IronMountainIssues.org

  Home Page Public Forum  

September 2007 Postings


9-30-2007-04

Dear Readers:

Entirely aside from and unrelated to the ongoing political campaigning in Iron Mountain and elsewhere, our group is a corporate practice that represents many gay individuals and organizations and monitors gay/anti-gay media activity.  We have an exhaustive index and are aware, or thought we were, of every Web site in and around Iron Mountain, Michigan.

In a post dated 9-28-2007-05 at www.ironmountainissues.org, the writer stated, "The challengers are being described as anti gay, because the website they are associated with is anti gay."

All of the sites of which we are aware are either neutral concerning homosexuality or are pro-gay/pro-lesbian to one extent or another.  Will you kindly post the Web site to which you are referring and direct us to the evidence that defines the site itself as anti-gay so that we might add it to our watchdog list and notify other watchdog companies and organizations?  We appreciate your cooperation.  Thank you.

Responsible Media Representation (RMR)


9-30-2007-03

Like a business?

Doesn't a business exist to profit?

How has Iron Mountain even remotely done the municipal equivalent of profiting under the current administration?

Aren't a business's shareholders supposed to benefit?

How have this city's shareholders, its owners, its citizens, benefited?  When has their stock value risen?  What dividends have they received?

Like a business?

What an unfortunate simile.  What an inaccurate comparison.

If you want a metaphor, try "bleeding to death."  And the current management and council have only widened the wound and not done one single effective thing to stanch the flow.  There's not a single shred of empirical evidence to prove otherwise, and puddles of blood in every corner of the city indicate an imminent death unless something effective is done.  Pardon me for protesting, but the current Board of Directors and CEO have not done a good job, are not doing a good job.  In fact, they are doing a terrible job while publicly trying to put a good face on it and withhold from the shareholders the truth of the matter.

Like a business indeed.


9-30-2007-02

After reading post 9-28-2007-05, I have an observation of my own to make.  While it is true that Truth and Issues both have opinion areas, the fact is that Issues also has loads of documentation accessible at the click of a button.  I think that informed opinions based on actual documentation is not even comparable to what the Truth site is putting out.  The "I-believe-the-incumbents-because-they-said-this-or-that" method of "documentation" is incredible.  What scares me is that so many people are willing to believe what they are saying, even when there is REAL DOCUMENTATION readily available to counter some of the ridiculous claims they are making.
 
People who form their opinion without weighing the facts are very dangerous, and foolish, too.  That is the glaring difference between Issues and Truth.  There is nothing BUT uninformed opinion on the Truth site.  What's more, I felt I was being prodded to avoid even seeking the real truth about City issues after reading that site.  I hope the people of this City are smarter than the incumbents give them credit for.

9-30-2007-01

What this election seems to be about is the landlords being to cheap to have the properties inspected for the safety of the tenants. Most if not all cities in the US have had rental ordinances for years. The IM property owners will lose out in the coming election if they choose to elect the new challengers who are only serving their own agenda and a return to the good ol boys network. We need to continue the progress or revert back to hooterville. We will get the government we deserve in Iron Mountain this November. Remember the old hospital site ? How long did that sit there looking like a bombed out building? We had to suffer looking at that for years because the owner wouldn't do any thing because it would cost money.

9-29-2007-09

Reply to post 9-28-07-05

If you were to go to www.ironmountaindemocracy.com you will find all the answers to your question and many more. I have never seen the Mayors address on this site. However I know it is on the City of Iron Mountain web site.  If you have any questions after reading the brochure, just email any of the challengers.


9-29-2007-08

JUST A INVITATION TO ALL
 
  For one day, Sunday October 7th, from 1p to 9pm, I would ask that everyone put aside your positions on issues and your political differences and come on down to our Iron Mountain City park for a celebration  and a big welcome home for our Veterans .
 
  So many of our young men and women from our area and this country have served with Pride, Honor and Integrity in their various missions during this Iraq war since its beginning. With the recent arrival home of our 46th MP Company, it seems like a good time to give everyone a chance to spend a little time with them , as well as all our area Veterans who have so proudly served before them, and have some BBQ Chicken or maybe a Brat, a little conversation, Maybe listen to a little music and let the kids take part in some great games. ( Ray Mariucci and the guys are giving some Bocci lessons also)
 
 I want to thank so many of you that have already stepped up in the public and private sector with offers of manpower and dollars to help this event be a success. It is much appreciated. If others would like to send a couple bucks to the effort, it will be put to good use. You can make a free will offering at the event to help or drop a check to the Elks 46th MP project at ELKS Lodge 700 , 1001 Cedar Ave Iron Mountain, Mich 49801 or give me a call at 906-396-3659. If you want to be a listed sponsor of the event, let me know , but I need that by 3pm Tuesday  October 2nd.
 
The organizations  putting this event together include;
 
Elks Lodge 46th MP Project 
Dickinson area Law Enforcement and Fire Personnel
VFW Post 3674/ Patriot Guard Riders
West Randville Sportsmen assoc.
American Legion Post 50
Son's of the American Legion Squad 50
American legion Auxilary
 
Remember....Sunday October 7th starting at 1pm to 9pm. bring the whole family and enjoy the day...tents will be available in addition to the pavilion area should we get any drizzle.
 
Thanks again to all and hope to see ya there....
 
Bill Revord, Chairman
Elks 46th MP Project


9-29-2007-07

Dear 9-28-2007-05,

You're right about one thing.  Even if residents are not for the challengers, even if they're against the challengers, if those citizens are against the current city council, they gravitate here, to the issues site.  All types with every opinion and every emotion under the sun.  Not too many other places for them to turn apparently.  But some of them bring other stuff too.  You'll notice that there are other sections in the issues web site, not just the Public Forum, and it's in those other sections where much, if not most, of this site's real value lies.


9-29-2007-06

In reference to 9-28-2007-5 in ironmountainissues web site.
 
To the person who wrote the article in the above reference number and said that I am biased and anti gay, is to distort everything I said about the gay web site that appeared the day before the primary and make it into another issue about this election.
 
I have never been "anti gay" nor am I trying to influence anyone on how to vote because of the web site's content. Funny thing is, you accused all of the challengers of also being anti-gay! Sounds to me like you have a serious identity problem!
 
I have several friends who are gay and even a relative from England and Appleton Wis and they are the best of human beings. I would help them at a moments notice if they asked for help!
 
Being gay is not a sin in and of itself, it does not make anyone a bad person and it surely is not my right to make any judgment about another person's sexual preference. (As the writer stated, "God will make that judgment"
 
If I were to use the same phrase as the person who said this, "perhaps you had better worry about God's judgment for yourself, as you distort my comments and viciously and personally attack my spirituality and integrity in the church to further your agenda!  
 
I do have a right however, as others have done, to condemn a web site that promoted hatred, anti Christian values, slanderous remarks about all candidates including the incumbents and challengers and actually bordering on threats and innuendoes and thoughts that would be enough to make any caring person angry and concerned.
 
For the record, here is a quote from my article written about this "suddenly appearing web site" just before the election!
 
“When I first read the four hate articles on the above web site,  www.ironmountaingay.com),  I had mixed emotions. Was it someone who wrote the articles to incite the citizens against the council incumbents, but under the disguise of a supporter ------ was it a mentally disturbed person (Dougie) who really believes and means what he said or will people think it was a ploy by the candidates who are running for office so they can discredit the incumbents.”  
 
Notice, ------ no blame was put on any incumbent, nor was it placed on the challengers! It was non-accusatory to any individual, but was condemning to it’s contents! To say that it was anti-gay is ludicrous and vicious and serves no purpose but to try to discredit any opponent apposed to your way of thinking! 
 
The last comment was as follows:
 
“It is time to take back our city! This is no longer about politics, --- it is our right and duty as a Christian to confront evil! We know who the enemy is, ------- let us face him on Tuesday! These words I just expressed are not about politics, or promoting a certain candidate for election Tuesday, but they are words of great concern and absolute truth!  

 
Confronting evil on Tuesday means the election will allow the voters to vote for the candidate of your choice who you know condemns this type of hate filled garbage and to stop this infiltration of lies, deceit and attempts at division in this city and slanderous remarks for personal agendas! The web site is a cesspool of sewage! 
 
To the person who wrote 09-28-2007 05 ---- I will not dignify any more of your lies and vicious remarks in future web site entries. If you don’t have enough guts to sign your name as I did, I will just consider the serious and personal problems you have and place you on ignore.
 
It is time for challengers, incumbents and any interested citizens to stop this viciousness and deal with the facts and what is best for this city. Perhaps that would serve a better purpose!
 
The gay issue is only here because some of you want it to be! 
.
Don Christy

9-29-2007-05

See 9-27-2007-05

Simply stated chlorine is a pesticide, as defined by the U.S. EPA, who’s sole purpose is to kill living organisms. When we consume water containing chlorine, it kills some part of us, destroying cells and tissue inside our body. Dr. Robert Carlson, a highly respected University of Minnesota researcher who’s work is sponsored by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, sums it up by claiming , “the chlorine problem is similar to that of air pollution”, and adds that “chlorine is the greatest crippler and killer of modern times!”

http://www.ghchealth.com/chlorine-cancer-and-heart-disease.html  

The weight of the evidence suggests that chlorination by-products pose substantial cancer risks that should be reduced.

MORE FACTS & SOURCES:

DID YOU KNOW??? 

"Drinking tap water that is chlorinated is hazardous if not deadly to your health."

HEALTHY WATER FOR LONGER LIFE - DR. MARTIN FOX 

"Known carcinogens are found in drinking water as a direct consequence of the practice of  chlorination" 

MUNICIPAL ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH LAB - FRANCIS T. MAYO, DIRECTOR 

"Cancer risk among people drinking chlorinated water is 93% higher than among those whose water does not contain chlorine." 

US COUNCIL OF ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY 

"Chlorine is the greatest crippler and killer of modern times. While it prevented epidemics of one  disease, it was creating another. Two decades ago, after the start of chlorinating our drinking  water in 1904, the present epidemic of heart trouble, cancer and senility began." 

SAGINAW HOSPITAL - DR J.M. PRICE 

The National Academy of Sciences estimate that 200-1000 people die in the United States each year from cancers caused by ingesting the contaminants in water." 

SCIENCIES NEWS, VOLUME 130 - JANET RALOFF

"The cause of atherosclerosis and resulting heart attacks and strokes is none other than the ubiquitous chlorine in our drinking water." 

CORONARIES/CHOLESTEROL/CHLORINE - DR. JM PRICE 

Chlorine gas was used despicably during WWI. When the war was over, the use of chlorine was diverted to poisoning the germs in our drinking water. All water supplies throughout the country were chlorinated. The combination of chlorine and animal fats results in atherosclerosis, heart attacks and death." 

WATER CAN UNDERMINE YOUR HEALTH - DR. N.W. WALKER, D.S. 

"48-49 states are failing to adequately enforce existing drinking water regulations." 

JAMES ELDER - U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

"Scientists discovered that chlorine reacted with organic material in water to produce hundreds of chemical by-products, several of which have proved in animal studies to be carcinogenic." 

U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT - JULY 29, 1991 

"Drinking chlorinated water may as much as double the risk of bladder cancer." 

NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE - KENNETH CANTOR


9-29-2007-04

Regarding Item 9-28-2007-05 ... Addresses are online, the disservice of lumping everyone together, and burying the gay issue

"I will ask the webmaster why he put the Mayor's address on the site...that seems a little strange.  I know that people are listed in the phone book, but do all of the challengers want their specific home address on a public forum?  I doubt it."

It seems clear why that writer submitted that post with the mayor's address to the Issues site.  Whether it was right or wrong is a matter each reader must decide.  But for the record regarding the challengers' addresses: so that voters might communicate with them openly and individually and/or support them (or damn them) directly, each of the challengers posted his or her name, address, and email address online at each one's section of their collective Web site in July, before the primary.  They remain there.  www.ironmountaindemocracy.com

Also to set the record straight: that is the challengers' official Web site, not www.ironmountainissues.org .  It's an important distinction and too few people are making it.  The Issues site, an informative and valuable resource despite the pointless and volatile garbage many have submitted to it, existed nine or ten months before the challengers even declared their candidacies.  Those challengers -- and citizens who support them, but with whom the candidates do not necessarily agree -- and some with whom they distinctly disagree -- have occasionally written and sent signed statements to the Issues site as a means of quick public communication.  So have their opponents and some supporters of the incumbents.  And each challenger has pledged that they will submit only signed -- i.e., not anonymous -- statements to the Issues site and any other.

The Issues site -- and sites like it all over the world, even as they begin to acquire, through use, a particular flavor and leaning -- isn't just one big happy family all on the same page of each issue.  It's a mistake to think that everyone knows everyone else and that they all agree with each other.  Nothing could be further from the truth, especially on such a heavily trafficked site -- the challengers, with some rue, will be the first to tell you that.  It would be wrong to demonize, vilify, and judge any of the candidates, challengers and incumbents, based on any undocumented, unsubstantiated rantings and ravings of others, including their so-called supporters.  Give the greatest weight to 1.) the candidates' statements themselves, then to 2.) substantiated presentations that can point to verifiable evidence, and then to 3.) informed opinions.

The rest -- to which we seem to inexplicably and absurdly give so much value -- is uncontrolled venting and dreck.  On both sides.  Ignore it.  Discriminate between the good stuff and the bad -- don't just lump it all together because it's at the same address at the same time.  You discern and discriminate among the individuals belonging to your church, don't you, even though you're all at the same service at the same time?  This is no different.

One more thing, readers: why don't you request that the challengers come right out on their blogs -- and/or at the Issues site -- and bluntly proclaim once and for all that they are not anti-gay homophobes and that they are disassociating themselves from anyone who is?  In fact, I'll join you and ask right here: Challengers, if you're reading this, will you please do that?  Will you please make it clear?  It may be the only way to disarm the militant gays and anti-gays on each side of this issue/non-issue who are trying to make political hay out of it.  I know the challengers have proclaimed their tolerance and inclusiveness here and there orally and in writing, but it would be nice if they cleared the air officially once and for all.


9-29-2007-03

I am a professional and I have taken my profession very, very seriously for nearly 30 years. I have served on state boards in my professional field. I know what it is like get caught up in the ‘glory of power’ and to be in the ‘hot spot of criticism’. I have learned over the years that when I have wronged someone it is best to own up to it and try to mend the situation. We all make mistakes because we are human. It is nothing to be ashamed of that we make mistakes but it is wrong to never admit our faults. Each day I go home from my workplace and evaluate my work and try to improve for the next day.


Each time I read the Iron Mountain Issues site I go through a number of emotions. I am glad for those who have received credit for a good deed, I feel educated when someone states or clarifies facts and I am disappointed when I sense that something someone has said will only make the city situation more volatile. I am disturbed by those who choose to write who don’t know the facts on the issue they are addressing. Please do your homework!

This site should be a tool for addressing city issues on any front, not a place to make people more upset and paranoid. We don’t want more problems than we already have, do we? But if there is a problem, it is our responsibility as citizens to address the issue. Those responsible for the problems have a responsibility to make amends.

All of us should take credit where credit is due and not take credit where it isn’t due. I think there are citizens in Iron Mountain that know a lot more than they are given credit. Be careful what you say or take credit for or you could be called a liar based on facts. This makes you look bad.

I know there are people out there that value the Iron Mountain Issues site because it gives people a voice on issues, there are people that don’t like this site because they feel it can be a hotbed of gossip and there are those that like to read it for the drama. It is my understanding that one of the purposes for this site was for people to have a chance to take a stand and be heard (with or without their name being attached) by the community when the council wouldn’t listen.

THIS IS FIRST-HAND, TRUTHFUL INFORMATION.
TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER: I WOULD NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO PRINT THE FOLLOWING IF I HAD NOT COME TO YOU FIRST. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE OFFENCE BUT TAKE THE FOLLOWING AS THE TRUTH AND EVALUATE YOUR PROCEDURES FOR THE FUTURE. I AM NOT LOOKING TO CAUSE TROUBLE OR TO MAKE YOU LOOK BAD.  I JUST WANT THINGS IN THIS CITY TO BE RIGHT. THANK YOU.

I have personally been mistreated by the city manager and the city council. I went to a meeting and spoke my mind and was disappointed by the lack of personal response from the city manager and the council. My issue was a small and personal matter that could have been handled simply and civilly but instead was handled poorly, unprofessionally, and I believe illegally. My suggestion was ignored and the council's solution only made the situation worse. I have watched others speak to the council with real concerns about how they are treated by the council and/or spoke of how they were called names by the council. If there are concerns about the citizens and/or the way they live, help them, work with them or educate them but don’t call them names.

They say money speaks. Well, I don’t care how much money an individual makes in this community but I do care that they have good character, truly know what they are talking about and do not hold themselves as better than the next person because they make more money and have obtained power in the community. If we could eliminate greed and power from our society I wouldn’t need to be sitting here writing this letter to the citizens of Iron Mountain. You can’t take your money with you when you die but you will leave your reputation behind. Ask yourself: Do you want this world a better place because of something you did to help others or do you want people to remember you for greed and short-sighted, personal goals?


I understand there was a comment made by a council member at a council meeting (this is 2nd hand information so correct me if I’m wrong because I want to know the TRUTH) that because there were only x number of citizens at a council meeting, only x number of citizens were probably concerned about the issues at hand. Some of us don’t attend the city council meetings on a regular basis, not because we don’t have concerns but we have other responsibilities at home, work and in the community. It could be that we have other meetings to attend (school board meetings, coaching a team of children, church functions, parents attending their child’s concert or sporting event, etc.). Please, please do not take offence that I am directing this paragraph to a council member as that would defeat the purpose of why I am writing this letter. I just want to be sure that I clarify why a large percentage of the citizens are not at every meeting.

I would like to thank those who have taken the time to keep up on the city matters. Not all of us should have to be watchdogs. As I stated above, some of us serve and volunteer in the community in other ways. Also, the citizens of Iron Mountain have important jobs and families that need their main focus and we would be cheating those areas of our lives and community if we all had to do homework on how the city is being managed. In a perfect world none of us should have to be watchdogs but it is not a perfect world. But isn’t it the council’s responsibility to fully understand the city workings and to make sure that the city employees follow legal policies and are doing their jobs so others in the community don’t feel they should need to question or micromanage the city workers/council and their integrity? I know that on any board or governing council, (city, state, national, school, etc.) often times people get on the board for personal gain, personal agendas or special interest. This is no secret and is also unethical. But I know that there are also those who get on to serve the community. There is much reward in truly serving others.

I am pleading that whoever is chosen to serve on the council at the November election serve the needs of the entire community of Iron Mountain. Not just the rich, the poor or a special interest group. I want to know that my community is safe, clean, well maintained and honesty managed by the powers that be. I am very willing to pay as many taxes as are needed to run the city properly. But I want the taxes to be spelled out honestly and I want to know that all city workers are hired according to city policy, earning an honest wage by doing their jobs to the best of their ability without waste or apathy. I want to know that the workers/council members are not working/serving for personal gain or special interests only to jeopardize the needs of the community as a whole. I want the city employees to be paid decently for a job well done. I want to know that my community is run on an honest platform that serves the common needs of all.


9-29-2007-02

In response to: 9-28-2007-05

Is it possible that the reason there are not more letters from or in support of the incumbents is because they have not submitted them to the issues sight? There is no reference to the site being only for the challengers for submissions. It is my understanding that everyone should be welcome to submit a letter. Don’t be so hasty to think that the incumbent’s letters won’t be posted. After all, your letter was posted and you appear to be in support of the incumbents.


9-29-2007-01

What is post # 9-28-2007-05 talking about when he/she refers to the webmaster putting the Mayor's home address on this website?  I can't find it on this website.  Not saying it isn't buried somewhere, but I can't find it.
 
In any case, I can find the Mayor's and all council members addresses on the city website, www.cityofironmountain.com, so what's the big deal, even if it is on this website somewhere.
 
If it is, I'd like the writer of that post to show where it is.  As I said, I can't find it.  Talk about a "nothing" issue, this is about as nothing as it gets.


9-28-2007-06

There's no doubt in my mind that Mike Carey (Carey Contracting, Inc.) got involved with the upcoming election through friendship with one or more of the candidates.  He trusted what he heard, as we all tend to do with many of our friends. 
 
As a result, he figured he knew enough to support his friend(s), and didn't need outside verification for whatever they told him. That was a big mistake.  As events and information will show between now and election time, he will wish he had not been so fast in jumping to a conclusion.
 
He not only put in his own ad, he also solicited many other businesses for contributions.  He wanted to get other businesses involved, most of whom do not follow city affairs all that closely.
 
That, I think, was a much more serious error on his part.  He took the word of his friend(s) at face value and promptly sent out solicitations to businesses hoping they would, in turn, take his word for it. Some may trust him and do so. They, in turn, would also be stigmatized and feel misled, but this time Mike will get the blame directly.
 
In a small town election, money is not as important as a national election.  The incumbents far outspent the challengers in the primary, yet they ended up 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th in a nine person primary.  Why?  The numerous missteps by this city council and city manager have been widely disseminated over the past four years by the local media, this and other websites and by other means.  Mike Carey either was not paying attention or didn't want to believe what he read.
 
The primary election results showed that the public was tuned in.  No, they were not fooled by the challengers.  Those who follow city affairs closely knew the real issues and voted
accordingly.
 
If Mike Carey had been duped before the primary, it would have been slightly more understandable. For him to get duped after the primary results were known is much harder to fathom. 
 
Businesses live or die on getting and keeping customers.  Most business owners understand that if they get too vocal and partisan in political matters, they inevitably will offend some of their customers.  Most of them will be non-committal with their customers, and wisely so.
 
I am reserving judgment on Mike Carey.  All of us can look back and wonder why we made what turned out to be wrong decisions and further wonder how we could have been so ignorant.  I think he will look back on this one as a true flaw in his judgment.  It's not just his decision to support incumbents, it's that some people will follow him and hold him responsible because they trusted him and he misled them.
 
Sorry, Mike, the city is not being operated like a well run business. Instead, it is a disaster waiting to happen.  I feel sorry for whoever sits on the council the next four years.  They have a lot problems to unwind that the current council initiated. John Marquart can pack his bags and move on, leaving the city taxpayers with far larger financial burdens that it had when he came here.  He won't pay for them, Mike, you and I will.


9-28-2007-05

 
Maybe someone can help me with these things...
 
I am not sure where the information comes from on some of the posts on this website, but it seems to really be a completely biased effort to make the election go a certain way. 
 
It seems that the all of the posts want to cut down our city council, and divide our city, and the only way to make our city run better is to oust the current council.  Is that true?
 
Now that the G** (homo) concept is banned, no one seems to care if it was ever there.   That is crazy.  It was used for influence in the election process, and is still part of the issues website.  Don't try to disguise hate.  As far as what the churches say, Don Christy leads the pack, as his pitchfork seems sharpest.  God will judge him, too.   The challengers are being described as anti gay, because the website they are associated with is anti gay.  I am sure that will be enough to get my letter rejected....
 
I am not sure, and would seriously like to know, what is the change the Challengers would make...?  Is it really gong to work?  How will you fund the School Liaison, and how will you fix the roads and alleyways?  Will the downtown revival just die? 
My , My, what a shame that would be.  I have seen a few really great pictures of downtown back in the day, before I was born.  I remember eating grilled cheese at Kresge's and shopping at Ben Franklin. 
 
Now there are once again places to go downtown.  It isn't perfect, and probably never will be, but I like the hope that the current city council gives us all, or at least those willing to hope and work with them....
 
I know Mike Carey, I think he's a good guy.  He certainly isn't as uninformed as the last poster thinks...My opinion, just like his...
 
Now the Ironmountaintruth.com website is merely a source of information and opinion, just like this issues site.  It is operated in favor of the current city council, because they are associated with it, just like the challengers are associated with the ironmountainissues.org website. 
 
It isn't anymore filled with lies and slander than the other site is.  They are equals in their opinion broadcasting.  That is all.
 
Iron Mountain's downtown did have welcome troops signs, and that was a really cruddy low blow at the downtown and it's merchants.  Shame on you.
 
There is so much more, but that is enough for now.. Wait, a little more...
 
I will ask the webmaster why he put the Mayor's address on the site...that seems a little strange.  I know that people are listed in the phone book, but do all of the challengers want their specific home address on a public forum?  I doubt it.
 
Progress is happening all around us, whether we like it or not....
 
Let's try not to damage each other's reputation to the point it literally affects our lives (and jobs or future) in this town, and takes the food right out of our mouths and away from our families.....Think about that.

9-28-2007-04

On Wednesday September 26, I attended Special Meeting of the TIFA Board and listened to Mr. Steve Mariucci as he made his presentation concerning the projects he is planning in Iron Mountain.

I was very impressed. I can see a great deal of benefit to our community. The Premier Center, currently being torn down, and was the largest facility available for large groups in Iron Mountain,  We will now have a convention center that will be able to hold  more than twice as many people, twelve hundred, in fact, with kitchen facilities to match.  If we can draw in some large conventions to the area, our other merchants will certainly benefit.  An adjacent full service restaurant and a hotel are also planned. In addition, there are two more possible projects, a retail area and a senior citizens community.

This is certainly what I would refer to as PROGRESS.  In so many derogatory statements from the incumbents we are always accused of not being in favor of progress.   That has never been true. Any city council would favor such a project. We want the benefits that are derived from such projects to be beneficial to the largest number of citizens possible, and this one certainly does that,

Thank you, Mr. Mariucci, for supporting your home town in such a valuable way.

Dave Farragh

Candidate for City Council


9-28-2007-03

A Plea
 
I strongly encourage visitors to this site to please do everything in their power to see that the information on this site -- particularly the sound and reasonable info that counters clearly and accurately others' views -- reaches all of the voters in Iron Mountain and especially all those who get the newspaper.  The reach of this site is not as great as that of the traditional types of media, so believers of what shows up here must go the extra mile to get the info out -- in an unobjectionable way -- that's very important -- in an unobjectionable way -- to the city's broader population, whether it be by flyers, word of mouth, emails, whatever.  Or just ask more people to visit this site and patiently sift through what's here.  You may even want to direct them to particular postings.  But get the word out.  Please.  The web itself does not a campaign make -- it's the info on the web that's important.
 
Thanks.

9-28-2007-02

Like a business?

Wow.  If there were qualities I always gave Mike Carey credit for, they were direct investigation, balanced judgment, and clear-eyed objectivity.  He's always been a pretty pragmatic guy.  You know -- let's do what works.  Now I'm not so sure.  Particularly in the light of so much evidence that contradicts exactly what he says. 

With all due respect, the last thing Iron Mountain is being run like is a successful business.  My goodness!  Simply compare and contrast it to a successful business!  Mike!  What's going on?  Your business ranks among those that will most suffer and perhaps even perish if Iron Mountain continues to be run as it is.

On the contrary, this city actually needs to be run like a business, professionally, not like a bunch of self-serving children huffing and puffing and playing at business, and it needs to attract and infuse private capital and those that provide it, not repel them, so that Carey Contracting and every other business already in this town can grow and prosper, not hunker in on itself, shrinking and depending on small jobs, fewer jobs, and/or dwindling government grants here and there.  Indeed!  This is precisely one of the major issues facing Iron Mountain and a principal point that the city-council challengers are trying to make.  We're not professional and businesslike and we must make ourselves so.

I respectfully request that you complete your homework regarding this, Mike.  We must become professional and businesslike if we're to survive and thrive.  Sorry, Mike.  Normally I'm inclined to value your opinion and tilt toward your conclusion, but I couldn't disagree with you more on this issue.  The evidence is public and available.  Because you haven't seen or heard it on TV, radio, or in the paper yet doesn't mean that this city's current management and government hasn't been seriously inept, irresponsible, and troublingly unlawful and unethical, having gotten us all into serious and worsening trouble.

Let's not pretend we're businesslike.  Let's become businesslike.


9-28-2007-01

RESIDENTS OF IRON MOUNTAIN - You are becoming a big nuisance.  How many times do you have to be told?  YOUR CIVIC DUTY is to pay your taxes and user fees and keep your mouth shut.
 
The City Council hits you with a $4,800,000 Water Bond - big deal. 
 
Your water and sewer rates go through the roof.  So what?
 
Miles of streets need to be milled and paved, sure, but what's a few thousand potholes.
A little cold patch takes care of 20% of them.
 
OK, the alleys are a disaster, but what the hell, alleys are alleys.  What are you getting excited about? How much time do you spend in your alley?
 
Sure, a little sewage back up into houses from time to time.  It wasn't your house was it?
Are you going to spend your life worrying about other peoples problems?
 
So some sewage is taken out of the sewer lines and dumped into the pit and at the bat cave.
What are you people, a bunch of environmental freaks?  Are you worried that the bats will get sick because of a little sewage?
 
All right, so the City Manager missed the deadline he was told about well in advance and we had a couple years of train horns all hours of the night.  Did it kill you?  Apparently not, if you're reading this.  You lost a little sleep. You were probably sleeping too much anyway.
 
I just read on this site that TIFA turned down a mere $750,000 expenditure for some work on one block behind city hall.  Doesn't the TIFA board understand what Marquart and the Mayor tried to explain what a "vibrant downtown" means?  Will Iron Mountain go on forever without a desperately needed pavilion for the Farmer's Market that meets for three-four hours twelve Saturday's a year?
 
And then there's the bandshell.  Don't you people understand that the bandshell could lead to Iron Mountain becoming the cultural center of the upper midwest?  Sure, November, December, January, February, March, April and May  are a little nippy for outdoor concerts, but for one hour a week in the summer, you could have listened to "Out to Lunch" Thursday musicians in a brand new bandshell, instead of the portable, but adequate one they have now.  The whole project was only going to cost $500,000 and lose a measly 30 parking spaces.
 
You people just don't understand "continued progress" when it's staring you in the face.


9-27-2007-10

My, my. What have we here? A crusade? A clutch of revolting peasants? Um, I mean peasants who are revolting? Hmm, still ambiguous. AH! The "we’ve-had-it-up-to-here" type of revolting. Yes, that’s it. Pitchforks and torches . . . tar and feathers . . . stocks and pillories . . . 21st century style, of course. Not as definitive as the good old days, but, there it is.
 
Aren’t you all the least bit concerned for your necks if this little venture falls on its’ face? Have you all temporarily laid aside personal security in favor of a shot at the common good?  How very Ben Franklinesque. Noble of you all to believe some sort of fairy tale outcome is actually possible. Quaint. You even have me entertaining the thought. Oh, heck, Down with the King!!
 
Percivale

9-27-2007-09

The political ad that Mike Carey  (from Carey Contracting ) states that this city is finally being ran like a buisiness.
He's right
JUST LIKE ENRON


9-27-2007-08

I finally checked out the Iron Mountain Truth site.  My my.  I was expecting something much more, um, civilized, even a touch sophisticated -- or at least affected and perhaps pseudo-sophisticated.  It's very disappointing.  So unintelligent and gauche.  I couldn't find a single informed opinion or any reference to proof, substantiation, or documentation of any claims made there.  Some wit mentioned on the Issues site recently that the word progress should check in at the Caring House because of the abuse it's been taking.  Perhaps the word truth should join it.

Somebody educate me please.  One thing at the Truth site that for some unknown reason particularly concerns me: Why are the writers there so vociferously and militantly trashing city council candidates Toedter, Peterson, Alessandrini, Farragh, and Rosen as anti-gay when those five are publicly and personally tolerant, inclusive, and clearly not homophobic?  What evidence do their ranting accusers have about these individuals to indicate that they're anti-gay?  And what does it have to do with anything?  If the Truth folks want to go after anti-gays, why don't they go after the churches in town?  Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant -- all of the Christian denominations.  All of the churches are openly, unapologetically anti-gay.  When the Truth writers make that accusation of the churches, it'll certainly be substantiated.  If they want to crusade against anti-gays in town, why not spend all the hateful bile spewing from their site on the local churches that are anti-gay instead of on five individuals that are not?


9-27-2007-07

 
I want to add my Congratulations to the TIFA Board along with post 9-26-2007-07, for rejecting the reckless and needless spending of around $750,000 for parking lot amenities we don't need.
 
Going one step further, I read in The Daily News that TIFA has agreed to buy the Khoury property to help move along the Mariucci LLC project. I also noticed that the TIFA will close the purchase subject to a definitive agreement with the developers - who will then buy back the property from TIFA.
 
TIFA is acting in a prudent and business-like manner.  In the end, without knowing all the details, it looks like TIFA will get all its money back and the project will go forward.
 
If the incumbents and Marquart try to make political hay for themselves out of this, it won't work.  The TIFA Board is so much better than the city council in its deliberations, in seeking legal advice every step of the way, in having long range plans and yet flexible enough to change course as the situation arises, that any comparison of the two bodies only makes the city council look more inadequate than ever.
 
They shot down a BAD deal and entered into a GOOD one - all in single afternoon session.
 
Excellent work, gentlemen. 


9-27-2007-06

     Are You Proud Of Yourselves  
   
    I came through Iron Mountain Sunday when I met our troops coming home. I noticed Iron Mountains "vibrant downtown" theme did not involve signs welcoming our soldiers home. I guess they must have thought it would make their stores look trashy.
   
    Evidently none of their family members put their lives on the line, so it did matter to them. No money in their pockets.
   
    I hope your PROUD of yourselves.
   
     I'll spend my money any place but there.
 
                                                Jim Ferris

9-27-2007-05

The cost of our new water system $5,000,000.

The cost of safe drinking water $4.50 per case.

The satisfaction of a new council priceless.

"The cancer risk among people drinking chlorinated water is 93% higher than among those whose water does not contain chlorine".[1]

From vendor reports

Valley Chemical Inc - Chlorine

June             $605.39

 July              $543.89

 August         $808.58

3 Month total $ 1957.86 

Used by Iron Mountain for:

Contaminant                                

Coliform Bacteria (an indicator organism for fecal coliform, streptococcal and other pathogenic bacteria.)

Source 

sewage and animal wastes backflow or improper pipe connections in water systems improperly sealed or constructed wells

Possible chronic health effects gastroenteritis, salmonella infection, dysentery, typhoid fever and cholera

[1] US Council of Environmental Quality


9-27-2007-04

August 2007 Vendors Report is available:  August 2007 Report

Webmaster


9-27-2007-03

I am still waiting for Doug Rigoni to actually prove that anything he has said in any of his campaign ads is true. Innuendo doesn’t cut it with me. That insinuation that landlords are responsible for fire deaths rubbed me the wrong way. Why innuendo? Why not say something he can actually back up with cold, hard, documented facts?  Is that all he has?  Innuendo, but no substance to hang his hat on?
 
Didn’t he say in his garbage and fire ad that we have better and cheaper fire protection? Can he prove that with cold, hard, documented facts? What does the ISO say about our fire protection? They are experts at determining that. Why is the City not begging the ISO to come back and prove their claims? What does MIOSHA say about our fire protection?  They, too, are experts on safety. Oh yeah, it’s none of MIOSHA’s business, according to John Marquart. He said that three times in one news article.
 
Why did the city give money to the sewage back up victim if they were immune? What a foolish claim; it only made him look irresponsible with our tax dollars.
 
Finally, why is he the only incumbent who at least has the guts to campaign in public? Even if he continues to shoot himself in the foot over and over, at least he is not trying to sneak through the back door with an obscure website obviously running on innuendo and outright lies.  He sure is spending a lot of money for a $500 a year job.  Why?

9-27-2007-02

I couldn't agree more with 9-26-2007-03 and 9-25-2007-04.  Finally, someone is hitting the nail on the head with the broader, all-encompassing issue.  Enough of this high falutin' Mickey Mouse approach to government that's all show, tail-covering, pettiness, expensive and unnecessary lawsuits, perpetual ineptness, constant contradictions, open and shameless law- and agreement-breaking in the face of documentation, disregard for taxpayers footing extravagant expense accounts, undeserved credit-taking, gratuitous finger-pointing, unresponsiveness, engineered city council meetings, outright lying in the face of evidence, and unrelenting self-advancement while Iron Mountain deteriorates worse than ever around us.
 
How did we ever let things get like this?
 
It's time to elect and then hire responsible, accountable city officials who are going to govern and manage this city in a professional, business-like, and effective manner that will openly and consistently strive to introduce new businesses and private capital to the city as well as increase grants and improve business for those businesses and organizations already here.  And all this with the goal of improving the entire city and benefiting everyone who lives or works in it with more choice, more openness, a concerted effort to provide more high-paying jobs, and better city safety and services.  Bravo!  Out with the old and in with the new.  If Iron Mountain is going to survive and prosper, it has to realistically and pragmatically enlist the enriching ways of those who are successful throughout the rest of the world.  Progress is more than a word.  Let's get some sober, serious, and real progress going in this town again.


9-27-2007-01

People are talking about two sewer back-ups that the city had to pay for.  Can I make that three?  Yes…it happened at my home and it, too, is on Fleshiem Street.  I think the reason mine didn’t make any news was because A) I did all the clean-up myself and B) I didn’t claim EVERYTHING.  I claimed what I felt was important.  In comparison to the others, my claim was miniscule but nevertheless, it was a sickening mess and God forbid that it happens again.  Because if it DOES happen again, I’m not going to be so polite and generous.

This brings me to an important point.  I’m paying up the nose for sewer & water and property taxes, yet there obviously is a problem with the sewer system if these backups aren’t isolated incidents.  They should be making improvements to the existing systems to prevent this from happening instead of, say….improving Hydraulic Falls Road.

I must say that what disappoints me most about the way this city is run is that the “average” citizen doesn’t benefit.  I’m appalled at how high my taxes are, but my street is horrible.  The sidewalks are impossible to walk on.  There’s a For Sale sign on practically every block.  There are no quality jobs that will keep our children in the area after college.  Sure, anyone can get a minimum wage job with no benefits, but that won’t keep our kids here.  I’d like to see a council that addresses the “Big Picture” or we may be putting up a For Sale sign as well.  But sadly, there’s not much incentive for anyone to move here and this home will probably sit on the market for years the way the others are.


9-26-2007-08

Webmaster, I've been chuckling with a few callers and online visitors off and on all evening over your latest post, 9-26-2007-06.  But we suspect your reasonably polite and tactful tongue-in-cheek sarcasm with the statistics went right over the I.M. Truth webby's head.  Nice try though.

I.M. Truth people, of course Issues isn't getting 14,000 unique hits or visits per week.  Server requests are not the same as unique visits.  The point is this: if you want your claims about how many hits or visits you're getting to have credence, you might want to use an independent and objective counter or meter that your Web host provides.  Just telling people usually doesn't cut it, particularly on a site such as yours.  And frankly 37,000 hits in your first week and a half, as you state, is misleading.  For a site the size, age, and nature of yours, the numbers really strain one's ability to believe -- they're not credible, and therefore you're not helping your cause, boys and girls.  That's what the Issues webmaster was getting at.  You can't count all of your server requests as visits.  Server requests include each photo and each little graphic, such as the 20 tiny arrows and Go Daddy material you have on each page.  You can count only visits.  Use a counter.  It's more believable.  And then only if you're not clicking the Refresh feature in your browser over and over continually to inflate the figure.  You get a generally accurate reading usually only over time -- the more time, the more accurate, the more believable.  Dig?  I don't know if you were paying attention or not, but the Issues site didn't even put its counters onsite till after it had been online for a few months.  With all due respect, come on.  If you're gonna play this game, you don't have to be a pro, but at least be a player.  Or at least make the effort to be.  No one has any love and respect for a Grand Pretender or outright liar.

An Uninvolved but Interested Geek Bystander


9-26-2007-07

"Yes, Virginia, there is an Island of Sanity left in city government". 
 
Congratulations to the TIFA Board!! They flatly rejected the unbelievably expensive proposal from Marquart, Tousignant and company for the parking lot pavilion, paving a parking lot that was not in such bad shape, and underground power lines in a one block area behind city hall.  They never did receive a final price, but it had reached $738,000 and counting.
 
In his spiel, Marquart didn't bat an eyelash at recommending approval.  Tousignant chimed in with his old and tired "vibrant downtown" theme.  All to no avail.
 
Shrewdly, I thought, TIFA Chairman Jim Brinker suggested a committee be formed from members of the TIFA Board and City Council to review all options and make recommendations next spring.
It passed unanimously. By then, there may be a second Island of Sanity, namely the city council.
 
Marquart and Tousignant have certainly taken their lumps in recent months.  Remember the proposed bandshell and 37 disappearing parking spaces?  Gone.  That's one. Remember the large, ugly, pavilion and rest rooms in the Downtown Plaza parking lot?  Gone. That's two. Remember the STS Consultants City Park plans that were never shown to the public because they might be "too controversial" with an election coming up? That's three. Remember their "deer must go" proposal that they conveniently blamed on the high school students studying city government, when in fact Marquart had recommended it far earlier in his 2006-07 Budget Proposal letter. That's four. And the latest TIFA bulldozing job makes the count FIVE.
 
Despite the best efforts of this dismissive, arrogant and egomaniacal bunch, the people have prevailed.   
And they will again in November as they did in August.  Democracy lives in Iron Mountain.

9-26-2007-06

I was just updating the forum and posting the note below when I decided to go to the truth.com website and see what was going on.  I noticed this statement on the site:

"The site had personally attacked the incumbents, their family and friends for four years. It has continuously spread misinformation and lies."

Funny thing is this site is only 13 months old.  We started it last August.

I then went to our statistics area of this web site and noticed that in 13 months we have had 611,714 server requests.  We are averaging about 14,000 a week.  The hit counters that I have on the home page and forum page are not accurate to the number of visitors.

Thanks for visiting.

Webmaster of Iron Mountain Issues


9-26-2007-05

I really must remind everyone reading this website that just because something is written on here does not mean it was put on by a challenger or a supporter of the challengers.

I am referring to 9-24-2007-7. 

I was at the 424 amendment meeting referred to, and immediately afterwards talked at length with Mr. Rigoni in the parking lot.  We both saw Mr. Tousignant leave. He did not even come close to talking with Mr. Rigoni.  I obviously can’t say what happened prior to the meeting

I can say this conversation did not happen after the meeting..  Post 9-24-07-07 is showing on the Truth website, making it sound like challengers will do anything to win.

If you are going to make a statement you want people to believe on this site, then I say sign your name so it can be verified.  On the other hand, perhaps this is a supporter of the incumbents trying to cause trouble again.

Always remember that anyone can post on this site unlike the truth.com site.

Dave Farragh

Candidate for City Council


9-26-2007-04

I attended the recent TIFA meeting and Mr. Mariucci did a presentation on what plans he had for the old Khoury property. I have been to many different presentations before and this was one of the best. He presented a development that the whole city can be proud of. He wants to start with a convention center and a hotel connected to it.  I hope everything goes as planned for him. What I have seen, if elected, I will support this project 100%. This project will truly be a positive approach to economic development for our city. Good luck to Mr. Mariucci
 
 
Sincerely,
 

Dale Alessandrini
 

See more on www.ironmountaindemocracy.com

9-26-2007-03

Concerning Item 9-25-2007-04

Well said.  And how!  And about time.  Thank you. 

Neither the people at city hall nor the regular writers to this site have a clue how many of us in town feel what this writer has expressed.  I encourage every voter in Iron Mountain to read the "progress/pro-business" posting completely and carefully.  And have everyone you know read it.  It's Item 9-25-2007-04.  It's mainstream stuff that affects everyone, and it cuts to the bone.  I defy all readers to argue that those are not six paragraphs of solid truth, clear vision, and great advice.

"Big Picture" is right, as the writer says.  What he writes reflects on and influences every issue this city faces.  It's time to grow up, broaden our vision to incorporate what's important and effective, then finally tackle Iron Mountain's issues with a realistic and universal businesslike professionalism instead of continuing year after year of bluff, half-measure, false bravado, and tawdry small-town politicking.


9-26-2007-02

The Iron Mountain Truth site is trying to say that landlords and challengers have tried intimidating tenants into voting for them. They state that “THE TRUTH has already collected three solid incidents of landlords and two of the challengers that approached then before the primary election and threatened a vote from them

 

I really find it hard to believe that these are credible. Who is dumb enough to think that would work? If a landlord ever said I had to vote for him/her, I’d know it was a joke and laugh with them. They’d have absolutely NO way of knowing how a tenant votes. To even think of threatening a vote would be absurd. I personally think that this is just another desperate ploy by the incumbents to slander the challengers.

 

I just laughed when I read what they have on the assessor portion.  We should believe that Rich Brook was an excellent assessor when the equalization department has proven otherwise?  Do they think we forgot about the notices from the County Equalization Department in 2006?
 

The more I hear and read from the incumbents, the more sure I become that I'll be looking to the challengers.  And it didn't take any propaganda from the challengers to convince me.  I'm just tired of all the double-talk from the incumbents.  And if any of the incumbents that are on the ballot are in favor of the current mayor as a write-in, they automatically lose my support. The people have already spoken on that issue. He lost and needs to accept that fact!   It's time you show us that WE, the voters, matter.... that our opinions and certainly our votes mean something.  Support the mayor, you slap us in the face.  By supporting the mayor, you are saying that we wasted all those tax dollars by even having a Primary election.


9-26-2007-01

It looks like the more Doug Rigoni spends on re-election advertising, the worse it gets for him.
 
The Letter to the Editor article by Mr. Giguerre's Attorney Herb McRoberts clearly points out the multi-month stonewalling Mr. Giguerre endured before he hired an attorney.  It lays low the comments made by Rigoni that the city "has to go through a process."  What process? The facts of the matter were there in black and white. The city blew sewage into his house.  Governmental immunity does not apply. End of story.
 
Doug Rigoni again misstated facts regarding his Rental Ordinance re-election ad.  He states:
 
"The landlord association sued the City to try to stop enforcement of the ordinance, costing you the taxpayers thousands of dollars.  They lost."
 
FACT: The landlords HAVE NOT lost anything.  No decision has yet been rendered by the court, as Mr. Rigoni certainly knows.  Why would he lie and say they lost?  Apparently because he has no qualms about LYING, a trait he has in common with City Manager John Marquart and Mayor Ken Tousignant. The Rental Ordinance HAS NOT been enforced and is not a legal ordinance of the city.
 
The Rental Ordinance, as written, is very complex.  His suggestion that it only will cost the landlords $3.88 per month is pure fiction.  The penalties spelled out in the ordinance are horrendous for minor infractions.  All of this will come to the attention of the taxpayers well before November in great detail.
 
Much more BIG NEWS of gross mismanagement in other areas is also about to break I am told from very keyed-in people.  STAND BY.


9-25-2007-06

Tonight's Daily News, Tuesday Sept. 25,  has a very interesting letter to the editor.  It is titled, "What is wrong for the city."   
Please read this article!!  It's author states, "As the attorney for the homeowner, I decided a response to Mr. Rigoni's article was necessary."  The homeowner that he refers to had a sewer backup problem in Iron Mountain.  I found the placement of the article to be very interesting due to the fact that it is at the bottom of the page and easy to miss. I have called a number of my friends who read the paper from page to page every evening.  They all missed seeing the article!


9-25-2007-05

I just read the letter from Mr. McRoberts in tonight’s Daily News. I found it very interesting when he pointed out that the City demanded that the terms of the settlement be kept confidential, and then Mr. Rigoni broke that agreement in his campaign ad. In case you didn’t see the letter, Mr. McRoberts is the attorney for the sewage victim, so I think he knows what he’s talking about.
 
I wonder. Since the City broke the agreement, could that also release Mr. Giguerre from the agreement? And, free to pursue the full amount again? I would love to see Mr. Rigoni have to eat his words. Yes, it’s even worth the extra twenty thousand or so in tax dollars if it turns out that Mr. Giguerre is legally entitled to it, after all. Interesting.  Keep shooting yourself in the foot, Doug.
 
Oh yeah, Ken Tousignant appeared in the new continue progress ad tonight, too, as a write-in.  Thanks for wasting our tax dollars on a primary that you won't honor, Ken.

9-25-2007-04

When you say progress, mean progress.  When you say pro-business, mean pro-business.
 
You like passing out flyers?  Then run copies of this opinion and hand it out all over town.  Pardon me if I'm feeling a little indignant, but the word progress ought to check in to the Caring House the way it's being abused by the incumbent city-council candidates in recent weeks.  Nice political catchphrase, nice slogan, but absolutely no substance.
 
Look, folks.  Let's talk Big Picture here.  Progress means advancement.  To progress means to advance.  In the broader political sense for a city, it means to advance the standard of living, to advance the quality of life.  To get better.  But I bet we'd be hard-pressed to find 100 unbribed citizens in Iron Mountain who would say that they're better off today than they were before this City Council and its management took over four years ago.  Led by Mayor Tousignant, City Manager Marquart, and lately Councilman Rigoni, there's an awful lot of chest-puffing and self-importance, a lot of big talk and self-congratulations, and there's a lot of posing and pretending and braggadocio galore from City Hall, and a lot of meaningless moving stuff around on the table -- and knocking stuff off the table! -- and plenty of smoke and mirrors, but, plain and simple, there's precious little accomplishment and advancement, despite all the empty boasting about it.
 
This town and its leaders have to abandon their preconceptions, get out of their box, and expand their vision if we're going to see some genuine progress.  We need some businesslike professionalism at City Hall, not just the constant claim and pretense of it.  We have to recognize that progress is not John Marquart writing grants to award to the same businesses in town over and over again, while ignoring overtures from out-of-town companies showing some interest in Iron Mountain.  Progress is not corporate welfare -- progress is not Michigan taking money from all of us taxpayers and awarding it as a grant to Iron Mountain, who in turn puts it, in contract form, in the pocket of a private business like Bacco -- which is run by a city councilman, for goodness' sake!  And progress is not getting the grant money and awarding it to downtown's pet programs of urban renewal that have a 50-year history of creating expensive bureaucracies and failing miserably in backwater towns like Iron Mountain.
 
Enough.  These guys have had their shot and botched it.  They can plead and rationalize all they want.  I'm more interested in effective government and success than I am in political catchphrases and excuses.  I say it's time to pursue real progress.  It's time to pursue new business, 21st-century technological, service, and manufacturing businesses, and the high-paying jobs these businesses provide.  It's time to pursue private capitalization and lots of it, not only puny state grant after puny state grant, each of which ends up in the same old private businesses' coffers around town and is of no benefit to the general population -- i.e., you and me.  We have to pursue wealth, private wealth, those new companies that will not only settle and invest in Iron Mountain, but will provide the type of cash flow within the community from which the businesses already here will themselves grow and prosper.  We have to provide a professional business environment in which new, private money flows into and through town, to Bacco and Champion and smaller employers like Carey Contracting and the plumbing-and-heating and electrical contractors, not to mention the realtors and banks and all the other businesses in town -- as well as the new businesses -- and jobs -- such an infusion will generate.
 
Enough of this "progress" nonsense from the incumbents.  Enough of the status quo.  These guys currently running Iron Mountain, elected and hired, are small time, lack vision, are generally inept, and don't know what they're doing other than attempting to serve themselves and their limited interests.  Even as they say otherwise.  It's time to pursue authentic progress and advance our standard of living and quality of life with a businesslike, professional approach to attracting the new businesses of the future with high-paying jobs and wealth, then conscientiously fixing, managing, and benefiting Iron Mountain and everyone in it.  It's a global economy, folks, a new day, and we have to assert ourselves competitively within it if we're to survive and prosper.  Paving the entire city and spending on largely unimportant pet projects in the old downtown are not enough.  Those shortsighted and limited priorities just don't cut it.
 
The incumbents and their city-management bureaucrats have had their chance and not even remotely measured up.  On the contrary -- by virtually every objective measurement we're a poorer, less safe city with worsening prospects than when they took over.  That's why I call on everyone in town -- everyone -- to take a look at the new guys who subscribe to the broader, more realistic, more professional, more businesslike, and genuinely progressive outlook and its application, the challengers running for City Council -- Toedter, Rosen, Peterson, Farragh, and Alessandrini.  Read and listen to what they have to say.  Offer them your vote this time around, and give them an opportunity to start correcting Iron Mountain's state of affairs and lead the city's advance.  With them, I daresay progress might actually mean progress again.


9-25-2007-03

LIES - INCOMPLETE INFO - HALF TRUTHS - That's how this council operates!!!!!

This is the only thing Doug Rigoni and the others has to offer us. High taxes, bad water, no fire protection, excessive fees,
throwing businesses out, stopping business from locating here, expanding local government with no benefit, making us the
laughing stock of Michigan. And the list goes on and on.

If anyone checks the facts that he writes his lies are right in front of us.
 

1. Sewage backup two times and claiming the city is held harmless due to State law.  Then why would the city settle for any amount of money with Giguere when they didnt have to. Because they applied external pressure to the lines which creates liability.  Doing the right thing and taking responsiblity just doesnt come into play with these idiots.

2. Continue Progress slogan. Ask ANYONE who has recently built or relocated within the city limits with a business. The   current council and manager make them jump through hoops that are set to the clouds. Walgreen, Simone Insurance, Peter Begress, to mention a few, all had real hurdles with the "city" to expand business here.
 

3. Fire the fire fighters to save money. Now we pay the each policeman an extra $4000.00 each per year and overtime for       certification when they still cant go into buildings as they lack qualifications. They are late in going to a fire or don't show up at all. This saves us money and affords better fire protection - NOT.

4. Rental housing. The council wants to create a bigger government and make money doing it. Can you say Ghost Town USA!
Rigoni puts in the paper that the landlords killed people because the ordinance was contested - what a bunch of dung. The fires were caused by an overloaded extension cord and food cooking on a stove while the tenant fell asleep. Spin that truth.com!
 

5. 425 agreement. Cant we hear all the facts just once from the council. Will I.M. get any tax revenue in 50 years with this
agreement unless the properties are sold? NO!!!!!!  Who will buy any of the property located in either area if they have to pay for running the water and sewer lines? NO ONE!!!!!! The day of the public meeting the council issues the agreement to the public that isn't the actual agreement - how can they do that? BECAUSE THEY CAN!!!!!!

There is just so much wrong with our council and manager. Each time they meet you wonder how can this happen to our city and what are thinking. THAT'S THE PROBLEM - THEY DON'T THINK!!!!!!!!!!!

If monkeys were running against them I would vote for the monkeys and feel justified in my vote.


9-25-2007-02

If the city holds a public hearing, and provides the wrong documentation for the public to review, doesn’t that make their vote invalid? I’m talking about the 425 agreement hearing, where several people got their copy of the agreement at the Iron Mountain meeting, and then took them to the Breitung meeting, only to find out that they had been given an obsolete copy of the document at Iron Mountain. The outdated copy was missing some very pertinent information that came out in the Breitung meeting. How can that be a valid way of holding a public hearing?

9-25-2007-01

Mr. Rigoni's latest ad was in the paper Monday night.  This time, it was the landlords' turn to take their lumps.  One thing I found curious is that, in his ad about the fire department he made no mention of the four fire fatalities that happened since he helped create our "cheaper, safer fire protection", but now is somehow blaming the landlords for the deaths.  What unmitigated gall. 
 
I have to say it again.  He had an entire ad about fire and garbage, and never once mentioned the four fire fatalities, but, he sees fit to blame that on landlords?  Outrageous.  How dare you blame them for what could just as likely have been the tragic results of your mistakes, Mr. Rigoni? How do you sleep at night?

9-24-2007-08

To the I.M. Truth webperson ... Sure.  A challenger could have created or underwritten or supported the dougie site.  Would have had to have been the dumbest person alive, but he or she could have done it.
 
But do you know what is real easy to imagine?  Especially if a person knows the slightest bit about the Web and the nature of politics?
 
It is real easy to imagine that if an incumbent wanted to discredit the challengers, he or she would shrewdly create the dougie site exactly as it is.  That incumbent would choose similarities for it that match other Web sites associated with the challengers.  That incumbent would buy identical features like the Web hosting company and the I.D. security protection.  Then that incumbent and his/her sympathizers would jump up and down sputtering in a manufactured fury of indignation and political correctness and point at the site and say, "Look, look at this horrible thing that the challengers have done!  It must be them!  The site has two of the exact same features as the public forum site that publishes their opinions!"
 
Get real.  Do you think there is a voter in this city, or a challenger, who believes any one of the incumbents is stupid enough to try and discredit the challengers that way?  Any more than the group of challengers, who are publicly tolerant and not anti-gay and not homophobic, would try to paint the incumbents so stupidly?
 
The really stupid people here are the handful of militant extremists on either side of the gay issue in Iron Mountain who are trying to use it as leverage to further their political goals ... and think it might work!
 
Every single one of the current candidates, incumbent and challenger, is savvy enough to understand that if they had been responsible for creating that site to discredit the other side, it would have been the kiss of political death.
 
It's a wash, pal.  This issue is a dead one.  I suggest we all move on.  And I do mean all.  This campaign is unimaginably larger, more inclusive, and more important than the gay issue and that pathetic dougie site.  Sadly, every candidate was unnecessarily violated and victimized by all of this nonsense, and no good purpose was served.  I know that these ethical considerations mean diddly to you, but it seems to me and probably the rest of Iron Mountain that in picking and choosing among our candidates, we should be looking for what good purposes can be served.  Not what cheap shots can be taken.


9-24-2007-07

I was just outside City hall after the 425 act meeting and over heard Mr. Rigoni and Ken Tousnaut  talking about the agreement and Mr. Rigoni said that he was happy that no one brought up the water and sewer district that
they are going to negotiate with BT for outside the city limits because he wanted to get all the work on that project and Mr. Tousignant said don't worry if we get in you will. And they even laugh about it.


9-24-2007-06

I hope all of you out there realize the the www.ironmountaintruth.com website is, in fact, the Ken Tousignant website.
 
It is so obvious it's pathetic.  It is the same ploy he used when Marcus Blomquist was signing letters to this site.  Tousignant was writing those letters.  Once again hiding behind somebody.
 
So when you go to the truth.com website, remind yourself that you are reading the vicious commentary of Ken Tousignant
 
After coming in ninth in the nine person Primary Election, his vengefulness and bitterness are coming through loud and clear.  More accurately, his true character is coming through loud and clear.
 
The voters had him pegged right.


9-24-2007-05

To Mr. Lefebvre and the deer pen Advocate:
 
The beauty of your dialogue is that you are able to have this dialogue! 
 
I believe that with new Council members, issues such as this will receive public input, healthy debate, and solutions that will satisfy both views.  I predict that things won't "go down" without the public's knowledge, ending in irreversible outcomes.
 
Until then, however, try to hang in there and have faith that all will be as it should be after November.  There are always solutions, always. 
 
There will be a better chance for creative solutions after November, when more than 6 or 7 people are allowed to contribute ideas!

9-24-2007-04

Webmaster,
 
Please place the following statement in the public forum.
 
Citizens of Iron Mountain and Surrounding Communities,
 
Please see my campaign blog at www.ironmountaindemocracy.com to read my views on issues, as well as, my response to the allegations, about me, on the iron mountain truth website.
 
Please feel free to email me, at that website, with any questions or comments.
 
Thanks,
 
William Toedter,
Candidate for Iron Mountain City Council

9-24-2007-03

I would urge all challengers to ignore the www.ironmountaintruth.com website completely.  The site claims it will send a questionnaire to all challengers and incumbents. Look what their true motives are.  Dale Alessandrini issued a clear, concise statement there and was immediately and viciously attacked, with many mischaracterizations of his words. 
 
Anyone can see the distortions just by reading the replies to his statements. 
 
Challengers, you have a clean website at www.ironmountaindemocracy.com. Keep posting there.

9-24-2007-02

I was wandering through the so-called truth site.  I did not notice Ken Tousignant's name in there anywhere
 
Also, John Marquart is mentioned very sparingly.  Once where Dale Alessandrini is alleged to have said Marquart should be fired.  He certainly is not alone in this thought.  The other occasion is where he pay raise is explained.
 
So the truth site has only one purpose:  to demean and attack any and all challengers.  They do it by attributing statements to the challengers that were never made, and then attacking the fictitious statements they created. 
 
Unlike the issues website, this one, where FOIA documentation can be found in many places, there is none.
 
Unlike the democracy website, where each candidate states his or her positions without personally attacking people, only the positions of the incumbents where they disagree, the truth website is very personal.  Hardly a class act.
 
Where are the positions of the individual incumbents posted on the truth site?  I can't find them.
 
Tousignant has a long history of hiding behind others instead of writing and signing his own material.  The truth website is nothing more than a continuation of that practice.
 
No one is fooled by the truth website who has any interest in city affairs.  The four year record of the incumbents and city manager is far too well known by the voters and taxpayers.


9-24-2007-01

To 9-21-2007-05 about your maps:

Sorry.  Too cryptic for me.  No matter how carefully I look.  Besides, not only are the maps hard for me to read, but I'm one of the general public and not privy to the inside info, assumptions, and ongoing exchanges.  (I have trouble understanding quite a few of the remarks that exist out of context on this site and ones like it -- you may be making a great point, but how would I know?)  What's missing on the map?  And what's significant about it missing?


9-23-2007-02

I request that someone who will be attending the Public Hearings at Iron Mountain City Council at 6:30 PM Monday, Sept 24 and/or at the Breitung Township Hall at 7:00 PM, post a report on this  website on any interesting discussions that transpired.
 
I am not against 484 annexations, but I won't be able to make either of those meetings and just curious about the discussions.

9-23-2007-01

Dean Lefebvre

If you are not against another location then WHY don’t you give up on destroying the deer pen? Did you not see the results of the open house at City Park there was enough people saying the deer should stay to make the council listen, and that is a first! A plaque should be erected for that rare occasion when the voice of Iron Mountain was finally heard. The council insisted up until the open house that the few (75) at the meetings voicing their desire to keep the deer did not represent the way the citizens felt. So why should the many give up so much for the few?


9-22-2007-07

When I presented the plan to Parks & Recreation Committee about building a new field at City Park, I did not ask the City to pay for the project.  There are several privately funded grants (a big one is with the NFL) that would help with the project.  The big portion of the funding would come from our league and the kids that would use the field.

I never asked the tax payers of Iron Mountain to fund this project.  All I asked was for a piece of land.

I have had several people talk to me about another location.  I am not against another location, but I do like the City Park Area.  This past Saturday we had hundreds of people at the upper Field.  The teams from West Iron County brought picnic lunches and kinda tailgated down by the playground.  I like the facilities located at the park.  We already have restrooms, parking, and pavilion if we needed to have a large function and the big one is the play ground.  3 to 7 year old kids have no interest in watching a football game, so the parents send them to the playground.

Thanks for listening.

Dean Lefebvre


9-22-2007-06

It's been said before, and I'll say it again, now that the issue is hot again.  How is it practical or cost-effective to turn the deer pen into any type of athletic field?  The cost to fill in and level that area would be enormous when there are plenty of more level properties in the area to use.


9-22-2007-05

Several times over the past few weeks, I have made it a point to drive through the Million dollar parking lot that the City of Iron Mountain has provided to Boss Snowplow for 1 dollar per year. I drove through at several different times of the day. To my surprise, the parking lot was never more than ¼ full. Then I started asking questions. Will the City provide parking for other business and industries that request it? Come on, have the doors been opened, or do only a select few like Boss Snowplow and the Downtown Merchants get a free ride. We have seen the cost of maintaining these lots downtown by the amounts put forward by the City engineers to repair and repave them. I wonder what is the costs to plow these lots in the winter, and will the Boss lot be plowed by the City. It seems a little strange, that if the City does in fact plow the lot, will they do it with a Western Plow, a Blizzard Plow, or some other manufacturer mounted on a City truck.
 
Also, with such an investment made in this lot, you would think that the City would get a great return on taxes as this industry expands. Wrong. As part of a sweet deal, this City Council has exempted Systems Control/boss Snowplows from paying all taxes on all new personal property. This is the only exemption of its type ever granted by the City of Iron Mountain and it was granted by the current City Council. The first year tax savings to Systems/boss is in the neighborhood of $490,000. This exemption was granted for 25 years. So the City looses tax money, by building the parking lot for a million dollars, loses by relocating streets and utilities to accommodate Boss/Systems and loses by not recouping their investment by exempting the facility from paying property taxes through the year 2031. Does this sound like progress to you? Especially when the City claims un-funded liabilities are looming out there. Will these un-funded liabilities eventually fall on the residents while business and industry are being exempted from taxes.
 
The following is an article entitled “Tax abatements under scrutiny” printed in the Lansing State Journal of November 25, 1999. In it is the statement, “if it’s an efficient company, it doesn’t need a subsidy, and if it’s inefficient, why are we subsidizing it”, said Kenneth Thomas, a political-science professor at the University of Missouri who has studied tax-break policy in Michigan and nationwide. What it winds up being is “you often have average people subsidizing the rich folks” Thomas said. A tax break on an individual basis is unfair because others do not benefit from it, in fact, it could be an additional burden on those not receiving the subsidy, while an across the board tax break benefits everybody on an equal basis.
 
It's been done before and didn't work. In the 1980’s, the City got involved with granting tax breaks under the Commercial Facilities Act. These breaks saw the businesses that obtained relief flourish. To this day, they are still viable properties in the community. This was at the expense of many other businesses that could not compete economically with those that obtained tax relief and thus went out of business. This program created an unfair tax advantage to those who received the tax cuts.
 
So City Council, by getting involved with “Corporate Welfare” what a fine mess you are leaving for the future of Iron Mountain. Is this your idea of ‘continued progress‘?

9-22-2007-04

Response to 9-22-2007-02

The soccer league does not create teams that are aligned with their respective high schools.  Lat year my son's team had kids form Kingsford and I believe Florence on it.  If you look at their shirts they do not say Iron Mountain Soccer Team.  It says SAY.

The soccer league does a great serve to our community.

The football league teams are youth versions of the high school football teams.  If you attended any of the games at City Park this past Saturday you would have found youth Mountaineers, Bobcats, and Wykon players and fans cheering for their teams.  We had a great Saturday at City Park.  Over 500 people came to the field through the course of the day.

That field was utilized to the fullest.

Dean Lefebvre


9-22-2007-03

After reading information on the truth website, I find it necessary to respond. I would like to address issues that affect the upcoming election.  If the incumbents feel it necessary to attack me personally, so be it.  I know who I am and what I stand for.

 

I have never stated that the four fire fighters would be hired back.  In fact, after reading a statement from Mr. Rigoni on  ironmountaintruth.com, I placed a call to him.  He responded that I had never made that statement to him.  Why it is listed as such even though he admits it is not the truth is beyond me.  Perhaps he does not care that they print lies using his name.   My comment on this issue is that if we were removing these positions to save money, why then did the city turn around and hire a public works director, a code enforcement officer, a community economic and development planner and a main street coordinator?  All of these positions are full time with benefits.  So where is the savings to the city?  You already had a competent individual running public works and other people available for code enforcement.  I am not saying that other positions may never be needed, but the issue at the time was saving money for the city.  As we have all stated, we need to study the situation to find any wasteful spending.

 

My next concern is the statement that I am not for the liaison officer.  Who ever heard me say that?  I have always favored that program, as I have grandchildren who attended school in Iron Mountain.  The program gives you some peace of mind knowing that someone is watching out for our  children.  Again they put words in my mouth.  What I stated is that the cable TV fee was not the way to pay for this service.  I attended the meeting at which this decision was made.  The city attorney commented that these funds should not be used for this purpose, but against legal advice they went ahead anyway.  I think more research is needed to see if this is a legal use of this fee, even though our intent is to eliminate it.  This should have been handled through a vote of the people. In my case my family would pay less in taxes than on my monthly cable statement at 5%--the point being it just was not handled correctly.

 

I will keep an eye on the truth website and respond as often as I can to keep you informed of my positions.  If you want know how I feel on issues, please email me at ironmountaindemocracy.com with your question and name, and I will be glad to respond.  You will never see any statements that I have made without my named signed to them.

You will always know how I honestly feel about the issues.

 

David Farragh

Candidate for City Council


9-22-2007-02

To Dean Lefebvre

You are right I will not compromise and neither will most of the people in Iron Mountain when it comes to the deer pen at city park. We fought city hall for too long to give up now. There is enough room according to the city for twelve deer. There are 18 soccer fields in the area and one deer pen. Many of us remember not only a larger pen and herd but also buffalo. We already lost half the pen plus access, the road once went all the way around the pen. There is other vacant land suitable for sports. I also find it hard to believe that the kids whine as much as you about where they play. My niece and  nephew just plain enjoy playing soccer I have never heard them whine about where.


9-22-2007-01

Dear Iron Mountain Issues,
 
Some of us are concerned about the stark unfairness of how the present City Council is cynically and politically hiding behind the popularity of our terrific School Liaison Officer Program to impose and then illegally use a cable-TV franchise fee for funding in Iron Mountain.  This concerns us enough that some of us decided to get a local online billboard, Fair is fair!, to inform the I.M. citizens 24/7 of what is really happening here.  By publishing this letter, will you please make your readers aware of our link?  Thank you.
 
Friends of the Iron Mountain School Liaison Officer Program

Fair is Fair Web Page


9-21-2007-06

Hey!  Any one else run across this site yet?

http://www.imeplace.org/phil_dougie_archive_item/

Interesting turn of events.

That got me thinking, so I checked http://www.ironmountaingay.com/ to discover yet another turn of events.  How long has that been there?

Actually kind of an upbeat note on both counts, huh?  No matter what side of the issues you're on.


9-21-2007-05

Look carefully at both maps at the bottom of this notice of public hearing.  What's missing from the North US-2 map?  I wonder if this is on purpose?


9-21-2007-04

Over the next few weeks I will be posting my response to the allegations posted on the truth web site. They will be posted on the ironmountaindemocracy.com site.
 
If you have any thoughts or questions, please feel free to email me from my site.
 
Thanks for your support.
 
Bruce J. Rosen
Candidate for City Council

9-21-2007-03

How much has the city spent on the re-assessment of property?

Click here:  PDF Format  Assessment              MS Excel Format Assessment


9-21-2007-02

 It is getting close to the November election, and I see by the lies on the Iron Mountain Truth website that the incumbents are starting to throw stones. I will not engage in any personal attacks, but I will talk about what is important.  I will stick to the issues that we face as residents of Iron Mountain. I will answer any questions that the citizens ask, and I will be truthful and courteous to you.  I invite any resident to e-mail me at www.ironmountaindemocracy.com with any questions, issues, or concerns that you may have.

There are a few items that I feel need to be addressed right now.

1 – The school liaison officer is a very good program for our children. When I sat on the council six years ago, I voted to have it put on the ballot because I wanted that program to be safe for at least five years, and it was, I was a little worried that if it was funded though the general fund and a new council came in, they may not fund it. The incumbents want you to believe that just because I want to do away with the T.V. fee that I won’t fund that program.  That is so far from the truth. We will still fund that program, but without levying a T.V. fee.

2 – I have stood up in many council meetings to address certain issues and have always had all the necessary documentation to support what I was saying, including tax reassessment issues, bidding processes, trips taken and money spent on these trips, and increased water bills to name a few. I have even told the city council that if they are interested in the information I have, I am willing to show all the data to them and to give me a call.  Not one of them has ever bothered to call and get the facts that I had.

3-The Main Street Program is a wonderful program.  It brings people downtown to enjoy our city. Britney, the Main Street coordinator, does a great job on the activities she brings in.  I had a chance to help her for a little while at the Italian Fest and found that her heart is in the right place.  Why would the truth website say that I want to fire her, especially to save $11,000.00?  The I.M. Truth web site stated that I just told ”somebody” (no name given) that the $13,000.00 raised by the Italian Fest went into the general budget. That is not true.  Before the Italian Fest even started, there were items on the Vendor’s Report that I questioned (wine glasses, wrist bands, etc.), so I called up City Hall.  The report was explained to me that the money spent on these items was deducted from the DDA account. Besides that, I didn’t even know how much money they had raised. But congratulations to Britney and all who worked on the Italian Fest to raise that kind of money.

4 – On one of the so-called truths, they said that I sat on the council and almost lost North Star Industries. That is another accusation that is not true. North Star sent out a letter asking communities what they have to offer them to locate in their area because they wanted to expand. Yes, I was on the council at that time; but before we could negotiate with them, the new council came in, and I was no longer there. I sit on the Economic Development Alliance Board. Why would I not want development in Iron Mountain? Absolutely I am for development in Iron Mountain.  The council needs to remember that if we are going to use city funds to supply water and sewer to develop property, we need to make sure that there is a contract with the developer to build on that site so the city can capture the taxes and, in turn, get our money back for the infrastructure costs.

Come back for more insight on the issues that we face as taxpayers of Iron Mountain.  I will be addressing the budget, tax reassessment, the bidding process, ISO rating, trips that this council and manager have taken,  water and sewer rates, state and federal grants, and more .

Thank You

Dale Alessandrini


9-21-2007-01

Response to 9-20-2007-05:
 
I like the fact that your letter tells a tale that possibly few residents are/were aware of.
 
What concerns me deeply, however, is not only that Mr. Marquart hit on you (!) but also how you felt villainized for trying to rectify a situation.  That is exactly what I am trying to convey about this administration.  That is exactly how it feels to try and communicate with them, no matter how polite you are.  That is exactly how they portray you if you have the audacity to actually speak up; as a troublemaking militant.
 
Next part of the old and tired pattern?:  You have to fight tooth and nail in an exhaustive battle of documents, contacting the proper sources, and researching.  TranslationYou do their job! 
 
Final outcome?:  Mr. John Marquart and Co. take the credit for the positive outcome you worked your butt off for....the outcome you grew 400 grey hairs for... the one you put your heart and soul into...the one they publicly slammed/slandered you for.
 
So I give you some major belated credit for what you accomplished, along with the many other citizens who worked so hard.  The difference it made in the quality of life was immeasurable and I'm glad you came forward to set things straight here.
 
Instead of "Letters to the Editor" like the one from Eden Caudell's Mom, I wish there were a few from residents like you who had the real scoop on experiences with this Council and Manager.  I wish that information was brought forward to the masses. 
 
The experiences you endured; the unjust situations, mistruths, and bullying...it's no gentler from a campaign perspective.  These guys are playing it pretty dirty and it would be great to have a couple of letters in the newspaper voicing support for us.  For me personally, it would be like having a very welcome "powerbar" against the drain of their constant slander and incredulous statements.
 
Tongue in cheek:  Hey, nothing wrong with long letters or hormones:  One might be needed to spell out the facts, and the other often comes in handy to prompt you to do it.
 
Sincerely,
Tina Peterson

9-20-2007-06

Response to 9-20-2007-04

From the tone of your post I would say that you are the one that wont compromise.

I don't believe that our league is looking a $250,000 gift horse in the mouth.  Again, it is a wonderful project that will help the youth soccer league.  I was approached by the group involved in this project and asked if I wanted to help.  See there is a grant for youth athletic fields.  I could see raising around $200,000 for a field project.  But I live in Iron Mountain and the facility should be within the city limits of Iron Mountain, supported by the residents of Iron Mountain, used for the youth of Iron Mountain.

You want me to tell the kids from Iron Mountain that our new facility is out on Pine Mountain Road and is located in Breitung Township.  The kids response will be "I don't play for Kingsford."  Now let me tell the parents that we want you to live in Iron Mountain and pay taxes here but your tax dollar wont be spent on any facilities here.  You have to go to Breitung Township for recreational facilities.  Tell the Little League that all games will now be played in Norway at Marion Park.

You do not know how important the spirit of our youth sports programs are.  If there is no home town spirit the program will suffer a slow death.  Look and Gwinn and tell me that there spirit is high.  This school district can barely field teams this year.  Iron Mountains are very strong.

So if your asking me to base this communities future on deer or our youth, the deer can join the ones in my yard.

But as I said in my post.  A discussion among concerned citizens will bring about a common goal.  I have been talking to other people and looking at other areas in the city.  Anyway who am I but just 1 citizen in this town.  Please don't be so threatened by my suggestions.

Dean Lefebvre


9-20-2007-05

Do those people really want to bring up the train horn issue?
 
This is long, it's not Tina Peterson, but I'm hormonal and have something to say.
 
I see that unpleasant new hate site is stirring the recent train horn issue so incumbent candidates can take credit for a problem that happened on their watch to begin with.  That's creative.  But ultimately self-defeating I'd guess.  Nerve is one thing those folks have.  And it finally got me writing to this site.
 
Those people are blowing smoke at you, Iron Mountain.  They figure you won't bother to check the facts or learn how they dropped the ball for almost two and a half years.  They figure they can lie, look good, that you're too lazy to discover the truth, and as a result they'll score some points and get a bunch of votes.
 
First, the State of Michigan passed no law and had nothing to do with what happened.  It was a Federal/local issue from Day One.  The state figured in it only peripherally.
 
Also, no one I'm aware of claimed that there was an agreement between the railroads and the city for a quiet zone.  Anyone who mentions an agreement is being disingenuous.  There was a definite public knowledge, however, that the quiet zone that did exist in the city was going to end on June 24, 2005, unless the city followed the guidelines that the Feds had laid out to preserve the quiet zone.
 
Following me so far?
 
The city -- meaning most of the council (because Marquart tells them only what he chooses) and most citizens (because Marquart tells them only what he chooses) -- may have been surprised, but not everyone was, including John Marquart, the city manager.  Because of rail and business associations, a lot of citizens in town were already aware in 2004 and not at all surprised about the upcoming new Horn Rule that was to go into effect in June 2005.
 
Between Fall 2004 and Spring 2005, several residents contacted John Marquart via telephone, mail, and email, providing him with the exact information of what was to happen and when, and that the city was responsible for grandfathering the Quiet Zone or otherwise preserving it.  If he was conscious -- and that really is a consideration, sadly -- he was perfectly aware of what was going on.  He chose to ignore everyone for over nine months, with the exception of one woman who finally snared him at City Hall just before Christmas 2004.  Me.  He hit on me, saw that was a no-go, then muttered that he would have to investigate.  But he handled these approaches in a very unbusinesslike and unprofessional manner -- total unresponsiveness, and the ridicule and villainization I personally overheard more than once in the parking lot behind City Hall, Greenleaf's Bar, and Sol Blu Lounge of those of us trying to communicate with him about this issue for well over two years.
 
Don't believe me.  I insist that you not believe me.  Don't believe anyone who agrees with me.  Go to http://www.fra.dot.gov/  -- the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA).  More specifically, go to http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1318 -- the Train Horn Rule at that site.  That's the information, with its warnings, citizens in this town were giving to John Marquart from Fall 2004 through June 24, 2006.  Surprised as anyone, my eye!  He knew perfectly well what was to happen and did nothing to prevent it.  Even though that same material clearly states that it was the municipality's responsibility to ensure or create a Quiet Zone.  He did nothing.
 
It took another year and a half of his dancing and bluffing and rationalizing ignorantly and incompetently -- but with the most charming smile and convincing daily bluff -- to do what he must to get the job done.  Even though he had in his hands, and for many months had had in his hands,  http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1318 -- the exact instructions of what he must do.
 
Everyone thinks it was just a few unreasonable and militant individuals like Rev. March, Trish Powell, Jim Hogan, and Carol Wicklund who were pressing this issue, but countless residents and businesses were on this issue, and instead of just fixing it, Marquart and his defenders in town and on the Council were concerned only with covering his tail -- like Bob Becotte at DPW trying to blur the issue and scare folks off with threats of you will have to pay MDOT $250,000 for new gates, lights, and bells at each crossing (except that they weren't necessary; that was only one option and dealt only with crossing protection, not horns).  And Marquart himself indignantly telling everyone he didn't botch it, that he didn't know (despite all the info directed to him for months), and that he couldn't do anything, it was Federal -- despite the Federal documentation in his hands telling him that it was the local municipality's responsibility and here are the steps you take to accomplish a Quiet Zone under the new Horn Rule.
 
Either he's a moron or he thinks the rest of us are.  Or both.
 
You know, I don't think so many of us would care so much about assigning the blame to him if he hadn't made such an effort to make everyone else look like hillbilly yooper asses and if he hadn't lied so consistently, so pathologically, about not having any warning prior to 6/24/05 and not having any responsibility for it happening and no responsibility to then fix it -- despite the Federal Railroad Administration, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Bart Stupak's office, and Carl Levin's office all looking into it and concluding irreducibly that it was Iron Mountain's local government that was responsible for initiating the process and carrying it out.  And just so the railroads -- who were nothing but gracious and cooperative every step of the way -- don't feel left out, let me include an email plenty of us got once the horns started blowing regularly, once Marquart denied responsibilty, and once we started inquiring of the rail companies.
 
"The City Manager of Iron Mountain failed to have the Whistle Ban Grandfathered, and therefore we are required by Federal Law to blow our whistles at the crossings.
"If you would like further information regarding this you may contact our office in Channing at (906) 542-3214.
"Doug Salminen
[elswells@up.net]
Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad Company (ELS)"

Canadian National (CN) ( contact@cn.ca), through a number of individuals, was more diplomatic and said that it had been, and remains, the responsibility of the municipality involved to take the necessary steps to preserve or re-create the Quiet Zone, and repeatedly directed us to the appropriate government officials other than Iron Mountain's, and reminded us that we should continue to direct our city officials to http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1318.

And everyone -- rail companies, Federal politicians, Federal agencies -- repeatedly showed us and emphasized that after all was said and done, if Iron Mountain wanted to preserve a quiet zone before 6/24/05 or re-create one after, the buck stopped at Iron Mountain City Hall and absolutely no place else.  Everything else was in place.  The first and final buttons had to be pushed there.  Except according to John Marquart, who stubbornly sat on his self-righteous can and let those horns blare for 19 months out of stupidity and incompetence or pridefulness and spite.

Personally, I think it was only when the City Council became aware last Fall that a significant number of people were really ticked off, had had enough, saw that the solution's bottleneck had been and remained at City Hall, and were prepared to sue the city, that the City Council finally moved on this and had Marquart take care of it.

So, you can believe that face-saving junk those weasels are trying to sell you at the new hate and spite site, or you can look at how things were, how they are, and how they operate through the official documentation, agencies, Congressman's and Senator's offices, and RR companies involved, then know what really happened.  Iron Mountain Truth.  Boy, the chutzpah of some people!

And why is it important that I even bring up all this and refute the claim those weasals are making?  After all, the horns have stopped.  Yes, but it's important that we learn from that entire episode and others just like it over the past four years, so we can act accordingly and prevent them from happening again.


9-20-2007-04

Dean Lefebvre wrote

Unfortunately it is located in Breitung Township and the church will have direct control over the fields.  I say this because we have been turned away from using other privately owned fields in the area.  The church did not say we could or could not use these fields.  I am just planning on not utilizing these new fields for our youth football program.

Did you inquire about it or are you just assuming. A lesson I learned early in life is don’t assume because you make an ass of u & me.

Also wrote “I hope that as a community we can discuss the future of City Park and come to a common goal.”

I thought they did. Leave deer pen where it is and let field where it is. The deer pen was shrunk once before for soccer, once is enough. 

Excuse me if I am wrong but you seem to be stuck on lets all compromise and do it my way. 

Stop looking a $250,000 gift horse in the mouth and ask if you can take it for a ride.


9-20-2007-03

This is in response to the 2 new soccer fields that the St. Mary’s Orthodox Church is building .  This is a wonderful project.

Unfortunately it is located in Breitung Township and the church will have direct control over the fields.  I say this because we have been turned away from using other privately owned fields in the area.  The church did not say we could or could not use these fields.  I am just planning on not utilizing these new fields for our youth football program.

The Central UP Youth Football League has 515 players from 8 areas playing this year.  Of the 515, 110 are from Iron Mountain and about 106 are from Kingsford.  All 110 kids from Iron Mountain use City Park, 4 to 5 days a week for practices and games.  We are crowded.

The location of City Park is great for the kids as most kids ride their bikes to practice or walk to the park after school.  To these kids City Park is their home field.

I invite all the citizens of Iron Mountain to visit the upper field this Saturday.  We will be hosting 3 home games.  I invite you to visit and see how nice it is to have this Iron Mountain sporting event held in Iron Mountain.

I would still like to see another field in the City Park area.  I also understand that the Deer are important too.  This past summer, while I was watering the field, I took notice as to how many people visit the Deer.  I was surprised by the number of cars that ride along the fence and the number of people that walked along the fence to see the Deer.  I hope that as a community we can discuss the future of City Park and come to a common goal.

Dean Lefebvre

President, Central UP Youth Football League


9-20-2007-02

To Writer 9-19-2007-11: Follow up on IP Addresses

Hey, I'm glad you pointed out all that stuff about many domain names and their sites residing at specific IP addresses on specific domain servers.  Thanks.  That stuff needed to be said.  Typo though near the end of Point "2.)": should be oneclickidea.com (not oneclick.com; visitors will be checking the wrong site).  I also found another domain name on that server at that IP address by doing entirely unrelated business.  The domain name is one of many that belongs to the sizeable, private think tank and consultancy firm, Global Network Associates -- globalnetworkassociates.net.  No site that I can find; they just own and store the name.  Think they're out to oust the current Iron Mountain city council and eradicate homosexuality in the U.P. as your forum's conspiracy theorists suggest?  LOL!!!  Yeah, right.  You think they even have the remotest idea that these other sites -- or Iron Mountain itself -- exist?

Also, if I can add my two cents about the sites, servers, and IP addresses?  Anyone can also go to a WHOIS feature like the one at http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/index.jsp and search an IP address itself.  Just choose that option and then enter the IP address and search it.  In this instance, you'll find that the address belongs to a domain server that belongs to Hostway, one of the largest and most popular web hosts in the world -- and a huge presence in this part of the country.  Learn about how web hosts work -- and about how Hostway itself works, for that matter -- and you'll understand that this type of domain server hosts at least hundreds of Web sites, Internet packages, and domain names.  You might also remember to tell your readers that this stuff changes constantly as hosts move domains to different servers and as clients change hosts -- that kind of stuff.  A domain name's IP address and domain server can change overnight.

BTW: I notice cityofironmountain.com and ironmountaintruth.com are registered at the same registrar: GoDaddy.  By the conspiracy accusers' own logic (or semblance of it), does that mean that those controlling the City of Iron Mountain's site and those controlling Iron Mountain Truth's site are either the same person or different persons but in bed together, as they claim these other sites are?  Ha!  Too much!  After all, what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.  Right?  No?  Ain't it?  Come on, use your heads!

That ethical/moral/civil etiquette stuff you (Writer 9-19-2007-11) mentioned too -- good stuff.  Some really unscrupulous people out there, don't care what they say or who they attack as long as they think they're serving their purpose.  You know that old saw about the neighborhood just not being the same since that shiftless riffraff moved in?  Sadly, that's pretty much how it's become across the Internet.  Selfish, meanspirited boneheads and flamers who bring their offline personalities onto the 'Net.  No consideration for anyone else online with them.  Bummer.  Anonymity has some real value and good stuff to be said for it -- hotlines, voting, protection from real threats and danger -- but the flip side if it is really wild and ugly and potentially harmful.  There are people who will use it, as they use everything else, irresponsibly.  In other words, abuse it.  Too bad because there's some great garbage on this site, including in this forum, if anyone bothers to sift and winnow through everything.  It also shows the jerks and morons for what they are, even if they are nameless. 

Make time to read The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture by Andrew Keen.  Great stuff.  Although, given the way some of these people write -- those who most need to read a book like this! -- and, by not being able to articulate, show their inability to think clearly -- I worry that they may not be able to take it up a notch and read an entire book, in English, and understand it.  But if you can't read, write, and think -- if you can't communicate but can only emote -- what the bloody deuces are you doing posting stuff on the Internet?  Hey?  (I bet most of you think that's a rhetorical question.  It ain't.  I'm asking.)


9-20-2007-01

Looks like those vile, hateful Christians are at it again. Just kidding. I read in the paper tonight that St. Mary’s Orthodox Church is building two regulation size soccer fields on the Pine Mountain Road.
 

THANK YOU, St. MARY’S!! What a wonderful, caring gesture for our area.

 
I hope this mean the current city council will cease their quest to get rid of our deer at City Park. I also hope the new fields will be a large part of the solution Mr. Lefebvre was looking for. Both were valid sides, and now it looks like we can have both a beautiful, natural park and soccer fields.  Now I'll have to wait and see how Iron Mountain Truth (less) spins this.  It was probably done for the sole purpose of making the incumbents look bad, after all.  It seems like everything good around here gets that kind of slant if they had no hand in it.

9-19-2007-12

Posted to ironmountaintruth.com and ironmountainissues,org

This is a quote from your web site.

"Keep in mind that two rental properties have burned in the last two years costing four young lives. Could we have avoided them if they had been inspected?"

If your web site is about the truth, then state the truth.  Why are you asking a question.

Northside Fire #1:

Overloaded outlet on the west wall.  Several appliances plugged into this outlet led to the fire.

Northside Fire #2:

Tenant started to cook something on the stove.  Went upstairs and fell asleep.  Fire then started in the kitchen.

Would someone please tell me how a landlord is supposed to prevent such tragedies.  I work hard to keep my rentals safe, including working smoke detectors, yet I have walked into my rental and found smoke detectors on the table with the batteries out.  I ask why?  The answer is that the battery in the TV remote was dead.

It boils down to this;  if you don't like the place you're renting, move to a better one.  If a landlord cannot rent a place he or she will be forced to upgrade the property.  Or is the real reason you won't move is that your past is chasing you.  "Ding Dong Rent" is a crime and I have brought every renter to court for past rent.  Four in the last year.

But wait.  It that a bird, or is it a plane, no wait its:

Have no fear the Iron Mountain City Council is here.

We will punish the landlord and make him or her pay for the tenants mistakes.

The last time I checked we lived in the USA and if you don't like where you live then move.

Landlord are not making money hand over fist.  The recent increase in interest rates have made it very hard to pass the increase in rent to the tenant.  Add to this the increase in property tax, the increase in water rate, increase in insurance, and the fees the city wants to add to the property make it a losing battle.

Then you may understand why we have so many houses for sale in this City.
Please start to see the trees through the forest.

Dean Lefebvre
Landlord in the City of Iron Mountain


9-19-2007-11

Basta!  Enough!  Stop the harsh finger-pointing before your accusations harm more innocent victims.

There are people at the ironmountaintruth.com site and at the forum of the ironmountainissues.org site who either don't know what they're talking about or are looking to find a conspiracy where there isn't one.  Political campaigning aside, you really should do your homework before jumping to your half-baked conclusions with ugly, unwarranted, and incorrect accusations.

1.)  In the industry there are no "sub sites."  There are subdomains AKA subdirectories, but they exist within a single domain.  For example, IronMountainTruth.com is a domain and its URL (Web address) is http://www.IronMountainTruth.com .  An example of a subdomain or subdirectory would be CampaignTactics.IronMountainTruth.com or IronMountainTruth.com/CampaignTactics and its URLs would be http://CampaignTactics.IronMountainTruth.com (nonexistent) and http://www.IronMountainTruth.com/CampaignTactics (nonexistent).  IronMountainDemocracy.com and IronMountainGay.com are separate, individual, discrete domains, entirely unrelated.  Neither is a subdomain-subdirectory of the other.

2.)  IronMountainDemocracy.com and IronMountainGay.com do indeed share the same I.P. address and the same domain server.  What you probably don't know, or don't care about, or choose not to disclose, is that hundreds and often even thousands of websites share a single server.  Are you starting to feel just a little bit silly yet?  A little bit mortified?  A little bit guilty?  The specific I.P. address you speak of 66.113.129.243.  But it is also the domain server and I.P. address for www.oneclickidea.com , a Net-Web design site out of Key West, Florida; www.presbyterypoint.net , a summer church camp for Michigan's Presbyterian kids; www.troop26bsa.com , a Boy Scout troop out in New Jersey; and so on and so forth for countless other Web sites of all types.  None is related, none is a subdomain of another -- each is as separate and independent as are your thousands of Word, music, and photo files on your PC's single hard drive.  Are you claiming that because they all have the same domain-server address they’re all part of a conspiracy of homophobes out to rout the Iron Mountain City Council’s incumbents and rid Iron Mountain of all gays and lesbians?  I think not.  You people are unbelieveable.  Are you that ignorant or just that low?  You can keep going through any WHOIS service and the more domain names you check, the more you'll eventually accumulate on the same domain server with the same I.P. address.  Here you go:  http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/index.jsp .  Or make your own choice of WHOIS feature -- all registrars have them.  Knock yourself out.  See for yourself.  Check the ones I tumbled onto and pointed out -- oneclick.com, presbyterypoint.net, troop26bsa.com -- then waste endless hours hunting for more.  See how it works.  Apparently you haven't anything better to do.  While you're occupied doing that at least you won't be shredding some hapless and unsuspecting mope's life with an unwarranted accusation.

3.)  IronMountainIssues.org does subscribe to the same security masking service (WhoisProtector) as others -- but many millions do; it's very good and therefore very popular.  But IronMountainIssues.org is not on the same domain server as IronMountainDemocracy.com and IronMountainGay.com, and by checking you'll see that its I.P. address is not 66.113.129.243.  And guess what else you're going to find that will contradict an item you pointed out?  WhoisProtector isn't always going to display as Vancouver, BC, Canada.  Sometimes it'll be Chicago, sometimes Austin, sometimes elsewhere.  Surprise!  Depends whose and which domain server the domain name and Web site land on.

Damn.  Don't you just hate it when the facts don't fit your theory.  Or your politics.

There.  All checkable, learnable stuff.  Now, please.  Get civil, will ya?  Know what the heck you’re talking about before you start destroying people’s lives and reputations by pointing fingers and making accusations.
 
"A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring."
                          - Alexander Pope


9-19-2007-10

Thank you for posting my question regarding the police department.  I sent the same email to the "Truth" website and as of yet, it has not posted.  I feel I may not have provided adequate information to receive an answer.  The question was, why is the city still filling daytime overtime shifts at the Police Department when, for the last 2 years, there have been dispatchers working in the office?
If I recall correctly, the dispatchers were hired to enable the city to increase patrols/police protection in the city as well as to decrease overtime paid.  During the day, when the dispatchers were in the office, if a patrolman called in sick, was in court, took a personal day, etc...the lieutenants could be out of the office on patrol since the dispatcher could cover the office, thus not requiring another patrolman to work overtime for that shift.  Sounds reasonable.
However, the hiring of the dispatchers is the only part of the plan that has actually been fulfilled.  The only difference is now the work formerly done by the lieutenants is now being done by dispatchers.  On any given weekday you will find the Chief of Police, the Detective-Lieutenant, a Lieutenant, a typist, and a dispatcher at the Police Department in addition to the two patrolmen and school liaison officer on duty. 
When an officer calls in sick or is in court, the shift is offered to the patrolmen per contract language.  However, if all of the patrolmen refuse the shift, one of the officers already on duty is forced to work the O/T shift.  This is regardless of the available staff in the police department.  Makes perfect sense for a midnight shift when the office is empty.  But a day shift when there are 5 or more people at the Police Department? 
A year ago I addressed this issue with a council person.  He was going to look into the situation and whether he did or not, I don't know. 
I can't help but ask, why have the dispatchers?   Why aren't the lieutenants on patrol EVERY day now that the dispatchers are in the office? Also, why was staff added to the Police Department but cut from the Fire Department?  Why, in an age of budget cuts, is the city adding non-essential personnel to any Department?  And of course, my original question, WHY is the city still FORCING the patrolmen to work overtime during the day?
I won't even address that a dispatcher was sent to the Police Academy at the expense of the city...that's one I'll never understand anyway. 
Thanks for posting me...again, anyone that finds answers to these questions will have my vote--in fact, I'll campaign on your behalf!

9-19-2007-09

What a pathetic, desperate, last ditch effort the misnamed ironmountaintruth.com website is.
 
Someone asked why there haven't been additional posts on there since Sept 14. 
 
Could it be because the Mayor is attending a Michigan Municipal League convetion in Traverse City and nothing gets on there without his approval?
 
That website is sick, sick, sick.


9-19-2007-08

In one of his articles, John Marquart mentioned that the City of Iron Mountain now has a world- class website.  OK, it's a pretty good website, maybe not world class, but good.
 
My question then, is why the past audits aren't on there, why the Vendor's Reports aren't on there and why the Proposed Budgets and his lengthy letters aren't on there.
 
Why do  citizens and taxpayers have to FOIA all this information, pay for it, and then have to scan it in to this website so the rest of the population can see it.
 
I have gone into many city websites.  All of the good ones have all this information out there in the open for anyone to see - as it should be.
 
If you want to impress us with your world-class website, Mr. Marquart, add all this stuff on there.
 
You don't have by any chance have anything to hide, do you?


9-19-2007-07

Here is the Dougie web site material in PDF Format.

Dougie Web Site 


9-19-2007-06

Ann Henrickson is the mother of Eden Caudell? Is this true? No way! No one would pull a stunt that low and transparent, not even our incumbents, would they? Her letter (in the paper Sept. 14) mentions more than once that she is a "newcomer" to the area. Praises the council over and over, yet does it in such a way as to leave you thinking she doesn’t have ties to any of them. How could she? She’s new to the area. She even directs you to the Iron Mountain Lies (I simply cannot write Truth when referring to that cesspool) website. She found out about that awful quickly, like before it was even on the net if you count the lead time for her letter.
 
I am really having a hard time believing this one. If this is true, it needs to be published in the same newspaper that printed her letter. Everyone in town believes she is just some new resident with no ties to the area because of her letter.

9-19-2007-05

Response to: 9-19-2007-04

Yes I do protect this web site: ironmountainissues.org

Our Info:

WhoisProtector Inc
550 Burrard Street, Suite 200
Vancouver, BC

This company protects millions of web sites.  Real coincidence.

Dougie did get the idea from me.  I told him to start his own web site.  To bad it was yanked after only a day.  The people of Iron Mountain needed to see that site to understand how this person wanted the future to look.

Here is your info: ironmountaintruth.com

Domains by Proxy, Inc.
(480) 624-2599 Phone
(480) 624-2599 Fax
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
ironmountaintruth.com@domainsbyproxy.com

Do you have any new information on the site?  The 14th of September seems to be a long time between posts.  Especially if your getting over a thousand visitors a day.

Webmaster Issues


9-19-2007-04

Webmaster of issues.org:
You asked your readers to send you a copy of what they sent to the truth website to the issues website, so as to ensure they post it....why the double standard, as you will not post from me.....As far as the website hit counter goes, I think you are exaggerating, as I have been watching it a bit....
 
As far as the connection to the ironmountaingay.com...
 
 
All are registered to the same IP address protection service in Canada.   Did Dougie get that same idea that you did?  Big coincidence.  Too big.  Your gay website was a fraud, cooked up by you.

9-19-2007-03

To keep the record straight and connect the dots -
 
Ann Henrickson, who wrote the Voice of the People piece last weekend in the Daily News praising the city is the mother of Council Member Eden Caudell.
 
She made no mention of that fact in her article.

9-19-2007-02

The Truth Web site has had 5,700 hundred hits in 4 days.  Pretty good considering that the Issues web site has had 14,704 hits in the same time period and I think most visitors of this site are linking to the truth web site.

I was questioned on why I put a link to the Truth Web site?

Well, this site was created to get the all information out to the people of Iron Mountain.  All information that I get I pass along.  I have stopped posting certain subject material and have made it clear what those subjects are.

I would like to clear up one thing.  The Ironmountaingay web site was real, even though it only lasted a day.  That site was created by someone who was writing to this site to get his message out.  I refused to post his ideas and encouraged him to start his own site, which he did.  The Truth web site says that I started that site to disrupt the preliminary election results.  Very Un-True.

I normally do not post items and only facilitate the open and free communications between citizens, but I am interested in how many of you have sent a note to the Truth Website and have not had it posted.  If you do send a note to the Truth Web Site, please send this site a copy so I can post it on the forum.  This will ensure that they are being truthful.

In regards to Mr. Rigoni's sewage ad in the paper.  Please visit this page Sewage Issues and read why the city paid those claims.  It was not out of the kindness of their heart.  They had to because they (city workers) caused the backup.  Not a natural blockage.

I would like to thank all those folks that have taken the time to research the material posted here.  Keep up the good work and stay informed.  The next 6 weeks are important to us all.

Webmaster of the Issues Site


9-19-2007-01

Mr. Hogan,
   I see you are upset about paying Iron Mountain taxes for the School Liaison Officer and not getting your monies worth because you are in an annexed area which includes Breitung Schools. Well fine Sir, I'm sure you will be happy to hear you also live in the TIFA district. NOW, I don't know how old your house is. BUT, if it was built after 1985 All your taxes are going to Iron Mountains TIFA ! If on the other hand Sir, your house was built prior to 1985, All the taxes generated from increases in your homes SEV since 1985 are going to TIFA.
  What does this mean for you? Not only are you paying for services you don't benefit from, you are also paying taxes for services you will never see. How can this be? Well I'll tell you, fine Sir. One example is the school debt tax for the new Breitung School you are paying. The City of Iron Mountain TIFA has collected close to three quarters of a Million dollars in this school tax alone! So, rather than these taxes paying for the new school, Breitung School District is about to pay for the City of Iron Mountains six hundred thousand plus dollar parking lots. Just think Sir, rather than the school getting the money, they now have to adjust their budget to make-up for lost revenue. This could have been a teaching position, a school nurse, an administrator, a janitor, or a multitude of any other things. But instead, the City of Iron Mountain is about to build a parking lot with school money!  This is just the beginning Sir. I will be informing you of more in days to come! I can't wait to see what the city does with township taxes after the 425 agreements go through.
  I'll bet you didn't know that!

9-18-2007-11

I know this should be a dead issue but ironmountaintruth claims that the deer issue always has been a non issue. The high school story.  There was never any real discussion about the issue.

Now the real truth.

Regular Meeting of the Common Council, City of Iron Mountain, County of Dickinson, Michigan held on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Room: 

Council Member Caudell said that more people are coming to her and looking for a greater use for City Park. She said the deer pen needs many improvements and the deer inside do not look like real deer and it seems inhumane to keep them there. An expansion of City Park is the feedback that she is receiving.

 

Council as a Whole Meeting of the Common Council, City of Iron Mountain, County of Dickinson, Michigan held on Monday, January 8, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Room:

Council Member Tchokreff would like to get rid of the deer for financial and usage purposes.

Council Member Caudell believes the Council would like to find if there is a greater use for the deer pen.

Council Member Burke state that what alternative uses are purposed will determine if he is for or against the removal of the deer pen.

Council Member VanLaanen liked the idea of a winter park on the west end as proposed by Mr. Nienstadt.

Mayor Tousignant understands the nostalgic sentiment towards the deer pen but the City Council should create a master plan for City Park to see what is included and what is left out.

 

Council as a Whole Meeting of the Common Council, City of Iron Mountain, County of Dickinson, Michigan held on Monday, December 11, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Room:

The Council briefly discussed the deer at City Park. Mayor Tousignant noted that the deer at City Park must be an issue of what is the best use of City Park for the greatest number of residents. They agreed that there needs to be a Public Hearing in the near future. 

When the current budget was presented, I recommended the elimination of the Deer Park at CityPark. I am not making that recommendation for the upcoming year. What I would propose, however, is to undertake an analysis asking the question: can that area be utilized in a better fashion to improve the Park? Can, for example, that area be converted into an out door amphitheater? Can that area be added to the ski trail or be developed into a hiking trail or into an interactive bio-ecology lab for use by students from the High School or Bay College? Or, in the final analysis, should it remain as is. Now is the time to pursue such an analysis in the event we wish to pursue grant funds from DNR for such purposes.

Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007 Budget

City of Iron Mountain

City Manager Letter

quote

“When the current budget was presented, I recommended the elimination of the Deer Park at City Park. I am not making that recommendation for the upcoming year. What I would propose, however, is to undertake an analysis asking the question: can that area be utilized in a better fashion to improve the Park? Can, for example, that area be converted into an outdoor amphitheater? Can that area be added to the ski trail or be developed into a hiking trail or into a interactive bio-ecology lab for use by students from the High School or Bay College? Or, in the final analysis, should it remain as is. Now is the time to pursue such an analysis in the event we wish to pursue grant funds from DNR for such purposes.”

You decide what to believe.

The truth is out there.


9-18-2007-10

After living in this city for four years; I look back at why I decided to move here from a rural town 45 min south of here?  I visited Iron Mountain many times  and always thought it was a neat place to live. But now I look around  the city and see  nothing special anymore.  The sidewalks are  a disaster on the east side of town. Businesses are deteriorating,  and some are moving out of  the city and moving into the neighboring committees. Instead of  redoing parking lots  spend that
money for the few businesses that are still in Iron Mountain. Regardless everyone  has  weak points and strong points in there life some think they are strong at certain stuff well others aren't. It takes some people to fall flat on their faces to learn their lessons.


9-18-2007-09

I find it very interesting that the so called "truth" web site is not only filled with lies, but does not have a easy way to contact  in order to contradict their lies. Maybe running scared ??

9-18-2007-08

This is a quote from a Frog Country news story about the 9-17-07 council meeting discussion on the Signature grant application:
 
"He (Marquart) also noted the renovation of the structure into a hotel and restaurant will create jobs for local residents, of which at least fifty-one percent (51%)of the jobs created will be for low and moderate income residents."
 
Maybe I’m just a whiner. Maybe I am full of negativity for no good reason. Maybe I’m just a bad person. Maybe I’m actually evil because I am not under the spell of JM & Co. Maybe there’s no hope for me.  Maybe it means  I'm against progress if I disagree with the council for any little reason. . . Forgive me for noticing, but, does that grant application actually say that more than 50% of the jobs HAVE to be low income? Do we lose the money if more than half the jobs pay too well?  That's progress?  Are you kidding me? Correct me if I’m wrong, but, aren’t most jobs taken by people looking for work at the time, and, therefore, moderate to low income? What a bunch of crap.
 
I’m not signing my name. Look what happened to Mr. Hogan for having the courage to voice his opinion on the cable fee. He has now been branded as part of the "evil empire" of the challengers, and "fair game" for the likes of Scot Nauertz to openly chastise.  Simply because he signed his name to a letter to the editor.  This is the kind of regime we are really dealing with, people. 
 
Mr. Nauertz, I have never met you, either.  I don't know what you look like.  I don't know what drives you.  What I do know is that, based on your record of public comment, past and present, I don't like you.  You seem to have a very hostile attitude in general, which you display and attack with indiscriminately.  If you are the sort of person who is "for continued progress", it's all the more reason for me to vote for four challengers this year.

9-18-2007-07

To the Webmaster,
 
I want to submit the following entry to the public forum.  You can sign my name to the article.
 
 
I took time yesterday to look at the ironmountaintruth website.  After reading, it is my opinion that it should be labeled www.ironmountainlies.com
 
I could not believe what they accused my father, Bill Toedter of.  It was slanderous.  They need to get their facts straight.   My father does not drink, gamble, had a bankruptcy, or ever not acknowledged his children or grandchildren.  Family is extremely important to him.  He started a family business and has two of his three children involved.  His grandchildren mean the world to him.  Bill would do anything for his family. 
 
It was also noted, in the website, that the challengers are against progress and that events such as the Farmers Market, Italian Fest, etc. will be gone if the challengers get in.  That is absolutely incorrect.  My dad is very supportive of progress, but progress that benefits the majority and not a select few.  He is also supportive of such things as the Farmer's Market, Out to Lunch, Hog Wild, Harvest on Hughitt, etc.  Many of these events were in place before the current city council and should continue way into the future.
 
As far as the School Liaison position, Dad is supportive of this position and the benefits of it.  He does not agree with the way the council decided to pay for it.  The cable franchise tax is not the way to do it.  Take it to the voters and let them decide how to fund it.
 
I read information, on the website, regarding the rental ordinance.  It is evident that they do not have a handle on what the issues of the landlords are.  I was at a city  council meeting in which Dad tried to talk to a council member, after the meeting, regarding concerns with the ordinance.  The council member, basically, said the ordinance stands and if you don't like it you will have to take us to court.  It is no wonder that people feel that they need to hire an attorney when dealing with the city.  In addition, I do not know how they would be able to enforce the ordinance fairly and equally.  The city does not have a good handle on who the landlords are.  The list of landlords which was provided, to the Landlord Association, by the city, is far from accurate.  Approximately 1/2 of the people listed are not landlords.  Some have a vacant lot of land, others that are listed reside in the home themselves as a personal dwelling, some rental homes have been sold and made personal dwelling, etc.
 
I have attended several council meetings.  It appeared to me that if you did not have the same thinking, as the council, you were labeled as a troublemaker.  I have even heard comments on how rude the citizens are to the council members.  Let me tell you, I observed rudeness on the part of the council members.  During public comments, on numerous occasions, I noted the city manager, as well as, council members talking to each other while citizens were voicing their comments.  That, to me, is very rude.  You have to be respectful if you want to receive respect back.    
 
I was also in attendance at the council meeting in which one of the members made the comment about their only being a small group of persons (75 people) who had concerns and that did not speak for the majority of people in Iron Mountain.  First of all, there were more than 75 citizens in attendance at that meeting.  People were lined up in the hallway to the glass doors at one point.  Second, 75+ citizens seems to be a significant representative of people to me and they should be genuinely listened to and their opinions, at least, considered.  Let me use an example, lets say you have a child, in school, who was having a problem and you went to the principal.  I am sure that even though you are only one parent, you would want you voice to be heard and your concerns considered.  You would not like to be told that you are only one parent and do not represent the larger majority of parents.  Based on the results of the primary election, I would say that there are more than 75 citizens which have concerns in the City of Iron Mountain. 
 
Thank you.  I am appreciative of having this outlet to set the record straight.
 
Barbara Toedter

9-18-2007-06

Oh!  Scot!  Ouch!

Wow.  Scot Nauertz should have done his homework.  Hogan was exactly the wrong guy to pick on.  Nauertz really botched it with his letter at the new ironmountaintruth.com site in the "Your Voice" section.  Just off the top of my head and just locally I can think of three examples showing that Nauertz hasn't been paying attention and doesn't know what he's talking about.  All three of these examples are/have been donated/underwritten without fanfare or remuneration by Hogan at his own expense as local public services.

Nauertz impugned Hogan regarding Bay College, abuse, and drug use.  Yet as early as March 2005 Hogan had put the following site online, a site which proves the exact opposite of what Nauertz suggests.

http://www.imeplace.com/bay_west_campus_bay_de_noc_community_college/

Although Nauertz unconscionably suggests Hogan is not anti-abuse, Hogan has had the following site online for years, and with links to it all over the place.

http://thecaringhouse.imeplace.com/

Nauertz also suggests Hogan is against anti-drug programs, but look at/click the banners on each page-top of the following public service site that Hogan provides.

http://www.kingsfordmusic.org/

And I know I've seen other, similar local sites for other just causes and good organizations.  And the local efforts pale beside much of what he quietly, charitably does nationally and internationally.

Frankly, Scot, you really stuck your foot in it this time.  Everything you claimed, suggested, or implied about this guy in that letter is flat-out wrong and immediately provable as such.  And, actually, what he points out about the inequitable usage of the cable-TV fee makes sense too.  His alternative example seems much more sensible, practical, and fair, and I'm surprised the city manager and council didn't see the arithmetic and ramifications of this issue months ago.  Effective city government would have.


9-18-2007-05

I am bemused by Mr. Rigoni and his apples to oranges comparison of a sewer backup in his home, and a city crew, with a known problem in a sewer line, forcefully blasting sewage until it had to take the path of least resistance into Mr. Giguerre’s home. I was very sympathetic to Mr. Giguerre’s problem, and I thought the City was obviously liable. I still do. Mr. Rigoni’s explanation of the settlement greatly disturbs me. If he truly believed that the City was not liable for the damages, and thought that could be backed up in court, why did he agree to give Mr. Giguerre our tax money at all? If he truly believed that was the case, which he claims, that settlement is a willful disregard for our interests as taxpayers.
 
When he spoke of the "politically smart" thing to do, I almost laughed. It was one way or another. All or nothing. Right or wrong. What did the council do? They rode the fence right down the middle, in the saddle of every politician since the beginning of time. The place where all politicians think is politically smart. How does that protect the interests of all taxpayers, part of your job? If your were right that the City was not liable, you robbed us all by agreeing to that settlement, Mr. Rigoni. If you were wrong, Mr. Giguerre should have got all that he asked for, as long as it was a legitimate amount. You didn’t do anyone any favors with that one.  That move was nothing but politics.

9-18-2007-04

Did you see Doug Rigoni's advertisement in the Daily News about the sewer incident involving Me Giguerre.  He claims the council was advised by the City Attorney to remain silent because of impending litigation.
 
He forgot to mention that for months Mr. Giguerre was trying to work with the council and the city manager and was getting the flip. Finally had to get an attorney.
 
If the city has automatic governmental immunity, as he claimed in his ad, why did they settle at all.  Why didn't they declare governmental immunity and end it right there?  Because the city does not have unlimited immunity.  If they did, why do they bother with any insurance. 
 
The incident with Mr. Giguerre was caused directly and unquestionably by the city.  No different than if a city vehicle ran a stop light and killed somebody. Would a governmental immunity plea work in that case?  I doubt it.

9-18-2007-03

Here's a question for an incumbent or a challenger...
Why, with dispatchers working in the Police Department for 2 years now, is our City Administration still filling daytime overtime shifts at the Police Department?
I asked this of a councilperson over a year ago...was going to be looked into...it's still going on.
Anyone who can answer this will get my vote.
Thanks!

9-17-2007-02

From http://www.cityofironmountain.com property tax lookup search NAUERTZ

Results below 

NAUERTZ SCOTT T & TOUSIGNANT K

 414 W LUDINGTON ST

 IRON MOUNTAIN, MI 49801

 The truth is out there.


9-17-2007-01

TO:  IronMountainTruth.com, IronMountainIssues.org, The Daily News
FROM:  Jim Hogan, Iron Mountain
DATE:  September 17, 2007
ABOUT:  An Open Letter to Iron Mountain

Dear Iron Mountain:

Ain't we got fun?!  Dandy new site at ironmountaintruth.com.  Spread the word.  Some church people and other friends were teasing me yesterday about being scolded on the "Your Voice" section of the site, so I had to get over there and check it this morning.

ITEM ONE

First I should respond to Scot Nauertz, whom I do not know, know of, and have never met.  I must say, Mr. Nauretz, after reading your 9/14/2007 letter to me, that I don't appreciate your condescension and presumption.  Otherwise I bet you're a swell guy.  I don't see the simplistic black-and-white, City Hall's-way-or-no-way that you lay out with such authority and finesse.  That's not progress in a vital democracy.  To me, it's pick-and-choose among the issues, with lots of shadings and nuances within each. 

I'm in favor of -- and have actively campaigned for and financially supported -- things that you bet I'm against.  You lose!  But more importantly, how can you misrepresent me like that?  And does it matter to you?  I have no grudge against you, but it's as if you're trying to pick a fight with me, trying to stir up animosity with all that malarkey you write about me.  Why?  I don't want to fight with you.  And how can you make that bet in your letter without knowing me, without having spoken with me, or without having asked me what I'm for and against?  I keep my own counsel, share it with whom I choose, and take it to the booth with me on Election Day.  You have me wondering, though, if you're divine -- based on your letter, you clearly know better than I do whom and what I "must obviously" support and oppose.  How you've made those quantum leaps is beyond me.

Specifically, in this instance, I have no idea why you imply that I'm against the Police Liaison Officer in Iron Mountain Schools.  This is just plain wrong.  On the contrary, I support and have always supported this program.  Where you may have learned otherwise mystifies me.  How dare you suggest, Mr. Nauertz, that I don't want to protect the children of our community from drugs and abuse?  If you had bothered to introduce yourself to me and learn a little about me, you would know that I have spent my adult life actively fighting, personally and professionally, precisely those threats and others.  What I oppose is the unfair, inequitable way the city has chosen to fund the Police Liaison Program.  You know, change isn't necessarily progress, and changing from an equitable tax to a select fee is an example of that.

Before proceeding, let me show other readers exactly what I wrote so they have more than your distorted reference to it.  The first letter below I wrote on August 29, 2007.  On 08|29|07 IronMountainIssues.org (8-29-2007-05) published it and on 09|06|07 The Daily News published it.
_____

"I am a resident of Iron Mountain.  I also subscribe to Charter Cable for TV service.  But I also live in one of the Iron Mountain neighborhoods that's a part of Breitung Township School District.  Therefore, I and Iron Mountain citizens living under the same circumstances are paying a five percent (5%) cable fee to the city of Iron Mountain for an Iron Mountain Police Liaison Officer at Iron Mountain School District even though we are members, through no choice of our own, of Breitung Township School District -- which doesn't get the services of that Liaison Officer.

"How does Iron Mountain's City Council justify its collection of that 5% cable-TV fee from us and its application toward a program at Iron Mountain Schools from which we get no benefit at Breitung Township Schools?

"In other words, why is the City of Iron Mountain forcing us to pay several dollars per month for something we're not getting?

"Jim Hogan
Resident of the City of Iron Mountain and Resident of Breitung Township School District"
_____

On September 3, 2007, I sent the following letter to IronMountainIssues.org (9-3-2006-07) and a more explanatory one to The Daily News (still unpublished as of today).
_____

"I agree with 9-3-2007-05.  Attacking the school liaison officer personally and the program itself is misdirected.  The program's a valuable resource.  What all of us should do is just pony up fairly across the board throughout the city and pay our share of what it costs to keep the program running effectively, not rely on this half-ass half-measure of a cable fee that has some paying, some not, everyone confused, half of us ticked off, and tries to be too slick by half.  Instead of making a mountain out of a molehill, let's just figure out what the city's share of the program costs and then do what's necessary to tax everyone plainly and fairly to pay for it.  How hard is that?

"Jim Hogan "
_____

That the cable fee (instead of standard across-the-board taxation) is now funding the Police Liaison Program, Mr. Nauertz, is not an oversight on my part, as you say you hope.  I wrote exactly what I meant.  Exactly.  And I stand by it.  I favor funding the program, but I oppose funding it with the cable fee.  Is that clear?  I favor funding the program, but I oppose funding it with the cable fee.

If my TV service remains the same, I will pay about $36 per year for the police liaison program through the cable fee.  Because only cable subscribers in Iron Mountain are paying this fee, and because only this fee funds the city's share of the program, Iron Mountain residents and businesses who do not have cable benefit from the program but do not have to pay for it.  The city's portion of this program's funding is carried on the back of cable subscribers only.  Hardly sounds fair and equitable, does it?

Look at this example instead.

Say, for the example's sake, that the city's portion of the Police Liaison Program comes to $43,000 per year.

Say that there are 4,300 tax-paying properties in Iron Mountain.

$43,000 divided by 4,300 property-taxpayers = $10 per year per taxpayer.

On one hand, $36 per year from only cable subscribers -- the route the city council has chosen.  On the other hand, only $10 per year -- and from every property owner throughout the city.  Which one looks fair and equitable to you?  Which sounds more progressive?

This doesn't address the issue that Iron Mountain residents who live in neighborhoods that are part of Breitung Schools would still be liable for $10 -- a horrible precedent, forcing citizens to pay for something they're not getting -- in another jurisdiction, no less!  But the city council could waive that fee for those BTS residents.  And although I can't speak for others, in a fair and equitable system I'd be happy to pay the $10 tax toward the Iron Mountain Schools' program for the long-range benefits I believe the Police Liaison Program provides for the greater community, even though I am not a resident of Iron Mountain's school district.  To me, this isn't an expense issue.  It's a fairness and rightness issue.

ITEM TWO

Mr. Nauertz, by what authority do you imply, create, and express my opinions, my beliefs, what I'm for, what I'm against?  Practically everything you ascribe to me in your letter is inaccurate.  I've never spoken to you -- and barely anyone else -- about any of the stuff you mention.  Who the heck do you think you are?  To cite one example: how and why do you jump to the conclusion that I'm against the cable fee?  I've never spoken to anyone about it, not a soul, certainly not to you, much less expressed an opinion about it to anybody.  I have never claimed that I am against the cable-TV franchise fee.  Never.  The only thing about the fee that I addressed was my opposition to its unfair and inequitable usage.  Do you have any evidence at all that I'm against that fee, and, if not, how did you come to that conclusion and how do you justify posting that conclusion publicly?

ITEM THREE

I support IronMountainIssues.org.  So far, I also support IronMountainTruth.com.  I'm inclined to support sites like these, public-opinion and watchdog sites, if overall they're genuinely open and constructive and informative.  The public can usually separate the wheat from the chaff  within the sites and among them.  But I do not own IronMountainIssues.org.  I do not manage it.  I am not its webmaster.  It belongs to the Iron Mountain Issues Association -- of which, alas, I'm not a member!  Therefore, to whom this concerns out there, please stop making anonymous hate calls and sending anonymous hate mail to me about the site.  (And that doesn't mean you should start directing it to the site, either!)  Thank you.

ITEM FOUR

Hope everyone shows up at the polls November 6!  Be terrific if we set a voter-turnout record.

Jim Hogan
Resident, City of Iron Mountain
Resident, School District of Breitung Township


9-16-2007-08

This current Council wants to take credit for the handful of new businesses that have come to Iron Mountain (as if they personally had something to do with those). Perhaps we should also attribute to them the list of businesses that have ceased to exist in those same four years. In just a few minutes, I came up with a list of more that 35. I’d be happy to post what I have if anyone questions that number.
 
 
This council (along with Mr. Marquart) wants to take credit for so many things that were in the works and/or in the budget before they were seated. All major road projects were already in the works. Even the City Park pavilion was in the budget before Marquart ever came here. Bay College was also in the works before Marquart. The Out-to-Lunch program is another that was in existence prior to this bunch.
 
 
This council tries to make people think that they, along with Marquart, have brought these things about; when in reality they just got to see them through to their completion. What have they done that was not already started by those who preceded them? Not much… other than a few special interest projects.

9-16-2007-07

I had to sit back and laugh at all the things that is being said about the challengers. I think that the web site should be shut down for all the slanderous things that is on there.

I know most of the challengers and they are very truthful and care about the citizen of Iron Mountain.

Mr., Corumbos is a good man and did a lot for this city. he save the police and fire pension fund a ton of money and made that fund money when he managed it ,not like NOW with Smith& Barney were spending 80,000.00 a year for them to manage it. I am appauld that that web site is slandering him. He is a man of very high standards. So your barking up the wrong tree.

I believe in Mr. Alessandrini and I know that when he has something to say he has the documentation to support it. He will treat the citizen with respect, has anyone ever seen the Mayor get his hands dirty on community projects I haven't.

Mr. Fararh has always been up front with me. Why would he start lying now (HE WOULDN'T'T)

Mr. Rosen He also does all his home work on city working and cares about us. He will do what's right.

These are the people that I know, but I have talked to the other 2 challengers and they seem very dedicated for the I.M. councel.

Mr Tousignant is a very sore loser and wants to slander all the challengers but the truth will prevail.
He must think that we want him back in for  another 4 years we aren't stupid (WE DON'T)
get it thru  your head . I see that Carey Contracting is supporting you and wants you for a write in.

So what your saying to the people of I.M. is that we just spent about 5000.00 for a election and you don't care what we said,  so we just blew 5000.00.

So Mr. Mayor keep fighting with bad taste and you will never win in politics.


9-16-2007-06

I tried to read the so called truth site. It brings to mind an old song by Tommy Roe DIZZY. Its just too much spin for this old man too handle. I read lie upon lie deer at City Park was never a serious issue, it was proposed by high school students while running a council meeting. Then why was money budgeted for their removal? Personal attacks Dale please sue the BAS****S. Is our tax money being used to fund this site? The cable franchise fee that the charter says can only be used for road funding will be reduced if too much money is collected. It is setup to collect more than twice the amount as needed, so cut it now if there is any truth to that lie. The real truth on that one is 5% BECAUSE WE CAN. The city was approached by the developer for the champion building. Then why did the city manager say the city had chosen a developer?


9-16-2007-05

An example of how the incumbents spin, bend, or embellish the truth is shown on ironmountaintruth.com, in this paragraph about fire protection:

"For one thing, the City just can't afford it." (Wrong. You're spending money on frivolous things now, when you should be focused on providing basic needs.)

"For another...we have more trained professionals responding to fires than we did four years ago." (No, you don't.  You have less. FOIA the fire department's incident reports if you don't believe it.)

  "ALSO,  we are saving REAL money." (No, you're not.  Check the figures, and be sure to take into account the "creative bookkeeping" that has occurred, such as moving the Police and Fire Pension out of the Public Safety budget).

  "The voters of Iron Mountain spoke loudly three years ago! "(The voters were blatantly lied to by Tousignant and Scot and crew.  They confused the voters about what the issues really were by saying that they would have to hire 4 firefighters (not true) and that it was all about "guaranteed jobs for life" (not true). Oh, and it was TWO years ago.)

"Keep in mind that cities the size of Iron Mountain simply don't have full time fire departments anymore and they are very well 
protected!" (No, they're not.  They may not know it, or admit it, but they're not.  Check their ISO ratings. Check the news stories about their fires, and you'll see the line "fully involved upon arrival" over and over.)

Those of us who read and write to this website have been accused of being homophobes, hating the Mayor and his special friends just because they're gay. With their accusations, they have made homophobia an Iron Mountain issue. Let me just say, once and for all, that I know MANY people who dislike the Mayor, including myself, but it has nothing to do with his being gay.  He could be straight and I would still find him objectionable.


9-16-2007-04

It's a Matter of Principal
 
To the Incumbents and creators of ironmountaintruth.com:  I am taking this opportunity to stand up for myself against what is written on your website.
 
For the life of me, I cannot understand how your website or the incumbents keep saying that I am against progress, children's safety, festivals, colleges, the farmer's market, MISHDA, tenant's safety, etc.  Where in the world does that information come from?  Have I uttered any of those words to another human being?  Muttered them in my sleep?
No, I have not.
I swear on my Grandmother's grave that I am not a homophobe.  You can ask anyone that knows me and they will instantly tell you, especially my children who I have raised to be tolerant of all races, religeons, sexual preferences, and differences.  My Aunt-by-marriage has been in a stable, loving relationship with her female partner for over 20 years.  When I have been to the Lautner Foundation meetings in California, most of the Board members are World renowned, highly respected Architects...and gay.  Another Lautner Board member, a dear friend, passed away this summer in Desert Hot Springs.  His name was Steve Lowe and he was an amazing, compassionate man.  He also happened to be gay. 
Saying that our campaign was mean and negative astonishes me.  First, how much more negative can you get than the public radio ads the incumbents played, hour after hour, day after day.  These ads were slanderous.  Legal action should have been taken.  We stuck to the issues and had the facts.  They sent out flyers with distorted numbers and claimed credit for programs that were here long before they ever came on the scene.  They even took credit for projects that countless volunteers put their muscle and sweat into.  We would never, never do that.
They have covered up so many issues in the last 6 months especially, that it's near impossible for the public to keep track.  The "Truth" has been buried by a professional politician we call "manager" and it has blatantly caught up to him.  Even if there are council members who did not instigate innapropriate happenings, they certainly should have stepped up to the plate to correct them.
I am going to address as many of the lies as possible from that website.  I cannot do it in one blog, as there are so many; so I will do something every few days.
 
I am going to start with the Deer at City Park...I can almost hear the collective groan out there, but bear with me on this.  It may not be this City's most dire issue, but it is a perfect example of the residents not being heard, treated shabbily, and it shows the intense, collective stubborness of this council. A stubborness that refused to open-mindedly entertain the thought that maybe, just maybe, they were going against the majority of the public's wishes.
 
There are two different places on that website that mention myself and the deer at City Park.  One claims that under the direction of someone else and near tears, I addressed the council over the matter.  What?!  (I am distressed to learn I have no mind of my own..again...) I recall being very calm when I addressed the council, every time.  I don't recall feeling calm after one of the meetings where Mrs. Jacobs and Ms. Caudell had claimed the deer had mange and they didn't look real.  I know I wasn't calm when Ms. Caudell accused me of not speaking well one-on-one and not being passionate enough when I wasn't at a podium...while I was trying to tell her the deer did not have mange. 
It also claims that by addressing the council, I have made it a "smear" campaign?  Huh? This website, under "parks and recreation" and under "gossip and lies", claim that the only reason the subject ever came up to get rid of the deer was because high school kids told them to do it. 
OK...
And they claim that this issue was never seriously discussed by the council. Take a look at council minutes and you will see otherwise.  As far back as 2005, it has been discussed by this council.  December 11th, 2006 has some discussion, but it is not specific in the minutes.
 
January 8th, 2007 Council Minutes:  The opinions go something like this, but I encourage you to please read the minutes for yourselves: 
Rigoni:  Believes the money spent to feed the deer (approximately $1600 per year, I found out) would be better spent on Park improvements.
Jacobs:  Feels the deer pen could be recreational space or a bowl area for summer concerts.  Also claimed at two separate meetings that the deer had mange, but that was not in the minutes.
Caudell:  Feels the deer pen would be better suited for additional recreational space.  Also stated that the deer don't look like real deer at another meeting.
Tchokreff:  Stated he would like to get rid of the deer for financial and usage purposes.
Tousignant:  Stated the City Council should create a Master Plan for City Park.  Which they went ahead and did.  Which the public was supposed to be able to see on July 29th according to their own article in the Daily News.  It was promised to be a time of Public Input towards the Master Plan, but said Plan was not available and one council member said it was too controversial to unveil. 
 
The Daily News article of the January 8th Meeting adds a bit more to this:
VanLaanen:  Renovations at the park can only happen if the deer are not there. (This is a pretty intense and misleading statement)
Rigoni:  Discussion of the deer removal had come before the council a couple of years before.  (Before the High School students?)
Burke:  Felt the money used to keep the deer could be put back into the park.
Jacobs:  There are other ways to put the park to good use.
Caudell:  Residents see so many other deer outside the park and the City has to shoot them...and then we have to pay to keep 10 penned up in the park?  Most people I talked with are OK with us taking the deer away from the park.
 
So, you see...no Serious discussions have happened about the deer by the City Council.  How can they say that?  Is being written out in a budget letter and planned for not considered "serious?"
 
In the 2007-2008 Budget Memorandum- page 5, written by John Marquart, read and approved by the council, it speaks of the removal of the deer pen as going ahead per recommendation.  It also promises public input towards this...but then again it also stated that we were going to see a 6.39% increase in City revenues from the reassessment.
 
What happened most recently was they eventually realized that most residents were very unhappy with a decision to remove the deer pen and they back-pedaled after the Pavilion open house on July 29th.  At a following meeting, a day before the Primary, they announced that it seemed as if people really wanted the deer and the Mayor endorsed a "Friends of the Park" committee to help fund things.
See, it only took months and months of begging, groveling, letter writing, and their thoughts of lost votes for them to place regard on the public's wishes.  While I am happily relieved that the deer will be able to stay, I am dumbfounded at the effort it took to make this happen and the personal price that had to be paid.
 
And somehow, they are twisting this around and saying that I have used the deer as a "smear tactic" when hords of residents have been speaking up about this issue for over a year or longer...many, many months before running for Council was ever a thought in my head.  Residents were writing "Letters to the Editor" and at the January 8th meeting, 7 residents stood up to speak.  Not one suggested full removal of the deer pen, three suggested partial removal for a Winter park concept, a wading pool, and a field, and the rest asked that the deer be allowed to stay.  Mr. Dinnocenzo stated that as DWP Foreman he took care of the deer, the cost was less than what the council stated, and that not a day goes by without someone visiting and observing the deer.
 
The Council had pushed that it was a strictly a money issue at first, but when solutions were brought before them to cut costs, it didn't matter.
When they said it was a space issue and it was brought to their attention that the piece of land in question was horrifically expensive and impractical to flatten out, let alone the problems of the water hole, they still refused to relent.
 
My point through all of this:  They did not listen to the residents and still mislead on information.  They had their own plans in motion already, sets of drawings done, and only stopped when it became an issue of possibly losing votes.  They pigeon-holed me on this issue, when I tried everything possible to find solutions that compromised.  I looked up Grants available, including Federal, State, NWF, and Nature Conservancy.  I spoke with UP Whitetails and Western UP DNR Wildlife who were both extremely kind and helpful.  I searched for possible locations of new Football and Soccer fields, and somewhere along the line I wondered why I was doing these things and the Council wasn't.
 
I wasn't out to get anyone, I just felt very passionate as a resident about this particular subject and gave it my all.  The deer were not political to me, they were simply creatures that meant something to me.  A child's ability to interact with them meant something to me.  The feedback that I saw from the paper, council meeting articles, and people on the street was that the deer were important to most of the residents.  So, I was silly (naive?) enough to try and make a difference before it was too late, before they were gone forever.  Is that really so bad?  
I didn't understand why it became an issue of wanting a field or the deer.  I knew there could be both and so much more if the effort was actually put into that direction.  But VanLaanen told the public that there could be no renovations if the deer remained, thereby drawing a definable and harmful line through our city.  And if you wanted to have both?  Were you against progress?
 
This will hopefully be the last I will have to explain about the deer at City Park.  Anything else in the future that is mentioned about them, I hope will only be progress about their habitat becoming improved.  I will also only be addressing the "truth" website on my blog at www.ironmountaindemocracy.com from this point on.
 
Thank you for your time.
 
Sincerely,
Tina Peterson

9-16-2007-03

To the spin-master that said the following:
"I am really having a hard time believing that someone could write in to this site and try to say with sincerity that having a full-time fire department is somehow an insult to our healthcare workers in the two hospitals located in Iron Mountain. That is spin at its’ extreme."
The insult lies in crediting the fire department with the VA's success.  The VA is an exceptional facility with outstanding staff and services and thus has remained opened in spite of budget cuts closing other facilities. 
If anyone honestly believes the federal government, in assessing which facilities to close, considered the VA in Iron Mountain and said, "Oh no, not that one...they have a full-time fire department in Iron Mountain, let's keep that one open." you really need to get real!  Give credit where credit is due on the VA...the VA administration & staff. 
Spin that.

9-16-2007-02

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
Thank you to Doug Rigoni:
 
1.  For keeping us well occupied, arguing amongst ourselves about things like the fire protection of other cities.
2.  For making us realize how easily we succumb to being baited.
3.  For making us temporarily forget about all of the other issues, just long enough to feel even more torn apart as a City.
 
Thank you to Ken Tousignant:
 
1.  For ironmountaintruth.com and the pure hatred it reeks of.
2.  For claiming that this website, ironmountainissues.org, is nothing but lies and complaining.
3.  For accusing nearly everyone in town of being homophobic and full of hatred.
4.  For being so vindictive at your loss that you will stop at nothing to demoralize the challengers; including trying to pull their credit reports, lying pathologically about their words or stances on issues, unthinkable accusations, and trying to dig up and publicly display whatever personal "skeletons" you think are the most crude and hurtful.
 
Thank you to all of the incumbents:
 
1.  For allowing all of this to happen, standing silently behind it, and as usual not having the moral courage to stand up and say, "this is just plain wrong."
 
Thank you to all involved, especially the City Manager, for allowing this election to become more painful and sinister than any Presidential or Congressional race...All in the name of 4 "at large" City Council seats for Iron Mountain, Michigan.

9-16-2007-01

There is a new web site that someone has created to counter this web site.

www.ironmountaintruth.com

Please visit the new site.

This site's content, other than the Forum, is only facts and links to factual information.

The web site proclaims that the good people of Iron Mountain are in favor of the current city council and this new web site and only the bad people of Iron Mountain are in favor of this web site.

You bad people that live in Iron Mountain better visit this new site and turn to the good side.

From the voter turnout in August and the number of people that visit this site daily, there are a lot of you that need to be converted to the good side.

Webmaster


9-15-2007-01

The City of Troy PUBLIC SAFETY budget for 2006 was 28,700,000.00
 
 
(If anyone actually gives a crap, cut & paste the above link in your address bar to verify the 28.7 million dollar figure.)
 
Enough with comparing apples to oranges.

9-14-2007-02

To 9-13-2007-03:           
9-13-03,
One more thing, Tomah, Wisconsin population 8419, home of Tomah VA Medical Center boasts a thirty(30) member VOLUNTEER fire dept. I am surprised the VA Center there is still open( for those of you who don't see it, thats sarcasm)
It has a 23 member police dept. (Iron Mtn has what 14)
and get this it has  2 full time EMS operators (not fire personnel) with 8 volunteers
So you see who is the real spinster...   
Now the real issue is how to get an open, caring, sharing two-way communication between the City Council and the residents.

9-14-2007-01

9-13-03
Please don't "SPIN" my words...I did not in anyway shape or form say that to have a full-time fire dept. was an insult to VA workers. What I said was that to think that the reason the facility is open is BECAUSE there is a full time fire dept. here in Iron Mountain is an insult to the hardworking caring people that work at the VA. I believe its more to do with the quality staff here and not the fire dept. that protects them that the facility remains open.  Stop the spin yourself!

9-13-2007-03

I am really having a hard time believing that someone could write in to this site and try to say with sincerity that having a full-time fire department is somehow an insult to our healthcare workers in the two hospitals located in Iron Mountain. That is spin at its’ extreme. I wonder who the couple of friends are that you got your misinformation from?
 
Everything that writer said is full of misinformation, as far as I’m concerned. I’m glad someone did more research on the city of Troy and posted it here. After looking at that information, I did some research myself. When Iron Mountain was staffed with 14 career firefighters in our fire department, they achieved a class 4 rating. A quick call to the fire department told me that a class 3 rating was missed by only 3 points. This was done WITHOUT 180 volunteers and 6 fire stations. What does that tell you about the capabilities of Troy compared to Iron Mountain? It tells me we had an awesome fire department if they could score that high in comparison to a department with 194 people and 6 fire stations. We should be begging the ISO to come back if our fire protection is better now, instead of the delaying and stalling that is documented. Have you ever called the fire department for information about the fire department, or have you ever checked for documentation supporting one side of an issue or another? Or, are you spoon-fed information that you take at face value without ever verifying it?
 
On the budget difference with Kingsford, it definitely appears that Kingsford does not include some items in their public safety budget that are included in Iron Mountain’s, plus Iron Mountain has 26 people compared to 20 in Kingsford. Incidentally, don’t believe the numbers for the "reduced" public safety costs you see on the line item for public safety in the ten year budget history in the newest city budget. More coming soon on that. You will be shocked.
 
You also did not do your research very well on the medical response issue. One, you overpriced the fire truck by a 6-figure amount. Two, you said every ambulance call, when the proposal was for life-threatening emergencies only. Three, you claimed the fire truck would not get to a scene faster than the ambulance, when in fact this was done on a trial basis and the fire truck averaged a response of a couple of minutes ahead of the ambulance. What is two minutes in a life or death situation? Literally, life and death in some cases. Four, you want real healthcare professionals responding, insinuating you would not get that on a fire truck, when in fact your full-time firefighters are all Michigan licensed healthcare professionals. Five, you insinuate that only big cities have fire-based EMS, when in fact over 90% of EMS in the entire country is fire-based.  Again, do some real research.  I could go on, but why bother?
 
I think someone is trying to turn this city election into a one-issue thing. The first attempt at that, the subject now banned on this site, didn’t work, so now we have moved to the fire issue. It’s a big, serious issue, but only one of many big, serious issues facing us as taxpayers. Let’s not lose sight of that as the election approaches. It will be hard for the challengers to address ALL of the large issues facing us, because there are so many legitimate ones and so little time, and sadly, so little interest in from people. I hope the primary was a sign that I’m wrong about the people not caring.  I hope that people will make up their minds based on what they can see in documentation rather than someone's politically spun prose.

9-13-2007-02

Comparing the Troy, MI Fire Dept with Iron Mountain is sheer nonsense.  It serves no purpose whatsoever.  Some pertinent facts:
 
Troy MI has a population of 80,500 (2000 census) or 10 times Iron Mountain.
 
Troy has 6 fire stations.  Iron Mountain has one.
 
Troy made 1225 runs in the year 2005 - latest info on their website.
 
227 actual fires in 2005 or almost 5 per week
 
Troy has 9 Pumper/Ladder trucks
3 Aerial Platforms
3 - 65 foot aerial pumpers
Much other equipment that I won't bother to list.
 
Their 180 volunteers are each assigned to a particular fire station, so it's roughly 30 volunteers per station.
 
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING is accomplished by making comparisons to TROY, so forget it.

9-13-2007-01

Lately I've been seeing an Iron mountain DPW pickup truck in Norway in the evenings and on weekends. Some times with a passenger and sometimes without. I was just curious as to why the taxpayers are providing transportation for this individual if he chooses to live out of Iron Mountain and does the insurance company cover passengers if they are not employees?


9-12-2007-06

Well, I did not mean to ruffle  feathers...
but since I am "spinning" check your own spin...City of Troy, 80,000+ citizens, City of Iron Mountain 8500+. That works out to about 10 times as many citizens as Iron Mountain!. Iron Mountain's fire budget is  approximately $1,000,000.  So how is it that Troy, with a population 10 times larger than us doesn't spend 10 time as much on fire protection?
Based on your numbers there are 194 fire trained personnel in Troy with TEN times the population of Iron Mountain. So that would equal about ohhhhh 19 fire trained personnel for Iron Mountain and would equal an ISO 3 rating..based on your own numbers it appears the City's haphazard plan has provided us with equal fire protection to the second highest SEV city in the state. Speaking of spin, We would hardly need 180 volunteers here. So stop the spin of your own! I am not sure if you are familiar with volunteers but its not possible for everyone to respond at any given time. At least with police they are awake, usually able to get away from their job...and actually in the city not true with many volunteers. And you call my info spin!  I am sure however that the multi-billion dollar corporations and retail establishments in Troy are on their way out because of the fire protection and skyrocketing insurance costs. 
I was merely pointing out some information I have found and the fact that our VA STAFF is the reason its still open.  Lost in the statement was the fact that the city reacted in an unplanned, uncaring, cold ,poorly thought out way. 
But, based on the additional information you provided me, I now believe the city has come out smelling like a rose and come up with a plan that is viable and equal to one of the most progressive cities in the state! Thanks for showing me the light.

9-12-2007-05

On the City of Troy Fire Department:
14 career firefighters, yes, PLUS 180 volunteers - do you really think we could come up with 180 volunteers in Iron Mountain? Why didn’t you mention this fact?
 
Troy Fire Dept. Budget - $5,200,000.00 per year - is this sinking in?
 
Volunteer Firefighters in Troy receive a pension from the City - can you imagine 180 MORE people on the pension system?  Why didn't you mention this fact?
 
Oh yeah, It’s ISO class 3, not 2, and it’s no doubt because of the 194 people on the department, and the number of runs is about the same as Iron Mountain.  Iron Mountain is responding with 10 career firefighters plus 9 minimally trained police officers, while Troy is responding with 14 plus 180.  Way to spin it, baby.
 
http://www.troymi.gov/Fire/  - go to FAQ, frequently asked questions for your answers.

9-12-2007-04

If the fire protection is so good now, as suggested by Doug Rigoni in his advertisement, why did the City of Iron Mountain have to pay a $3000 ISO fine.
 
You don't pay ISO fines if everything is running as smoothly ask he claims.  Care to explain this to us - Mr. Rigoni or anyone who knows ISO rules.
 
I am told even if policemen respond to a fire, they are not yet certified to go into basements or second floors.  Does this mean we must all stay on the first floor at all times if we expect to be rescued in case of fire?

9-12-2007-03

What's the latest on the assessment of the city?  Haven't heard a word about since Brook left.
 
We taxpayers have over $300,000 stuck in this thing.  Nothing to show for it yet - and probably never will. 
 
I've heard Brook has a vital computer disc in his possession and so far hasn't turned it over to the city. 
 
Funny how we don't hear the City Manager bragging about this caper that he and Brook cooked up in the first place.

9-12-2007-02

I would like to see some documentation on Mr. Rigoni’s claims that our fire protection is expanded and is costing us less. I don’t believe that is truthful at all.  Something smells very fishy.

9-12-2007-01

Let Rigoni write his ads.  He just digs himself in deeper and deeper.
 
He talks about laying off four firemen, but neglects to say he agreed to add three dispatchers to the police department.
 
He also forgets to mention the additional hires:  DPW Director (nobody has figured out what he does all day), the ridiculous position of Economic Planner, (whose main purpose is to give everyone who wants to develop anything around here a bad time) a full-time Code Enforcer, and a full time Main Street Coordinator - with nothing to coordinate. 
 
All of these people get salaries, health insurance and pension benefits. 
 
How about the $300,000 that he agreed to blow on the Assessor fiasco?  Doesn't this count.
 
Yes, let Rigoni ramble on.  It will come back to hound him big-time.
 
Let's not forget the benefits the Kramer Road project gave to the development he has an interest in.
 
Let's not forget the $350,000, or is it $500,000, he is fishing to get the city to put water and sewer  lines that ONLY benefit land he has an interest in on the Hydraulic Road project. Other developers pay for their own development costs, but then, they aren't on the city council.
 
Keep writing ads, Dougie.  Nobody ever grasped for more "FREE" city money for his own benefit than you.
 
Keep thinking the public is stupid.  Apparently you didn't read the results of the recent election. The public has your number.


9-11-2007-02

In response to 9-11-01,
 
After reading this letter I did some research and spoke to some friends, and used just plain common sense.
Now I am not sure the main reason the Iron Mountain VA remains open is because of the fire department being full time. I would tend to believe that the quality staffing, excellent services, efficiency and just plain need probably has a greater role in keeping the facility open. I would tend to believe that the vast federal Government and Veterans Administration look more closely at these than a full time fire department when they decide  to keep a facility open. The staff at The Iron Mountain VA should be insulted by insinuating that the reason they are open is because there is a full time fire department here.
While I know their hearts are in the right place but as a citizen do I want my $500,000.00 fire truck rolling on every ambulance call? Do I want what few firefighters we have left tied up lifting someone off of their toilet? I am sure the police cars can travel much quicker and perform the job until the real medical professionals arrive. The ambulance crews are prompt and by the time you load up a fire truck and get it rolling the ambulance is going to be seconds away if not ALREADY on scene. Sure in "other full-time departments" it occurs, right, like L.A. where response is necessary because the ambulance staff is probably strung out across a huge city and back up fire coverage is already on duty. Thus, in this community, it probably is not cost effective nor, in actuality the safest option. 
In the name of fire ratings and insurance costs etc I did some research as well. We hear an awful lot about insurance costs and fire dept staffing. What I found was even more interesting. The City of Troy, downstate, has the SECOND HIGHEST sev in the state, second only to Detroit. It has a fire rating of 2. The only one higher is, again, Detroit. The City of Troy employs only 14 full-time firefighters! The rest is augmented by volunteers or paid-on-call. Now our city has approximately 8500 people and we now have, what, 10 firefighters with 9 cross-trained police officers. If fourteen is adequate for Troy, I am sure 19 trained fire personnel is adequate for our fair city. We, as far as I can tell, are the only city of its size to have a full-time fire dept.
Now I went a little closer to home. The City of Escanaba has a long standing public Safety Dept. and I know a few people in Escanaba and they and most of their residents feel perfectly safe with their police AND fire protection.
Even closer of course is Kingsford, ask any of the residents of Kingsford and I bet they will all be satisfied with their level of protection. Now for something I found shocking...On any given evening, late at night, the City of Iron Mountain has 2 police officers on duty. Combined with the 3 firefighters we now have on duty it makes for a total of 5 fire personnel on duty covering the city. In Kingsford, they too have five, sometimes four, fire personnel on duty (overnite) the difference is in Kingsford, ALL 5(sometimes 4)ON DUTY ARE POLICE OFFICERS. Now Kingsford is half the size of Iron Mountain and has over twice the police coverage at times. The REAL kicker: Kingsford's public safety budget is approximately $1,000,000.00 LESS than Iron Mountain's public safety budgets (police and fire)! Same fire protection, more police coverage for a million less?  In these days of dwindling revenue sharing from the state something had/has to be done
Its just a shame that the current council and its sna..errr I mean:"slick" city manager didn't present these issues in an open, caring, well thought out way so that it might just be an option. Instead they alienated everyone and missed the message.
God bless our firefighters and our police officers for having the courage to not only put their necks on the line for us but for the courage to deal with the mindless way these changes were brought about.   But to think for one minute that the reason the VA remains open is because there is a full-time fire department here is just plain silly.

9-11-2007-01

According to Doug Rigoni’s latest article on Garbage Collection and Fire Fighting, he states that the savings of 4 full time firemen was $185,000. This is a savings of about $23.00 per year or less than $2.00 per month per citizen of Iron Mountain. Past administrations of this City saw to it that the citizens were protected. A full time department is the best insurance policy that money can buy, and you cannot buy this level of insurance for such a low cost anywhere.
 
The City of Iron Mountain Fire Department, prior to the arrival of Tousignant and the gang, was on the verge of providing First response Medical Service to its citizens. As a part of the full-time firefighters training, each member was a qualified emergency medical technician. During discussions on how to make more efficient use of personnel, the Fire Department presented a plan to provide first responder medical services to the citizens of Iron Mountain. This plan had the backing of the medical staff of both Dickinson County Hospital and the V.A. Hospital. It also had the backing of Beacon Ambulance and the Emergency Services Director of Dickinson County. 
 
The plan would have been, that in the event of a medical emergency, Iron Mountain firefighters would be dispatched to the scene ahead of Beacon Ambulance. The firefighters would stabilize and provide medical assistance and Beacon would arrive and transport the victim. This would have provided a very rapid response time within the City and given the citizens the best possible fire department and medical coverage possible. This is a life-saving procedure used by full-time departments elsewhere. 
 
Everything was in place to proceed, the firemen had the necessary training, and the hospital and Beacon Ambulance would be providing the necessary medical equipment and supplies. Everything was ready to go, except one last item. The City Council had to approve a $500 fee to license the Department as a First Responder Service. It was rejected without discussion. I believe, during the same meeting, further on in the agenda was an item to spend approximately $13,000 to color the concrete sidewalk across Chapin Pit. This item was discussed and approved. And guess who did the work as an add-on to their contract for the US-2 project? None other than Bacco Construction. This medical service can no longer be accomplished with the cuts that have been made in the Department. So, again we have lost something that could have been a life-saving benefit to our citizens. 
 
Which would you rather have show up at a fire. A full crew that can immediately enter a burning building to save lives, or a partial crew that has to wait for the trained police officers to arrive and get into their gear. The police officers may be tied up with any number of things such as a traffic accident or a crime scene. The firemen have little choice but to wait.
Past administrations saw to it that the citizens were protected by a full time department. We have in this town, many older buildings, multiple story motels, and two hospitals. Why do you suppose the VA Hospital is still in Iron Mountain when other facilities have been closed down. I don’t suppose that it was our level of fire protection that kept them here, was it? So how much have we REALLY saved? Can we put a cost figure on this Mr. Rigoni? Basic services to and protection of our citizens cannot be just about dollar savings. Especially not when this council has no problem spending far greater amounts on frivolities.

9-9-2007-05

Does anybody know how the developer for the Champion Signature Building was chosen? Was this a fair and open process? Were proposals submitted and the best one chosen? Was this done openly and legally or was it done behind closed doors? Sounds like one sweetheart deal for the developer and I have to wonder if there was only one player in this game of stick it to the tax payer.


9-9-2007-04

So, we should keep Mr. Rigoni's politics and Bacco separate, 'eh?  That sounds like a reasonable request, as long as that goes both ways.  It's the appearance that he is intertwining the two, or at least his other personal business interests, that got people all riled up in the first place.
 
I am glad someone pointed out that the school liaison officer does cost us more than "half", to the tune of an extra $35,000.00 to $40,000.00 OVER & ABOVE the city's "half."
 
Why are we paying for a private person to develop a building and business?  Are we now officially giving up traditional city services and becoming a welfare agency for the already well-to-do to rob us blind?  This is outrageous, considering the coinciding drop in services we have ALL suffered.

9-9-2007-03

The Bacco Scholarship was set up by Medeo Bacco personally.  The first scholarship was given in 1949, over 57 years ago.  It was funded with $100,000 at the time, mostly in stock. That would be roughly equivalent to $1,000,000 today.
 
It was and is a wonderful scholarship that has helped well over 100 students over the years.
 
The Bacco Construction Company itself has never had anything to do with the Bacco scholarship. It is named after the man who established and funded it, not the company.
 
Doug Rigoni wasn't even born until years after the scholarship was up and running, so let's disconnect the Bacco scholarship from the Bacco Construction company, and especially from Doug Rigoni, in the interest of honesty.

9-8-2007-02

Just a few points:

The Iron Mountain School liaison officer is a shared expense by the City and the School District.  $26,000 per year from the School and $26,000 per year from the City.  Other duties performed by the liaison officer is budgeted in the Cities Operating budget.

Please keep in mind to keep Mr. Rigoni the politician and Bacco Construction separate.  I have heard a few people talking a little negative towards Bacco Construction because Mr. Rogoni is associated with Bacco.  I would hope that we can keep the politician and the business man separate. 

I was talking to a fellow citizen about this subject and he pointed how much Bacco Construction has done for our community.  They employ quite of few citizens and have given generously in the area of scholarships for our graduates.  We were trying to figure how many kids the Bacco Scholarship has put through college, but could only agree that it is a lot.

Politics can be a messing thing and I am sure things will get messier the closer to the election we get.  Please remember that everyone involved in the upcoming election are fellow citizens in our City.


9-8-2007-01

This is in response to the questions posed by post 9-7-2--7-03 about the Signature Grant application for the Champion Inc. building.
 
I have read that application.  It is public information.  The following information is my best recollection of the facts. If I'm not sure, I will mention that fact.
 
The developer for the project is listed in the application as Bruce Varda. There was additional documentation on the projected cost of renovating the building.  They figures were quite high. (I believe they were over $1,000,000.)  I don't know how the developer was chosen.
 
If the application is accepted by the state, two or three (I'm not sure) independent appraisals of the building must be made.  There is language in the application forms about how the final value will be determined.  
 
The maximum dollar amount of the grant would be $300,000 with a 20% match by the city, or $60,000.  In other words, the owners of the Champion, Inc. could receive up to $360,000 if the appraisals were at or above that amount.
 
The city would take title to the building if the deal goes through.  The city must hold the building for five years.  If they sold it before that, they would have to return the grant money proportionately.  For example, if they sold it in two and half years, they would have to give back half of the grant.  If they sold it after four years, they would have to give back 20%.
 
In the meantime, the developer is supposed to make all necessary improvements and begin renting the building.  The city apparently can make any kind of deal it chooses with the developer.  They can lease it to the developer for $1.00 a year for five years, for example.  After five years, the city can sell it to the developer for $1.00 or $360,000 or any other price.
 
The whole arrangement struck me as very strange.  It is very open-ended.   The current owners of the building, if they accepted the appraisal price, would get their money and be gone.  Thereafter, it would be between the city and the developer.  This could lead to some weird and complex arrangements. It is safe to assume the developer will not enter into any arrangement that is not in his interest. 
 
If the process moves forward, it will be interesting to see where the appraisals come in.  Certainly, the building is worth nowhere near the maximum possible price of $360,000, as is, to any arms-length buyer. It needs extensive renovation and would have to meet all current structural, electrical, plumbing, and heating codes. It would also have to meet all the American With Disabilities Act requirements.   
 
At some point, you wonder why someone would pay anything for it considering the cost of renovation and the return on investment. But, that's not our concern.  We just don't want the city to somehow get stuck with a white elephant.  
 
The application for the Signature grant is available for review at city hall by any interested citizen.  It is public information.

9-7-2007-04

The city does not absorb the complete cost of the liaison officer.  The school district and the city share the expense.


9-7-2007-03

I have a few questions. On the home page, there is a link to a FOIA response dated June 7, 2007.  One of the items that the requester obtained is the Signature grant application for the Champion building. Is there anything of interest in that application? Does it name a developer for the project? If not, does anyone know if a developer has been "chosen"? Who is it? How were they picked? What was the criteria? Were other people given an opportunity to partake of this grant as a potential developer? Why is this issue not openly discussed in public meetings?  This is tax money we are talking about, isn't it?  Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks.

9-7-2007-02

  I don't believe any of the posts on this site have been against the school liaison officer himself. I think what people are trying to point out is the deception City Manager John Marquart keeps putting out to the people of this city. As reported in the Tuesday, August 21, 2007 Daily News, Mr. Marquart states "the posistion of school liaison officer costs approximately $52,000 a year for salary and benefits". If City Manager John Marquart has nothing to hide, why does he keep misinforming us? If the position actually costs closer to $90,000 a year with salary and benefits, why not just tell the truth? If Mr. Marquart received a $6,000 dollar MIOSHA fine, and the city paid $6,000 dollars for the fine, why did he tell the citizens "he actually had the fine cut in half"? If raw sewage was dumped into chapin pit, why did Mr. Marquart say "it was not raw sewage, just dirt and sand"? The documented list goes on!! If Mr. Rigoni is going to clear up what he calls "lies", I sure hope he plans on getting the current city councils "house in order" first.


9-7-2007-01

On the Crystal Lake issue, we have another example of people knowing practically nothing about it making various foolish pronouncements.  Examples:
 
1. John Marquart has repeatedly stated that the only way Crystal Lake levels can go down is through evaporation.  He's been here running the show, and it has been a show, for three and a half years ariound here and still doesn't know that there is a drain field there.  It was put in when Crystal Lake rose substantially during a particularly rainy period a few years the storm water
was diverted there and caused the lake to rise.
 
2.  A large diverter gate valve was put in the "C" or "D" Street area as part of the US-2  project (the first phase)  from Kent Street and Washington Avenue. This diverter valve can divert all of the water coming down from the East Side into the West Chapin Pit.  It can also be closed so that all of that water can be diverted into Crystal Lake.  This project solved a 100 year old problem of flooded basement in the downtown area.
 
3.  The city worked very closely with MDOT and the Department of Environmental Quality for years designing this project and doing extensive impact studies of Crystal Lake and East and West Mud Lake.  If there is a problem, MDOT and DEQ should be contacted.  They were intimately involved throughout the process and approved it.
 
4.  The catch basins were routinely and carefully cleaned for many years as required by MDOT and DEQ.  Whether this process has continued, I don't know, but extensive documentation of these cleaning procedures was recorded and should exist in city files.  There were hundreds of catch basins involved.  I doubt that Dr. Feleppa was wandering around watching this process, but she makes the outrageous claim that such catch basin cleaning not done.  This is patently untrue.
 
5.  If the city council and manager would seek out the people who were involved in the process at the time, including retired foremen, city managers, city council and TIFA members,  they would increase their knowledge of the issue immensely. 
 
But you have to realize that this city council and city manager have taken the position that the city was run only and exclusively by morons for 125 years until they showed up, so there is no point in asking them anything.  Ya, sure.  When you have this kind of arrogance, you have to re-invent the wheel at every turn because you have to deny it was invented in the first place. All of this at enormous expense of taxpayers. 
 
Fortunately, there is some hope for this city after November 6.  Let's just hope they don't squander too much in the meantime.

9-5-2007-11

These are the last to posts that I will show about this issue.  I am not trying to be biased about this subject but I don't want it to turn into a dog chasing his tail.  Post #2 is upset with that I wont post every little comment that has the word gay in it.  Post # 1 wants the chance to answer number #1.  There is no city issue here and that is why I wont publish anymore posts on this subject.  Poster #2, if you want a place to discuss this issue please start your own website.

Thanks for visiting and stay informed on City Issues.

Webmaster

Post #1

Dear webmaster,

 
I am in complete agreement with your announcement about not posting anymore on the gay issue, because it is not a city issue.  However, by letting post #9-5-2007-09 stand unchallenged and undeleted, you are being a bit unfair.  This person, whoever he or she is, has been allowed to post misinformation/spin with no chance for anyone to respond, counteract or correct it.  This situation of no responses allowed sounds a lot like the sort of thing we are all fighting against in city hall right now.
 
Please don't get me wrong.  I agree that sexual preference is not a city issue.  But, I believe that the tactic used by the writer that we are not permitted to respond to IS a city issue.
 
Thanks for everything you have done.  Sincerely.

Post #2

Please be informed I am calling attention to this completely biased refusal to publish my letters to TV 6 and the Daily News.  You will publish a song about ding dong the mayor is gone, but refuse to allow me to express myself.  I am sure you do not think what I AM TYPING IS RELEVANT TO THE ISSUES, BUT IT IS TO ME AND OTHERS, JUST AS THE ISSUE OF CABLE TAX ETC. IS TO OTHER PEOPLE.

 
GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FAIR WEBSITE...

9-5-2007-10

I will not post anymore material on the "Gay Issue".  I have received several posts from someone that has gone through the archives and found references to the Gay issue.  I am sorry but I don't see any reference to any anti-gay or gay bashing.  I am also getting several responses to this person's posts and so on and so on.  I hope you can see were this is going.

These are not the issues we are facing as citizens of Iron Mountain.

Webmaster


9-5-2007-09

This is to respond to the post stating basically that there is no ill will towards gay people in this town...or maybe I should say, there is no attempt at using anything anti gay to steer the election......read these if you think so.....
 
8-19-2007-04

I am responding to the comment - 8-19-2007-02 - that asks why a name was listed as a negative item in the list from comment 8-4-2007-11. I wrote that. I should not have put the name in the list.

 

Marcus was a "line item"  Oh good for you, you removed it…too late


9-5-2007-08

I agree with the person who posted 9-4-2007-03. Let them defeat themselves.  The citizens aren't blind or stupid.  They've seen their tax dollars spent on special interests/pet projects while basic services, maintenance, etc. have been lost.  A person needn't go far beyond their own driveways to see the deterioration in this city.  How many people have been
ignored or treated rudely by Mr. Marquart and/or council members (both privately and at council meetings)?  How many have had ridiculous citations for blight while some council members and their families still have some of the worst properties in the city?  It is very difficult to undo much of what has been done and said personally to many citizens.  This has been far more damaging to many than some of the bigger issues that we see posted here.

I say yes. Let them have all the rope they need to hang themselves.  They will find out that we, the citizens, have our eyes wide open!  We've been abused by the misuse of our tax-dollars as well as personally.  We have been paying attention. We want to be represented by those we elect. One council-person stated that 75 people at the council meetings were a
tiny fraction of the community and did not represent how the whole city felt. Yet you are only seven and feel you are entitled to decide for everyone. Well, in fact, it seems that you are no longer wanted to represent the majority of the citizens of Iron
Mountain. Perhaps this council-person lost sight of the fact that each of those 75 people have a number of family members and even more friends that may have supported that one person in going to speak for them and who care about how you viewed and publicly spoke of them. 

If the incumbent council members cannot see from the primary that even many of those who originally elected them are no longer trusting them, then it is they who are blind.  Mr. Rigoni admits that they made mistakes.   Well, unless they take steps to correct those mistakes, what is left to believe?  The greatest mistake made was the hiring of Mr. Marquart; yet, instead of this council getting rid of him, they vote him a 9% raise.  How do you "campaign" your way out of that?

Finally, people of Iron Mountain, let's not stoop to their level.  We don't need name-calling and personal attacks. That is an incumbent/Marquart tactic that only demonstrates immaturity. If we use this site in such a manner, it could backfire and reflect badly on the challengers.  With the anonymity afforded here, it would be easy for readers to assume that some of the
'trash-talk is coming from them; and that will not work in their favor.

Keeping to the facts is what keeps the issues in the forefront.


9-5-2007-07

Is it true Marqaurt has hired Mr. Ray, the part-time police dispatcher as a part-time patrolman? This was done without council approval and possibly a civil service violation. He was hired the day his one eligibility certification from the police academy was to expire. Rumor has it he will be working 16 hours per week. Don't forget he was sent to the police academy last year at an expense of $16,000.00 without the council approval and having never taken the civil service exam. My question is why would the city send him to school when you already have a valid eligibility list? Why wasn't the position advertised? Norway and Niagara have recently hired part-time officers and didn't have to incur the schooling costs.

9-4-2007-06

Doug Rigoni must think that the voters are just plain stupid and have total memory loss every three weeks or so.
 
Sorry, but your four years of self-serving actions hounded you in the primary election and will hound you even more in the general election.  Put in all the ads you want. 
 
Yo have stated that a "small, unrepresentative group" that came to city council meetings meant nothing.  The voters thought otherwise.  Do you really believe the dozens and dozens of bad decisions you and your group of elitist incumbents over four years can be negated with a couple of ads. -  Good luck.
 
There are people out there in this community who will not sit by idly and let you pile up even more lies without retaliation. 
 
You have been one of the most self-serving council members ever.  There is a price to pay for this on election day, and you will pay that price once again in November.

9-4-2007-05

Regarding Mr. Rigonis Campaign ad, where he mentions misinformation and outright lies.
 
I wonder if he is referring to John Marquarts explanation, at a council meeting, of the Bolt decision. What the manager said was not true. See link for documentation:
 
I wonder if he was referring to John Marquarts explanation, at a council meeting, of a recent $3,000.00 fine from MIOSHA. What the manager said about that was not true.
 
I wonder if he was referring to the incumbent campaign brochure that claimed Iron Mountain was receiving "next to no state grant money" before he was elected. That is not true, according to the 2007-2008 budget. In fact, the record shows LESS state grant money to Iron Mountain since he was elected. See link for documentation:
 
I wonder if he was referring to the incumbent campaign brochure that claimed we had "no protection against blighted property." Again, not true - look at the code of ordinances that was in place before he was elected. It was there, just not enforced.
Incumbent brochure is attached.  Front  Back
 
I wonder if he was referring to the raw sewage dumping explanations from the city that did not match what the DEQ (experts) said.
 
I really don’t want to get too long-winded here. There is a multitude of other issues of this nature that most regular visitors to this website already know about.  The ONLY thing he is right about is that there is a LOT of misinformation and outright lies going on.  9% Bonus?

 


9-4-2007-04

The current council should make an attempt (however late and feeble) at listening to the tax paying public and fire Marquart before the challengers have the chance to.  Steal their thunder and try to save your own necks.  Not sure it would help re-election efforts at this point, but a city-wide sigh of relief may be heard.

9-4-2007-03

About How Doug Rigoni and the Other Incumbents Are Choosing to Campaign

I am delighted!  Rigoni campaigning publicly, in the paper?  This is terrific!  Let's hope we can get him on the radio and television!  If you are anti-status-quo/anti-incumbent and are pro-challenger/pro-progress-and-positive-change in the upcoming election, and if the challengers and their supporters can simply and quietly keep a factual spotlight on the incumbent candidates without being baited and getting strident, volatile, defensive, and disagreeable, then you can only hope and pray beyond hope and prayer that the other incumbent candidates and John Marquart will campaign likewise, and that all of them, including Rigoni, will appear often across the traditional media.

Because, ladies and gentlemen, the incumbent candidates will have to win with smoke and mirrors.  They are their own worst enemies and have been for nearly four years.  With rare exceptions, these candidates don't have a leg to stand on, and by merely publicly and clearly holding up their words in comparison to their records of the last four years, by pointing to the stark contradictions of what they've done versus what they say, the opposition will allow the incumbents to defeat -- to continue to defeat -- themselves.  When your opponents are shooting themselves in the foot, have the sense to shut up and merely point at them, so others can be aware of what's going on and exercise the necessary judgment to remain away from those people, safe and better off.

As I talk to people around town, I'm running into an awful lot of crybabies whining over the incumbent candidates promising to defend themselves and campaign publicly -- even about Ken Tousignant running as a write-in candidate.  Are you crybabies crazy?  This has to be Marquart advice or Marquart-like advice, because the incumbents are figuratively offering to hang themselves.  You Nervous Nellies ought to be offering them rope!  Let them defeat themselves.  If you're smart, you'll start contributing to their ad campaigns.  Just make sure every voter in town is watching so fact-versus-fiction is visible to all, and keep your bloody traps shut.  Let the accumulating nonsense that has done in these people over the last few years continue to do in these people over the last few weeks.


9-4-2007-02

There has been much discussion on this web site about Mr Mattson, our Liaison Officer, who is serving our schools here in Iron Mountain.
 
I personally know officer Mattson and I believe he is a critical component in our fight against drugs in our school system. The kids trust him and have much respect for what he does!
 
I would encourage everyone, to absolutely support his work, results and continuing position in this community as a Liaison Officer.
 
I am sure most people feel the same way about this critical service in our schools, but the issue is not our support, as it is how to fund the position. The school district pays for 50% of the costs right up front and the rest is paid by the city. I am personally disgusted with our city council for voting to use this money  (even against the advice of the city attorney not to use cable fees because it could cause a problem in the future!
 
In the past, (as it is suppose to be) this program was paid for by the tax payers voting for a  very small tax mileage and all that has to be done is for this mileage to be re-newed again in November. I have not talked to anyone who said they would not support continuing this service!
 
As many have pointed out, this is wrong (and I have been told illegal, though I don't know if this is a fact)) to use a franchise fee for this purpose. Only those who have cable are footing the bill while the rest of the community gets the benefit. That is really taxation without representation and I strongly disagree with it's implementation!
 
The new challengers for city council will make it right when they get in office and because they absolutely support Mr Mattson's position, they will use the funding from proper sources and discontinue another fee burden on the people "just because I can do it"
 
Remember to get out to vote in November and tell your friends how important this election is for our city's health .
 
Don Christy

9-4-2007-01

Nobody, but nobody, on this site as far as I can determine, is opposed to continuation of the Liaison Officer.
 
Let's let the matter rest.  The Liaison Officer stays,  He will stay in the budget , just not with the TV fee money-grab the incumbents thought up.
 

9-3-2007-09

To 08-30-2007-06 about the gay slurs.
 
Google has the best algorithms for running an internal search and I simply can't find any gay slurs on IronMountainIssues.org.  I'm curious what you consider a slur.  Or maybe I missed them and you can point them out.  Then again, maybe you can't.
 
There are homophobes in town.  Absolutely.  But on the whole there isn't a major homosexuality issue in Iron Mountain or in this year's campaign.  There is a general disagreeable-behavior issue regarding some city-council members, city-management employees, and the mayor, who just happens to be gay.  By association, the gay issue surfaces.  The problem is this: who likes a gay with a chip on his shoulder?  Any more than they like a feminist with a chip on her shoulder, or an African-American with a chip on his shoulder?  People don't like a bad-ass, in-your-face attitude from a homosexual shaped by an agenda in his man purse and a grudge in his heart any more than they like a similar attitude from anyone else.  A jerk is a jerk whether he's straight or he's gay. 
 
For one, I'd like the mayor to stop treating the city, and me by extension, as if I personally owed him something -- a certain degree of guilt, if nothing else, or maybe a special degree of privilege -- as if I'd personally been persecuting him his entire life because of his sexual preference.  Well, I haven't.  Most of us haven't.  You and your closest, paranoid, bleeding-heart pals want tolerance, equal rights, and some authentic friendliness, Mr. Mayor?  Then cut the rest of us some slack.  Gay or not gay, genuinely behave like a decent human being and that's how we'll treat you.


9-3-2007-08

Response to 9-3-2007-05:
 
I agree with you whole-heartedly and feel that the Liaison Officer has become a political issue now.  This is not right.
 
I believe it happened because of the irresponsible way the program became funded, but I urge everyone to please see the program as a separate entity from politics. What was done, can't be undone right now.  It is very important that you hear what the poster said about the drug problem in the school system and the wisdom of being proactive towards it.
 
My son was approached in his Freshman year by many "sellers" and he had the courage to tell me that kids could get whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted it...including illegal prescription drugs.  This scared me to death.  This is at a crisis stage, but nobody will talk about it!
 
When the school does a locker search, the kids already know about it and then there is never anything found.  Children have died.  Are we going to quibble about the salary of someone who may be able to help prevent this?
 
How about if we start fighting back against all the drug houses that have popped up in all of our neighborhoods?  These people are making a profit, a PROFIT on ruining or eventually ending young lives.  What if we followed Hermansville's example and joined forces as residents to force out the sellers and dealers? 
 
I used to think it would be enough to talk our children's ears off about the dangers of drugs.  I'm not so sure anymore.  For every child in this town that does drugs, they have a parent who would stake their life on the fact that their child would never do that.  I have heard countless stories of heroin addiction in our area and these teens cannot seem to get clean, ever.  We have somehow let nameless, faceless strangers come to our town and sell our teenagers a life-dooming substance. 
 
Read the newspaper.  Our court system is filled with drug offenders and most other crimes are drug related in that they stole to feed their habit. 
 
Does anybody out there really think that our Middle School kids are somehow safe from this activity?  If we keep burying our heads in the sand, our kids will pay the ultimate price.  Whatever we can do to help them navigate through all of this, including the Liaison Officer, is something we owe our kids as a community.
 
So, forget the politics for a minute...please...just think of the kids.  Maybe being a parent makes this issue more urgent to me, but the old saying goes..."it takes a community to raise a child."
 
Tina Peterson

9-3-2006-07

I agree with 9-3-2007-05.  Attacking the school liaison officer personally and the program itself is misdirected.  The program's a valuable resource.  What all of us should do is just pony up fairly across the board throughout the city and pay our share of what it costs to keep the program running effectively, not rely on this half-ass half-measure of a cable fee that has some paying, some not, everyone confused, half of us ticked off, and tries to be too slick by half.  Instead of making a mountain out of a molehill, let's just figure out what the city's share of the program costs and then do what's necessary to tax everyone plainly and fairly to pay for it.  How hard is that?

Jim Hogan


9-3-2007-06
How to Campaign for Your Opponents

Progress?  LOL!!!  Doug Rigoni's gonna pursue the "progress" campaign?  That's too much, man.  I'm for progress.  I can't tell you how many Iron Mountain voters I know -- and knew on August 7 -- who are for progress.  It's a major reason we turned out for the primary.  And it's precisely because we're for progress that we're supporting the challengers and not voting for Doug Rigoni and the other incumbents on November 6!  Look around.  Just look at the descent this city has made over the past four years despite City Hall's P.R. machine.  It's sinking fast, babe.  "Continue the progress?"  Progress to perdition maybe.  Brother.  Talk about being out of touch.  If I want a shot at progress, the last person I'm gonna vote for is one of the incumbents.  They had their shot.  What they've done and continue to do to Iron Mountain ain't my idea of progress.  My idea of what they've been doing to Iron Mountain is something I'm positive the webmaster won't include on this website.


9-3-2007-05

I think all who are attacking our liaison officer and his position need to do a little home work.  I know that he is very involved with the kids at our schools and is also involved with the KIND program.  Open your eyes...we have a bad drug problem in our town.  He is our first defense against potential crimes and the possibility of changing or even saving a kid's life.  Don't attack the officer and his position...find out why it has become such an issue with the council.  We need him in our schools.  I don't like the fact that the council has decided to implement the cable fee any more than my neighbors.  The city's tax $$$ should be spent on this program before any more cobbled streets, band shell/parking lot reconstruction.  You can make the town "appear" pretty but without programs like the liaison officer it will be like putting a Band-Aid on a severed limb.  Let's be practical.

9-3-2007-04

Here we go again,
 
Picture and article in the daily news from Doug Rogoni about "Re-introducing himself" to the people about what he has done, will do and what he will continue to do while on the city council, AND WHAT THE REAL TRUTH IS.
 
Fact is Mr Rogoni, --- you had the time to "do it" for the past several years and you never did!
 
Fact is, you had the opportunity to "do it" and you failed to grasp the chance.
 
Fact is, you had the means of making a difference in this city and all you did is look out for yourself, your company and the whims of the Mayor and City Manager!
 
Fact is Mr Rogoni, you did not listen to the people and their wishes and opinions. All you did is promote your own and the council's personal agendas!
 
Fact is, ------- you can re-introduce yourself again to the people of this community and the response will be the same at election time in November, you will be the lowest vote getter in the race because you have lost all credibility with the people and they will not fall for your deceptions, lies and propaganda again.
 
Fact is Mr Rogoni, --- if you care about this city, drop out of the race and support the new people who will have the chance, take the opportunity and support the means, of being honest, trustworthy and ethical in city government.
 
You are  probably a good person who meant well, but you blew it because you saw fit to be a puppet for Marquart, you would not listen to the people and you supported your own personal interests!
 
Tousignant is gone, you will be next, along with Sally, VanLannen and finally Marquart!
 
Keep your articles coming in the paper. -- the new running candidates need the lies to reveal the truth to the people.
 
Fact is --- IT IS ALL OVER FOR YOU AT CITY HALL
 
I'll be looking forward to your next article!

9-3-2007-03

Is this administration so desperate to try to make themselves look good (and the Daily News so interested in helping) that a few residential road repairs are news?  I cannot remember past administrations putting articles in the paper every time they did basic road maintenance. The article isn't clear as to whether these streets (Fairbanks, Grant and Main) are being paved in their entirety or if it will be just the portions that are currently being worked on.  We came down Fairbanks last night and turned at the detour.
The condition of Kent street was atrocious. Oh, and of course lets count  Brown street which is being done to assist (or as they put it: coordinated with) the Blomquist project, a development on the corner of U.S. 2 and Brown Street. We, the tax-payer will pay to make Blomquist's construction project easier, including changing the parking during the project (and, I
imagine, changing it back again afterwards). Since when are tax-payers supposed to kick in to assist new
businesses.  That money should come out of Blomquist's pocket, not ours.

I'm rather anxious to see what articles Mr. Rigoni has planned to promote himself and the other incumbents with their Continue Progress campaign.  Their idea of progress is to help special interests, ignore the average citizens, let the City crumble in any area that is not 'downtown', to brag up every little project that should be considered basic maintenance,
take credit for businesses that aren't even within the City limits, and make it sound like every change that happens is as a direct result of something they did.  They brag up grants that don't even amount to those acquired by other administrations (and never tell us how they plan to match funds on those requiring such)..

Sure, I see changes in Iron Mountain, some are even good ones; but I do not see progress that I can attribute to this administration.  Many of the major projects that have been completed since Marquart was hired were in the works before he was ever hired.  He, and this present council, just get to take the credit.


9-3-2007-02

Let’s not forget about Rich Brook and his botched attempt at reassessment. If he was under contract to provide a service or product, where is it? Mr. Brook and his cohorts where paid $210,467.67 (by my recent calculations) to provide a product that the City could use to raise assessments. But where is it? I have heard that many errors were made in the process that go against state tax law.
 
Mr. Marquart can’t just get out of this fiasco by firing Mr. Brook and refusing to give the public any details. Our tax dollars were spent for a service, and we are entitled to see the fruit of it or have that money back. There was a contract for this reassessment; and if it wasn’t fulfilled, there is a breach and we are entitled to that money back. This one better not get swept under the rug. Mr. Marquart, in his new budget, is counting on a projected State Equalized Value for the City of nearly 10 million dollars more than last year. With this botched reassessment, where is that going to come from?
 
I was sure I had read earlier where someone had asked the City for information about Rich Brook’s product and got nothing. Can we really afford to sit on this until new council members are seated and we are half way through this fiscal year? If there is no product, and the City must have it completely redone, what’s that going to cost? If there is no product from Rich Brook, the money paid to him (and his cronies) must be returned. And, I find it hard to believe it will be easy to find someone else to do the job that isn’t going to expect the same lucrative deal that Brook had. Assessors in the State are well aware of what went on here. [And Mr. Marquart can’t hire from out-of-state because of State required certification.]
 
I cannot begin to imagine how many things have been mishandled and miscalculated because of this Rich Brook mess. Even the Rental Housing fees must be grossly overestimated. I know of several (so there must be many more) people who own property other than where they reside, who received notices from the city to register their rental property. Many of these properties are vacant lots that Mr. Brook decided to refer to as rental property simply because the owners did not reside there.
 
This City is going to be in such a disaster that it’s going to be difficult for anyone to try to straighten it out.  And they call this PROGRESS.  I'm all for progress, but this ain't it!

9-3-2007-01

For those who do not receive the newspaper, I have attached a Doug Rigoni campaign ad for your review that was in the Daily News morning edition, 9-3-2007. Mr. Rigoni says that, "Over the last several months, there has been some misinformation and some outright lies going around about the Iron Mountain City Council." He goes on to say that he will be addressing these inaccuracies over the next several weeks.

 
That’s okay with me. Fair is fair, people. I just hope he addresses things with documentation, and not just words. There are several items I would like to see him address that are backed up by documentation. The huge mess over the reassessment, for instance. When was it properly bid? How did several individuals get paid without contracts? What about the figures being rejected two years in a row? What about the huge waste of money because of that? David Legge?  What about the 9% bonus given to the city manager, almost as if in response to citizen outrage over this issue? That’s just a beginning of questions on ONE ISSUE! Good luck making that one sound all rosy and nice, Mr. Rigoni.
 
P.S. There was an ad in the Advertiser this past week for a piece of land - price, $950,000.00.  There was a post here claiming that was your land, sir, and that the price has jumped by a factor of 950%.  Mr. Rigoni, can you please prove false the rumors that you are enjoying personal gain from being a councilman in control of where and what our tax money is spent on?  (with some sort of documentation, please)

Rogoni Ad


9-2-2007-01

I believe the TOTAL COST for the Liaison Officer is around $86,000, not just the city's share.
 
The city's share is presumably about half of that figure, or around $43,000, give or take. The Iron Mountain school district picks up the other half.
 
The $52,000 per year quoted by Marquart may be (a) his salary, or (b) salary plus overtime.  The rest would be the city's cost of his health benefits and  pension contribution, paid vacation and incidental costs such as uniform allowance, etc. 
 
Now, the Liaison Officer doesn't have much to do with the school during summer recess, Christmas break and Spring break, etc.  Where he fits into the police schedule during those periods is an interesting question, but certainly somebody knows. 
 
Is he putting in more time with the school than the city?  Obviously he is because the school year is a minimum of 180 days of a working year schedule of 250 days before vacations, personal days and sick leave.   I don't know if he goes there every school day or not.  The program is highly regarded, and I am not suggesting it not be continued, but a post by people "in the know" would be helpful for general information purposes.
 
If the city council and city manager had the sense to pay for him out of the General Budget, this controversy of paying him out of the TV fee would never have arisen.  The TV fee is money,
though apparently somewhat restricted to streets according to state law.  The General Fund revenue is money.  Does it make much difference is you pay for something out of money in your left pocket or right pocket? 
 
The General Fund allocates some money to the Local Streets Fund anyway, so if they cut back on that and shoveled the TV fee into the local streets fund, the issue never would have arisen.    
More to the point, the challengers have vowed to cancel the TV fee and keep the Liaison Officer in any case, so this is an issue which will automatically resolve itself if four challengers get in.

9-1-2007-04

I see that post 8-22-2007-06 appears to be very accurate about the school liaison officer costing more than the fifty-two thousand dollars as stated by City Manager John Marquart and reported in the Daily News. Looking at the minutes posted on the city web-site for the 8-20-07 council meeting, I see that mayor pro-tem Rigoni states that the liaison officer actually costs the city about eighty-six thousand dollars a year. I wonder why the Daily News forgot to report this information. Was this information left out of the article on purpose? Did Mr. Rigoni actually say this at the meeting? If so, I commend him for clarifying the truth to Mr. Marquart. Or, was this information added to the minutes after the city saw the truth on this web-site? I could not attend this meeting for work reasons. Anyone know the truth on this meeting? I think a follow-up article in the Daily News with the truth would be nice. I'll have to contact the paper.


9-1-2007-03

In response to 8-30-2007-08
  Your post pointed out several expenditures that prompted me to do a little research. I'm not sure how to tie all this information together, so work with me. I'll try, and start at the beginning.
  First you have the creation of the Downtown Development Authority (DDA) pursuant to Public Act 197 of 1975. When Iron Mountains DDA was adopted, the Law stated:
 "An authority with the approval of the municipal governing body may levy an ad valorem tax on the real and tangible personal property not exempt by law and as finally equalized in the downtown district. The tax shall not be more than 1 mill if the downtown district is in a municipality having a population of 1,000,000 or more, or not more than 2 mills if the downtown district is in a municipality having a population of less than 1,000,000. The tax shall be collected by the municipality creating the authority levying the tax. The municipality shall collect the tax at the same time and in the same manner as it collects its other ad valorem taxes. The tax shall be paid to the treasurer of the authority and credited to the general fund of the authority for purposes of financing only the operations of the authority."
 
The term "operations" is defined by MCL 125.1651; MSA 5.3010(1):" 'Operations' means office maintenance, including salaries and expenses of employees, office supplies, consultation fees, design costs, and other expenses incurred in the daily management of the authority and planning of its activities."
 
This is how the 1.5 mills of revenue ($25,000-$38,000) were spent up until the last couple of years.
 
 So, how can the city be spending authorized revenues on actual things such as bricks and trees? Section 12 was amended by 1983 PA 86, to remove the words "financing only the operations of," thereby lifting the restriction upon the use of the revenues of a tax levy and broadening the authority for the tax levy to all purposes of a downtown development authority.
 
  This got me wondering if the way the current city manager and council are spending the revenue is legal! The following Attorney Generals opinion would lead me to believe otherwise.
Read this before moving on!
  Has the Headlee Amendment been violated? Have the electors residing in the downtown district had a chance to vote on this issue as required by the Headlee Amendment?
 
  This brings me to my next questions. If the electors residing in the downtown district have voted to approve the spending of millage on bricks and trees, HOW have the revenues grown from $38,000 a year to over $70,000 a year? Are these authorized revenues received by the DDA? After looking at the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 budgets posted on this web-site, I've noticed a trend over the last couple of years of the city taking money from the general fund and putting it into the DDA fund. In fact it looks like $30,000 dollars were transferred from the general fund to DDA in 06-07, and $20,000 dollars in 07-08. The city manager and council budgeted $38,000 for 06-07 but have received over $75,000. How is this happening?
How is it that no contribution from the general fund shows up on the 06-07 budget, but then the 06-07 contribution shows up in the 07-08 budget along with more money? All this creative book keeping is somewhat confusing, but the bottom line is that the tax payers outside the downtown district are getting stiffed! In fact, if one were to look at DDA Act 197 of 1975 as amended, Section 125.1661 Financing activities of authority; disposition of money received by authority; municipal obligations. Sec. 11 (2) states: Except as provided in this act, the municipality shall not obligate itself, nor shall it ever be obligated to pay any sums from public funds, other than money received by the municipality pursuant to this section, for or on account of the activities of the authority.
  Again, I would ask if the city is spending authorized revenues for the DDA. If the qualified electors in the downtown district are required to vote and approve spending money outside of  "Operations" costs (per Headlee), should ALL qualified electors be required to vote per Headlee if our taxes are being spent within a Downtown District? Is this even legal, or should we expect the current city manager and council to start spending our tax dollars for TIFA projects also? Can anyone help me with this? I think we are getting used by this current special interest group. I'm tired of it !!!!

9-1-2007-02

I'm hearing that some individuals might be spending company time and money trying to stop this truth machine. The truth only hurts those that lie!


9-1-2007-01

REFERENCE POST 8-39-07  06


      I don't believe that having a gay mayor is the issue. Who cares if the Mayor is black, gay . pollack, italian. The real issue is how he treats the taxpayers and votes on certain issues. For example, he voted on selling the property to Mr. Blomqiust, and now his mothers firm is listed on the board to rent out the spots. How about the Koury property when two member of the
counsel went to TIFA to have them buy the property and the Mayors mom what of made at that time about 80,000.00 and the Mayor gets 1% of that for being the office manager. Conflict, hidden agendas. ruddiness, thats what we have for a Mayor, and there is a lot of other things he did to us, these are 2 among many. So don't think its because he's gay, WHO CARES