed out that
the school liaison officer does cost us more than "half", to the
tune of an extra $35,000.00 to $40,000.00 OVER & ABOVE the
city's "half."
Why are we paying for a private
person to develop a building and business? Are we now
officially giving up traditional city services and becoming a
welfare agency for the already well-to-do to rob us blind? This
is outrageous, considering the coinciding drop in services we
have ALL suffered.
9-9-2007-03
The Bacco
Scholarship was set up by Medeo Bacco personally.
The first scholarship was given in 1949, over 57 years ago.
It was funded with $100,000 at the time, mostly in
stock. That would be roughly equivalent to $1,000,000 today.
It was and is a wonderful
scholarship that has helped well over 100 students over the
years.
The Bacco Construction Company
itself has never had anything to do with the Bacco
scholarship. It is named after the man who established and
funded it, not the company.
Doug Rigoni wasn't even born
until years after the scholarship was up and running, so
let's disconnect the Bacco scholarship from the Bacco
Construction company, and especially from Doug Rigoni, in
the interest of honesty.
9-8-2007-02 Just a few points: The Iron Mountain School liaison officer is a shared expense by the City and the School District. $26,000 per year from the School and $26,000 per year from the City. Other duties performed by the liaison officer is budgeted in the Cities Operating budget. Please keep in mind to keep Mr. Rigoni the politician and Bacco Construction separate. I have heard a few people talking a little negative towards Bacco Construction because Mr. Rogoni is associated with Bacco. I would hope that we can keep the politician and the business man separate. I was talking to a fellow citizen about this subject and he pointed how much Bacco Construction has done for our community. They employ quite of few citizens and have given generously in the area of scholarships for our graduates. We were trying to figure how many kids the Bacco Scholarship has put through college, but could only agree that it is a lot. Politics can be a messing thing and I am sure things will get messier the closer to the election we get. Please remember that everyone involved in the upcoming election are fellow citizens in our City. 9-8-2007-01
This is in response to the questions posed by
post 9-7-2--7-03 about the Signature Grant
application for the Champion Inc.
building.
I have read that application.
It is public information. The following information is my
best recollection of the facts. If I'm not sure, I will
mention that fact.
The developer for the project is
listed in the application as Bruce Varda. There was
additional documentation on the projected cost of renovating
the building. They figures were quite high. (I believe they
were over $1,000,000.) I don't know how the developer was
chosen.
If the application is accepted
by the state, two or three (I'm not sure) independent
appraisals of the building must be made. There is language
in the application forms about how the final value will be
determined.
The maximum dollar amount of the
grant would be $300,000 with a 20% match by the city, or
$60,000. In other words, the owners of the Champion, Inc.
could receive up to $360,000 if the appraisals were at or
above that amount.
The city would take title to the
building if the deal goes through. The city must hold the
building for five years. If they sold it before that, they
would have to return the grant money proportionately. For
example, if they sold it in two and half years, they would
have to give back half of the grant. If they sold it after
four years, they would have to give back 20%.
In the meantime, the developer
is supposed to make all necessary improvements and begin
renting the building. The city apparently can make any kind
of deal it chooses with the developer. They can lease it to
the developer for $1.00 a year for five years, for example.
After five years, the city can sell it to the developer for
$1.00 or $360,000 or any other price.
The whole arrangement struck me
as very strange. It is very open-ended. The current
owners of the building, if they accepted the appraisal
price, would get their money and be gone. Thereafter, it
would be between the city and the developer. This could
lead to some weird and complex arrangements. It is safe to
assume the developer will not enter into any
arrangement that is not in his interest.
If the process moves forward, it
will be interesting to see where the appraisals come in.
Certainly, the building is worth nowhere near the maximum
possible price of $360,000, as is, to any arms-length
buyer. It needs extensive renovation and would have to meet
all current structural, electrical, plumbing, and heating
codes. It would also have to meet all the American With
Disabilities Act requirements.
At some point, you wonder why
someone would pay anything for it considering the cost of
renovation and the return on investment. But, that's not our
concern. We just don't want the city to somehow get stuck
with a white elephant.
The application for the
Signature grant is available for review at city hall by any
interested citizen. It is public information.
9-7-2007-04 The city does not absorb the complete cost of the liaison officer. The school district and the city share the expense. 9-7-2007-03
I have a few questions. On the home
page, there is a link to a FOIA response dated June 7, 2007.
One of the items that the requester obtained is the Signature
grant application for the Champion building. Is there anything
of interest in that application? Does it name a developer for
the project? If not, does anyone know if a developer has been
"chosen"? Who is it? How were they picked? What was the
criteria? Were other people given an opportunity to partake of
this grant as a potential developer? Why is this issue not
openly discussed in public meetings? This is tax money we are
talking about, isn't it? Can anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks.
9-7-2007-02 I don't believe any of the posts on this site have been against the school liaison officer himself. I think what people are trying to point out is the deception City Manager John Marquart keeps putting out to the people of this city. As reported in the Tuesday, August 21, 2007 Daily News, Mr. Marquart states "the posistion of school liaison officer costs approximately $52,000 a year for salary and benefits". If City Manager John Marquart has nothing to hide, why does he keep misinforming us? If the position actually costs closer to $90,000 a year with salary and benefits, why not just tell the truth? If Mr. Marquart received a $6,000 dollar MIOSHA fine, and the city paid $6,000 dollars for the fine, why did he tell the citizens "he actually had the fine cut in half"? If raw sewage was dumped into chapin pit, why did Mr. Marquart say "it was not raw sewage, just dirt and sand"? The documented list goes on!! If Mr. Rigoni is going to clear up what he calls "lies", I sure hope he plans on getting the current city councils "house in order" first. 9-7-2007-01
On the Crystal Lake issue, we
have another example of people knowing practically nothing
about it making various foolish pronouncements. Examples:
1. John Marquart has repeatedly
stated that the only way Crystal Lake levels can go down is
through evaporation. He's been here running the show,
and it has been a show, for three and a half years
ariound here and still doesn't know that there is a drain
field there. It was put in when Crystal Lake rose
substantially during a particularly rainy period a few years
the storm water
was diverted there and caused
the lake to rise.
2. A large diverter gate valve
was put in the "C" or "D" Street area as part of the US-2
project (the first phase) from Kent Street and Washington
Avenue. This diverter valve can divert all of the water
coming down from the East Side into the West Chapin Pit. It
can also be closed so that all of that water can be diverted
into Crystal Lake. This project solved a 100 year old
problem of flooded basement in the downtown area.
3. The city worked very closely
with MDOT and the Department of Environmental Quality
for years designing this project and doing
extensive impact studies of Crystal Lake and East and West
Mud Lake. If there is a problem, MDOT and DEQ should be
contacted. They were intimately involved throughout the
process and approved it.
4. The catch basins were
routinely and carefully cleaned for many years as required
by MDOT and DEQ. Whether this process has continued, I
don't know, but extensive documentation of these cleaning
procedures was recorded and should exist in city files.
There were hundreds of catch basins involved. I doubt that
Dr. Feleppa was wandering around watching this process, but
she makes the outrageous claim that such catch basin
cleaning not done. This is patently untrue.
5. If the city council and
manager would seek out the people who were involved in the
process at the time, including retired foremen, city
managers, city council and TIFA members, they would
increase their knowledge of the issue immensely.
But you have to realize
that this city council and city manager have taken the
position that the city was run only and exclusively by
morons for 125 years until they showed up, so there is no
point in asking them anything. Ya, sure. When you have
this kind of arrogance, you have to re-invent the wheel at
every turn because you have to deny it was invented in the
first place. All of this at enormous expense of taxpayers.
Fortunately, there
is some hope for this city after November 6. Let's just
hope they don't squander too much in the meantime.
9-5-2007-11
These are the last to posts that I will show about this issue. I am not trying to be biased about this subject but I don't want it to turn into a dog chasing his tail. Post #2 is upset with that I wont post every little comment that has the word gay in it. Post # 1 wants the chance to answer number #1. There is no city issue here and that is why I wont publish anymore posts on this subject. Poster #2, if you want a place to discuss this issue please start your own website. Thanks for visiting and stay informed on City Issues. Webmaster Post #1 Dear webmaster,
I am in complete agreement with your
announcement about not posting anymore on the gay issue, because
it is not a city issue. However, by letting post #9-5-2007-09
stand unchallenged and undeleted, you are being a bit unfair.
This person, whoever he or she is, has been allowed to post
misinformation/spin with no chance for anyone to
respond, counteract or correct it. This situation of no
responses allowed sounds a lot like the sort of thing we are
all fighting against in city hall right now.
Please don't get me wrong. I agree
that sexual preference is not a city issue. But, I believe that
the tactic used by the writer that we are not permitted to
respond to IS a city issue.
Thanks for everything you have
done. Sincerely.
Post #2 Please be informed I am calling attention to this completely biased refusal to publish my letters to TV 6 and the Daily News. You will publish a song about ding dong the mayor is gone, but refuse to allow me to express myself. I am sure you do not think what I AM TYPING IS RELEVANT TO THE ISSUES, BUT IT IS TO ME AND OTHERS, JUST AS THE ISSUE OF CABLE TAX ETC. IS TO OTHER PEOPLE.
GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FAIR WEBSITE...
9-5-2007-10 I will not post anymore material on the "Gay Issue". I have received several posts from someone that has gone through the archives and found references to the Gay issue. I am sorry but I don't see any reference to any anti-gay or gay bashing. I am also getting several responses to this person's posts and so on and so on. I hope you can see were this is going. These are not the issues we are facing as citizens of Iron Mountain. Webmaster 9-5-2007-09
This is to respond to the post stating
basically that there is no ill will towards gay people in this
town...or maybe I should say, there is no attempt at using
anything anti gay to steer the election......read these if you
think so.....
8-19-2007-04
I am responding to the comment - 8-19-2007-02 - that asks why a name was listed as a negative item in the list from comment 8-4-2007-11. I wrote that. I should not have put the name in the list.
Marcus was a "line item" Oh good for you, you removed it…too late 9-5-2007-08 I agree with the person
who posted 9-4-2007-03. Let them defeat themselves. The citizens
aren't blind or stupid. They've seen their tax dollars spent on
special interests/pet projects while basic services, maintenance,
etc. have been lost. A person needn't go far beyond their own
driveways to see the deterioration in this city. How many people
have been 9-5-2007-07
Is it true Marqaurt has hired Mr.
Ray, the part-time police dispatcher as a part-time patrolman?
This was done without council approval and possibly a civil
service violation. He was hired the day his one
eligibility certification from the police academy was to expire.
Rumor has it he will be working 16 hours per week. Don't forget
he was sent to the police academy last year at an expense of
$16,000.00 without the council approval and having never taken
the civil service exam. My question is why would the city send
him to school when you already have a valid eligibility list?
Why wasn't the position advertised? Norway and Niagara have
recently hired part-time officers and didn't have to incur the
schooling costs.
9-4-2007-06
Doug Rigoni must think
that the voters are just plain stupid and have total memory
loss every three weeks or so.
Sorry, but your four years of
self-serving actions hounded you in the primary election and
will hound you even more in the general election. Put in
all the ads you want.
Yo have stated that a "small,
unrepresentative group" that came to city council meetings
meant nothing. The voters thought otherwise. Do you really
believe the dozens and dozens of bad decisions you and your
group of elitist incumbents over four years can be negated
with a couple of ads. - Good luck.
There are people out there in
this community who will not sit by idly and
let you pile up even more lies without retaliation.
You have been one of the
most self-serving council members ever. There is a price to
pay for this on election day, and you will pay that price
once again in November.
9-4-2007-05
Regarding Mr. Rigonis Campaign ad,
where he mentions misinformation and outright lies.
I wonder if he is referring to John
Marquarts explanation, at a council meeting, of the Bolt
decision. What the
manager said was not true. See link for documentation:
I wonder if he was referring to John
Marquarts explanation, at a council meeting, of a recent
$3,000.00 fine from MIOSHA.
What the manager said about that was not true.
I wonder if he was referring to the
incumbent campaign brochure that claimed Iron Mountain was
receiving "next to no state grant money" before he was elected.
That is not true, according to the 2007-2008 budget. In fact,
the record shows LESS state grant money
to Iron Mountain since he was elected. See link for
documentation:
I wonder if he was referring to the
incumbent campaign brochure that claimed we had "no protection
against blighted property."
Again, not true - look at the code of ordinances that was in
place before he was elected. It was there, just not enforced.
I wonder if he was referring
to the raw sewage dumping explanations from the city that did
not match what the DEQ (experts) said.
I really don’t want to get too
long-winded here. There is a multitude of other issues of this
nature that most regular visitors to this website already know
about. The ONLY thing he is right about is
that there is a LOT of misinformation and outright lies going
on. 9% Bonus?
9-4-2007-04
The current council should make an
attempt (however late and feeble) at listening to the tax paying
public and fire Marquart before the challengers have the chance
to. Steal their thunder and try to save your own necks. Not
sure it would help re-election efforts at this point, but a
city-wide sigh of relief may be heard.
9-4-2007-03 About How Doug Rigoni and the Other Incumbents Are Choosing to Campaign I am delighted! Rigoni campaigning publicly, in the paper? This is terrific! Let's hope we can get him on the radio and television! If you are anti-status-quo/anti-incumbent and are pro-challenger/pro-progress-and-positive-change in the upcoming election, and if the challengers and their supporters can simply and quietly keep a factual spotlight on the incumbent candidates without being baited and getting strident, volatile, defensive, and disagreeable, then you can only hope and pray beyond hope and prayer that the other incumbent candidates and John Marquart will campaign likewise, and that all of them, including Rigoni, will appear often across the traditional media. Because, ladies and gentlemen, the incumbent candidates will have to win with smoke and mirrors. They are their own worst enemies and have been for nearly four years. With rare exceptions, these candidates don't have a leg to stand on, and by merely publicly and clearly holding up their words in comparison to their records of the last four years, by pointing to the stark contradictions of what they've done versus what they say, the opposition will allow the incumbents to defeat -- to continue to defeat -- themselves. When your opponents are shooting themselves in the foot, have the sense to shut up and merely point at them, so others can be aware of what's going on and exercise the necessary judgment to remain away from those people, safe and better off. As I talk to people around town, I'm running into an awful lot of crybabies whining over the incumbent candidates promising to defend themselves and campaign publicly -- even about Ken Tousignant running as a write-in candidate. Are you crybabies crazy? This has to be Marquart advice or Marquart-like advice, because the incumbents are figuratively offering to hang themselves. You Nervous Nellies ought to be offering them rope! Let them defeat themselves. If you're smart, you'll start contributing to their ad campaigns. Just make sure every voter in town is watching so fact-versus-fiction is visible to all, and keep your bloody traps shut. Let the accumulating nonsense that has done in these people over the last few years continue to do in these people over the last few weeks. 9-4-2007-02
There has been much discussion on
this web site about Mr Mattson, our Liaison Officer, who is
serving our schools here in Iron Mountain.
I personally know officer Mattson
and I believe he is a critical component in our fight against
drugs in our school system. The kids trust him and have much
respect for what he does!
I would encourage
everyone, to absolutely support his work, results and continuing
position in this community as a Liaison Officer.
I am sure most people feel the same
way about this critical service in our schools, but the issue is
not our support, as it is how to fund the position.
The school district pays for 50% of the costs right up front and
the rest is paid by the city. I am personally disgusted with our
city council for voting to use this money (even against the
advice of the city attorney not to use cable fees because it
could cause a problem in the future!
In the past, (as it is suppose to
be) this program was paid for by the tax payers voting for a
very small tax mileage and all that has to be done is for this
mileage to be re-newed again in November. I have not talked to
anyone who said they would not support continuing this service!
As many have pointed out, this is
wrong (and I have been told illegal, though I don't know if this
is a fact)) to use a franchise fee for this purpose. Only those
who have cable are footing the bill while the rest of the
community gets the benefit. That is really taxation without
representation and I strongly disagree with it's implementation!
The new challengers for city
council will make it right when they get in office and because
they absolutely support Mr Mattson's position, they will use the
funding from proper sources and discontinue another fee burden
on the people "just because I can
do it"
Remember to get out to vote
in November and tell your friends how important this election is
for our city's health .
Don Christy
9-4-2007-01
Nobody, but nobody, on this
site as far as I can determine, is opposed to continuation of
the Liaison Officer.
Let's let the matter rest.
The Liaison Officer stays, He will stay in the budget , just
not with the TV fee money-grab the incumbents thought up.
9-3-2007-09 To 08-30-2007-06
about the gay slurs. 9-3-2007-08
Response to 9-3-2007-05:
I agree with you whole-heartedly and
feel that the Liaison Officer has become a political issue now.
This is not right.
I believe it happened because of the
irresponsible way the program became funded, but I urge everyone
to please see the program as a separate entity from politics.
What was done, can't be undone right now. It is very important
that you hear what the poster said about the drug problem in the
school system and the wisdom of being proactive towards it.
My son was approached in his
Freshman year by many "sellers" and he had the courage to tell
me that kids could get whatever they wanted, whenever they
wanted it...including illegal prescription drugs. This scared
me to death. This is at a crisis stage, but
nobody will talk about it!
When the school does a locker
search, the kids already know about it and then there is never
anything found. Children have died. Are we going to quibble
about the salary of someone who may be able to help prevent
this?
How about if we start fighting back
against all the drug houses that have popped up in all of our
neighborhoods? These people are making a profit, a PROFIT on
ruining or eventually ending young lives. What if we followed Hermansville's
example and joined forces as residents to force out the sellers
and dealers?
I used to think it would be enough
to talk our children's ears off about the dangers of drugs. I'm
not so sure anymore. For every child in this town that does
drugs, they have a parent who would stake their life on the fact
that their child would never do that. I have
heard countless stories of heroin addiction in our area and
these teens cannot seem to get clean, ever. We have somehow let
nameless, faceless strangers come to our town and sell
our teenagers a life-dooming substance.
Read the newspaper. Our court
system is filled with drug offenders and most other crimes are
drug related in that they stole to feed their habit.
Does anybody out there really think
that our Middle School kids are somehow safe from this
activity? If we keep burying our heads in the sand, our kids
will pay the ultimate price. Whatever we can
do to help them navigate through all of this, including the
Liaison Officer, is something we owe our kids as a
community.
So, forget the politics for a
minute...please...just think of the kids.
Maybe being a parent makes this issue more urgent to me, but the
old saying goes..."it takes a community to raise a child."
Tina Peterson
9-3-2006-07 I agree with
9-3-2007-05. Attacking the school liaison officer personally and
the program itself is misdirected. The program's a valuable
resource. What all of us should do is just pony up fairly across
the board throughout the city and pay our share of what it costs to
keep the program running effectively, not rely on this half-ass
half-measure of a cable fee that has some paying, some not, everyone
confused, half of us ticked off, and tries to be too slick by half.
Instead of making a mountain out of a molehill, let's just figure
out what the city's share of the program costs and then do what's
necessary to tax everyone plainly and fairly to pay for it. How
hard is that? 9-3-2007-06 Progress? LOL!!! Doug Rigoni's gonna pursue the "progress" campaign? That's too much, man. I'm for progress. I can't tell you how many Iron Mountain voters I know -- and knew on August 7 -- who are for progress. It's a major reason we turned out for the primary. And it's precisely because we're for progress that we're supporting the challengers and not voting for Doug Rigoni and the other incumbents on November 6! Look around. Just look at the descent this city has made over the past four years despite City Hall's P.R. machine. It's sinking fast, babe. "Continue the progress?" Progress to perdition maybe. Brother. Talk about being out of touch. If I want a shot at progress, the last person I'm gonna vote for is one of the incumbents. They had their shot. What they've done and continue to do to Iron Mountain ain't my idea of progress. My idea of what they've been doing to Iron Mountain is something I'm positive the webmaster won't include on this website. 9-3-2007-05
I think all who are attacking our
liaison officer and his position need to do a little home work.
I know that he is very involved with the kids at our schools and
is also involved with the KIND program. Open your eyes...we
have a bad drug problem in our town. He is our first defense
against potential crimes and the possibility of changing or even
saving a kid's life. Don't attack the officer and his
position...find out why it has become such an issue with the
council. We need him in our schools. I don't like the fact
that the council has decided to implement the cable fee any more
than my neighbors. The city's tax $$$ should be spent on
this program before any more cobbled streets,
band shell/parking lot reconstruction. You can make the town
"appear" pretty but without programs like the liaison officer it
will be like putting a Band-Aid on a severed limb. Let's be
practical.
9-3-2007-04
Here we go again,
Picture and article in the daily news from
Doug Rogoni about "Re-introducing himself" to the people about
what he has done, will do and what he will continue to do while
on the city council, AND WHAT THE REAL TRUTH IS.
Fact is Mr Rogoni, --- you had the time to
"do it" for the past several years and you never did!
Fact is, you had the opportunity to "do it"
and you failed to grasp the chance.
Fact is, you had the means of making a
difference in this city and all you did is look out for
yourself, your company and the whims of the Mayor and City
Manager!
Fact is Mr Rogoni, you did not listen to the
people and their wishes and opinions. All you did is promote
your own and the council's personal agendas!
Fact is, ------- you can re-introduce
yourself again to the people of this community and the response
will be the same at election time in November, you will be the
lowest vote getter in the race because you have lost all
credibility with the people and they will not fall for your
deceptions, lies and propaganda again.
Fact is Mr Rogoni, --- if you care about this
city, drop out of the race and support the new people who will
have the chance, take the opportunity and support the means, of
being honest, trustworthy and ethical in city government.
You are probably a good person who meant
well, but you blew it because you saw fit to be a puppet for
Marquart, you would not listen to the people and you supported
your own personal interests!
Tousignant is gone, you will be next,
along with Sally, VanLannen and finally Marquart!
Keep your articles coming in the paper. --
the new running candidates need the lies to reveal the truth to
the people.
Fact is --- IT IS ALL OVER FOR YOU AT CITY
HALL
I'll be looking forward to your next article!
9-3-2007-03 Is this administration
so desperate to try to make themselves look good (and the Daily News
so interested in helping) that a few residential road repairs are
news? I cannot remember past administrations putting articles in
the paper every time they did basic road maintenance. The article
isn't clear as to whether these streets (Fairbanks, Grant and Main)
are being paved in their entirety or if it will be just the portions
that are currently being worked on. We came down Fairbanks last
night and turned at the detour. 9-3-2007-02
Let’s not forget about Rich Brook and his botched attempt at
reassessment. If he was under contract to provide a service or
product, where is it? Mr. Brook and his cohorts where paid
$210,467.67 (by my recent calculations) to provide a product
that the City could use to raise assessments. But where is it? I
have heard that many errors were made in the process that go
against state tax law.
Mr. Marquart can’t just get out of this fiasco by firing Mr.
Brook and refusing to give the public any details. Our tax
dollars were spent for a service, and we are entitled to see the
fruit of it or have that money back. There was a contract for
this reassessment; and if it wasn’t fulfilled, there is a breach
and we are entitled to that money back. This one better not get
swept under the rug. Mr. Marquart, in his new budget, is
counting on a projected State Equalized Value for the City of
nearly 10 million dollars more than last year. With this botched
reassessment, where is that going to come from?
I was sure I had read earlier where someone had asked the City
for information about Rich Brook’s product and got nothing. Can
we really afford to sit on this until new council members are
seated and we are half way through this fiscal year? If there is
no product, and the City must have it completely redone, what’s
that going to cost? If there is no product from Rich Brook, the
money paid to him (and his cronies) must be returned. And, I
find it hard to believe it will be easy to find someone else to
do the job that isn’t going to expect the same lucrative deal
that Brook had. Assessors in the State are well aware of what
went on here. [And Mr. Marquart can’t hire from out-of-state
because of State required certification.]
I cannot begin to imagine how many things have been mishandled
and miscalculated because of this Rich Brook mess. Even the
Rental Housing fees must be grossly overestimated. I know of
several (so there must be many more) people who own property
other than where they reside, who received notices from the city
to register their rental property. Many of these properties are
vacant lots that Mr. Brook decided to refer to as rental
property simply because the owners did not reside there.
This City is going to be in such a disaster that it’s going to
be difficult for anyone to try to straighten it out. And they
call this PROGRESS. I'm all for progress, but this ain't it!
9-3-2007-01
For those who do not receive the newspaper, I have attached a Doug Rigoni campaign ad for your review that was in the Daily News morning edition, 9-3-2007. Mr. Rigoni says that, "Over the last several months, there has been some misinformation and some outright lies going around about the Iron Mountain City Council." He goes on to say that he will be addressing these inaccuracies over the next several weeks.
That’s okay with me. Fair is fair,
people. I just hope he addresses things with documentation,
and not just words. There are several items I would like to see
him address that are backed up by documentation. The huge
mess over the reassessment, for instance. When was it properly
bid? How did several individuals get paid without contracts?
What about the figures being rejected two years in a row?
What about the huge waste of money because of that? David Legge?
What about the 9% bonus given to the city manager, almost as if
in response to citizen outrage over this issue? That’s just a
beginning of questions on ONE ISSUE! Good luck making
that one sound all rosy and nice, Mr. Rigoni.
P.S. There was an ad in the
Advertiser this past week for a piece of land - price,
$950,000.00. There was a post here claiming that was
your land, sir, and that the price has jumped by a factor
of 950%. Mr. Rigoni, can you please prove false the rumors that
you are enjoying personal gain from being a councilman in
control of where and what our tax money is spent on? (with some
sort of documentation, please)
9-2-2007-01
I believe the TOTAL
COST for the Liaison Officer is around $86,000, not
just the city's share.
The city's share is presumably
about half of that figure, or around $43,000, give or take.
The Iron Mountain school district picks up the other half.
The $52,000 per year quoted by
Marquart may be (a) his salary, or (b) salary plus
overtime. The rest would be the city's cost of his health
benefits and pension contribution, paid vacation and
incidental costs such as uniform allowance, etc.
Now, the Liaison Officer doesn't
have much to do with the school during summer recess,
Christmas break and Spring break, etc. Where he fits into
the police schedule during those periods is an interesting
question, but certainly somebody knows.
Is he putting in more time with
the school than the city? Obviously he is because the
school year is a minimum of 180 days of a working year
schedule of 250 days before vacations, personal days and
sick leave. I don't know if he goes there every school day
or not. The program is highly regarded, and I am not
suggesting it not be continued, but a post by people
"in the know" would be helpful for general
information purposes.
If the city council and city
manager had the sense to pay for him out of the General
Budget, this controversy of paying him out of the TV fee
would never have arisen. The TV fee is money,
though apparently somewhat
restricted to streets according to state law. The General
Fund revenue is money. Does
it make much difference is you pay for something out of
money in your left pocket or right pocket?
The General Fund allocates some
money to the Local Streets Fund anyway, so if they cut back
on that and shoveled the TV fee into the local streets fund,
the issue never would have arisen.
More to the point, the
challengers have vowed to cancel the TV fee and keep the
Liaison Officer in any case, so this is an issue which will
automatically resolve itself if four challengers get in.
9-1-2007-04 I see that post 8-22-2007-06 appears to be very accurate about the school liaison officer costing more than the fifty-two thousand dollars as stated by City Manager John Marquart and reported in the Daily News. Looking at the minutes posted on the city web-site for the 8-20-07 council meeting, I see that mayor pro-tem Rigoni states that the liaison officer actually costs the city about eighty-six thousand dollars a year. I wonder why the Daily News forgot to report this information. Was this information left out of the article on purpose? Did Mr. Rigoni actually say this at the meeting? If so, I commend him for clarifying the truth to Mr. Marquart. Or, was this information added to the minutes after the city saw the truth on this web-site? I could not attend this meeting for work reasons. Anyone know the truth on this meeting? I think a follow-up article in the Daily News with the truth would be nice. I'll have to contact the paper. 9-1-2007-03
In response to 8-30-2007-08
Your post pointed out several
expenditures that prompted me to do a little research. I'm not
sure how to tie all this information together, so work with me.
I'll try, and start at the beginning.
First you have the creation of the
Downtown Development Authority (DDA) pursuant to Public Act 197
of 1975. When Iron Mountains DDA was adopted, the Law stated:
"An authority with the approval of
the municipal governing body may levy an ad valorem tax on the
real and tangible personal property not exempt by law and as
finally equalized in the downtown district. The tax shall not be
more than 1 mill if the downtown district is in a municipality
having a population of 1,000,000 or more, or not more than 2
mills if the downtown district is in a municipality having a
population of less than 1,000,000. The tax shall be collected by
the municipality creating the authority levying the tax. The
municipality shall collect the tax at the same time and in the
same manner as it collects its other ad valorem taxes. The tax
shall be paid to the treasurer of the authority and credited to
the general fund of the authority for purposes of financing only
the operations of the authority."
The term "operations" is defined by
MCL 125.1651; MSA 5.3010(1):" 'Operations' means office
maintenance, including salaries and expenses of employees,
office supplies, consultation fees, design costs, and other
expenses incurred in the daily management of the authority and
planning of its activities."
This is how the 1.5
mills of revenue ($25,000-$38,000) were spent up until the last
couple of years.
So, how can the city be spending
authorized revenues on actual things such as bricks and
trees? Section 12 was amended by 1983 PA 86, to remove the words
"financing only the operations of," thereby lifting the
restriction upon the use of the revenues of a tax levy and
broadening the authority for the tax levy to all purposes of a
downtown development authority.
This got me wondering if the way
the current city manager and council are spending the revenue is
legal! The following Attorney Generals opinion would lead me to
believe otherwise.
Read this before moving on!
Has the Headlee Amendment been
violated? Have the electors residing in the downtown district
had a chance to vote on this issue as required by the Headlee
Amendment?
This brings me to my next
questions. If the electors residing in the downtown district
have voted to approve the spending of millage on bricks and
trees, HOW have the revenues grown from $38,000 a year to over
$70,000 a year? Are these authorized revenues received by the
DDA? After looking at the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 budgets posted
on this web-site, I've noticed a trend over the last couple of
years of the city taking money from the general fund and putting
it into the DDA fund. In fact it looks like $30,000 dollars were
transferred from the general fund to DDA in 06-07, and $20,000
dollars in 07-08. The city manager and council budgeted $38,000
for 06-07 but have received over $75,000. How is this happening?
How is it that no contribution from
the general fund shows up on the 06-07 budget, but then the
06-07 contribution shows up in the 07-08 budget along with more
money? All this creative book keeping is somewhat
confusing, but the bottom line is that the tax payers outside
the downtown district are getting stiffed! In fact, if one were
to look at DDA Act 197 of 1975 as amended, Section
125.1661 Financing activities of authority; disposition of money
received by authority; municipal obligations. Sec. 11
(2) states: Except as provided in this act, the municipality
shall not obligate itself, nor shall it ever be obligated to pay
any sums from public funds, other than money received by the
municipality pursuant to this section, for or on account of the
activities of the authority.
Again, I would ask if the city is
spending authorized revenues for the DDA. If the qualified
electors in the downtown district are required to vote and
approve spending money outside of "Operations" costs (per
Headlee), should ALL qualified electors be required to vote per
Headlee if our taxes are being spent within a Downtown
District? Is this even legal, or should we expect the current
city manager and council to start spending our tax dollars for
TIFA projects also? Can anyone help me with this? I think we are
getting used by this current special interest group. I'm tired
of it !!!!
9-1-2007-02 I'm hearing that some individuals might be spending company time and money trying to stop this truth machine. The truth only hurts those that lie! 9-1-2007-01 REFERENCE POST 8-39-07
06 |