|
IronMountainIssues.org |
||||
|
||||
|
October 2007 Postings 10-31-2007-03
INTEGRITY, an unimpaired condition:
soundness: firm adherence to to a code of exp. moral or artistic
values: INCORRUPTIBILITY: honesty. this is
the definition according to Websters Dictionary.
Somewhere along the way it seems the
incumbents have lost their way. This campaign should not be
about personal attacks but based on the issues. You feel that
the challengers are using dirty tactics against you, that is not
true. We have all strived to stick to the issues. The
community has questions that we need to ask, and if you are
upset that you have to answer to them, so be it. When we have
accused the incumbents of misstating the truth, there
is documentation to back it up. As far as the Manager, you
all seem shocked to find out about the $20,000 MIOSHA fine. To
me withholding information, if that is the case, is the same as
being untruthful. Your responsibility is to give
the citizens of this
community honest information, no matter how it concerns you.
After all, honest mistakes will be forgiven, intentional ones
will not.
Now it seems you have managed to go
even lower, bringing out personal business about a person in an
attempt to gain votes. I wonder how many businesses in Iron
Mountain and the surrounding areas, have fallen on bad times and
had to close their businesses. I would say from what I have
seen in the past several year there are quite a few. Sometimes
there just is no other recourse and bankruptcy is filed. Does
this make a person a totally dishonest, uncaring
or incapable of handling responsibilities, I think not!!
Is it your intentions to expose personal business about any one
who may challenge you? Thank God we have not stooped to this
level, as I am sure you may have information in your background
which is less than stellar. Nobody is perfect even though you
seem to have this notion about yourselves. I can no longer
respect anyone who would carry on this way and I hope the
citizens of Iron Mountain are more forgiving and understanding
than this Council has been. You have thrown one rock to many
and I dare say it will come back to haunt you. I am proud of
the way I have handled this campaign, while you have certainly
forgotten the Golden Rule, DO TO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD
HAVE THEM DO TO YOU (Luke 6:31)
David Farragh
Candidate for City Council
10-31-2007-02
10-31-2007-01 Dear Citizens
of Iron Mountain: 10-30-2007-07
Did anyone see that letter in the
paper today titled "You might be next"? It had quite a strange
take on the ongoing fire and police problems. First, the writer
admits that the city’s plan is not working, but fails to take
into account that the MIOSHA fines laid the blame clearly where
it belongs - the city management. The writer also forgets to
mention that the citations were hidden from the public for two
months, while the City did nothing to address the problems. The
employees fault, indeed.
Then, we are told to believe that
people who have a vested interest in something should not have a
say in it. Really. Then, things get even more confusing, even
contradictory at times. For instance, don’t punish whistle
blowers, but punish free speech? The writer did not use those
words exactly, but he may as well have.
Whew! He then goes on to dismantle a
compliment given to the police chief by a firefighter, ignoring
the fact that such a compliment shows mutual respect. And then
my favorite part is the rest of the letter, where he rants and
raves about how incompetent our entire police department has
become lately. I wonder if it crossed the writer’s mind that he
was contradicting his earlier argument that the plan could work,
by pointing out that the police do not have enough time to
devote just to their police duties, let alone time for fire
duties. Or, that his arguments about the police are covering the
time period when they became cross-trained to fight fires.
Ironic, to say the least. The only clear message that was
communicated to me from the letter is this: The writer does not
like the police.
PS - Pete Flaminio is a nice guy.
PPS - What the heck else was that
writer trying to say? I got lost in the contradictions.
10-30-2007-06 10-30-2007-05 From Bruce J. Rosen, some important positions and pre-election reminders 10-30-2007-04
Answering
10-30-2007-01:
The notion
isn't silly if the campaigners are being sneaky, unnecessarily
secretive, and openly deceitful, sweetheart.
Furthermore,
your argument is intellectually dishonest. Of course everyone
wants to root for and do what's best for his or her own
business. But we're discussing a city government here, not a
corporate board room. You have to take off your blinders and
widen your vision, enlarge your perspective. The candidates we
elect must concern themselves with the success of not your
business but of business itself, ALL business. As well as
everything and everybody else in this city, integrating and
balancing everything to serve the greatest possible welfare for
ALL citizens and ALL businesses.
Even if it
means lowering the priority of one's own business. That's why
they call a business community a business community.
Because if ALL
business doesn't work in this town, and if the fire department
and police department and water system and sewage system and the
city streets and revenue system and every single other program,
and service in this town isn't taken into consideration and made
to work well as one well tuned machine, you may as well burn
your business to the ground, dear -- the ghost town that'll
remain won't be able to support it anyway.
It seems that
you and yours continue to miss the point. A city is a
collective endeavor. For each part to benefit, the whole has to
benefit. The present government and management have been
terrible. Everything they are doing is counterproductive and
will continue to backfire on the entire city -- meaning on you
and your individual business, too. We need to start over
and try to form a government that's going to create and sustain
a healthy whole in Iron Mountain, so that even your own little
individual business part of it can prosper and grow. Let's get
the whole garden growing and healthy, not just a couple of puny
petunias.
Come on. Use a
little foresight. Remember how Cause & Effect works. And
always keep in mind the Law of Unintended Consequences, which
seems to be the only law both in nature and outside of it that
this city government has hewn to.
I would love to
end this posting by quoting what the writer down the page wrote
in "All in the Family." I wish I had written it myself. It is
so perfectly true and exactly how we must approach things. I
wish I could personally hand a copy to every voter in the city.
"Folks,
government is in the business of governing, not being a
commercial business partner. It must concern itself with the
welfare of all of the citizens in its jurisdiction, not just a
privileged few who attempt to manipulate and milk the system for
their own profit.
"Ladies and gentlemen of Iron Mountain, I submit that local government should provide the opportunity for local businesses to survive and prosper. Under thinly veiled efforts at disguise, it should not provide corporate welfare -- large sums of money itself -- directly to businesses who game the city's political system for their own benefit."
Amen.
Marion M.
Anderson
10-30-2007-03
As a voter, I’ve been given a lot of
information to absorb in a short period of time. To deal with
all of it approaches the point of being overwhelmed. It’s fairly
evident that most of this information is for real, but it’s hard
to believe that so many things have been botched in four short
years.
I’m picking one important issue for
the subject of this post, the fire protection issue. It took a
while for the depth of what just happened with MIOSHA to sink
in. We’ve been told all along that we have cheaper and safer
fire protection. A campaign ad bragged about it. Then, I find
out that the City has been fined $20,000.00 by MIOSHA, and that
this happened on August 10, but was kept from us until other
people exposed it in early October.
It’s bad enough that we got fined.
What really gets me going is that this problem has been ignored,
and then even worse, it was hidden from the public. That is very
bad, and it violated my trust in the council. I can never trust
them again on anything, and suddenly all these other issues
received a lot more credibility in my eyes.
Then another aspect of this hit me,
which I find unforgivable. While this fire problem was being
ignored and kept from the public, it meant that the City knew
they were putting our policemen and firemen in great danger, and
they didn’t do anything about it. Not a damn thing! To
keep something this important hidden for campaign purposes
is, as I said, unforgivable. I am appalled that the incumbents
thought they could use the fire issue to get themselves
reelected. If anything, it has been proven to me beyond the
shadow of a doubt that they should be thrown out based on this
issue alone.
10-30-2007-02 Greetings, Iron
Mountain! 10-30-2007-01 Wouldn't you support and campaign for your friends, family and those who are doing things to help your business if they were running for office? The notion that these businesses and people are being sneaky by campaigning for people that they are either related to or support the same issues as they do is just silly. 10-29-2007-08
10-29-2007-07 The Decline
and Fall of the U.S.A. Voters of the area, you better wise up and start electing responsible councils and boards who will hire competent managers, supervisors, and superintendents. And you had better start holding them all accountable all the time. You are letting things go down the tubes without even realizing it, and unless you wise up and stop it soon, it will be too late and your city, your state, and your country will have slipped away. Simply because you let it. 10-29-2007-06 Do
they just not do their homework, or do they do this kind of thing on
purpose and figure they'll get away with it? It happens so
often. And it's damning in either case. 10-29-2007-05
¡Ay, caramba! It's true! They're real! They live! 10-29-2007-04 Sigh. I'm mortified that I voted for five of the seven current Iron Mountain City Council members. For four years for four of them and two years for one, I've sat back and sourly observed the behavior of this council, the manager it hired, and its staff. I've watched the city generally come undone as a result of their governance, deteriorating as the government tried to use the city itself for its officials' personal benefit, and as it tried to counter reality by creating a P.R. and publicity machine that could at least claim all was going well and throw up the facades of a Potemkin's village. Continue progress? What progress? We've entered an accelerating spiral, folks, and the direction is backwards and down. Week after week, month after month, I've watched elected and hired city officials and their dwindling but adamant supporters deny the undeniable time and time again. Then a couple of minutes ago it dawned on me: Iron Mountain's City Council and management would rather be wrong their way than right anybody else's way. It's inescapable. Iron Mountain's City Council and management would rather be wrong their way than right anybody else's way. That's no good, folks. That's when it's time for a major change. We have to do better than this. We should at least give four of the five new candidates a shot. I can't imagine how they can do any worse. And, with God's grace and great good luck, maybe they'll put a new and effective management team in place too. 10-29-2007-03 Single-Issue, My
Foot! 10-29-2007-02 Plain and
Simple Let's just elect somebody who's gonna enforce the Code and do the other accomplishing and forgo all this unnecessary political baloney of recent years, please. Thank you. 10-29-2007-01 Growing, Developing, and Improving the Entire City. Realistically and Fairly. By Tina Peterson. 10-28-2007-14
Ann Markell, you are a rude,
arrogant condescending person. Thank you for showing your true
nature in your article. Why don't you list the many good deeds
you have done for the less fortunate people of the area. I'm
sure there are many:)))). Ever get your hands dirty helping
someone besides yourself? If you thought what you wrote would
hurt Dale I can assure you that you have accomplished just the
opposite. I have been in business for over 35 years and I have
talked to may of my customers about our article and I would
tell you what they said about you but it couldn't be printed
here. Also some were not voting for Dale until they read your
little rant and you changed there mind. I can also assure you of
this. There are many, many people and not just in Iron Mountain
that will never do business with Markell roofing again. Nice PR
work for the company Ann.
By the way Ann I do know you very well. we have the same relatives. 10-28-2007-13 Post 10-28-2007-04 says
James Hogan's letter is calculating because it was posted recently
in the midst of the campaign. 10-28-2007-12
Response to 10-27-2007-15....and
more....
I have read and re-read Mary
Robitaille's "letter to the editor." Based on only this letter,
I see just a woman with a concerned point of view; I am not
seeing anything spiteful or unrealistic in her letter. She
seems to have the courage to voice her opinion in what appears
to be a very calm and non-vindictive way, and I don't think her
character should be called into question for doing so.
I happen to disagree with an idea in
her letter, however: I know of a situation on the North side
where a Homeonwer has put approximately $80,000 into his
property over 8 years. In his immediate area, there is only one
rental and the rest are privately owned. His home improvements,
mostly affecting the exterior, have not prompted any
other homeowners to follow suit.
So...I am not convinced that by
simply cleaning up the neighborhoods, so to speak, everyone will
be able to suddenly afford to follow suit. Personally, I have
aluminum siding that desperately needs attention, has become
oxidized, and I want very much to fix it. When I looked into
estimates a couple of years ago, I got the shock of my life.
Vision 20/20 is an
excellent organization and the low interest loan program for
home improvements is a Godsend to many. However, there are many
families and seniors who are in the situation where their
household budget cannot afford even one more payment,
no matter how low the interest is.
My belief is that most homeonwers
would love nothing better than to be able to spruce up the
exterior of their homes and yards. Monthly financial
obligations keep leaving most families with minimal, if any,
leftover amounts to put towards that. Mortgage payments, Heat,
Electric, Food, and Insurance will always come first. Add
children's needs or health needs into those equations, and new
siding or a roof becomes an unattainable fantasy. I believe
that most homeowners who have "run down" homes, and/or exteriors
of their homes, experience this not by choice; but by financial
circumstances.
I am not speaking for the Landlords
Association, I am speaking for myself when I say this:
I have studied the International Property Maintenance Code,
and I cannot for the life of me figure out why this is not good
enough for our City. It is clear, concise, adopted nationally,
covers all entities for safety--both for renters and
for homeowners, and is known to be successful. Anyone
can look it up online and judge for yourself. All Landlords
that I have spoken with are very much in favor of either the
IPMC or a fair version of a rental ordinance...and for being
registered. The incumbents would have you think otherwise for
political reasons.
If the IPMC was properly enforced in
our City, everyone would be protected...everyone. We
have had it in effect and I am asking why it has not been
enforced properly.
Maybe, as a City, we should
be looking at how to provide better income to our residents
instead of chastising them for the appearance of their homes?
How about actively pursuing
industry which provides the type of jobs a family can do more
than barely survive on? Structuring the civic foundation of the
City to receive a large Company, to attract them to our area?
Being known as an area that is affordable to live in, has
leadership with integrity and character, enjoys enhanced natural
areas? Being an area that has taken care of its basic
infrastructure needs, and especially the safety and well being
of its residents?
It's just common sense that growth
will be the outcome if all of the above were to happen here.
Sincerely,
Tina Peterson
Candidate for City Council
10-28-2007-11
Reference to post # 10-28-2007-03
I was one who was coming home a week
ago and I saw several students in their Imt sport shirts with
numbers on them and they were on the 6 to 8 hundred block of
Margaret Street carrying a pack of papers going to each door.
When I saw them, I thought that I
would see them a little later at my own home because I thought
they were selling ads or something for the booster club for the
school.
Now I know what they were doing ---
distributing booklets for the incumbents. I also was told that
Eden Caudell from Moose Jackson was the one who asked the
students to distribute them.
I hope someone does check this out
and find out the real truth because
it is disgusting that Caudell would
stoop this low although it certainly doesn't surprise me what
anyone does any more!.
10-28-2007-10
Wow. A lot of people are digging up
the dirt and connections here. It’s fascinating, and it’s
ticking me off the more I see how the incumbents are interwoven
throughout their support base, who all try to act like they are
interested bystanders with nothing to gain and no personal
attachments.
I completely forgot about Carey
Contracting starting the Merrill house on fire until someone
pointed it out. I bet he was ticked when the fire department
saved the house and he had to pay to have another contractor
rebuild it. That explains a lot.
I had no idea that Mr. Brule voted
in favor of the extravagant parking lot idea. Why on earth would
anyone vote for something so frivolous? And that gas line
fiasco. Is someone settling a score there, too? And with all
these sisters and marriages owning this business and that, it’s
like freakin’ Peyton Place. And I suppose they expect us to
believe no one is making any personal gain from having these
four incumbents in office? Ha! What a joke we have for a city
government right now. And people anywhere can see this and read
about us. And laugh at us.
10-28-2007-09
In response to
10-28-2007-04: 10-28-2007-08
Regarding Affinity Mortgage: I only
know who Mary Robitaille is by sight, but the little I have
heard about her company in the past was all positive in how well
they work with people. In fact, her company was recommended to
someone new to the community a few years ago. Until I see
documentation to the contrary, I will regard this subject as
merely a speculative rumor. I might add that I am 100% behind
the challengers to oust the current council on November 6th, but
I will not engage in bashing or furthering rumors about Mary or
Affinity Mortgage without facts.
10-28-2007-07
Attention post 10-28-2007-17:
Fair is fair. If you want to include
the campus cops up north, shouldn’t you also include the other
professional, dedicated police officers who respond in Iron
Mountain, too? Kingsford has what, 20? The Sheriff’s Department
must have that many. And the State police, they must have a few,
too. Did I miss any? What is that? About 60 or more police
officers to cover this area? Does Iron Mountain really need any
cops at all? Think about it, K.
10-28-2007-06
Post 10-28-2007-04 criticizes the
timing of Jim Hogan’s letter? Excuse me for a moment.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
. . . There, that’s better. I
suppose the timing was just coincidental for Ann Markell,
Ann Henricksen, Mike Carey, Mary Robitaille, Jane Santini, Scot
Nauertz, Kurt Rosenthal, Barbara Kramer, Bruce Torretti, I guess
that’s enough. Yes, you are absolutely right in that I only
listed people who wrote in favor of the incumbents, and I did
not list those against them. You chose that tactic, so, tit for
tat
You know what? After you got
me thinking about it, it seems like most of the people who wrote
in against the incumbents were doing so only to defend
themselves, or were responding to personal attacks
published by either the incumbents or their supporters.
Like these, to name a few:
Ted Corombos responding to bogus
claims about TIFA - and his character - in campaign ads
Bob Moraska responding to campaign
ads blaming landlords for fire deaths
Two different attorneys responding
to distorted info about their clients in campaign ads
Charles Lauersdorf responding to
distorted and false information in ads and letters on fire
issues
Mark Bubloni responding to the
constant bashing of landlords
Carol Schneider responding to the
endless lies in general
Jim Hogan responding to the cable
franchise fee usage
etc.
And I will have to agree with the
writer of 10-28-2007-01 who worked up a good list of people I
will avoid in the future. It’s their own fault if they never
bothered to check the facts on how dirty and underhanded this
city has been run over the last four years. Do they run their
businesses with this lack of oversight? I don't want to find
out the hard way.
10-28-2007-05 All in the Family 10-28-2007-04 Considering the date and common council campaign , James M. Hoagns letter to the editor post at 10-25-2007-03 seems pretty calculatiing. 10-28-2007-03
Post 10-27-2007-11 talks about
potential unethical behavior by our City officials, in the form
of having government students pass out flyers for the
incumbents. That post is the first I have heard about the
possibility of anything like that happening. It should not be
all that hard to get to the bottom of this. A simple phone call
to school officials on Monday should clear it up, and I would
think the school should expect a flood of calls on Monday. I
have children attending Iron Mountain Schools, so I, too, am
very concerned. If I call, and I don’t get an open and
straightforward answer from school officials, I will give some
credence to the post. I am reserving my feelings about this for
now, but I will be furious if it turns out to be true. The most
disturbing thing about this rumor - and that’s all it is to me
until proven otherwise - is its’ believability due to past
actions by this council.
To Bill Revord, who is a school
board member: great post about Dale Alessandrini. Can you, as a
school board member, shed any light on this subject? It would be
greatly appreciated by many parents and citizens.
10-28-2007-02 The very, very cheap
shot by Ann Markell has had the exact opposite
effect of her intentions. 10-28-2007-01
I too feel compelled to comment on
Ann Markell's letter to the paper. It staggers the imagination
on how stupid and insensitive people can be. I have an idea of
what she planned to accomplish but it back fired. If nothing
else, this election has taught me who not to do business with in
the future. Anyone who would stand behind the incumbents and
the mess they've made of the city is not a person I need
hire. So yet another business is added to my list of who not to
call. My list keeps getting longer and longer. But on the
other hand if I want my house to burn down I can call Carey
Contracting. They did a fabulous job on Dr. Merrill's house. Or
if I need a gas line dug up, Bacco can help me out I'm sure. Or
if God forbid I fall on tough times and had to file bankruptcy,
Mrs. Markell would be more than happy to tell the whole
community about it. You people are sad. I almost wish for the
good old days of public floggings.
10-27-2007-17 Tina: 10-27-2007-16 Please read post 10-27-2007-14 This post reflects the true Mr. Alessandrini and all the hard work he has given to this community. Dale is a person of action to back up his words. There are not many that can claim to be able to do this. Thanks Dale. Dean Lefebvre 10-27-2007-15
I’ve known Mary Robitaille, just as
an acquaintance, since she processed my first home loan 15+
years ago at the bank where she worked. She was very
professional and helpful. A few years later, she got me out of
that first loan, an ARM because I was too naive to know the
difference, even when the bank was trying to hold me to it. I
have always appreciated that from her. Since then, I have not
seen that much of her, but when I do, she always remembers me
and always has a friendly greeting for me. A real professional.
That is why I cannot understand why
she would support the incumbents in any way. I have grown to
know the incumbents far more thoroughly than I ever knew Mary,
and I don’t like what I know about them. I hope that my
original, lasting, and favorable impression of Mary can be
sustained. Mary, that is going to take an honest attempt on your
part to give an honest and open look at the many documented
issues they have screwed up. At the times too numerous to
mention where they have lied to cover those things up. At the
personal attacks many have suffered just for questioning - or
challenging - them on anything. The utter arrogance so many have
had to put up with. The outright rudeness to citizens at
council meetings. And so on.
People are not making this stuff up,
Mary. I was very let down when I saw your letter in the paper.
It burst my bubble about you. If you really want to associate
yourself with this sort of group, I just can’t, well, . . .
damn, please give things another look, without being
spoonfed bits and pieces of information that seem to support
them at first glance. They are very good at showing you just
enough to hide the big picture. You'll see if you look.
10-27-2007-14 Thank you Dale for all
the years of help you have given me and others on important
community projects. And thanks to your men and women from the
training school as well. 10-27-2007-13
If you want to see an example of
police and firefighters working together in MICHIGAN, follow
this link:
This is a Michigan Supreme Court
case - The Detroit Firefighters vs the City of Detroit,
scheduled to be heard on November 7. Look at the list of
briefs. The MML (Michigan Municipal League) and MAC
(Michigan Association of Counties) in support of the City, and
virtually every police and fire union in the state, plus AFSCME
and the AFL-CIO on board with the Detroit firemen.
Oh yeah, there’s one more brief on
board with the City of Detroit - The City of Iron Mountain.
Why is Iron Mountain the
only other city in the entire state to get on board a
case against firefighters? Don’t try to tell ME they don’t
have some nasty vendetta against our firemen. And that
brief was prepared with our tax money, no doubt, without a
council vote to approve it. The plot thickens on this issue.
The more that gets exposed, the uglier it looks for the council.
10-27-2007-12 Mr. Hogan, with regrets, great punchline to your posting 10-25-2007-03. The City Manager was paying closer attention than you gave him credit for. I saw your formal correspondence from Day One. Immediately after the City ignored your 2005-06 tech donations, proposals, and requests for a meeting, John Marquart went to the TIFA Board and palmed off your idea for the Wi-Fi (wireless) umbrella/hotspot over Iron Mountain as his, asked TIFA for the money to pay for it, and asked Dean Carollo and Computer Connections if they'd do the tech work and give the city a kickback -- I mean a fee -- on the amount that Computer Connections got for the business. TIFA and Carollo would have nothing to do with it for legal, practical, and financial reasons, but you hafta give that scoundrel Marquart an A+ for sheer nerve, hey? Swipes your idea, takes credit for it, and tries to turn it into a buck and make himself look like Mr. John Terrific Indispensable. The guy is one primo _______ (fill in the blank). 10-27-2007-11 I would like to know if
anybody out there has different information and/or more information
regarding the IMHS government students and the Iron Mountain city
government between Friday October 12th and Monday October 15th. This
is an issue about which I am very concerned and curious and which
bothers me more as I talk to some of the players and as others of
the players refuse to talk about it. 10-27-2007-10 In early 2006 I had read a couple "underground" offer sheets and letters from the previous months from Mr. Hogan to the full range of city officials, asking for some kind of reply one way or another to his approaches. Yesterday I was reading Mr. Hogan's letter to the editor and that "irrationality" aspect of the absolutely and continuously silent city government jumped out at me. That seems a recurrent theme. The senselessness and almost spooky madness like the-aunt-in-the-attic insanity you sense sometimes from this council and its bureaucrats. I had a communication problem for months with those city people trying to talk to someone about a serious and expensive issue in our neighborhood. I know at least half a dozen who will tell you the same thing. No one would talk to me. It was nutty. And when they finally do, like the city manager, he says well he'll have to investigate, then you never hear from him again. And if you do finally talk with him again, he says the same thing and then never gets back to you! And big stuff too like when TIFA offers them a million and a half dollars for the water project, a project TIFA can actually legally contribute to, and the city people refuse!!! Huh? And then the city people turn around over and over and over again like a bunch of chewy gumheads and request money for stuff TIFA isn't permitted to contribute to!!! Huh? These people are in charge? What's the matter with these people? Irrational is as good a word as any. Dumb, crazy -- those words work too. And that doesn't even approach the related etiquette side of their behavior. You would think a company or consortium group contacts you with inquiries and info like Mr. Hogan describes about things those city guys and gals downtown are always clamoring for in the paper and on their radio programs, the city manager or mayor or clerk or an appropriate council committee chairperson or SOMEBODY down there would at least have it in him to jot out an email reply or take a single minute and pick up a phone and say "Drop dead, we're not interested." You know? It's not like there aren't four hundred thousand million phones and Internet connected computers in city hall. The correspondence I saw had phone numbers and addresses of all kinds to contact Mr. Hogan and his group. I mean, someone asks you a question, you answer it. That's what I want my city government to do. That's behavior that's rational and right. Ya gotta wonder what the heck other weird stuff is going on. Maybe next month we can start a thorough housecleaning down there and start getting things sane again. 10-27-2007-09
POOR JUDGMENT, This
is how I feel about the Markell statement in the Daily News. I
have met Mrs. Markell
through a former employer. I thought she seemed quite nice and
easy to talk with. Now I find myself feeling very
disappointed.
I
have worked in the service world for years, so I am aware that
most businesses at one time or other have had bills they are
unable to collect for whatever reason. I am sure this is not
the first in your business, as you have been around the area for
many years. I dare say, that I have never seen other
businesses however, disclosing personal business in our news
paper. I wonder how your current clients feel about this
article? Maybe they wonder if they are next to be put on the
chopping block. Maybe they wonder if you disclose their
personal information to others on a regular basis. Perhaps not
in print but maybe verbally.
I
have had occasion to see the reports you discussed, but never in
my wildest dreams would I have ever considered disclosing this
information. It may be out there for people to research, BUT
PERSONALLY THIS IN NONE OF MY BUSINESS!! In positions of
employment I have had, I have helped both those who are well
off and those who have less. I can tell you by looking at a
person, you can never make a determination as to what their
credit may look like. So I am wondering do the incumbents and
all others currently seated on the Council really want to
disclose their personal credit information?
INCUMBENTS, IF YOU APPROVE OF THESE TACTICS, YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS BEING ON OUR CITY COUNCIL!
Our
lives can change in an instant, from safe and secure to a living
nightmare due to unforeseen circumstances.
In
the current climate of business, none of us are safe from losing
our jobs, being diagnosed with a terrible disease or numerous
other pitfalls that life brings. I would say a large percentage
of us could find ourselves in bankruptcy if this occurred.
However, I hope that others would not be so quick to judge us.
THERE IS NO ROOM IN THIS ELECTION FOR DIRT LIKE THIS. IF THE
CHALLENGERS NEED TO PROVE ANYTHING, THEN THE CURRENT COUNCIL
SHOULD ALSO. TO SAY THE LEAST THERE HAVE BEEN SOME POOR
SPENDING CHOICES IN THE LAST FOUR YEAR!
Donna Farragh
10-27-2007-08
Regarding post #10-27-2007-04, on
the fire truck blinker:
I know you meant well, but in the
interest of accuracy, the order to discontinue maintenance on
the old fire truck did not come from John Marquart. The order
was issued by the city council a couple of months before
John Marquart was hired. Mayor Tousignant must have forgot that
when he tried to blame the firemen for the results of one of his
own decisions. Again.
10-27-2007-07 Expertise is a wonderful thing. Publicly witnessing an example of professional expertise is even more wonderful. Read about Our Water by Dave Farragh.
10-27-2007-06
I had promised I would get back with you concerning the water issue (chlorination) and flushing of hydrants. I am back, but with a vengeance, I am afraid. If there is anything I detest in a person, it is lying and I find that even more repulsive when it concerns a statement I made. I may not be the best speaker, writer or the best dressed individual, but I can state without a doubt that you will always know where you stand with me. I took it very personally when the Mayor made his quote in the Iron Mountain News article of October 16, 2007. You can refer to the article on line at ironmountaindailynews.com. I have lived in this City for years and worked for 25 of those years on the Iron Mountain DPW. I am well aware when the hydrants are flushed and when there is a problem with the system. As I had stated in a previous statement, that can be accessed on ironmountainissues.org and ironmountaindemocracy.com, (post of 10-16-2007-04) it was two years this month since the hydrants had been flushed. I did a FOIA to the City of Iron Mountain so I could obtain those records, at a cost of $51.00, to prove an issue that I already knew to be true. The Mayor had stated " The hydrants are flushed regularly by the DPW and Fire Department and this can be easily checked with the records the City keeps." Every employee that works for the DPW is required to fill out a daily time sheet that shows what work has been completed and the hours spent on a particular job. These time sheet requires each individuals signature. These are the records that I requested, from the time of my retirement in 2004 until the current date. Those records prove that the system has not had a complete flush since October of 05. I don't know about you, but I figure that is two years. Anyone who wishes to see these records can contact me, and I will be happy to get you a copy. Now it is to bad that the current Mayor, who wants us to believe every statement he makes, does not know the difference between a systematic flushing of the water system and what the Fire Department does routinely. Unless a system flush is done in the correct order it will not accomplish the intended purpose . A full flush of the system starts at the well site and goes in a systematic order until every hydrant in the City has been flushed. This usually takes 3 to 5 days depending on man power. The Fire Department on the other hand will open hydrants, not in any particular order, and will flush just enough water to clear the hydrant. They will then place their gauges on the hydrant to check flow capacity and pressure. This is no doubt what the Fire Department was doing by the Mayors home. What the Fire Department does is not in any way a full flush of the system.
Next to be addressed is the chlorination that has been going on
since August of 2006. First I will state chlorination has been
done in the past when major construction is
in progress. This is a preventative step suggested by the DEQ
to avoid a possible contamination of the system while work is in
progress. At the end of the construction period
the
system would be flushed, water samples taken and if they were
clear the chlorination would be discontinued. Of
course if a water sample indicated a problem then again
chlorination would be done until the problem was corrected.
This was always done in a reasonable amount of time.
I am sure the City will try to
dispute this statement, as records show flushing of hydrants in
August of 2006. However this was done for 4 hours only on the
14th of
August 2006, in response to
notification from the DEQ of
coliform bacteria in the system which resulted in a violation of
the state drinking water standards. At the
time of notification, the City must start chlorinating
immediately and that takes 3 or 4 men to go to select points in
the City in order to open hydrants. When these hydrants are
opened it will pull the chlorine into the system from the well
head. This is where the four hours on August 14, 2006 came into
play.
The normal procedure would be to continue chlorination until the
origin of the contamination can be found and repaired. In my
discussions with the DEQ, I came away with the impression that
this problem should have been dealt with by April or early May
of this year. We are now going into November and the problem is
not corrected yet. For years the City followed the required
maintenance recommended by the DEQ. It now seems that
the Manager has dropped the ball.
Routine flushing is important twice a year to keep coliform
bacteria from forming in the system. While it is true most
coliform bacteria is safe, it is however, a concern when there
is a presence in the water system. Make
sure to read the attached information from the DEQ. There is
reference to systems being flushed and re-disinfected before a
negative bacteria sample can be obtained. As you can see this
is not an issue fabricated by me, but a true statement that can
be verified if you look for the information. You will again
need to refer back to my previous statement to find the
information received by the City Manager, Council and Mayor in a
letter dated December of 2006. In this letter the DEQ STRONGLY
recommend several items that should be done to the A street
water tank. I have spent time researching this information so
the citizens could be made aware of any issues that may concern
their health. Since I first started digging the City has now
done SOME of the strongly recommended work by the DEQ on the A
street water tank. I also now understand the hydrants will be
flushed starting next week. Why do we have to bring these
issues to light over and over before action is taken?
I
know this has been rather lengthy, but bare with me on one more
item. The well systems currently in use was started back in the
1980's and for many years there was no chlorination.
The Manager in his last statement in the Daily News on October
22, referred to a list of 35 Cities in the Upper Peninsula that
are currently chlorinating, which by the way I also have a copy
of. First of all he is counting both ground water and surface
water systems. Of those 35 cities 24 have ground water systems
like Iron Mountain, and those are the ones that should be
counted. MY POINT ON THIS MATTER IS I REALLY DON'T CARE WHAT
THOSE OTHER CITIES DO, I CARE ABOUT IRON MOUNTAIN. This is
where we live and in the past we have managed to keep our system
clean and avoid the chlorine, except for short periods of
time. That is what I would like to see again. By the way
Kingsford and Norway have the same systems as Iron Mountain and
are not chlorinating. Total running costs since August of 2006
for chlorine $6214.00 per vendors reports, and counting.
Dave Farragh
Candidate for City Council
10-27-2007-05
Openness and responsive government mean public access -- and that
means YOU. Dave Farragh ... Email ... 906-774-8575 Tina Peterson ... Email ... 906-776-1150 Bruce Rosen ... Email ... 906-779-9089
Bill Toedter ...
Email ...
906-779-1347 10-27-2007-04 FLUSHING
THE HYDRANTS - 10-27-2007-03
10-27-2007-02
On the cheap shot letter from Ann
Markell:
I think that, if someone is accused
of being a thorn in the side of the current city council, it is
a badge of honor, not something to be ashamed of.
On credit history, I am much more
concerned with what the current city council did with MY money
in the past four years than I am with what someone else did
years ago with their own.
Tens of thousands of dollars in
legal fees, only to be proven wrong
Tens of thousands of dollars in
MIOSHA fines
Hundreds of thousands of dollars on
a useless reassessment
Millions of dollars on a water bond
when TIFA could have eased the burden
Do I have to go on?
Instead of credit, I think more on
credibility. The current council has no
credibility at all in my eyes. What do I have to judge the
credibility of the current council? I have been robbed, lied
to, ignored, personally attacked, had things shoved down my
throat, etc., but I suppose that's just my opinion.
Let's also do drug tests on council
members. I think that says a lot about a person's character,
too.
10-27-2007-01 The
sleaziest letter ever appeared in the
Voice of the People column yesterday, asking for credit reports of
all candidates. Shame on you, Ann Markell. You
are now officially a part of the sleaze campaign. |